Understanding Why Nurse Practitioner (NP) and Physician Assistant (PA) Productivity Varies Across Community Health Centers (CHCs): A Comparative Qualitative Analysis
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online February, 2021
Understanding Why Nurse Practitioner (NP) and Physician Assistant (PA) Productivity Varies Across Community Health Centers (CHCs): A Comparative Qualitative Analysis
This study asks how much and why the productivity of advanced practice clinicians (APCs; nurse practitioners and physician assistants) varies across community health centers (CHCs), as measured in their marginal contribution to overall patient visits. We found APCs in the 90th percentile CHCs provide about 1,840 adjusted-visits per year, whereas APCs in the 10th percentile CHCs provide about 978 adjusted-visits per year. We interviewed leadership at 14 high APC and 16 low APC productivity CHCs to elicit organizational conditions that could explain the difference. Using content analysis and then qualitative comparative analysis, we found several important conditions were more common among high productivity CHCs, including scheduling APCs and physicians for the same number of visits, parity in terms of any financial incentives, and formal education programs for new APCs during onboarding/transition to practice.
BeggC. B.CramerL. D.HoskinsW. J.BrennanM. F. (1998). Impact of hospital volume on operative mortality for major cancer surgery. Journal of the American Medical Association, 280(20), 1747-1751. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.280.20.1747
4.
BirkmeyerJ. D.SiewersA. E.FinlaysonE.StukelT. A.LucasF. L.BatistaI.WelchH. G.WennbergD. E. (2002). Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States. New England Journal of Medicine, 346, 1128-1137. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsa012337
5.
Bryant-LukosiusD.DicensoA.BrowneG.PinelliJ. (2004). Advanced practice nursing roles: Development, implementation and evaluation. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 48(5), 519-529. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2004.03234.x
6.
CreswellJ. W.ClarkV. L. P. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage.
7.
CusterW. S.MoserJ. W.MusacchioR. A.WillkeR. J. (1990). The production of health care services and changing hospital reimbursement: The role of hospital–medical staff relationships. Journal of Health Economics, 9(2), 167-192. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6296(90)90016-V
FriedsonE. (1970). Profession of medicine: A study of the sociology of applied knowledge. University of Chicago Press.
10.
HenryL. (2015). Physician assistants, nurse practitioners, and community health centers under the Affordable Care Act. Human Organization, 74(1), 42-51. https://doi.org/10.17730/humo.74.1.f85035t702600534
11.
HenryL.HookerR. S. (2014). Caring for the disadvantaged: The role of physician assistants. Journal of the American Academy of Physician Assistants, 27(1), 36-42. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.JAA.0000438532.92138.53
12.
HillnerB.SmithT. J.DeschC. E. (2000). Hospital and physician volume or specialization and outcomes in cancer treatment: Importance in quality of cancer care. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 18(11), 2327-2340. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2000.18.11.2327
13.
HravnakM.BaldisseriM. (1997). Credentialing and privileging insight into the process for acute-care nurse practitioners. AACN Clinical Issues, 8(1), 108-115. https://doi.org/10.1097/00044067-199702000-00014
14.
HughesR. G.HuntS. S.LuftH. S. (1987). Effects of surgeon volume and hospital volume on quality of care in hospitals. Medical Care, 25(6), 489-503. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005650-198706000-00004
KuL.FrognerB.SteinmetzE.PittmanP. (2015). Community health centers employ diverse staffing patterns, which can provide productivity lessons for medical practices. Health Affairs, 34(1), 95-103. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0098
19.
LiuN.D’AunnoT. (2012). The productivity and cost-efficiency of models for involving nurse practitioners in primary care: A perspective from queueing analysis. Health Services Research, 47(2), 594-613. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6773.2011.01343.x
20.
LiuN.FinkelsteinS. R.PoghosyanL. (2014). A new model for nurse practitioner utilization in primary care: Increased efficiency and implications. Health Care Management Review, 39(1), 10-20. https://doi.org/10.1097/HMR.0b013e318276fadf
21.
MartinS. (1999). The pediatric critical care nurse practitioner: Evolution and impact. Pediatric Nursing, 25(5), 505-510.
22.
