Help-Seeking to Cope With Experiences of Violence Among Women Living With HIV in Canada

Abstract

Using baseline data from a community-collaborative cohort of women living with HIV in Canada, we assessed the prevalence and correlates of help-seeking among 1,057 women who reported experiencing violence in adulthood (≥16 years). After violence, 447 (42%) sought help, while 610 (58%) did not. Frequently accessed supports included health care providers (n = 313, 70%), family/friends (n = 244, 55%), and non-HIV community organizations (n = 235, 53%). All accessed supports were perceived as helpful. Independent correlates of help-seeking included reporting a previous mental health diagnosis, a history of injection drug use, experiencing childhood violence, and experiencing sexism. We discuss considerations for better supporting women who experience violence.

Keywords

violence help-seeking women HIV community-based research CHIWOS

Ending violence against women is a global public health priority (Garcia-Moreno & Watts, 2011; WHO, 2017). An estimated one in three women worldwide will experience violence in their lifetime (WHO, 2017). In Canada, women are disproportionately represented in police reports reporting experiences of intimate partner violence, sexual assault, and stalking compared to men (Burczycha & Conroy, 2018; Conroy & Cotter, 2017; Perreault, 2015; Sinha, 2013). Acts of violence are not experienced in isolation but are often compounded by multiple forms of oppression driven by social and structural inequities (Russo & Pirlott, 2006). Such inequities include access to stable housing, living in poverty, racism, sexism, engagement in transactional sex (Decker et al., 2016), and colonialism (Barrett & St Pierre, 2011). In Canada, violence against women must be understood within its colonial history. Intergenerational (Bombay et al., 2014) trauma caused by residential schools (Bombay et al., 2014), the Sixties Scoop (Spencer, 2017), and the ongoing systematic attempts to destroy Indigenous identity, language, and culture has created an environment where Indigenous women experience significantly higher rates of intimate partner and domestic violence (Barrett & St Pierre, 2011; Klingspohn, 2018), structural violence (Proulx, 2014), and interpersonal violence (Razack, 2016).

Previous research illustrates a dynamic relationship between HIV and experiences of violence (Li et al., 2014). An estimated 89% of women living with HIV globally report having experienced or feared experiencing violence throughout their lifetime (Orza et al., 2015), with 25% of a Canadian cohort of women living with HIV reporting that they experienced violence in the last 3 months (Logie et al., 2019). HIV-related stigma may increase risk of experiencing violence among women living with HIV, especially when disclosing their HIV status to a partner (Decker et al., 2016; Dhairyawan et al., 2013; Orza et al., 2015; Zunner et al., 2015). At the same time, women who experience intimate partner violence are at higher risk of acquiring HIV (Kouyoumdjian et al., 2013) as perpetrators rarely use condoms in sexual assault (O’Neal et al., 2013), the physical trauma of sexual assault can increase susceptibility to infection (Draughon, 2012), and controlling tactics can limit a woman’s ability to navigate health decisions, such as negotiating condom use (Coker, 2007). In a Canadian cohort of women living with HIV, forced sex was the third most commonly reported mode of HIV acquisition (16.5%), after consensual sex (51.6%), and sharing needles (19.7%) (Logie et al., 2020).

Violence has significant impacts on the lives and health of women (Coker, 2007) including depression (Logie et al., 2019), impeding engagement in sustained HIV care and antiretroviral therapy (ART) adherence (Carter et al., 2017; Hatcher et al., 2015; Schafer et al., 2012; Zunner et al., 2015), deterring active participation in social and health advocacy (Cho et al., 2020; Schafer et al., 2012), and a synergistic relationship between violence, poly-substance use (Carter et al., 2017), and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD; Cuca et al., 2019). While this relationship between violence and HIV has been acknowledged and integrated in both community and national action plans (Khan, 2011; Women’s Coalition, 2014), there is a lack of research that investigates how women cope with experiences of violence, including where women seek help, and the perceived helpfulness of such supports.

Help-Seeking Post Violence

Support for women experiencing violence can be critical in coping with their experiences and mediating potential long-term impacts of experiencing violence (Kaukinen, 2002; Liang et al., 2005; Postmus et al., 2009). However, support is not always available, accessible, or helpful. The likelihood of seeking and receiving help is dependent on the perceived need for services (i.e., for an immediate medical concern) and the structural conditions that shape women’s lives and agency (Cho et al., 2020). HIV-related stigma may discourage disclosure to or discussion of violence with health care providers or social groups (Illangasekare et al., 2014). Previous experiences utilizing help—particularly if a support is perceived to be unhelpful or harmful—may deter future help-seeking (Colman et al., 2014). Help-seeking becomes even more complex when we consider the multiple forms of violence that women living with HIV experience throughout their life course (Cho et al., 2020), including violence from health care providers (Green & Platt, 1997; Nyblade et al., 2009) and lateral violence from their wider communities (Gielen et al., 1997).

Therefore, using data from a Canadian community-collaborative cohort study, the purpose of this analysis is to assess the prevalence and correlates of seeking help among women living with HIV who report experiencing violence as an adult, the sources of supports most frequently accessed, and their perceived helpfulness. By understanding the current use and perceived helpfulness of support systems in place for women living with HIV who experience violence, potential policy and programmatic changes to support women can be identified.

Methods

We used data from the Canadian HIV Women’s Sexual and Reproductive Health Cohort Study (CHIWOS: www.chiwos.ca), Canada’s largest longitudinal, community-based cohort of women living with HIV. Between August 2013–May 2015, CHIWOS enrolled 1,422 self-identified women living with HIV aged 16 years and older (inclusive of cis, trans, and gender nonbinary women) from three Canadian provinces (British Columbia, Ontario, and Quebec) (Loutfy et al., 2016, 2017). CHIWOS is guided by Women’s Social Determinants of Health (Wuest et al., 2002) and critical feminism (Harnois, 2013) frameworks, which highlight the ways in which socially constructed identities intersect with social and structural inequities to impact the way that women navigate their lives, relationships, and overall health, and employs intersectional principles across a woman’s life course (Carter et al., 2015).

