This qualitative study explored how the cultural context of intimate partner violence affected accessibility to mainstream services for one immigrant group: Haitian women. Analysis of the data revealed two major themes. First, the nature and context of intimate partner violence in the Haitian immigrant community contribute to Haitian women’s reluctance to seek services as well as their overall vulnerability to intimate partner violence. Second, mainstream services are largely inaccessible to Haitian women. The authors conclude with suggestions for overcoming cultural barriers through education, increasing cultural competency of mainstream services, and creating alternative community-based services.
Abbott, J., Johnson, R., Koziol-McLain, J., & Lowenstein, S. R. (1995). Domestic violence against women: Incidence and prevalence in an emergency department population. Journal of the American Medical Association, 273, 1763–1767.
2.
Action for Boston Community Development. (2003). Women’s Safety Net Parties. Retrieved July 10, 2003, from http://www.bostonabcd.org/publicinfo/pubs/safety-net.htm
3.
Applewhite, S. R., Wong, O., & Daley, J. M. (1991). Service approaches and issues in Hispanic agencies. Administration and Policy in Mental Health, 19, 27–37.
4.
Bacigalupe, G. (2000). Family violence in Chile: Political and legal dimensions in a period of democratic transition. Violence Against Women, 6, 427–448.
5.
Bennett, L. E., & Burt, M. R. (1999). Reaching out to women victims of violence in underserved communities: Progress and pitfalls. A component of the 1998–1999 national evaluation ofthe STOP Formula Grants to Combat Violence Against Women. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
6.
Bloom, S. L., & Reichert, M. (1998). Bearing witness: Violence and collective responsibility. New York: Haworth.
7.
Byrne, C. A., Resnick, H. S., Kilpatrick, D. G., Best, C. L., & Saunders, B. E. (2001). The socioeconomic impact of interpersonal violence on women. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67, 362–366.
8.
Charmaz, K. (2000). Grounded theory: Objectivist and constructivist methods. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research(2nd ed., pp. 509–535).Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
9.
Collins, P. H. (1986). Learning from the outside within: The sociological significance of Black feminist thought. Social Problems, 33, 514–530.
10.
Collins, P. H. (1989). The social construction of Black feminist thought. Signs, 14, 745–773.
11.
Collins, P. H. (1990). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. Boston: Unwin Hyman.
12.
Cook, J. A., & Fonow, M. M. (1986). Knowledge and women’s interests: Issues of epistemology and methodology in feminist sociological research. Sociological Inquiry, 56, 2-29.
13.
Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
14.
Denzin, N., & Lincoln, Y. (Eds.). (2000). Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
15.
Downe-Wamboldt, B. (1992). Content analysis: Method, applications, and issues. Health Care for Women International, 13, 313–321.
16.
Dutton, M., Orloff, L. E., & Hass, G. A. (2000). Characteristics of help-seeking behaviors, resources, and service needs of battered immigrant Latinas: Legal and policy implications. Georgetown Journal on Poverty Law and Policy, 7, 245–305.
17.
Gorelick, S. (1991). Contradictions of feminist methodology. Gender & Society, 5, 459–477.
18.
Governor’s Commission on Domestic Violence. (1998, December). Statewide hearings on domestic violence: Findings and recommendations. Boston: Author.
19.
Hamby, S. L. (2000). The importance of community in a feminist analysis of domestic violence among American Indians. American Journal of Community Psychology, 28, 649–669.
20.
Jang, D., Lee, D., & Morello-Frosch, R. (1990). Domestic violence in the immigrant and refugee community: Responding to the need of immigrant women. Response, 13(4), 2–7.
21.
Jasinski, J. L., & Williams, L. M. (Eds.). (1998). Partner violence: A comprehensive review of 20 years of research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
22.
Jenkins, E. J. (2002). Black women and community violence: Trauma, grief, and coping.Women & Therapy, 25(3/4), 29–44.
23.
Kantor, G. K., & Jasinski, J. L. (1998). Dynamics and risk factors in partner violence. In J. L. Jasinski & L. M. Williams (Eds.), Partner violence: A comprehensive review of 20 years of research(pp. 1–43). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
24.
LeCompte, M. D. (1995). Some notes on power, agenda, and voice: A researcher’s personal evolution toward critical collaborative research. In P. L. McLaren & J. M. Giarelli (Eds.), Critical theory and educational research(pp. 91–112). Albany: State University of New York Press.
25.
Le-Doux, C., & Stephens, K. S. (1992). Refugee and immigrant social service delivery: Critical management issues. Journal of Multicultural Social Work, 2, 31–45.
26.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
27.
Loue, S., & Faust, M. (1998). Intimate partner violence among immigrants. In S. Loue (Ed.), Handbook of Immigrant Health(pp. 521–544). New York: Plenum.
28.
McFayden, D., LaRamee, P., Fried, M., & Rosen, F. (Eds.). (1995). Haiti: Dangerous crossroads. Boston: South End.
29.
Nichols, R. R. (2002). Striving for a more excellent way. Women & Therapy, 25(3/4), 183–188.
