This talk was the Egon Guba Invited Lecture at the American Educational Research Association annual conference, April, 2003, Chicago. This article mobilizes three counterdiscourses to critique the federal government’s incursion into legislating scientific method in the realm of educational research via the “evidence-based” movement of the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. Foucauldian policy analysis, feminism via Luce Irigaray, and postcolonialism via Stuart Hall are used to situate such scientism as a racialized masculinist backlash against the proliferation of research approaches that characterize the past 20 years of social inquiry. Congressional disdain for educational research is addressed within a context of the Science Wars and the needs of neoliberal states, including conservative restoration.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Apple, M. (2001). Educating the “right” way: Markets, standards, God, and inequality. New York: Routledge Kegan Paul.
2.
Atkinson, E. (2004). Thinking outside the box: An exercise in heresy. Qualitative Inquiry, 10(1).
3.
Baez, B., & Boyles, D. R. (2002, October). Are we selling out? Grants, entrepreneurship, and the future of the profession. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Studies Association, Pittsburgh, PA.
4.
Bennett, T. (1992). Putting policy into cultural studies. In L. Grossberg, C. Nelson, & P. Treichler (Eds.), Cultural studies (pp. 23-37). London: Routledge Kegan Paul.
5.
Birnbaum, R. (2000). Policy scholars are from Venus; policy makers are from Mars. The Review of Higher Education, 23(2), 119-132.
6.
Blomfield, R., & Hardy, S. (2000). Evidence-based nursing practice. In L. Trinder & S. Reynolds (Eds.), Evidence-based practice: A critical appraisal (pp. 111-137). London: Sage.
7.
Boruch, R., & Mosteller, F. (2002). Overview and new directions. In F. Mosteller & R. Boruch (Eds.), Evidence matters: Randomized trials in education research (pp. 1-14). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
8.
Burtless, G. (2002). Randomized field trials for policy evaluation: Why not in education? In F. Mosteller & R. Boruch (Eds.), Evidence matters: Randomized trials in education research (pp. 179-197). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
9.
Bush, B. (2003, February 6). Columbus schools dumping four-way reading program. Columbus Dispatch, p. C1.
10.
Canclini, N. G. (2001). The North-South dialogue on cultural studies. In N. G. Canclini (Ed.), Consumers and citizens: Globalization and multicultural conflicts (pp. 3-13). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
11.
Clymer, A. (2002, December 27). Changes in health Web sites draw flak. Columbus Dispatch, p. A3.
12.
Cochran-Smith, M. (2002). What a difference a definition makes: Highly qualified teachers, scientific researchers, and teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 53(3), 187-189.
13.
Conley, V. (2000). Become-woman now. In I. Buchanan & C. Colebrook (Eds.), Deleuze and feminist theory (pp. 18-37). Edinburgh, Scotland: Edinburgh University Press.
14.
Cook, T. D., & Payne, M. R. (2002). Objecting to the objections to using random assignment in educational research. In F. Mosteller & R. Boruch (Eds.), Evidence matters(pp. 150-178). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
Davies, B. (2003). Death to critique and dissent? The policies and practices of new managerialism and of “evidence-based practice”. Gender and Education, 15(1), 91-103.
Education at a crossroads: What works and what’s wasted in education today: Hearings before the Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations, of the Committee on Education and the Workforce, 105th Cong., (July 17, 1998).
19.
Elden, S. (2002). The war of races and the constitution of the state: Foucault’s Il faut defendre la societe and the politics of calculation. boundary 2, 29(1), 125-151.
20.
Ferguson, M., & Golding, P. (1997). Cultural studies and changing times: An introduction. In M. Ferguson & P. Golding (Eds.), Cultural studies in question (pp. xiii-xxvii). London: Sage.
21.
Feuer, M. J., Towne, L., & Shavelson, R. J. (2002). Scientific culture and educational research. Educational Researcher, 31(8), 4-14.
22.
Fink, B. (1995). The Lacanian subject: Between language and jouissance. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
23.
Flyvbjerg, B. (2001). Making social science matter: Why social inquiry fails and how it can succeed again. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
24.
Foucault, M. (1970). The order of things: An archaeology of the human sciences. New York: Vintage.
25.
Foucault, M. (1991). Remarks on Marx: Conversations with Duccio Trombadori. New York: Semiotext(e). (Original work published 1981)
26.
Foucault, M. (1994). The punitive society. In P. Rabinow (Ed.), Michel Foucault: Ethics, subjectivity and truth (Vol. 1, pp. 23-38). New York: Free Press.
27.
Foucault, M. (1998). On the archaeology of the sciences: Response to the epistemology circle. In J. Faubion (Ed.), Michel Foucault: Aesthetics, method, and epistemology (Vol. 2, pp. 297-333). New York: Free Press.
28.
Friedman, S., Dunwoody, S., & Rogers, C. (Eds.). (1999). Communicating uncertainty: Media coverage of new and controversial science. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
29.
Galison, P., & Stump, D. (Eds.). (1996). The disunity of science: Boundaries, contexts, and power. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
30.