CHIWOS operationalizes the Greater Involvement of People living with HIV (GIPA) (UNAIDS, 1999, 2007) and the Meaningful Involvement of Women living with HIV (MIWA) (Loutfy et al., 2016) principles by hiring women living with HIV as Peer Research Associates (PRAs), undergoing training in quantitative research methods to collaborate with researchers, clinicians, policymakers, and community partners to guide survey design, recruitment, data collection, analysis, and knowledge translation activities (Kaida et al., 2019). PRAs administered a computer-assisted questionnaire in English or French supported by FluidSurveys^TM software. Median study visit completion time was 120 minutes (interquartile range [IQR]: 90–150). Each participant received a $50 honorarium after completing the survey (Loutfy et al., 2017).

Ethics and Consent

All participants provided written or witnessed verbal informed consent. Ethical approval was granted from all institutional Research Ethics Boards, including Simon Fraser University, University of British Columbia/Providence Health Care, Women’s College Hospital, McGill University Health Center, and participating clinics and AIDS Service Organizations where requested.

Analytic Sample

Due to the sensitive and potentially emotionally activating nature of survey questions related to violence, participants had the option of completing the violence section with a PRA, skipping the section altogether, or completing it themselves (without the PRA). Our analysis was restricted to participants who completed the violence section and reported experiencing violence as an adult (≥16 years of age).

Violence is defined as experiencing controlling behaviors, physical, sexual, and/or verbal violence (Logie et al., 2019). Experiencing violence was measured as “yes” to any of the following four questions: “As an adult, has someone ever physically hurt you?”; “As an adult, has someone ever insulted, threatened, screamed, or cursed at you?”; “As an adult, has someone ever restricted your actions by controlling where you can go and what you can do?”; and/or “As an adult, has someone ever sexually forced themselves on you, or forced you to have sex?”

Main Outcome: Help-Seeking to Cope With Experiences of Violence

Help-seeking to cope with experiences of violence was measured by responses to the question: “Did you ever seek help, such as medical treatment, counselling, or social support to cope with the violence?” Response options included all of the time versus some of the time versus none of the time and were subsequently dichotomized into Yes (sought help all/some of the time) or No (none of the time).

Supports Accessed, Perceived Helpfulness, and Identifying Missed Opportunities

Women were asked about the types of supports they sought after experiencing violence, including: (a) family/friends (including a partner/spouse); (b) peer support (peers/other people living with HIV, peer navigators/peer counselors, peer support groups); (c) support from non-HIV specific community organizations (staff at a women’s center, sexual health center, rape crisis center, community organization, support group for women); (d) religious/spiritual support (traditional healer, Elder, religious counselor); (e) health care providers (doctors, nurses, social workers, mental health counselors); or (f) legal advisors/traditional justice. Women were then asked about the perceived helpfulness of each support accessed by answering the questions, “Of the people and services you consulted, how useful were they in helping you cope with your experience?” Responses were dichotomized as helpful (very helpful or a little bit helpful) or unhelpful (not at all helpful).

Women who did not report seeking help were asked to identify any supports that might have been helpful in coping with their experiences by answering, “Are there supports that you think might have been or might be helpful in coping with your experience?” Responses were grouped as follows: (a) family/friends (including a partner/spouse); (b) peer support (peers/other people living with HIV, peer navigators/peer counselors, peer support groups, peer support group for women); (c) support from non-HIV specific community organizations (staff at a women’s center, sexual health center, rape crisis center, community organization); (d) religious/spiritual support (traditional healer, Elder, religious counselor); (e) health care providers (doctors, nurses, social workers, mental health counselors); or (f) legal advisors/traditional justice.

Covariates

Covariates of help-seeking to cope with experiences of violence were identified a priori based on available literature and informed by the living experiences of women living with HIV advising this study. Covariates included socio-demographic factors, including province of interview (BC vs. ON vs. QC), age, ethnicity (Indigenous vs. African/Caribbean/Black vs. White vs. Mixed Race/Other), legal status in Canada (Canadian citizen vs. landed/permanent resident vs. refugee/other), gender identity (woman vs. Transwoman/Two-Spirited/Queer/Other), sexual orientation (heterosexual vs. lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer [LGBTQ]), annual gross household income (<$20,000 CAD vs. ≥$20,000), housing stability (stable vs. unstable), education (lower than high school vs. high school or higher), experiences of violence as a child (No vs. Yes), current sex work (No vs. Yes), ever injection drug use (No vs. Yes), incarceration experiences (Never vs. Ever [but not within the past year] vs. Recent [within the past year]), number of dependents (0 vs. 1 vs. ≥2), and food security (secure vs. insecure). Stable housing was defined as renting or owning an apartment, house, self-contained room in a house or apartment, or living in a group home; unstable housing was defined as a self-contained room with or without amenities, a transition/halfway/safe house, couch surfing, or living outdoors or in a car.

Psychosocial factors included diagnosis of a mental health condition ever (No vs. Yes), resilience [the Resilience Scale RS-10, a 10-item scale scored on a 7-point scale, with higher scores indicating higher resilience (Wagnild & Young, 1993)], experiencing racism [the Everyday Discrimination Scale—racism, with higher scores indicating higher levels of racism (Williams et al., 1997)], experiencing sexism [the Everyday Discrimination Scale—sexism, with higher scores indicating higher levels of sexism (Williams et al., 1997)], and HIV stigma using the 10-item HIV Stigma Scale [ranges: 0–100, with higher scores indicating higher stigma (Wright et al., 2007)]. HIV-related clinical factors included years living with HIV (<6 years vs. 6–14 years vs. >14 years) and current antiretroviral (ARV) use (currently on ARVs vs. not currently on ARVs but previously vs. never on ARVs).

