The goal of Multi-Agency Risk Assessment Conferences (MARACs) is to provide a forum for sharing information and taking actions to reduce harm to high-risk domestic violence victims. Interviews with participants and victims, observations, and police data reveal how the MARACs work in practice and also what they can accomplish. Results showed MARACs to be invaluable: Agencies assisted victims more efficiently, primarily through enhanced information sharing. MARACs improve victims' safety because both police and victim data revealed that 6 in 10 victims had not been revictimized. These positive results demonstrate the benefits of a coordinated community response.
Bennett, L., Goodman, L., & Dutton, M. A. (2000). Risk assessment among batterers arrested for domestic assault. Violence Against Women,6, 1190-1203.
2.
Buzawa, E. S., & Buzawa, C. G. (2003). Domestic violence: The criminal justice response (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
3.
Campbell, J. C. (1986). Assessment of risk of homicide for battered women. Advances in Nursing Science, 8, 36-51.
4.
Campbell, J. C. (1995). Assessing dangerousness: Violence by sexual offenders, batterers, and child abusers. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
5.
Coker, A. L., Smith, P. H., McKeown, R. E., & King, M. J. (2000). Frequency and correlates of intimate partner violence by type: Physical, sexual and psychological battering. American Journal of Public Health,90, 553-559.
6.
Cook, D., Burton, M., Robinson, A. L., & Vallely, C. (2004). Evaluation of specialist domestic violence courts/fast-track systems. London: Crown Prosecution Service and Department of Constitutional Affairs. Available at http://www.cps.gov.uk/publications/docs/specialistdvcourts.pdf
7.
de Becker, G. (1997). The gift of fear: Survival signals that protect us from violence. Boston: Little, Brown.
8.
Fagan, J. (1989). Cessation of family violence: Deterrence and dissuasion. In L. Ohlin & M. Tonry (Eds.), Family violence, Vol. 11, Crime and justice: A review of research (pp. 377-425). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
9.
Goodman, L. A., Dutton, M. A., & Bennett, L. (2000). Predicting repeat abuse among arrested batterers: Use of the Danger Assessment Scale in the criminal justice system. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 15, 63-74.
10.
Hart, B. (1994). Lethality and dangerousness assessments. Violence Update,4(10), 7-8.
11.
Hemphill, J. F., Hare, R. D., & Wong, S. (1998). Psychopathy and recidivism: A review. Legal and Criminological Psychology,3, 139-170.
12.
Humphreys, C., & Thiara, R. K. (2003). Neither justice nor protection: Women's experiences of post-separation violence. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law,25, 195-214.
13.
Jasinski, J. L. (2004). Pregnancy and domestic violence: A review of the literature. Trauma, Violence & Abuse,5, 47-64.
14.
Kane, R. J. (1999). Patterns of arrest in domestic violence encounters: Identifying a police decision-making model. Journal of Criminal Justice,27, 65-79.
15.
Lloyd, S., Farrell, G., & Pease, K. (1994). Preventing repeat domestic violence: A demonstration project in Merseyside (Crime Prevention Paper 49). London: Home Office.
16.
Office of National Statistics. (2001). Key statistics for Wales. Retrieved December 1, 2004, from http://www.statistics.gov.uk
17.
Olson, D. E., & Stalans, L. J. (2001). Violent offenders on probation: Profile, sentence, and outcome differences among domestic violence and other violent probationers. Violence Against Women,7, 1164-1185.
18.
Robinson, A. L. (2003). The Cardiff Women's Safety Unit: A multi-agency approach to domestic violence. Final evaluation report. Cardiff, Wales, UK: Cardiff University School of Social Sciences. Available at http://www.cf.ac.uk/socsi/staff/robinson.html
19.
Robinson, A. L., & Pickles, J. (2003). Gweithio gyva ein gilydd: Y profiad cymreig [Working together: The Welsh experience]. Safe: The Domestic Abuse Quarterly,7, 4-7.
20.
Shepard, M. E. (1999). Evaluating a coordinated community response. In M. E. Shepard & E. L. Pence (Eds.),Coordinating community responses to domestic violence: Lessons from Duluth and beyond(pp. 169-191). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
21.
Shepard, M. E., Falk, D. R., & Elliott, B. A. (2002). Enhancing coordinated community responses to reduce recidivism in cases of domestic violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence,17, 551-569.
22.
Straus, M. A. (1990). The national family violence surveys. In M. A. Straus & R. J. Gelles (Eds.),Physical violence in American families: Risk factors and adaptation to violence in 8,145 Families (pp. 3-16). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishing.
23.
Walby, S. (2004). The real cost of domestic violence. Safe: The Domestic Abuse Quarterly,11, 15-18.
24.
Walby, S., & Allen, J. (2004),Domestic violence, sexual assault and stalking: Findings from the British Crime Survey (Home Office Research Study 276). London: Home Office.
25.
Walker, L. E. (1979). The battered woman. New York: Harper and Row.
26.
Walker, L. E. (1984). The battered woman syndrome. New York: Springer.
27.
Weisz, A. N., Tolman, R. M., & Saunders, D. G. (2000). Assessing the risk of severe domestic violence: The importance of survivors' predictions. Journal of Interpersonal Violence,15, 75-90.
28.
Wilson, M., & Daly, M. (1992). Homicide. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
