To prevent children from reentering the welfare system, it is crucial to understand the role of caseworker visits after reunification on reentry and identify the factors related to reentry. Utilizing the administrative data of one Mid-Atlantic state, children who reunified with their families between July 2016 and June 2020 were selected as the study sample (N = 3,510). Reentry rates were higher for children who did not have caseworker visits after reunification than for those who did. The survival analysis revealed that male children, living in metropolitan areas, having a prior history of removal, having a behavioral issue, and court-ordered return increased the risk of reentry, while Black children, older children, having a last placement as trial home visit, and caseworker visits after reunification decreased the risk of reentry. The study suggests formally outlining policies for post-reunification caseworker visits and increasing collaboration between the child welfare system and court system.
AhnH.HartzelS.ShawT. (2018). Participants’ satisfaction with family involvement meetings: Implications for child welfare practice. Research on Social Work Practice, 28(8), 952–963.
2.
AhnH.XuY.WilliamsK. A.Parks-BournK.WilliamsS.ConwayD. (2022). Family team decision meeting and child welfare service disparities: The influence of race and poverty. Children and Youth Services Review, 143, 106705.
3.
BarthR. P.WeigensbergE. C.FisherP. A.FetrowB.GreenR. L. (2008). Reentry of elementary aged children following reunification from foster care. Children and Youth Services Review, 30(4), 353–364.
4.
BoyerB. A. (1995). Jurisdictional conflicts between juvenile courts and child welfare agencies: The uneasy relationship between institutional co-parents. Maryland Law Review, 54(2), 377–431.
5.
BrownS. M.OrsiR.ChenP. C. B. (2020). Child, family, and case characteristics associated with reentry into out-of-home care among children and youth involved with child protection services. Child Maltreatment, 25(2), 162–171.
6.
BrownS. M.OrsiR.ChenP. C. B.EversonC. L.FlukeJ. (2022). The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on child protection system referrals and responses in Colorado, USA. Child Maltreatment, 27(1), 3–11.
7.
CarnochanS.Rizik-BaerD.AustinM. J. (2013). Preventing re-entry to foster care. Journal of Evidence-Based Social Work, 10(3), 196–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/15433714.2013.788949
8.
CarnochanS.TaylorS.Abramson-MaddenA.HanM.RashidS.ManeyJ.TeuwenS.AustinM. (2006). Child welfare and the courts: An exploratory study of the relationship between two complex systems. Journal of Public Child Welfare, 1(1), 117–136. https://doi.org/10.1300/J479v01n01_06
Child Welfare Information Gateway. (2021). Child welfare practice to address racial disproportionality and disparity. In U.S. Department of health and human services, administration for children and families. Children's Bureau. https://www.childwelfare.gov/pubs/issue-briefs/racialdisproportionality/
12.
CourseG.GhertnerR.MaddenE.RadelL. (2021). Foster care entry rates grew fater for infants than for children of other ages, 2011-2018. In Office of the assistant secretary for planning and evaluation. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. https://www.aspe.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/2021-08/infant-foster-care-brief.pdf
13.
DavidsonR. D.TomlinsonC. S.BeckC. J.BowenA. M. (2019). The revolving door of families in the child welfare system: Risk and protective factors associated with families returning. Children and Youth Services Review, 100, 468–479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2019.03.012
14.
DetlaffA. J.WeberK.PendletonM.BoydR.BettencourtB.BurtonL. (2020). It is not a broken system, it is a system that needs to be broken: The upEND movement to abolish the child welfare system. Journal of Public Child Welfare, 14(5), 500–517. https://doi.org/10.1080/15548732.2020.1814542
15.
DickersonK. L.LavoieJ.QuasJ. A. (2020). Do laypersons conflate poverty and neglect?Law and Human Behavior, 44(4), 311–326. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000415
16.
DiGregorioN.SelphJ. (2022). Small town politics, stigma, and services: Understanding the unique needs of rural families post-reunification. Journal of Social Service Research, 48(4), 460–471. https://doi.org/10.1080/01488376.2022.2087825
17.
DouglasE.GushwaM.HernandezA.AmmermanM. (2023). US child welfare practice during the COVID pandemic: An exploratory study of working conditions, practice experiences, and concerns. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/15548732.2023.2225427
18.
EllettA.SteibS. (2005). Child welfare and the courts: A statewide study with implications for professional development, practice, and change. Research on Social Work Practice, 15(5), 339–352. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731505276680
19.
FinsterH. P.NorwalkK. E. (2021). Characteristics, experiences, and mental health of children who re-enter foster care. Children and Youth Services Review, 129, 106165.
20.
FongK. (2017). Child welfare involvement and contexts of poverty: The role of parental adversities, social networks, and social services. Children and Youth Services Review, 72, 5–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2016.10.011
21.
FongK. (2020). Getting eyes in the home: Child protective services investigations and state surveillance of family life. American Sociological Review, 85(4), 610–638. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122420938460
22.
FontS. A.SattlerK. M.GershoffE. (2018). When home is still unsafe: From family reunification to foster care reentry. Journal of Marriage and Family, 80(5), 1333–1343.
23.
FrameL. (2002). Maltreatment reports and placement outcomes for infants and toddlers in out of home care. Infant Mental Health Journal, 23(5), 517–540.
24.
FrameL.BerrickJ. D.BrodowskiM. L. (2000). Understanding reentry to out-of-home care for reunified infants. Child Welfare, 79(4), 339–369.
25.
GoeringE. S.ShawT. V. (2017). Foster care reentry: A survival analysis assessing differences across permanency type. Child Abuse & Neglect, 68, 36–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2017.03.005
26.