Statistical Analyses

This analysis used cross-sectional data from the CHIWOS baseline survey. Baseline characteristics of study participants were described for the cohort overall and by province. We used row percentages to report the proportion of help-seeking among women with different identities and experiences seeking help for violence. In bivariable analysis, associations between help-seeking to cope with experiences of violence (yes vs. no) and covariates were assessed using Fisher’s exact test and Pearson’s chi-square test as appropriate for categorical variables or Wilcoxon Rank Sum test for continuous variables. All p values are two-sided with a significance level of α < 0.05. Don’t know/prefer not to answer responses were excluded from the p value calculations.

Explanatory univariable and multivariable logistic regression (the latter adjusting for factors meeting confounding criteria) were used to investigate factors associated with help-seeking to cope with experiences of violence, using no as the reference category. Unadjusted (ORs) and adjusted odds ratios (aORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) are reported. Independent variables in the final model were selected based on Type-III p values (based on the Type-III Sum of Squares testing the overall effect of variables) and Akaike Information Criterion (AIC). The variable with the highest Type-III p value was dropped at each step of the selection process until the model reached the lowest AIC (lower AIC indicates better model fit). Observations with “don’t know,” “prefer not to answer,” or missing responses were removed. Analyses were conducted using SAS version 9.4 (SAS, North Carolina, United States).

Results

Of the 1,422 women living with HIV who completed the baseline survey of CHIWOS, women who chose not to complete the violence section (n = 105) were excluded. Of the remaining 1,317, 80% (n = 1,057) reported experiencing violence as an adult and were included in the analytic sample. A bivariate analysis was performed to assess differences in socio-demographic and psychosocial differences between the women included in the analysis (n = 1,057), and the women who were excluded because they did not complete the violence section (n = 105). We found a higher proportion of African, Caribbean, or Black women chose not to complete the violence section (n = 45, or 14% chose not to complete the violence section) compared to other ethnicities (p < .001). Other statistically significant differences were found among women who reported a lower than high school education (p = .021), and women with two or more dependents (p = .007). The results can be found in Supplementary File 1.

Baseline characteristics of the analytic sample are found in Table 1. The median age was 43 [IQR: 36–50], with 247 (23%) identifying as Indigenous; 273 (26%) as African, Caribbean, or Black; 456 (43%) as white; and 81 (8%) as mixed race or other. The majority identified as cisgender women (n = 1,009, 96%), and heterosexual (n = 909, 86%). While most women reported living in stable housing (n = 943, 89%), over half were food insecure (n = 685, 65%) and had an annual income of less than $20,000 CAD (n = 681, 64%). Approximately 35% (n = 369) had been living with HIV for more than 14 years, and 905 (86%) were on ART at the time of their interview.

Table 1.

Baseline Characteristics of Women Seeking Help After Experiences of Violence Among Women Living With HIV Enrolled in CHIWOS (n = 1,057) (row %).

