Two incidents of partner violence are investigated using qualitative methodology to discover strategies women use to protect themselves and examine women's use of violence. Data were collected from 447 women (age 18 or older) from 7 domestic violence programs and 5 substance use disorder treatment programs in a midwestern state. Women were found to have developed numerous self-protection strategies, some using nonphysical means only, others using physical means only, and others combining nonphysical and physical means. Women often used a variety of strategies in the same incident. Few women initiated violence against partners. Implications for theory and research are discussed.
Adams, S. R., & Freeman, D. R. (2002). Women who are violent: Attitudes and beliefs of professionals working in the field of domestic violence. Military Medicine,167, 445-450.
2.
Archer, J. (2000). Sex differences in aggression in heterosexual partners: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin,126, 651-680.
3.
Berg, B. (1998). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences (3rd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
4.
Bowker, L. (1983). Marital rape: A distinct syndrome?Social Casework: The Journal of Contemporary Social Work,64, 357-352.
5.
Chase, K. A., O'Farrell, T. J., Murphy, C. M., Fals-Stewart, W., & Murphy, M. (2003). Factors associated with partner violence among female alcoholic patients and their male partners. Journal of Studies on Alcohol,64, 137-149.
6.
Dasgupta, S. D. (2002). A framework for understanding women's use of nonlethal violence in intimate heterosexual relationships. Violence Against Women,8, 1364-1389.
7.
DeKeserdy, W. S., & Schwartz, M. D. (1998). Woman abuse on campus: Results from the Canadian National Survey. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
8.
Dobash, R. P., Dobash, R. E., Wilson, M., & Daly, M. (1992). The myth of sexual symmetry in marital violence. Social Problems,39, 71-91.
9.
Downs, W. R. (2001). Alcohol problems and violence against women (Grant 96-WT-NX-0005). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, National Institute of Justice, Violence Against Women Office.
10.
Dutton, M. A. (1992). Empowering and healing the battered woman. New York: Springer.
11.
Edleson, J. L. (1999). The overlap between child maltreatment and woman battering. Violence Against Women,5, 134-154.
12.
Hamberger, L. K. (1997). Female offenders in domestic violence: A look at actions in their context. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma,1, 117-129.
13.
Hamberger, L. K., & Guse, C. E. (2002). Men's and women's use of intimate partner violence in clinical samples. Violence Against Women,8, 1301-1331.
14.
Helzer, J. E., Burnam, A., & McEvoy, L. T. (1991). Alcohol abuse and dependence. In L. N. Robins & D. A. Regier (Eds.),Psychiatric disorders in America: The Epidemiologic Catchment Area Study(pp. 81-115). New York: Free Press.
Johnson, M. P. (2001). Conflict and control: Symmetry and asymmetry in domestic violence. In A. Booth, A. C. Crouter, & M. Clements (Eds.),Couples in conflict(pp. 95-104). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
17.
Kimmel, M. S. (2002). “Gender symmetry” in domestic violence. Violence Against Women,8, 1332-1363.
18.
O'Leary, K. (2000). Are women really more aggressive than men in intimate relationships? Comment on Archer. Psychological Bulletin,126, 685-689.
19.
Osthoff, S. (2002). But, Gertrude, I beg to differ, a hit is not a hit is not a hit. Violence Against Women,8, 1521-1544.
20.
Rindels, B., Atkinson, C., Woods, C., Leff, K. A., Jones, M. B., & Downs, W. R. (2006). The Integrative Services Project: Fostering collaboration between domestic violence programs and substance abuse treatment agencies. Unpublished manuscript.
21.
Rollstin, A. O., & Kern, J. M. (1998). Correlates of battered women's psychological distress: Severity of abuse and duration of the postabuse period. Psychological Reports,82, 387-394.
22.
Sands, R. G., & McClelland, M. (1994). Emic and etic perspectives in ethnographic research on the interdisciplinary team. In E. Sherman & W. J. Reid (Eds.),Qualitative research in social work (pp. 32-41). New York: Columbia University Press.
23.
Saunders, D. G. (2002). Are physical assaults by wives and girlfriends a major social problem? A review of the literature. Violence Against Women,8, 1424-1448.
24.
Shepard, M. F., & Campbell, J. A. (1992). The Abusive Behavior Inventory: A measure of psychological and physical abuse. Journal of Interpersonal Violence,7, 291-305.
25.
Smith, P. H., Smith, J. B., & Earp, A. L. (1999). Beyond the measurement trap: A reconstructed conceptualization and measurement of woman battering. Psychology of Women Quarterly,23, 177-193.
26.
Straus, M. A., & Gelles, R. J. (1995). How violent are American families? Estimates from the National Family Violence Resurvey and other studies. In M. A. Straus & R. J. Gelles (Eds.),Physical violence in American families: Risk factors and adaptations to violence in 8,145 families(pp. 95-112). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
27.
Walker, L. E. A. (2000). The battered woman syndrome (2nd ed.). New York: Springer.
28.
White, J. W., Smith, P. H., Koss, M. P., & Figuerdo, A. J. (2000). Intimate partner aggression–What have we learned? Comment on Archer. Psychological Bulletin,126, 690-696.
29.
Worcester, N. (2002). Women's use of force. Violence Against Women,8, 1390-1415.
30.
World Health Organization. (1997). Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI):Trainer's manual, core version 2.1. Geneva, Switzerland: Author.
