Moderate Effects of Same-Sex Legislation on Dependent Employer-Based Insurance Coverage Among Sexual Minorities

Abstract

A difference-in-difference approach was used to compare the effects of same-sex domestic partnership, civil union, and marriage policies on same- and different-sex partners who could have benefitted from their partners’ employer-based insurance (EBI) coverage. Same-sex partners had 78% lower odds (Marginal Effect = −21%) of having EBI compared with different-sex partners, adjusting for socioeconomic and health-related factors. Same-sex partners living in states that recognized same-sex marriage or domestic partnership had 89% greater odds of having EBI compared with those in states that did not recognize same-sex unions (ME = 5%). The impact of same-sex legislation on increasing take-up of dependent EBI coverage among lesbians, gay men, and bisexual individuals was modest, and domestic partnership legislation was equally as effective as same-sex marriage in increasing same-sex partner EBI coverage. Extending dependent EBI coverage to same-sex partners can mitigate gaps in coverage for a segment of the lesbians, gay men, and bisexual population but will not eliminate them.

Keywords

sexual minorities disparities same-sex policies employer-based insurance health coverage LGBT

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abraham

J. M.

Vogt

W. B.

Gaynor

M. S.

(2006). How do households choose their employer-based health insurance? Inquiry, 43, 315-332.

Abrams

(2013, March 27). Ruth Bader Ginsburg during DOMA case: There’s “full marriage” & “skim milk marriage.” Huffington Post. Retrieved from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/03/27/ginsburg-doma_n_2966548.html

Ash

M. A.

Badgett

M. V.

(2006). Separate and unequal: The effect of unequal access to employment-based health insurance on same-sex and unmarried different-sex couples. Contemporary Economic Policy, 24, 582-599. doi:10.1093/cep/byl010

Badgett

M. V. L.

(1995). The wage effects of sexual orientation discrimination. Industrial & Labor Relations Review, 48, 726-739. doi:10.2307/2524353

Besley

Case

(2000). Unnatural experiments? Estimating the incidence of endogenous policies. Economic Journal, 110, F672-F697.

Buchmueller

Carpenter

C. S.

(2010). Disparities in health insurance coverage, access, and outcomes for individuals in same-sex versus different-sex relationships, 2000-2007. American Journal of Public Health, 100, 489-495. doi:10.2105/ajph.2009.160804

Buchmueller

T. C.

Carpenter

C. S.

(2012). The effect of requiring private employers to extend health benefit eligibility to same-sex partners of employees: Evidence from California. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 31, 388-403. doi:10.1002/pam.21603

Case

Hunter

D. J.

Manson

J. E.

Malspeis

Willett

W. C.

Spiegelman

(2004). Sexual orientation, health risk factors, and physical functioning in the Nurses’ Health Study II. Journal of Women’s Health, 13, 1033-1052.

Cochran

S. D.

Ackerman

Mays

V. M.

Ross

M. W.

(2004). Prevalence of non-medical drug use and dependence among homosexually active men and women in the US population. Addiction, 99, 989-998. doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2004.00759.x

10.

Corliss

H. L.

Rosario

Wypij

Wylie

S. A.

Frazier

A. L.

Austin

S. B.

(2010). Sexual orientation and drug use in a longitudinal cohort study of U.S. adolescents. Addictive Behaviors, 35, 517-521. doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2009.12.019

11.

DeNavas-Walt

Proctor

B. D.

Smith

J. C.

(2013). Income, poverty, and health insurance coverage in the United States: 2012. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.

12.

DiBennardo

Gates

(2014). Research note: US Census same-sex couple data: Adjustments to reduce measurement error and empirical implications. Population Research and Policy Review, 33, 603-614. doi:10.1007/s11113-013-9289-2

13.

Gates

(2010). Same-sex couples in the US Census Bureau data: Who gets counted and why. Los Angeles, CA: The Williams Institute.

14.

Gates

Steinberger

(2011, June). Same-sex unmarried partner couples in the American Community Survey: The role of misreporting, miscoding, and misallocation. Paper presented at the Miniconference on Census Microdata and Applications, Los Angeles, CA.

15.

Gonzales

Blewett

L. A.

(2013). Disparities in health insurance among children with same-sex parents. Pediatrics, 132, 703-711. doi:10.1542/peds.2013-0988

16.

Gonzales

Blewett

L. A.

(2014). National and state-specific health insurance disparities for adults in same-sex relationships. American Journal of Public Health, 104(2), e95-e104. doi:10.2105/ajph.2013.301577

17.

Hatzenbuehler

M. L.

Keyes

K. M.

Hasin

D. S.

(2009). State-level policies and psychiatric morbidity in lesbian, gay, and bisexual populations. American Journal of Public Health, 99, 2275-2281.

18.

Heck

J. E.

Sell

R. L.

Gorin

S. S.

(2006). Health care access among individuals involved in same-sex relationships. American Journal of Public Health, 96, 1111-1118. doi:10.2105/ajph.2005.062661

19.

Herek

G. M.

(2006). Legal recognition of same-sex relationships in the United States: A social science perspective. American Psychologist, 61, 607-621. doi:10.1037/0003-066x.61.6.607

20.

Hull

K. E.

(2008). Employment discrimination based on sexual orientation: Dimensions of difference. In Nielsen

L. B.

Nelson

R. L.

(Eds.), Handbook of employment discrimination research: Rights and realities (pp. 167-188). Berlin, Germany: Springer.

21.

Meyer

I. H.

(2003). Prejudice, social stress, and mental health in lesbian, gay, and bisexual populations: Conceptual issues and research evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 674-697. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.129.5.674

22.

Mojola

S. A.

Everett

(2012). STD and HIV risk factors among U.S. young adults: Variations by gender, race, ethnicity and sexual orientation. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 44, 125-133. doi:10.1363/4412512

23.

Monheit

A. C.

Vistnes

J. P.

(2008). Health insurance enrollment decisions: Preferences for coverage, worker sorting, and insurance take-up. Inquiry, 45, 153-167.

24.

National Conference of State Legislatures. (2013). Civil unions & domestic partnership statutes. Retrieved from http://www.ncsl.org/research/human-services/civil-unions-and-domestic-partnership-statutes.aspx

25.

Polsky

Stein

Nicholson

Bundorf

M. K.

(2005). Employer health insurance offerings and employee enrollment decisions. Health Services Research, 40, 1259-1278. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00415.x

26.

Ponce

N. A.

Cochran

S. D.

Pizer

J. C.

Mays

V. M.

(2010). The effects of unequal access to health insurance for same-sex couples in California. Health Affairs (Millwood), 29, 1539-1548. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2009.0583

27.

Ragins

B. R.

Singh

Cornwell

J. M.

(2007). Making the invisible visible: Fear and disclosure of sexual orientation at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1103-1118. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.4.1103

28.

Raley

S. B.

Mattingly

M. J.

Bianchi

S. M.

(2006). How dual are dual-income couples? Documenting change from 1970 to 2001. Journal of Marriage and Family, 68, 11-28. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2006.00230.x

29.

Ruggles

Genadek

Goeken

Grover

Sobek

(2015). Integrated public use microdata series: Version 6.0 [Machine-readable database]. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota.

30.

U.S. Census Bureau. (2012). American community survey and Puerto Rico community survey—2012 Subject definitions. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from http://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs/tech_docs/subject_definitions/2012_ACSSubjectDefinitions.pdf