Variable	Overall (n = 1,057) n (col %) or median [IQR]	Help-seeking
Variable	Overall (n = 1,057) n (col %) or median [IQR]	None (n = 610) n (row %) or median [IQR]	All/some (n = 447) n (row %) or median [IQR]	p value
Province of interview				<.001
British Columbia	316 (29.9)	142 (44.9)	174 (55.1)
Ontario	472 (44.7)	314 (66.5)	158 (33.5)
Quebec	269 (25.4)	154 (57.2)	115 (42.8)
Age	43 [36–50]	43 [36–51]	44 [36–50]	.706
Ethnicity				<.001
Indigenous	247 (23.4)	117 (47.4)	130 (52.6)
African/Caribbean/Black	273 (25.8)	185 (67.8)	88 (32.2)
White	456 (43.1)	256 (56.1)	200 (43.9)
Mixed race/Other	81 (7.7)	52 (64.2)	29 (35.8)
Legal status in Canada				.003
Canadian citizen	870 (82.3)	482 (55.4)	388 (44.6)
Landed/permanent resident	111 (1.5)	78 (70.3)	33 (29.7)
Refugee/other	72 (6.8)	48 (66.7)	24 (33.3)
DK/PNTA	4 (0.4)	2 (50.0)	2 (50.0)
Gender identity				.492
Woman	1009 (95.5)	580 (57.5)	429 (42.5)
Transwoman/two-spirited/queer/Other	48 (4.5)	30 (62.5)	18 (37.5)
Sexual orientation				.038
Heterosexual	909 (86.0)	535 (58.9)	374 (41.1)
LGBTQ	143 (13.5)	71 (49.7)	72 (50.3)
DK/PNTA	5 (0.5)	4 (80.0)	1 (20.0)
Household yearly income				.038
<$20,000	681 (64.4)	376 (55.2)	305 (44.8)
≥$20,000	352 (33.3)	218 (61.9)	134 (38.1)
DK/PNTA	24 (2.3)	16 (66.7)	8 (33.3)
Housing stability				.966
Stable	943 (89.2)	544 (57.7)	399 (42.3)
Unstable	114 (1.8)	66 (57.9)	48 (42.1)
Education				.057
Lower than high school	178 (16.8)	91 (51.1)	87 (48.9)
High school or higher	875 (82.8)	515 (58.9)	360 (41.1)
DK/PNTA	4 (0.4)	4 (100.0)
Experienced violence as a child				<.001
No	212 (2.1)	157 (74.1)	55 (25.9)
Yes	836 (79.1)	446 (53.3)	390 (46.7)
DK/PNTA	9 (0.9)	7 (77.8)	2 (22.2)
Current sex work				.630
No	938 (88.7)	545 (58.1)	393 (41.9)
Yes	76 (7.2)	42 (55.3)	34 (44.7)
DK/PNTA	43 (4.1)	23 (53.5)	20 (46.5)
Injection drug use (ever)				<.001
No	651 (61.6)	423 (65.0)	228 (35.0)
Yes	390 (36.9)	173 (44.4)	217 (55.6)
DK/PNTA	16 (1.5)	14 (87.5)	2 (12.5)
Incarceration				<.001
Never	596 (56.5)	393 (65.9)	203 (34.1)
Ever (but not last year)	384 (36.4)	174 (45.3)	210 (54.7)
Recent (within the last year)	74 (7.0)	42 (56.8)	32 (43.2)
Number of dependents				.408
0	611 (57.8)	354 (57.9)	257 (42.1)
1	206 (19.5)	111 (53.9)	95 (46.1)
≥2	238 (22.5)	143 (60.1)	95 (39.9)
DK/PNTA	2 (0.2)	2 (100.0)
Food security				.022
Secure	368 (34.8)	230 (62.5)	138 (37.5)
Insecure	685 (64.8)	378 (55.2)	307 (44.8)
DK/PNTA	4 (0.4)	2 (50.0)	2 (50.0)
Psychosocial factors
Mental health diagnosis				<.001
No	554 (52.4)	384 (69.3)	170 (30.7)
Yes	493 (46.6)	219 (44.4)	274 (55.6)
DK/PNTA	10 (0.9)	7 (70.0)	3 (30.0)
Resilience scale	64 [58–68]	64 [58–69]	63 [57–67]	.025
Everyday racism scale	17 [8–29]	16 [8–27]	19 [8–31]	.025
Everyday sexism scale	19 [11–28]	18 [10–27]	22 [13–29]	<.001
HIV stigma scale	58 [43–70]	58 [43–70]	60 [45–73]	.084
Medical information
Years living with HIV				.805
Less than 6 years	242 (22.9)	138 (57.0)	104 (43.0)
6–14 years	413 (39.1)	237 (57.4)	176 (42.6)
More than 14 years	369 (34.9)	219 (59.3)	150 (40.7)
DK/PNTA	33 (3.1)	16 (48.5)	17 (51.5)
Current antiretroviral use				.051
Currently on ARVs	905 (85.6)	510 (56.4)	395 (43.6)
Not currently but previously	53 (5.0)	32 (60.4)	21 (39.6)
Never on ARVs	97 (9.2)	67 (69.1)	30 (30.9)
DK/PNTA	2 (0.2)	1 (50.0)	1 (50.0)

Note. IQR = interquartile range; DK / PNTA= don’t know/prefer not to answer; LGBTQ = lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer. All percentages were weighted for sample probabilities; therefore, percentages reported in tables represent national estimates.

Overall, 42% (n = 447) reported help-seeking to cope with experiences of violence, and 58% (n = 610) did not seek help, with a higher proportion of women seeking help in British Columbia (n = 174, 55%) compared to Ontario (n = 158, 34%) and Quebec (n = 115, 43%) (p < .001). A higher proportion of women who identified as Indigenous reported help-seeking to cope with experiences of violence (n = 130, 53%) compared to African, Caribbean, Black women (n = 88, 32%), white women (n = 200, 44%), and women who identified as mixed race or other ethnicity (n = 29, 36%) (p < .001). Similarly, half of the women who identified as LGBTQ sought help (n = 72, 50%), compared to 41% of heterosexual women (n = 374, 41%, p = .038). More women who were food insecure sought help (n = 307, 45%) compared to women who were food secure (n = 138, 38%, p = .022). A lower proportion of women who had never been incarcerated sought help (n = 203, 34%) compared to women who had previously (n = 210, 55%) and recently (n = 32, 43%) been incarcerated (p < .001). And women who had ever used injection drugs sought help at a higher frequency (n = 217, 56%) than women who had not (n = 228, 35%, p < .001). A higher proportion of women who had ever been diagnosed with a mental health condition sought help (n = 274, 56%) than women who had not (n = 170, 31%, p < .001). There were no significant differences found between age, gender identity, housing stability, education, engagement in sex work, and engagement in HIV care.

Explanatory Logistic Regression

Overall, 956 observations were included in the model, after removing observations with “don’t know” or “prefer not to answer,” and any missing observations due to skip patterns in selected variables. Table 2 presents the ORs, aORs, and 95% CIs of help-seeking to cope with experiences of violence by covariates of interest. In univariate analyses, covariates significantly associated with help-seeking to cope with experiences of violence inversely, referent to no, included province of interview; African, Caribbean, Black ethnicity; reporting refugee, or landed/permanent resident status; reporting an annual household income ≥$20,000 CAD; and never having taken ARVS. Accordingly, women who identified as Indigenous, LGBTQ, having previous (but not within the past year) incarceration experience, diagnosis of a mental health condition, history of injection drug use, experienced violence as a child, and experience sexism in their daily lives had higher unadjusted odds of help-seeking to cope with experiences of violence.

Table 2.

Explanatory Logistic Regression of Factors Associated With Seeking Help After Experiencing Violence as an Adult, in Reference to Never Seeking Help, Among Women Living With HIV in CHIWOS (n = 956).

