This study collected information on arrests for child pornography (CP) production at two points (2000–2001 and 2006) from a national sample of more than 2,500 law enforcement agencies. In addition to providing descriptive data about an understudied crime, the authors examined whether trends in arrests suggested increasing CP production, shifts in victim populations, and challenges to law enforcement. Arrests for CP production more than doubled from an estimated 402 in 2000–2001 to an estimated 859 in 2006. Findings suggest the increase was related to increased law enforcement activity rather than to growth in the population of CP producers. Adolescent victims increased, but there was no increase in the proportion of arrest cases involving very young victims or violent images. Producers distributed images in 23% of arrest cases, a proportion that did not change over time. This suggests that much CP production may be primarily for private use. Proactive law enforcement operations increased, as did other features consistent with a robust law enforcement response.
18 USC Section 2256 (2003). Child pornography defined, in criminal code: United States of America.
2.
BeechA.ElliottI. A.BirgdenA.FindlaterD. (2008). The Internet and child sexual offending: A criminological review. Aggression & Violent Behavior, 13, 216–228.
3.
CarrA. (2009, April). The social dimension of the online trade of child sexual exploitation materials. Paper presented at the Global symposium for examining the relationship between online and offline offenses and preventing the sexual exploitation of children. University of North Carolina: Injury Prevention Research Center & Gillings School of Global Public Health, Durham, NC.
4.
CarrJ. (2003). Child abuse, child pornography and the Internet. London: NCH.
CooperS. (2009, April). How many ways can you hurt me? An overview of Internet and communication technology crimes against children: A victim’s perspective. Paper presented at the Global symposium for examining the relationship between online and offline offenses and preventing the sexual exploitation of children. University of North Carolina: Injury Prevention Research Center & Gillings School of Global Public Health, Durham, NC.
FinkelhorD.JonesL. (2006). Why have child maltreatment and child victimization declined?Journal of Social Issues, 62, 685–716.
10.
FinkelhorD.JonesL. (2008). Good news: Child victimization has been declining. Why? In FinkelhorD. (Ed.), Child victimization: Violence, crimes, and abuse in the lives of young people (pp. 122–147). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
11.
FinkelhorD.TurnerH. A.OrmrodR. K.HambyS. L. (2010). Trends in childhood violence and abuse exposure: Evidence from two national surveys. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 164, 238–242.
Internet Watch Foundation (IWF). (2009). 2008 Annual and charity report. Oakington, Cambridge, UK: Internet Watch Limited.
16.
JenkinsP. (2009). Failure to launch: Why do some social issues fail to detonate moral panics?British Journal of Criminology, 49, 35–47.
17.
JonesL.FinkelhorD. (2009). Updated trends in child maltreatment, 2007. Durham, NH: Crimes against Children Research Center, University of New Hampshire.
18.
KishL. (1992). Weighting for unequal pi. Journal of Official Statistics, 8, 183–200.
19.
KlainE. J.DaviesH. J.HicksM. A. (2001). Child pornography: The criminal-justice-system response. Washington, DC: American Bar Association Center on Children and the Law.
20.
LanningK. V.BurgessA. W. (1989). Child pornography and sex rings. In ZillmannD.BryantJ. (Eds.), Pornography: Research advances and policy considerations (pp. 235–255). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
21.
LearyM. G. (2008). Self-produced child pornography: The appropriate societal response to juvenile self-sexual exploitation. Virginia Journal of Social Policy and the Law, 15, 2–50.
22.
MichelL.SchulmanS. (2009, February5). The child pornpipeline: Part one: Russia and U.S. are bound in the illegal cyber-trafficking of child pornography. Retrieved fromhttp://www.buffalonews.com/339/story/182863.html
23.
MitchellK.FinkelhorD.WolakJ. (2005). The Internet and family and acquaintance sexual abuse. Child Maltreatment, 10, 49–60.
24.
MitchellK.WolakJ.FinkelhorD. (2009). The national juvenile online victimization study: Methodology report. Durham, NH: Crimes against Children Research Center. Retrieved fromhttp://www.unh.edu/ccrc/pdf/N-JOV2_methodology_report.pdf
25.
OosterbaanA. G. (2009). Global symposium for examining the relationship between online and offline offenses and preventing the sexual exploitation of children. Washington, DC: Law Enforcement Projects Sub-Group (LEPSG), U.S. Department of Justice.
26.
PernegerT. V. (1998). What’s wrong with Bonferroni adjustments?British Medical Journal, 316, 1236–1238.
QuayleE. (2009, April). Abuse images of children: Identifying gaps in our knowledge. Paper presented at the Global symposium for examining the relationship between online and offline offenses and preventing the sexual exploitation of children. University of North Carolina: Injury Prevention Research Center & Gillings School of Global Public Health, Durham, NC.
29.
SedlakA. J.MettenburgJ.BasenaM.PettaI.McPhersonK.GreeneA.LiS. (2010). Fourth national incidence study of child abuse and neglect (NIS–4): Report to congress: Executive summary. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
30.
TaylorM.QuayleE. (2006). The Internet and abuse images of children: Search, precriminal situations and opportunity.”. Crime Prevention Studies, 19, 169–195.
31.
Troup-LeasureK.SnyderH. N. (2005). Statutory rape known to law enforcement. Juvenile Justice Bulletin (NCJ208803). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
United States v. KnoxStephen A., 32 F 3rd 733 (1994).
35.
WolakJ.FinkelhorD. (2011). Sexting: A typology. Durham, NH: Crimes against Children Research Center.
36.
WolakJ.FinkelhorD.MitchellK. J. (2005a). Child pornography possessors and the Internet: A national study. Arlington, VA: National Center for Missing & Exploited Children.
37.
WolakJ.FinkelhorD.MitchellK. J. (2005b). The varieties of child pornography production. In TaylorM.QuayleE. (Eds.), Viewing child pornography on the Internet: Understanding the offense, managing the offender, helping the victims (pp. 31–48). Dorset, UK: Russell House.
38.
WolakJ.FinkelhorD.MitchellK. (2009). Trends in arrests of “online predators”. Durham, NH: Crimes against Children Research Center.
39.
WolakJ.FinkelhorD.MitchellK. (2011). Child pornography possessors: Trends in offender and case characteristics. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 23, 22–42.
40.
WolakJ.FinkelhorD.MitchellK.YbarraM. (2008). Online “predators” and their victims: Myths, realities and implications for prevention and treatment. American Psychologist, 63, 111–128.
41.
WortleyR. K. (2009, April). Situational prevention of child sexual abuse in the new technologies. Paper presented at the global symposium for examining the relationship between online and offline offenses and preventing the sexual exploitation of children. University of North Carolina: Injury Prevention Research Center & Gillings School of Global Public Health, Durham, NC.