GreenfieldB.ZhangL.SimmelC. (2023). Exploring state level factors associated with short-stays in child welfare: The role of systemic risk and surveillance. Child Maltreatment, 28(2), 345–358. https://doi.org/10.1177/10775595221104826
27.
JedwabM.ChatterjeeA.ShawT. V. (2018). Caseworkers’ insights and experiences with successful reunification. Children and Youth Services Review, 86, 56–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2018.01.017
28.
JedwabM.ShawT. V. (2017). Predictors of reentry into the foster care system: Comparison of children with and without previous removal experience. Children and Youth Services Review, 82, 177–184.
29.
KimberlinS. E.AnthonyE. K.AustinM. J. (2009). Re-entering foster care: Trends, evidence, and implications. Children and Youth Services Review, 31(4), 471–481.
30.
KohE.TestaM. F. (2011). Children discharged from kin and non-kin foster homes: Do the risks of foster care re-entry differ?Children and Youth Services Review, 33(9), 1497–1505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2011.03.009
31.
LaBrenzC. A.FongR.CubbinC. (2020). The road to reunification: Family- and state system-factors associated with successful reunification for children ages zero-to-five. Child Abuse & Neglect, 99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2019.104252
32.
LeeS.Jonson-ReidM.DrakeB. (2012). Foster care re-entry: Exploring the role of foster care characteristics, in-home child welfare services and cross-sector services. Children and Youth Services Review, 34(9), 1825–1833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2012.05.007
McDonaldT.BrysonS.PoertnerJ. (2006). Balancing reunification and reentry goals. Children and Youth Services Review, 28(1), 47–58.
35.
MichielJ.Jan-WillemK.TomS.MaxV.LambertusB.RenéC.KoenV. (2011). Analysis preexistent vertebral rotation in the normal infantile, juvenile, and adolescent spine. Spine, 36(7), E486–E491.
36.
PennellJ.EdwardsM.BurfordG. (2010). Expedited family group engagement and child permanency. Children and Youth Services Review, 32(7), 1012–1019.
37.
RenovV.RisserL.BergerR.HurleyT.VillavecesA.DeGueS.KatzA.HendersonC.PremoK.TalisJ.ChangJ. C.RagavanM. (2022). The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on child protective services caseworkers and administrators. Child Abuse & Neglect, 130(1), 105431.
38.
SchlösserT. P. C.VincentK. L.AttrachH.KuijfH. J.ViergeverM. A.JanssenM. M. A.CasteleinR. M. (2013). Quantitative analysis of the closure pattern of the neurocentral junction as related to preexistent rotation in the normal immature spine. The Spine Journal, 13(7), 756–763.
39.
Semanchin JonesA.LaLiberteT. (2017). Risk and protective factors of foster care reentry: An examination of the literature. Journal of Public Child Welfare, 11(4–5), 516–545.
40.
ShawT. V. (2006). Reentry into the foster care system after reunification. Children and Youth Services Review, 28(11), 1375–1390.
41.
ShawT. V. (2021). Trial home visits and foster care reentry. Journal of Public Child Welfare, 15(1), 6–21.
42.
ShawT. V.AhnH. (2015). An examination of reentry into state sponsored out of home care after reunification in Maryland. In Funded by Maryland department of human resources, social service administration. University of Maryland Baltimore, School of Social Work.
43.
ShawT. V.WebsterD. (2011). A matter of time: The importance of tracking reentry into foster care beyond one year after reunification. Journal of Public Child Welfare, 5(5), 501–520.
44.
SheetsJ.WittenstromK.FongR.JamesJ.TecciM.BaumannD. J.RodriguezC. (2009). Evidence-based practice in family group decision-making for Anglo, African American and Hispanic families. Children and Youth Services Review, 31(11), 1187–1191.
45.
ShipeS. L.ShawT. V.BetsingerS.FarrellJ. L. (2017). Expanding the conceptualization of re-entry: The inter-play between child welfare and juvenile services. Children and Youth Services Review, 79, 256–262.
VictorB. G.RyanJ. P.MooreA.MowbrayO.EvangelistM.PerronB. E. (2016). Foster home licensing and risk of reentry to out-of-home care following family reunification. Children and Youth Services Review, 70, 112–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2016.09.015
48.
VilodasM. T.CromerK. D.MosesJ. O.LitrownikA. J.NewtonR. R.DavisI. P. (2016). Unstable child welfare permanent placements and early adolescent physical and mental health: The roles of adverse childhood experiences and post-traumatic stress. Child Abuse & Neglect, 62, 76–88.
49.
WangE. W.LambertM. C.JohnsonL. E.BoudreauB.BreidenbachR.BaumannD. (2012). Expediting permanent placement from foster care systems: The role of family group decision-making. Children and Youth Services Review, 34(4), 845–850.
50.
WellsK.GuoS. (1999). Reunification and reentry of foster children. Children and Youth Services Review, 21(4), 273–294.
51.
WellsM.CorreiaM. (2012). Reentry into out-of-home care: Implications of child welfare workers’ assessments of risk and safety. Social Work Research, 36(3), 181–195. https://doi.org/10.1093/swr/svs011
52.
WilliamsK. A.AhnH.MoellerE. (2024). Stakeholder's perspectives on child welfare and court: Identifying challenges and implications to move social work practice forward. Journal of Public Child Welfare. Advance online publication.
53.
WulczynF. (2004). Family reunication. Future of Children, 14(1), 94–113.
54.
WulczynF.ParoliniA.SchmitsF.MagruderJ.WebsterD. (2020). Returning to foster care: Age and other risk factors. Children and Youth Services Review, 116, 105166.