Variable	Seeking help after experiencing violence as an adult
Variable	OR (95% CI)	aOR (95% CI)
Province of interview
British Columbia	1.00 (Reference)	1.00 (Reference)
Ontario	0.44 (0.32, 0.59)	0.59 (0.42, 0.82)
Quebec	0.66 (0.47, 0.93)	1.04 (0.71, 1.53)
Age	1.01 (0.99, 1.02)	Not selected
Ethnicity
White	1.00 (Reference)
Indigenous	1.39 (1.01, 1.93)	Not selected
African/Caribbean/Black	0.59 (0.42, 0.82)
Mixed race/other	0.74 (0.44, 1.23)
Legal status in Canada
Canadian citizen	1.00 (Reference)
Landed/permanent resident	0.60 (0.38, 0.93)	Not selected
Refugee/other	0.56 (0.32, 0.98)
Gender identity
Woman	1.00 (Reference)	Not selected
Transwoman/two-spirited/queer/other	0.90 (0.48, 1.70)
Sexual orientation
Heterosexual	1.00 (Reference)	Not selected
LGBTQ	1.53 (1.05, 2.23)
Annual household income
<$20,000	1.00 (Reference)	Not selected
≥$20,000	0.72 (0.55, 0.95)
Violence as a child
No	1.00 (Reference)	1.00 (Reference)
Yes	2.39 (1.68, 3.40)	1.81 (1.24, 2.63)
Injection drug use (ever)
No	1.00 (Reference)	1.00 (Reference)
Yes	2.26 (1.73, 2.95)	1.68 (1.25, 2.28)
Incarceration
Never	1.00 (Reference)
Ever (but not last year)	2.13 (1.62, 2.79)	Not selected
Recent (within the last year)	1.52 (0.92, 2.52)
Mental health condition
No	1.00 (Reference)	1.00 (Reference)
Yes	2.97 (2.28, 3.87)	2.54 (1.91, 3.39)
Resilience scale	0.99 (0.97, 1.00)	1.01 (1.00, 1.03)
Everyday racism scale	1.01 (1.00, 1.02)	Not selected
Everyday sexism scale	1.02 (1.01, 1.04)	1.02 (1.01, 1.03)
HIV stigma scale	1.01 (1.00, 1.01)	Not selected
Current ARV use
Currently on ARVs	1.00 (Reference)
Not currently, previously	0.89 (0.48, 1.63)	Not selected
Never on ARVs	0.62 (0.39, 0.98)

Note. OR = odds ratio; CI = confidence interval; aOR = adjusted odds ratio; LGBTQ = lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer. All percentages were weighted for sample probabilities; therefore, percentages reported in tables represent national estimates.

In adjusted analyses, women in Ontario had significantly lower odds of help-seeking (aOR = 0.59 [0.42–0.82]) compared to women in British Columbia. Women who had previously been diagnosed with a mental health condition (aOR = 2.54 [1.91–3.39]), who reported a history of injection drug use (aOR = 1.68 [1.25–2.28]), experiencing violence as a child (aOR = 1.81 [1.24–2.63]), and experiencing sexism in their daily lives (aOR = 1.02 [1.01–1.03]) had higher odds of help-seeking to cope with experiences of violence. Resilience was not significantly associated with help-seeking (aOR = 1.01 [1.00–1.03]).

Supports Accessed and Perceived Helpfulness in Coping With Experiences of Violence

Of the 447 women who reported help-seeking to cope with experiences of violence, the most frequently accessed supports were health care providers (n = 313, 70%), family/friends (n = 244, 55%), and other non-HIV community organizations (n = 235, 53%; see Figure 1). The majority of women reported high levels of perceived helpfulness across supports, with traditional justice having the lowest perceived helpfulness (82% of women who accessed traditional justice found it helpful), and peer support having the highest perceived helpfulness among those who accessed it (96%).

Figure 1.

Supports accessed by women living with HIV experiencing violence (n = 447) and the perceived helpfulness of supports accessed.

Of the 610 women who did not report seeking help, 42% (n = 259) identified that family/friends may have been helpful in coping with their experiences of violence, followed by health care providers (n = 201, 33%), and other non-HIV community organizations (n = 128, 21%; see Figure 2). However, there was not one type of support identified that would have been particularly helpful in coping with their experiences. Overall, approximately one quarter (n = 163) reported that no supports would have been helpful in coping with their experiences of violence.

Figure 2.

Perception of supports that might have been helpful in coping with experiences of violence, among women who did not seek help (n = 610).

Discussion

Despite an alarmingly high proportion of women living with HIV enrolled in CHIWOS reporting experiencing violence as an adult (80%), less than half sought help to cope with their experience. In adjusted analyses, we found that women in Ontario were less likely to seek help compared to women in British Columbia, with no other significant provincial differences. Women who were ever diagnosed with a mental health condition, reported a history of injection drug use, experienced violence as a child, and who reported experiencing sexism in their daily lives were more likely to seek help. Resilience was not a significant predictor of help-seeking after violence, which suggests the importance of external factors in shaping help-seeking patterns rather than an intrinsic personal motivation or ability. While our findings contrast with previous research suggesting that women who experience multiple forms of oppression and discrimination in their daily lives are less likely to seek help (Einboden & Varcoe, 2019), they resonate with a hypothesis that women who are already connected into care through their health care providers, informal networks, and other community organizations are more likely to seek help as they have trusted informal and/or formal relationships to rely on (Barrett & St Pierre, 2011). For example, women who have a history of injection drug use may be connected with other services, including harm reduction or mental health, which may open opportunities to receive help for violence.