30.
Oliver, W. (2000). Preventing domestic violence in the African American community: The rationale for popular culture interventions. Violence Against Women, 6, 533–549.
31.
Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods(2nd ed.). Newbury Park,CA: Sage.
32.
Raj, A., & Silverman, J. (2002a). Violence against immigrant women: The roles of culture, context, and legal immigrant status on intimate partner violence. Violence Against Women, 8, 367–398.
33.
Raj, A., & Silverman, J. (2002b). Intimate partner violence against South Asian women in Greater Boston. Journal of the American Medical Women’s Association, 57, 111–114.
34.
Raphael, J. (2001). Public housing and domestic violence. Violence Against Women, 7, 699– 706.
35.
Respect Action Collaborative. (1999). Needs assessment of the Haitian community on domestic violence. Boston: Author.
36.
Richie, B. E. (1996). Compelled to crime: The gender entrapment of battered Black women. New York: Routledge.
37.
Safe Havens Interfaith Partnership Against Domestic Violence. (2002). Safe Havens Family Violence Prevention Project. Boston: Author.
38.
Sandelowski, M. (2000). Whatever happened to qualitative description?Research in Nursing & Health, 23, 334–340.
39.
Sherraden, M. S., & Martin, J. J. (1994). Social work with immigrants: International issues in service delivery. International Social Work, 37, 369–384.
40.
Shetty, S., & Kaguyutan, J. (2002). Immigrant victims of domestic violence: Cultural challenges and available legal protection. Retrieved July 5, 2003, from http://www.vaw.umn.edu/%20documents/vawnet/arimmigrant/arimmigrant.html
41.
Simmons, A. S. (2002). Using celluloid to break the silence about sexual violence in the Black community. Women & Therapy, 25(3/4), 175–181.
42.
Smith, D. E. (1979). Asociology for women. In J. A. Sherman & E. T. Black (Eds.), The prism of sex: Essays in the sociology of knowledge(pp. 135–187). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
43.
Smith, D. E. (1987). The everyday world as problematic: A feminist sociology. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
44.
Smith, D. E. (1990). Texts, facts, and feminity: Exploring the relations of ruling. New York: Routledge.
45.
Smith, D. E. (1991). Writing women’s experience into social science. Feminism and Psychology, 1, 155–169.
46.
Song, Y. I. (1996). Battered women in Korean immigrant families: The silent scream. New York: Garland.
47.
Stepick, A., Stepick, C. D., & Kretsedemas, P. (2001). Civic engagement of Haitian immigrants and Haitian Americans in Miami-Dade County. Miami, FL: Immigration and Ethnicity Institute.
48.
Stern, P. N. (1980). Grounded theory methodology: Its uses and processes. Images, 12, 20–23.
49.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
50.
Taylor, J. Y. (2002). Talking back: Research as an act of resistance and healing for African American women survivors of intimate male partner violence. Women & Therapy, 25(3/4), 79–94.
51.
Thorne, S. E. (1997). Phenomenological positivism and other problematic trends in health science research. Qualitative Health Research, 7, 287–293.
52.
Timmins, L. (1995). Listening to thunder: Advocates talk about the battered women’s movement. Vancouver: Women’s Research Center.
53.
Tjaden, P., & Thoennes, N. (2000). Full report of the prevalence, incidence, and consequences of violence against women: Findings from the National Violence against Women Survey. Washington, DC: Institute of Justice.
54.
Tolman, R. M., & Rosen, D. (2001). Domestic violence in the lives of women receiving welfare: Mental health, substance dependence, and economic well-being. Violence Against Women, 7, 141–158.
55.
Trickett, E. J. (1996). A future for community psychology: The contexts of diversity and the diversity of contexts. American Journal of Community Psychology, 24, 209–234.
56.
Weis, L., & Fine, M. (2000) Speed bumps: A student-friendly guide to qualitative research. New York: Teacher’s College Press.
57.
Weiss, R. S. (1994). Learning from strangers: The art and method of qualitative interview studies.New York: Free Press.
58.
Wessel, L., & Campbell, J. C. (1997). Providing sanctuary for battered women: Nicaragua’sCasas de la Mujer. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 18, 455–476.
59.
West, C. M. (2002). Battered, Black, and blue: An overview of violence in the lives of Black women. Women & Therapy, 25(3/4), 5–27.
60.
White, A. M. (2001). I am because we are: Combined race and gender political consciousness among African American women and men anti-rape activists. Women’s Studies International Forum, 24, 11-24.
61.
Yearwood, D. L. (2002). Domestic violence shelters and minorities: An assessment of minority victims’ needs and the extent of minority involvement as shelter staff. Domestic Violence Report, 7(6), 81, 91–92.
62.
Yoshihama, M. (2001). Immigrants-in-context framework: Understanding the interactive influence of socio-cultural contexts. Evaluation and Program Planning, 24, 301–318.
63.
Zweig, J. M., Schlichter, K. A., & Burt, M. R. (2002). Assisting women victims of violence who experience multiple barriers to services. Violence Against Women, 8, 162–180.
