Battered women (n = 159) report on their experiences with their Temporary Assistance to Needy Families (TANF) case workers. Workers most often ask about physical harm, feelings of fear, and police involvement. They least often create a safety plan, give information about work exemptions, and ask whether the partner had a gun. Women’s major reasons for not talking about abuse are that the worker did not ask and a fear of negative outcomes. Workerswho attendeda 1-day training are more likely than untrained workers to discuss the women’s fear and physical harm, to help develop a safety plan, and to be viewed as generally helpful.
Administration for Children and Families, Office of Family Assistance. (2002). Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) (Fifth annual report to Congress). Retrieved May 21, 2003, from http://www.acf.dhhs.gov/programs/ofa/annualreport5/1212.htm
2.
Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation. (1997). Ancillary services to support welfare to work: Domestic violence. Retrieved July 4, 2002, from http://aspe.hhs.gov/hsp/isp/ancillary/DV/htm
3.
Brandwein, R. A. (1999). Family violence and welfare use: Report from the field. In R. A. Brandwein (Ed.), Battered women, children, and welfare reform (pp. 45-58). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
4.
Brandwein, R. A., & Filiano, D. M. (2000). Toward real welfare reform: The voices of battered women. Affilia, 15, 224-243.
5.
Brush, L. D. (1999). Women battering and welfare reform: The view from a welfare-to-work program. Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare, 26, 49-60.
6.
Brush, L. D. (2000). Battering, traumatic stress, and welfare-to-work transition. Violence Against Women, 6, 1039-1065.
7.
Burt, M. R., Zweig, J. M., & Schlichter, K. (2000). Strategies for addressing the needs of domestic violence victims within the TANF program: The experience of seven counties: Final report (HHS-100-95-0021). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation.
8.
Busch, N. B., & Wolfer, T. A. (2002). Battered women speak out: Welfare reform and their decisions to disclose. Violence Against Women, 8, 566-584.
9.
California Institute of Mental Health–CalWORKS. (2000). The CalWORKS Project: Six County Case Study-Alameda, Kern, Los Angeles, Monterey, Shasta, Stanislaus: Executive summary. Sacramento: California Institute of Mental Health.
10.
California Institute of Mental Health–CalWORKS. (2002a). The CalWORKS Project: Domestic violence summary. Sacramento, CA: California Institute for Mental Health.
11.
California Institute of Mental Health–CalWORKS. (2002b). Mental health, domestic violence and substance abuse: Need for a use of services among adult female TANF participants (CalWorks Project, Policy and Practice Brief, 1). Washington, DC: California Institute of Mental Health.
12.
Danis, F. S. (2003). Social work response to domestic violence: Encouraging news from a new look. Affilia, 18, 177-191.
13.
Davies, J. (1996). New welfare law: State implementation and use of the Family Violence Option. Violence Against Women Online Resources. Retrieved August 22, 2002, from http://www.vaw.umn.edu/documents/welpol2/welpol2.html
14.
Davies, J. (1998a). Building opportunities for battered women’s safety and self-sufficiency. Harrisburg: Welfare and Domestic Violence Technical Assistance Initiative, National Resource Center/Pennsylvania Coalition Against Domestic Violence.
15.
Davies, J. (1998b). Family violence protocol development. Harrisburg: Welfare and Domestic Violence Technical Assistance Initiative, National Resource Center/Pennsylvania Coalition Against Domestic Violence.
16.
Davies, J. (2000). Recommendations for training TANF and child support enforcement staff about domestic violence. Harrisburg, PA: National Resource Center on Domestic Violence. Retrieved March 15, 2002, from http://www.vawnet.org
17.
Davis, M. F. (1999). The economics of abuse: How violence perpetuates women’s poverty. In R. A. Brandwein (Ed.), Battered women, children, and welfare reform (pp. 17-30). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
18.
Ganow, M. (2001, December). Strategies for TANF agencies to identify and address domestic violence. Welfare Information Network: Issue Notes. Retrieved March 8, 2002, from http://www.welfareinfo.org
19.
General Accounting Office. (1998). Domestic violence: Prevalence and implications for employment among welfare recipients. Washington, DC: Author.
20.
Griswold, E. A., Pearson, J., & Thoennes, N. (2000). New directions for child support agencies when domestic violence is an issue. Policy and Practice for Public Human Services, 58, 29-36.