Gherardi, S., & Turner, B. A. (1987). Real men don’t collect soft data. Quarderno, 13, Dipartimento di Politica Sociale, Universaita di Trento.
31.
Goenka, S. (2002, February 23). A day in the field that changed my methodology. British Medical Journal, 324, 493.
32.
Graham, L. (1978). Concerns about science and attempts to regulate inquiry. Daedalus, 107(2), 1-21.
33.
Greenberg, D. (2001). Science, money and politics: Political triumph and ethical erosion. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
34.
Hall, S. (1996). Stuart Hall: Critical dialogues in cultural studies (D. Morley & K.-H. Chen, Eds.). London: Routledge Kegan Paul.
35.
Hamilton, D. (2002). “Noisy, fallible and biased though it be” (on the vagaries of educational research). British Journal of Educational Studies, 50(1), 144-164.
36.
Hammersley, M. (2000). Evidence-based practice in education and the contribution of educational research. In L. Trinder & S. Reynolds (Eds.), Evidence-based practice: A critical appraisal (pp. 163-183). London: Sage.
37.
Katz, A., & Mishler, E. G. (2003). Close encounters: Exemplars of process-oriented qualitative research in health care. Qualitative Research, 3(1), 35-56.
38.
Kuhn, T. B. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
39.
Lagemann, E. (2000). An elusive science: The troubling history of educational research. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
40.
Laitsch, D., Heilman, E., & Shaker, P. (2002). Teacher education, pro-market policy and advocacy research. Teaching Education, 13(3), 251-272.
41.
Lather, P. (in press). Foucauldian “indiscipline” as a sort of policy application. In B. Baker & K. Hayning (Eds.), Dangerous coagulations? The uses of Foucault in the study of education. New York: Peter Lang.
42.
McGuigan, J. (2001). Problems of cultural analysis and policy in the information age. Cultural Studies/Critical Methodologies, 1(2), 190-219.
43.
McRobbie, A. (1997). The E’s and the anti-E’s: New questions for feminism and cultural studies. In M. Ferguson & P. Golding (Eds.), Cultural studies in question (pp. 170-186). London: Sage.
44.
Miller, G., & Droglin, B. (2002, October 11). Hawks pressuring CIA, sources say. Columbus Dispatch, p. A2.
45.
Mosteller, F., & Boruch, R. (Eds.). (2002). Evidence matters: Randomized trials in education research. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
46.
National Research Council. (2002). Scientific research in education (Committee on Scientific Principles for Education Research; R. J. Shavelson & L. Towne, Eds.). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
47.
Nietzsche, F. (1974). The gay science (W. Kaufmann, Trans.). New York: Vintage.
48.
Olkowski, D. (2000). Body, knowledge and becoming-woman: Morpho-logic in Deleuze and Irigaray. In I. Buchanan & C. Colebrook (Eds.), Deleuze and feminist theory (pp. 86-109). Edinburgh, Scotland: Edinburgh University Press.
49.
Plotnitsky, A. (2002). The knowable and the unknowable: Modern science, nonclassical thought, and the “two cultures”. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
50.
Porter, T. M. (1995). Trust in numbers: The pursuit of objectivity in science and public life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
51.
Reynolds, S. (2000). The anatomy of evidence-based practice: Principles and methods. In L. Trinder & S. Reynolds (Eds.), Evidence-based practice: A critical appraisal (pp. 17-34). London: Sage.
52.
Ross, A. (Ed.). (1996). Science wars. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
53.
Shaker, P. (2002, October). Is Washington serious about scientifically based research? Paper presented at the Curriculum and Pedagogy Conference, Decatur, GA.
54.
Shavelson, R., Phillips, D. C., Towne, L., & Feuer, M. (2003). On the science of education design studies. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 25-28.
55.
Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (Eds.). (2002). Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
56.
Trinder, L. (2000a). Introduction: The context of evidence-based practice. In L. Trinder & S. Reynolds (Eds.), Evidence-based practice: A critical appraisal (pp. 1-15). London: Sage.
57.
Trinder, L. (2000b). A critical appraisal of evidence-based practice. In L. Trinder & S. Reynolds (Eds.), Evidence-based practice: A critical appraisal (pp. 212-241). London: Sage.
58.
Trinder, L., & Reynolds, S. (Eds.).(2000c). Evidence-based practice: A critical appraisal. London: Sage.
Vivovskis, M. (2002). Missing in practice? Development and evaluation at the U.S. Department of Education. In F. Mosteller & R. Boruch (Eds.), Evidence matters: Randomized trials in education research (pp. 120-149). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
61.
West, C. (1990). The new cultural politics of difference. In R. Fergusonet al. (Eds.), Out there: Marginalization and contemporary cultures (pp. 19-36). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
62.
Westcott, M. (1979). Feminist criticism of the social sciences. Harvard Educational Review, 49(4), 422-430.
63.
Willinsky, J. (2001). The strategic education research program and the public value of research. Educational Researcher, 30(1), 5-14.
