The article concerns itself with the struggles that are prompted by the question, “What is my position as a teacher who whilst wanting to pursue emancipatory practices nevertheless is fearful of finding herself supporting and perpetuating normalizing structures?” An extract drawn from a journal entry serves as a base on which a series of reflexive readings are rehearsed. These have spanned over a period of time (2000-2009) and, as a consequence, convey the theoretical vantage points that have been used to create conceptual openings where there are possibilities for thinking “differently.” Both practices of deconstruction (Derrida) and anthropological work on purification rites (Douglas and Kristeva) are used to shift the means with which the author makes sense. Overall, the article depicts an individual’s attempts at creating a becoming space, where thinking and doing may be a little less bounded.
Berlack, A. ( 1989). Teaching for outrage and empathy in the liberal arts , Educational Foundations, 3, 78.
2.
Bernstein, R. ( 1983). Beyond objectivism and relativism: Science, hermeneutics and praxis. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
3.
Bhabha, H. ( 1993). The postcolonial and the postmodern: The question of agency. In S. During (Ed.) The cultural studies reader. London: Routledge.
4.
Bishop, R. ( 1998). Freeing ourselves from neo-colonial domination in research: A Maori approach to creating knowledge. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 11, 199-219.
5.
Boler, M. ( 1999). Feeling power: Emotions and education. London: Routledge.
6.
Britzman, D. ( 1995). "The question of belief": Writing poststructural ethnography . International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education , 3, 229-238.
7.
Britzman, D. ( 2003). Practice makes practice: A critical study of learning to teach. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
8.
Butler, J. ( 1993). Bodies that matter: On the discursive limits of "sex ." London: Routledge.
9.
Dahlberg, G., Moss, P., & Pence, A. ( 1999). Beyond quality in early childhood education and care: Postmodern perspectives. London: Falmer.
10.
Derrida, J. ( 1972). Dissemination. New York: Continuum.
11.
Derrida, J. ( 1976). Of Grammatology (G. C. Spivak, Trans.) Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
12.
Derrida, J. ( 1978). Writing and difference. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
13.
Derrida, J. ( 1980). The archaeology of the frivolous: Reading Condillac. Pittsburg, PA: Duquesne University Press.
14.
Douglas, M. ( 1970). Purity and danger: An analysis of pollution and taboo . New York: Penguin.
15.
Fine, M. ( 1994). Dis-tance and other stances: Negotiations of power inside feminist research. In A. Gitlen (Ed.), Power and method. London: Routledge .
16.
Gray, J. ( 1995). Liberalism. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
17.
Hegel, G.W.F. ( 1967). The phenomenology of the mind (J. B. Baillie, Trans.). New York: Harper Torchbooks.
18.
Hultqvist, K. ( 1998). A history of the present on children’s welfare in Sweden: From Froebal to present day decentralization projects. In T. Popkewitz & M. Brennan (Eds.), Foucault’s challenge: Discourse, knowledge and power in education. New York: Teachers’ College Press.
19.
Johnson, B. ( 1980). The critical difference. Baltimore : Johns Hopkins University Press.
20.
Jones, L., Pickard, A., & Stronach, I. ( 2009). Primary schools: The professional environment. In R. Alexander (Ed.), Primary review of education (Primary Review Briefing 6/2). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. (pp. 1-26)
21.
Kristeva, J. ( 1982). Powers of horror: An essay on abjection. New York: Columbia University Press.
22.
Lather, P. ( 1991). Getting smart: Feminist research and pedagogy with/in the post-modern. London: Routledge .
23.
Lather, P. ( 1993). Fertile obsession: Validity after poststructuralism. The Sociological Quarterly, 34, 673-693.
24.
Lather, P. ( 1995). The validity of angels: Interpretive and textual strategies in researching the lives of women with HIV/AIDS. Qualitative Inquiry, 1, 41-68.
25.
MacLure, M. ( 2003). Discourse in educational and social research. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
26.
McKenzie, E. ( 2003, September 18-19). Private gated communities in the American urban fabric: Emerging trends in their production, practices and regulation . Paper presented on "Gated Communities: Building Social division or Safer Communities?"Department of Urban Studies, University of Glasgow, Scotland, UK.
27.
Patai, D. ( 1994). When method becomes power: Response. In A. Gitlen (Ed.), Power and method. London: Routledge. (pp. 13-35)
28.
Pillow, W. ( 2003) Confession, catharsis, or cure? Rethinking the uses of reflexivity as methodological power in qualitative research. Qualitative Studies in Education, 16, 175-196.
29.
Smith, L.T. ( 1999). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples . Dunedin, Otago, New Zealand: University of Otago Press.
30.
Spivak, G. ( 1980). Revolutions which as yet have no model. In D. Landry & G. McLean (Eds.), The Spivak reader. London: Routledge.
31.
Spivak, G. ( 1984). Criticism, feminism and the institution. Thesis Eleven, 10/11, 175-189.
32.
Spivak, G. ( 1988) Can the Subaltern Speak?; Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture. Urbana/Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
33.
St. Pierre, E. ( 2008). Decentering voice in qualitative inquiry. International Review of Qualitative Research, 3, 3219-3336.
34.
Visweswaran, K. ( 1994). Fictions of feminist ethnography. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
35.
Walkerdine, V. ( 1990). School girl fictions. London: Verso.
36.
Woolgar, S. ( 1988). The next step: An introduction to the reflexive project . In S. Woolgar (Ed.), Knowledge and reflexivity. London: Sage.
