Issues in the Application of Bayes' Theorem to Child Abuse Decision Making

Abstract

Proposals for the application of Bayes' Theorem as an aid to child abuse decision making are discussed critically. Subsequently, two examples of the application of research findings concerning signs of child abuse to decision making are demonstrated, using data from research studies of signs of physical abuse and sexual abuse. The calculation of the probability of the presence of abuse using Bayes' Theorem is described, given prevalence information and specific indicators of abuse. In addition, a method for describing the degree of imprecision in estimates of the probability of abuse is discussed. Specific issues that affect the valid application of research findings within Bayes' Theorem are discussed, including estimates of the prevalence or base rate of child abuse, sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic signs, and the independence of information that is combined in Bayes' Theorem. Recommendations for addressing these issues when Bayes' Theorem is applied to child abuse decision making are discussed, including assessment of the independence of indicators that are combined in Bayes' Theorem, suitable bases for estimating the prevalence of abuse, and the calculation of imprecision in probability estimates of abuse.

Keywords

Bayes' Theorem diagnosis child abuse

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bayes, T. (1763). An essay towards solving the problem of chances . Philosophical Transactions, 53, 376-418.

Dalgleish, L. (1998). Risk assessment, computer learning, diagnosis and Bayes. A commentary. Child Abuse Review, 7, 189-193.

Emans, S.J. , Woods, E.R. , Flagg, N.T. , & Freeman, A. (1987). Genital findings in sexually abused, symptomatic and asymptomatic, girls. Pediatrics, 79, 778-785.

Fargason, C.A. , Peralta-Carcelen, M.C. , Fountain, K.E. , Amaya, M.I. , & Centor, R. (1997). Impact of uncertainty on non-medical professionals' estimates of sexual abuse probability. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 6, 49-64.

Fargason, C. , Zorn, K. , Ashworth, C. , & Fountain, K. (1997). Limitations of the current child sexual abuse medical literature from a Bayesian perspective. Child Maltreatment , 2, 73-77.

Hanson, R.K. (1997). The development of a brief actuarial scale for sexual offense recidivism. Ottawa: Department of Solicitor General.

Joseph, L. , Gyorkos, T.W. , & Coupal, L. (1995). Bayesian estimation of disease prevalence and the parameters of diagnostic tests in the absence of a gold standard. American Journal of Epidemiology, 141, 263-272.

Kemp, A. , Kemp, K. , Evans, R. , Murray. L. , Guildea, Z. , Dunstan, F. , & Sibert, J. (1998). Diagnosing physical abuse using Bayes' Theorem . A preliminary study. Child Abuse Review, 7, 178-188.

Meehl, P.E. , & Rosen, A. (1955). Antecedent probability and the efficiency of psychometric signs, patterns, or cutting scores. Psychological Bulletin , 53, 194-216.

10.

Mossman, D. (2000). Interpreting clinical evidence of malingering: A Bayesian perspective. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 28, 293-302.

11.

Mossman, D. (2003). Daubert, cognitive malingering, and test accuracy . Law and Human Behavior, 27, 229-249.

12.

Mossman, D. , & Berger, J. (2001). Intervals for post-test probabilities: A comparison of 5 methods. Medical Decision Making, 21, 498-507.

13.

Mossman, D. , & Hart, K. (1996). Presenting evidence of malingering to courts: Insights from decision theory. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 14, 271-291.

14.

Rogers, R. , & Salekin, R. (1998). Beguiled by Bayes: A re-analysis of Mossman and Hart's estimates of malingering. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 16, 147-153.

15.

Sbraga, T.P. , & O' Donohue, W. (2003). Post hoc reasoning in possible cases of child sexual abuse: Symptoms of inconclusive origins. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 10, 320-334.

16.

Sonis, J. (1999). How to use and interpret interval likelihood ratios . Family Medicine, 31, 432-437.

17.

Tabachnick, B.G. , & Fidell, L.S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics (3rd ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

18.

Winkler, R.L. , & Smith, J.E. (2004). On uncertainty in medical testing. Medical Decision Making, 24, 654-658.

19.

Wood, J.M. (1996). Weighing evidence in sexual abuse evaluations: An introduction to Bayes's Theorem. Child Maltreatment, 1, 25-45.

20.

Zou, G. (2004). From diagnostic accuracy to accurate diagnosis: Interpreting a test result with confidence. Medical Decision Making, 24, 313-318.