MooteM.NelsonR.VeltkampR.CampbellD. (2012). Productivity assessment of physician assistants and nurse practitioners in oncology in an academic medical center. Journal of Oncology Practice, 8(3), 167-172. https://doi.org/10.1200/JOP.2011.000395
23.
MoranE. A.BasaE.GaoJ.WoodmanseeD.AlmenoffP.HookerR. (2016). PA and NP productivity in the Veterans Health Administration. Journal of the American Academy of Physician Assistants, 29(7), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.JAA.0000484311.96684.0c
24.
ParkJ.AtheyE.PericakA.PulciniJ.GreeneJ. (2018). To what extent are state scope of practice laws related to nurse practitioners’ day-to-day practice autonomy?Medical Care Research and Review, 75(1), 66-87. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077558716677826
25.
ParkJ.HanX.PittmanP. (2020). Does expanded state scope of practice for nurse practitioners and physician assistants increase primary care utilization in community health centers?Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners, 32(6), 447-458. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1097/JXX.0000000000000263
26.
ParkJ.LuoQ.PittmanP. (2019). Does independent prescriptive authority for nurse practitioners and physician assistants increase the number of patient visits in community health centers? Manuscript submitted for publication.
27.
PartisM. (2001). Practice development. A multi-disciplinary education project in primary care. British Journal of Community Nursing, 6(2), 68-73. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjcn.2001.6.2.68
28.
PetersonM. A. (2001). From trust to political power: interest groups, public choice, and health care. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 26(5), 1145-1146. https://doi.org/10.1215/03616878-26-5-1145
PittmanP.LeachB.EverettC.HanX.McElroyD. (2018). NP and PA privileging in acute care settings: Do scope of practice laws matter?Medical Care Research and Review, 77(2), 112-120. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1177/1077558718760333
31.
PoghosyanL.NanniniA.SmaldoneA.ClarkeS.O’RourkeN. C.RosatoB. G.BerkowitzB. (2013). Revisiting scope of practice facilitators and barriers for primary care nurse practitioners: A qualitative investigation. Policy, Politics, & Nursing Practice, 14(1), 6-15. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527154413480889.
32.
PoghosyanL.NanniniA.StoneP. W.SmaldoneA. (2013). Nurse practitioner organizational climate in primary care settings: Implications for professional practice. Journal of Professional Nursing, 29(6), 338-349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2013.07.005
33.
RaginC. (1989). The comparative method: Moving beyond qualitative and quantitative strategies. University of California Press.
34.
ReinhardtU. (1972). A production function for physician services. Review of Economics and Statistics, 54(1), 55-66. https://doi.org/10.2307/1927495
35.
RihouxB.RaginC. C. (2008). Configurational comparative methods: Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) and related techniques (Vol. 51). Sage.
36.
StarrP. (1982). The social transformation of American medicine. Basic Books.
37.
TashakkoriA.TeddlieC. (2003). The past and future of mixed methods research: From data triangulation to mixed model designs In TashakkoriA.TeddlieC. (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 671-701). Sage.
ThurstonN.LibbyA. (2002). A production function for physician services revisited. Review of Economics and Statistics, 84(1), 184-191. https://doi.org/10.2307/3211748
40.
U.S. Congress Office of Technology Assessment. (1986). Nurse practitioners, physician assistants, and certified nurse-midwives: A policy analysis (Health Technology Case Study 37: OTA-HCS-37). U.S. Government Printing Office. www.princeton.edu/~ota/disk2/1986/8615/8615.PDF
WestM. A. (1995). The effectiveness of teamworking in primary care. A report to the Health Education Authority. Institute of Work Psychology, Sheffield.
43.
WestM. A.SlaterJ. (1995). Teamwork, myths, realities and research. The Occupational Psychologist, 24, 24-29.
44.
WhiteW. D. (2004). Reason, rationalization and professionalism in the era of managed care. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 29(4-5), 853-868. https://doi.org/10.1215/03616878-29-4-5-853
45.
XueY.TuttleJ. (2017). Clinical productivity of primary care nurse practitioners in ambulatory settings. Nursing Outlook, 65(2), 162-171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2016.09.005
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