Previous research in a Swedish cohort similarly found that women who reported experiencing childhood violence were more likely to seek help after experiencing intimate partner violence (Popescu et al., 2010), although this connection was theorized to represent an internal resilience, which was not significant in our analysis. Furthermore, our finding that experiencing sexism predicted help-seeking may be explained by a linkage between experiencing sexism and poor mental health, prompting a previous connection to mental health care (Moradi & Funderburk, 2006); or, it may signal an understanding of violent acts in their lives and that they have less acceptance of violent and/or sexist behaviors (Rollero et al., 2019). These pathways that facilitate help-seeking need to be explored and clarified further.

Among women who did seek help, family and friends, health care providers, and non-HIV organizations were the most frequently accessed supports. However, regardless of the support that was accessed, women reported high levels of perceived helpfulness. Women who did not seek help largely did not identify that any particular support would have been helpful, although almost half (42%) thought family/friends might have been helpful in coping with their experiences. Approximately one quarter reported that they did not think any supports would have been helpful in coping with their experiences of violence.

The Canadian Violence Against Women Survey found much higher rates of help-seeking among Canadian women, with 76% seeking at least one source of support after experiencing violence (Kaukinen, 2002). However, help-seeking needs to be understood within the larger social context in which an individual is situated. The economic dependency hypothesis suggests that one barrier to help-seeking, especially in instances where the perpetrator of violence is a family member or intimate partner, relies on the socio-economic standing of the woman herself (Liang et al., 2005). Some women may be financially dependent on their partner or caregiver who is perpetrating the violence; or, due to classist biases in service provision, women who are living in poverty may not have trusting relationships with existing services (Liang et al., 2005). However, our study suggests that women living with HIV reporting a higher annual income were less likely to seek help. This may be explained by our dichotomization of annual income by $20,000 CAD, obscuring potential patterns among high-, middle-, and low-income households. Women reporting a higher income may also believe that they have the resources available to deal with the violence, rather than seeking outside help; or, they may fear consequences to their economic status by seeking help (Kaukinen et al., 2013).

Indigenous women living with HIV were more likely to seek help compared to white women in our univariable analysis. This may be due to the ongoing activism of Indigenous peoples to reclaim stolen culture, spirituality, and land (Barker, 2015), thereby creating opportunities to seek and receive help if needed (Lavallee & Poole, 2010). Women who identified as African, Caribbean, or Black were less likely to seek help than white women, which was in contrast to previous findings that racial minority status was not a determinant of help-seeking in Canada (Hyman et al., 2009). A higher proportion of women living with HIV who are refugee/other or have permanent residency did not seek help after experiencing violence compared to Canadian citizens, which remained significant in our univariable model. Therefore, a potential mediating factor could be precarious legal status in Canada, deterring women from seeking help in fear of jeopardizing their legal status. Fear of having culturally insensitive care or being stereotyped (Ghafournia & Easteal, 2019; Monterrosa, 2019) may further discourage women from speaking out (Cho et al., 2020). Ultimately, as neither variable was selected for inclusion in the multivariable model, and we may have an underrepresentation of African, Caribbean, and Black women in this analysis (see Supplementary File 1), further investigation into legal barriers that may be deterring women from accessing services is needed.

We found that a high proportion of women who are food insecure, living in poverty, and facing other sources of discrimination sought help, indicating that services provided to women experiencing violence could incorporate some cross-services such as financial assistance or access to food banks (Postmus et al., 2009). In any service provision, it will be important to be conscious of secondary victimization and institutional violence within services and institutions and the impact of institutional barriers that result in additional trauma for women experiencing violence. This will require providers to have a nuanced understanding of the way that social and structural factors, social identities, and enabling or disabling environments shape and potentially constrain the decisions that people are able to make (Einboden & Varcoe, 2019).

Sources of Support Accessed

Similar to our findings, previous studies looking at help-seeking patterns among women living with HIV who experienced violence have found that the most common types of supports accessed were family members and their HIV or health care providers (Illangasekare et al., 2014). When engaged in HIV care, women living with HIV will consult a health care provider multiple times a year, providing a potential connection to seeking help (Illangasekare et al., 2014). For some women living with HIV, developing strong social networks was imperative in coping with their HIV diagnosis (Derlega et al., 2002; Peterson, 2010). Therefore, women who already have strong networks in place in coping with their diagnosis may have pre-existing connections and networks that they can lean on. However, the stigma of living with HIV can also limit social support (Smith et al., 2008) and act as a deterrent to help-seeking (Hudson et al., 2001), especially considering that some women experience this upon disclosure of their positive status. Fear of disclosure may impede access to peer support services designed for people living with HIV. The visibility of walking into an organization for people living with HIV, or accessing services from an HIV-specific organization or program, may cause involuntary disclosure, or fear of disclosure, of their HIV status (Greene et al., 2015). Furthermore, there are limited women-specific HIV-related organizations and/or programming provided in Canada. Some women living with HIV have reported that they are not likely to seek support from an HIV-related organization if they do not see their unique needs reflected within the offered programming (Greene et al., 2015).

Consistent with our findings, accessing legal services have been perceived as less helpful in comparison to other sources of support (eg., professional counseling or self-help groups) (Einboden & Varcoe, 2019; Kaukinen et al., 2013; Postmus et al., 2009). This is unsurprising, as there may be mistrust with the legal system, especially for women who are Indigenous, racialized, or use substances (Einboden & Varcoe, 2019). This may be a particularly salient issue for women living with HIV, where threats of HIV nondisclosure criminalization could keep women living with HIV in abusive relationships or violent situations (Greene et al., 2019), and potentially discourage them from sharing openly with their health care provider (Greene et al., 2019; Patterson et al., 2019) due to the fear of HIV nondisclosure prosecution.

