Child Protective Services Reports After Reunification: An Examination of the Risk of Being Rereported to Child Protective Services After Returning Home From Foster Care
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online February, 2025
Child Protective Services Reports After Reunification: An Examination of the Risk of Being Rereported to Child Protective Services After Returning Home From Foster Care
While a number of studies have examined the risk of reentry after exiting foster care, few studies have examined the risk of rereport to Child Protective Services (CPS) in the United States. Understanding more about rereports may help identify targets for supportive services that prevent reentry and promote safety. This study is the first to use nation-wide linked data to examine the risk of rereport for reunified children. The sample included children reunified after experiencing their first episode in foster care with at least one CPS report prior to care. With a 2000-day observation period, flexible parametric survival models with time varying hazard ratios were used to model the hazard or rereport conditional on prior CPS and foster care characteristics. Over 50% of the sample experienced a rereport after reunification. Results indicate that children entering foster care following a history of multiple CPS reports prior to placement were at substantially increased risk of rereport after returning home. A group of children with shorter stays in care had a high risk of recurrence within the first month, but this was not true over time. Implications for future research as well as permanency planning and addressing the needs of families with chronic reports are discussed.
BarthR. P.Liggett-CreelK. (2014). Common components of parenting programs for children birth to eight years of age involved with child welfare services. Children and Youth Services Review, 40, 6–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2014.02.004
2.
BiehalN.SinclairI.WadeJ. (2015). Reunifying abused or neglected children: Decision-making and outcomes. Child Abuse & Neglect, 49, 107–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2015.04.014
Congressional Research Service. (2018). Child welfare: An overview of federal programs and their current funding. CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform.
5.
ConnellC. M.VanderploegJ. J.KatzK. H.CaronC.SaundersL.TebesJ. K. (2009). Maltreatment following reunification: Predictors of subsequent child protective services contact after children return home. Child Abuse & Neglect, 33(4), 218–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2008.07.005
6.
DelfabbroP.FernandezE.McCormickJ.KettlerL. (2013). Reunification in a complete entry cohort: A longitudinal study of children entering out-of-home care in Tasmania, Australia. Children and Youth Services Review, 35(9), 1592–1600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2013.06.012
7.
DrakeB.FlukeJ. D.KimH.OrsiR.StubblefieldJ. L. (2022). What proportion of foster care children do not have child protective services reports? A preliminary look. Child Maltreatment, 27(4), 596–604. https://doi.org/10.1177/10775595211033855
8.
EspositoT.CaldwellJ.ChabotM.DelayeA.TrocméN.HélieS.FallonB. (2022). Reunification trajectories in Quebec: Acknowledging chronic family challenges to support stability. Child Abuse & Neglect, 130, 105437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2021.105437
9.
FontS. A.Maguire-JackK. (2020). The Scope, Nature, and Causes of Child Abuse and Neglect. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 692(1), 26–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716220969642
10.
FontS.SattlerK.GershoffE. (2018). When home is still unsafe: From family reunification to foster care reentry. Journal of Marriage and Family, 80(5), 1333–1343. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12499
11.
FullerT. L. (2005). Child safety at reunification: A case-control study of maltreatment recurrence following return home from substitute care. Children and Youth Services Review, 27(12), 1293–1306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2005.01.004
12.
GilbertR.WidomC. S.BrowneK.FergussonD.WebbE.JansonS. (2009). Burden and consequences of child maltreatment in high-income countries. Lancet (London, England), 373(9657), 68–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61706-7
13.
HardenB. J. (2004). Safety and stability for foster children: A developmental perspective. The Future of Children, 14(1), 30–47. https://doi.org/10.2307/1602753
14.
HélieS.PoirierM.-A.TurcotteD. (2014). Risk of maltreatment recurrence after exiting substitute care: Impact of placement characteristics. Children and Youth Services Review, 46, 257–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2014.09.002
15.