21.
Hagen, J. L., & Owens-Manley, J. (2002). Issues in implementing TANF in New York: The perspective of frontline workers. Social Work, 47, 171-182.
22.
Hearn, M. E. (2000). Dangerous indifference: New York City’s failure to implement the Family Violence Option. New York: Joint Project of the NOW Legal Defense and Education Fund; the Legal Aid Society, the Women, Welfare, and Abuse Task Force; and the Urban Justice Center.
23.
Legal Momentum.(2004). Familyviolence option:State by state summary. New York: Author.
24.
Lein, L., Jacquet, S., Lewis, C. M., Cole, P. R., & Williams, B. B. (2001). With the best intentions. Violence Against Women, 7, 193-210.
25.
Levin, R. (2001). Less than ideal. Violence Against Women, 7, 211-221.
26.
Lyon, E. (2002). Welfare and domestic violence against women: Lessons from research. Retrieved September 2, 2002, from http://www.vawnet.org/DomesticViolence/Research/VAWnetDocs/AR_Welfare2.php?s=brf
27.
Magen, R. H., & Conroy, K. (1997, June). Domestic violence in child welfare preventative services: Results from an intake screening questionnaire. Paper presented at the 5th International Family Violence Research Conference, Durham, NH.
28.
Magen, R. H., Conroy, K., Hess, P. M., Panciera, A., & Simon, B. L. (1995, July). Evaluation of a protocol to identify battered women during investigations of child abuse and neglect. Paper presented at the 4th International Family Violence Research Conference, Durham, NH.
29.
Meisel, J., Chandler, D., & Rienzi, B. (2003). Domestic violence prevalence and effects on employment in two California TANF populations. California Institute of Mental health–CalWorks. Unpublished manuscript.
30.
Moore, T., & Selkowe, V. (1999). Domestic violence victims in transition from welfare to work: Barriers to self-sufficiency and the W-2 response. Milwaukee: Institute for Wisconsin’s Future.
31.
Pearson, J., Griswold, E. A., & Thoennes, N. (2001). Balancing safety and self-sufficiency: Lessons on serving victims of domestic violence for child support and public assistance agencies. Violence Against Women, 7, 176-192.
32.
Postmus, J. L. (2000). Analysis of the family violence option: A strengths perspective. Affilia, 15, 244-259.
33.
Postmus, J. L. (2002). In their own words: Battered women, welfare, and the Family Violence Option. Dissertation Abstracts International, A63/05, 1999.
34.
Raphael, J. (1999). The family violence option: An early assessment. Violence Against Women, 5, 449-466.
35.
Raphael, J. (2000). Saving Bernice: Battered women, welfare, and poverty. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
36.
Rhodes, N. R., & McKenzie, E. B. (1998). Why do battered women stay? Three decades of research. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 3, 391-406.
37.
Sable, M. R., Libbus, M. K., Huneke, D., & Anger, K. (1999). Domestic violence among AFDC recipients: Implications for welfare-to-work programs. Affilia, 14, 199-216.
38.
Sachs, H. (1999). Domestic violence as a barrier to women’s economic self-sufficiency. Welfare Information Network, 3(10). Retrieved June 9, 2002, from http://www.financeprojectinfo.org/Publications/domesticviolence.htm
39.
Seefeldt, K. S., Danziger, S. K., & Anderson, N. (1999). What FIA directors have to say about welfare reform. Ann Arbor: Program on Poverty and Social Welfare Policy, University of Michigan.
40.
Seefeldt, K. S., & Peters, J. (2000). The Family Independence specialist: Successes and challenges. Ann Arbor: Program on Poverty and Social Welfare Policy, University of Michigan.
41.
Shepard, M., & Raschick, M. (1999). How child welfare workers assess and intervene around issues of domestic violence. Child Maltreatment, 4, 148-156.
42.
Tolman, R. M. (1999). Guest editor’s introduction. Violence Against Women, 5, 355-369.
43.
Tolman, R. M., & Raphael, J. (2000). Areview of research on domestic violence and welfare. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 655-682.
44.
Tolman, R. M., & Rosen, D. (2001). Domestic violence in the lives of women receiving welfare: Health, mental health and well-being. Violence Against Women, 7, 126-140.