Systems Impeding the Ability to Seek Help

There are many reasons why a woman may not have accessed help. Some women may not be aware of any sources of support available to them (Hyman et al., 2009), do not feel like they want or need help, believe that the violence they experienced was not “severe” enough (Hyman et al., 2009; Illangasekare et al., 2014), or want to “take care of the problem themselves” (Postmus et al., 2009). Some women report fearing potential repercussions of seeking help, such as the involvement of child welfare services (Peterson, 2010). Especially after considering the history of mistreatment and systematic oppression of women living with HIV, Indigenous women, and racialized women throughout the Canadian health care (Mill et al., 2009; Phillips-Beck et al., 2020; Wagner et al., 2016), social services (Greene et al., 2014; Martens, 2019), and legal system (Cameron, 2009; Wortley & Owusu-Bempah, 2012), this is not a surprising deterrent to accessing care in a particularly vulnerable time.

Other barriers to accessing social support from providers and their social networks include: fear of abandonment; a lack of support services available; a mismatch in goals between the woman and the person she is seeking support form (eg., she is seeking emotional support, but the supporter provides informational support instead) (Derlega et al., 2002); fear of burdening their families and friends with disclosures of violence and HIV (Peterson, 2010); or receiving judgment (Illangasekare et al., 2014). Disclosure of HIV status was highlighted as a particularly important barrier to accessing social support and a lack of resources available specifically for women living with HIV (Peterson, 2010), especially for aging women living with HIV who are largely ignored in interventions for gender-based violence (Cooper & Crockett, 2015).

Moving Beyond a Focus on the Individual

When addressing help-seeking for women living with HIV, the underlying values, priorities, and histories within society need to be addressed. Care models must engage with dismantling stigma, oppression, and social inequities that are influencing health outcomes. Our analysis highlighted health care providers and non-HIV specific organizations as particularly important and helpful formal supports for women living with HIV who have experienced violence. Therefore, ensuring that those who provide care or services to women—whether in a formal or informal setting—are equipped to explore issues of safety in a supportive, empowering, and nonjudgmental manner is particularly vital.

Implementing trauma-aware practices and engraining women-centered principles may create an opportunity for women to feel safe reaching out; and for women who are already connected into care for their HIV treatment, health clinics and other points of care may be the optimal starting point (Decker et al., 2016; Dhairyawan et al., 2013). Supports offered should be flexible—including options to meet with peers—as well as responsive to practical barriers, such as child care commitments and travel costs (Wielding & Scott, 2016). In building trauma-aware care models, the focus centers on creating an organizational culture that is safe for everyone, including staff, regardless of disclosure of violence. In this “universal precautions” approach, staff and providers are trained and supported to provide emotionally, physically, and culturally safe care to all people (Einboden & Varcoe, 2019).

Dismantling harmful societal views outside of the clinic or organizational setting must also be a priority, to raise awareness, dispel stigma, and correct misassumptions that exist. One such model is outlined in the gender-based violence and recovery center at Coast Provincial General Hospital in Mombasa, Kenya (Temmerman et al., 2019) and at Oak Tree Clinic at the British Columbia Women’s Hospital in Vancouver, British Columbia (Oak Tree Clinic, 2014). Both care models provide competent medical care, and seek to respond to the societal and structural basis of gender-based violence by educating health care and service providers in surrounding regions and advocating for this training to be incorporated into medical curricula (Kestler et al., 2018; Temmerman et al., 2019).

Ultimately, in all discussions of supporting women who have experienced violence, it is important to balance individual needs with larger social responses that perpetuate and sustain high patterns of violence against women living with HIV. Supporting women to cope with their experiences is an overly individualistic approach to a structural, pervasive public health and safety issue. Strategies must support women who are seeking help after experiences of violence, while minimizing risk of future harm and responding with “autonomy, confidentiality, safety, and dignity” (Einboden & Varcoe, 2019). This should include review of institutional policies, and a critique of the broader social and political climate that normalize violence against women, especially women who live within the intersections of poverty, HIV, and racialization.

Limitations

There are important limitations of this study. With a cross-sectional analysis, we are only able to assess associations of women who report ever-experiencing violence as an adult, and we are not able to assess temporality or causality of its covariates, including assessing the time between the experience of violence and when support was accessed. Furthermore, we were not able to assess who perpetrated the violence, which previous research has found to have a significant predictor effect of help-seeking (Kaukinen, 2002), nor why a particular support was helpful or unhelpful, nor the frequency with which the source of support was accessed. Furthermore, asking about accessing sources of support in our survey has an implicit assumption that services sought are available and accessible (Postmus et al., 2009). Therefore, we are also not able to understand if women did not seek help because they did not want to, or because it was not accessible.

We were not able to tease out if a particular source of support was particularly helpful for coping with certain experiences of violence. The type and severity of intimate partner violence (non-HIV specific) experienced or the consequence of the violence (e.g., PTSD) (Cho et al., 2020) may predict which services women access.

In a supplementary analysis, we found a higher proportion of African, Caribbean, and Black women, women who reported an education lower than high school, and women with more than two dependents chose not to complete the violence section and were excluded (see Supplementary File 1). We anticipate that women chose not to complete the violence section to avoid answering emotionally activating questions about violence they experienced in the past, and thus have an underrepresentation of both groups in our prevalence estimates of how many women living with HIV experience violence in adulthood, and in our analysis. Although ethnicity was not included in our adjusted analyses, bivariate and univariate analyses show that there may be important concerns for racialized women living with HIV in accessing help, which will need to be explored further.

Finally, there are always limitations regarding overall study recruitment. CHIWOS’ peer-driven recruitment strategies, including support from community partners, were effective in recruiting women living with HIV from diverse social positions (e.g., ethnicity, sexual orientation, experiences with injection drug use) (Webster et al., 2018). However, we were limited in recruiting younger women, women with a more recent HIV diagnosis, and women who may not be publicly disclosed and/or fear disclosing their HIV status for a research project (Webster et al., 2018).

