Responding to calls for improved measurement in the field of domestic violence, this paper reports the development and initial validation of the Brief Coercion and Conflict Scales in a sample of incarcerated women. Confirmatory factor analyses tested the scales hypothesized structure and supported coercion and conflict as moderately and positively related but distinct constructs. Although women reported experiencing both conflict and coercion in their most recent relationship before incarceration, they reported that their experiences were more often marked by interpersonal conflict than by coercion. Further, the coercion and conflict scales differentially predicted women's behavioral and psychological responses to abuse. Only coercion consistently predicted strategic responses and posttraumatic stress symptoms. Overall, findings support the instrument as a viable option, but further psychometric evaluation of internal and external validity with additional samples is warranted.
American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
2.
Archer, J. (2000). Sex differences in aggression between heterosexual partners: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 651-680.
3.
Bentler, P. M. (1995). EQS structural equations program manual. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software.
4.
Cason et al. v. Seckinger et al., 84-313-1-MAC (M.D. Georgia Macon Div. 1994).
5.
Cook, S. L., Conrad, M. L. I., Grall, M. B., & Kaslow, N. J. (2003). The internal validity of the Index of Spouse Abuse in African American women. Violence and Victims, 18, 641-657.
6.
Dobash, R. P., Dobash, R. E., Cavanagh, K., & Lewis, R. (1998). Separate and intersecting realities: A comparison of men’s and women’s accounts of violence against women. Violence Against Women, 4, 382-414.
7.
Dobash, R. P., Dobash, R. E., Wilson, M., & Daly, M. (1992). The myth of sexual symmetry in marital violence. Social Problems, 39, 71-91.
8.
Foa, E. B., Riggs, D. S., Dancu, C. V., & Rothbaum, B. O. (1993). Reliability and validity of a brief instrument for assessing post-traumatic stress disorder. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 6, 459-473.
9.
Gondolf, E. W., & Fisher, E. R. (1988). Battered women as survivors: An alternative to treating learned helplessness. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
10.
Goodman, L. A., Dutton, M. A., Weinhurt, K., & Cook, S. L. (2003). The Intimate Partner Violence Strategies Index: Development and application. Violence Against Women, 9, 163-186.
11.
Hall Smith, P., Smith, J. B., & Earp, J. A. (1999). Beyond the measurement trap: A reconstructed conceptualization and measurement of woman battering. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 23, 177-193.
12.
Johnson, M. P. (1995). Patriarchical terrorism and common couple violence: Two forms of violence against women. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57, 283-294.
13.
Johnson, M. P. (2006). Conflict and control: Gender, symmetry, and asymmetry in domestic violence. Violence Against Women, 12, 1003-1018.
14.
Kimmel, M. S. (2002). “Gender symmetry” in domestic violence. Violence Aaginst Women, 8, 1332-1363.
15.
Kline, R. B. (1998). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford.
16.
Koss, M. P., Gidycz, C. A., & Wisniewski, N. (1987). The scope of rape: Incidence and prevalence of sexual aggression and victimization in a national sample of higher education students. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55, 162-170.
17.
Kowalski, R. M., & White, J. W. (1994). Deconstructing the myth of the nonaggressive woman. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 487-508.
18.
Molm, L. D. (1997). Coercive power in social exchange. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
19.
Pagelow, M. D. (1981). Woman-battering: Victims and their experiences. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
20.
Radloff, L. S. (1977). The CES-D scale: A self report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 385-401.
21.
Raven, B. H. (1993). The bases of conjugal power: Origins and recent developments. Journal of Social Psychology, 49, 227-251.
22.
Richie, B. E. (1996). Compelled to crime: The gender entrapment of battered black women. New York: Routledge.
23.
Straus, M. A. (1979). Measuring intrafamily conflict and violence: The Conflict Tactics (CT) Scales. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 41, 75-88.
24.
Straus, M. A., Hamby, S. L., Boney-McCoy, S., & Sugarman, D. B. (1996). The Revised Conflict Tactics Scales: Development and preliminary psychometric data. Journal of Family Issues, 17, 283-316.
25.
Swan, S., & Snow, D. (2006). The development of a theory of women’s use of violence in intimate relationships. Violence Against Women, 12, 1026-1045.
26.
Tolman, R. M. (1989). The development of a measure of psychological maltreatment of women by their male partners. Violence and Victims, 4, 159-177.
27.
Tolman, R. M. (1999). The validation of the Psychological Maltreatment of Women Inventory. Violence and Victims, 4, 173-189.
28.
White, J. W., Hall Smith, P., Koss, M. P., & Figueredo, A. J. (2000). Intimate partner aggression—What have we learned? Comment on Archer (2000). Psychological Bulletin, 126, 690-696.