HorwitzS. M.HurlburtM. S.CohenS. D.ZhangJ.LandsverkJ. (2011). Predictors of placement for children who initially remained in their homes after an investigation for abuse or neglect. Child Abuse & Neglect, 35(3), 188–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2010.12.002
16.
Jonson-ReidM.ChiangC.KohlP.DrakeB.BrownD.GuoS.KimH.McBrideT. (2019). Repeat reports among cases reported for child neglect: A scoping review. Child Abuse & Neglect, 92, 43–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2019.03.013
KimH.Maguire-JackK. (2021). Longitudinal changes in child maltreatment reports. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 91(5), 635–646. https://doi.org/10.1037/ort0000565
20.
KohE.WareA.LeeE. (2021). State implementation of the fostering connections to success and increasing adoptions act: Exploratory study on kinship care. Advances in Social Work, 21(1), 77–99. https://doi.org/10.18060/23942
21.
KohlP. L.Jonson-ReidM.DrakeB. (2009). Time to leave substantiation behind: Findings from a national probability study. Child Maltreatment, 14(1), 17–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077559508326030
22.
LaBrenzC. A.BaidenP.FaulknerM.FongR. (2021). Service utilization and association with recurrences of child maltreatment post-reunification. Journal of Public Child Welfare, 15(1), 52–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/15548732.2020.1850602
23.
LaBrenzC. A.FongR.CubbinC. (2020a). The road to reunification: Family- and state system-factors associated with successful reunification for children ages zero-to-five. Child Abuse & Neglect, 99, 104252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2019.104252
24.
LeeS.Jonson-ReidM.DrakeB. (2012). Foster care re-entry: Exploring the role of foster care characteristics, in-home child welfare services and cross-sector services. Children and Youth Services Review, 34(9), 1825–1833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2012.05.007
25.
LiuX.-R.PawitanY.ClementsM. (2018). Parametric and penalized generalized survival models. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 27(5), 1531–1546. https://doi.org/10.1177/0962280216664760
26.
MarcynyszynL. A.MaherE. J.CorwinT. W. (2011). Getting with the (evidence-based) program: An evaluation of the incredible years parenting training program in child welfare. Children and Youth Services Review, 33(5), 747–757. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2010.11.021
27.
NegriffS.SchneidermanJ. U.SmithC.SchreyerJ. K.TrickettP. K. (2014). Characterizing the sexual abuse experiences of young adolescents. Child Abuse & Neglect, 38(2), 261–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2013.08.021
28.
RoystonP.ParmarM. K. B. (2002). Flexible parametric proportional-hazards and proportional-odds models for censored survival data, with application to prognostic modelling and estimation of treatment effects. Statistics in Medicine, 21(15), 2175–2197. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.1203
29.
SedlakA. J.EllisR. T. (2022). Trends in Child Abuse Reporting. In KorbinJ. E.KrugmanR. D. (Eds.), Handbook of Child Maltreatment (2nd ed., pp. 3–26). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7208-3.
TeicherM. H.SamsonJ. A.AndersonC. M.OhashiK. (2016). The effects of childhood maltreatment on brain structure, function and connectivity. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 17(10), Article 10. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn.2016.111
34.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2022). Administration for children and families, administration on children, youth and families. Trends in foster care and adoption: FY 2012 – 2021. Children’s Bureau. https://www.acf.hhs.gov/cb/report/trends-foster-care-adoption
35.
U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. (2023). Administration for children and families, administration on children, youth and families. Children’s Bureau. Child Maltreatment 2021.
36.
WinokurM. A.HoltanA.BatchelderK. E. (2018). Systematic Review of Kinship Care Effects on Safety, Permanency, and Well-Being Outcomes. Research on Social Work Practice, 28(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731515620843
37.
WulczynF.ParoliniA.SchmitsF.MagruderJ.WebsterD. (2020). Returning to foster care: Age and other risk factors. Children and Youth Services Review, 116, 105166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105166
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