Despite these limitations, in recognizing the multitude of violence that women living with HIV report experiencing, this analysis still illustrates an important relationship between women who are seeking help and covariates that may help to inform existing services to support women who experience violence in the future.

Conclusion

Our analysis illuminates a troubling gap whereby women living with HIV are experiencing high levels of violence, yet less than half report seeking formal or informal support, despite a high level of perceived helpfulness among women who did seek help after experiencing violence. Implementing women-centered and trauma-aware care models designed by, with, and for women living with HIV and providers who care for them in any setting where women access care could help to mediate experiences of violence and create open communication between women and their providers (Women and HIV Research Program at Women’s College Hospital, 2020a, 2020b). Further research into understanding the barriers and facilitators to accessing care are critical.

Supplemental Material

sj-docx-1-vaw-10.1177_10778012211019047 – Supplemental material for Help-Seeking to Cope With Experiences of Violence Among Women Living With HIV in Canada

Supplemental material, sj-docx-1-vaw-10.1177_10778012211019047 for Help-Seeking to Cope With Experiences of Violence Among Women Living With HIV in Canada by Rebecca Gormley, Valerie Nicholson, Rebeccah Parry, Melanie Lee, Kath Webster, Margarite Sanchez, Claudette Cardinal, Jenny Li, Lu Wang, Rosa Balleny, Alexandra de Pokomandy, Mona Loutfy and Angela Kaida in Violence Against Women

Footnotes

Acknowledgements

The CHIWOS research team would like to thank the women living with HIV for their contributions to this study. They also thank the national team of co-investigators, collaborators, and peer research associates and acknowledge the national Steering Committee, their three provincial Community Advisory Boards, the National CHIWOS Aboriginal Advisory Board, CHIWOS African Caribbean and Black Advisory Board, and CHIWOS Trans Women Advisory Board, and the BC Center for Excellence in HIV/AIDS for data support and analysis, and all our partnering organizations for supporting the study.

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: CHIWOS is funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR), the CIHR Canadian HIV Trials Network (CTN 262), the Ontario HIV Treatment Network (OHTN), and the Academic Health Science Centers (AHSC) Alternative Funding Plans (AFP) Innovation Fund. A.P. received support from Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Santé (FRQS) (Chercheur-boursier clinician- Junior 1), and A.K. received salary support through a Tier-2 Canada Research Chair in Global HIV and Sexual and Reproductive Health.

List of CHIWOS Research Team

Rahma Abdul-Noor (Women’s College Research Institute), Aranka Anema (Harvard Medical School), Jonathan Angel (Ottawa Hospital Research Institute), Dada Mamvula Bakombo (McGill University Health Center), Fatimatou Barry (Women’s College Research Institute), Greta Bauer (University of Western Ontario), Kerrigan Beaver (Women’s College Research Institute), Marc Boucher (CHU Ste-Justine), Isabelle Boucoiran (CHU Ste-Justine), Jason Brophy (Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario), Lori Brotto (University of British Columbia), Ann Burchell (St, Michael’s Hospital), Claudette Cardinal (Simon Fraser University), Allison Carter (Kirby Institute), Lynne Cioppa (Women’s College Research Institute), Tracey Conway (Women’s College Research Institute), José Côté (Center Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal), Jasmine Cotnam (Canadian Aboriginal AIDS Network), Cori d’Ambrumenil (AIDS Vancouver Island), Janice Dayle, (McGill University Health Center), Erin Ding (British Columbia Center for Excellence in HIV/AIDS), Danièle Dubuc, (McGill University Health Center), Janice Duddy (Pacific AIDS Network), Mylène Fernet (Université du Québec à Montréal), Annette Fraleigh (Women’s College Research Institute), Peggy Frank (Simon Fraser University), Brenda Gagnier (Women’s College Research Institute), Marilou Gagnon (University of Victoria), Jacqueline Gahagan (Dalhousie University), Claudine Gasingirwa (Women’s College Research Institute), Nada Gataric (British Columbia Center for Excellence in HIV/AIDS), Rebecca Gormley (British Columbia Center for Excellence in HIV/AIDS), Saara Greene (McMaster University), Danielle Groleau (McGill University), Charlotte Guerlotté (COCQ-SIDA), Trevor Hart (Ryerson University), Catherine Hankins (McGill University), Roula Hawa (Women’s College Research Institute), Emily Heer (Alberta Health Services), Robert S. Hogg (British Columbia Center for Excellence in HIV/AIDS and Simon Fraser University), Terry Howard (Glasshouse Consultants), Shazia Islam (Women’s College Research Institute), Joseph Jean-Gilles (GAP-VIES), Hermione Jefferis (AIDS Vancouver Island), Evin Jones (Pacific AIDS Network), Charu Kaushic (McMaster University), Mina Kazemi (Women’s College Research Institute), Mary Kestler (Oak Tree Clinic, BC Women’s Hospital and Health Center), Maxime Kiboyogo (McGill University Health Center), Marina Klein (McGill University Health Center), Nadine Kronfli (McGill University Health Center), Gladys Kwaramba (Women’s College Research Institute), Gary Lacasse (Canadian AIDS Society), Ashley Lacombe-Duncan (University of Michigan), Melanie Lee (Simon Fraser University), Rebecca Lee (CIHR Canadian HIV Trials Network), Jenny Li (British Columbia Center for Excellence in HIV/AIDS), Viviane Lima (British Columbia Center for Excellence in HIV/AIDS), Elisa Lloyd-Smith (Vancouver General Hospital), Carmen Logie (University of Toronto), Evelyn Maan (Oak Tree Clinic), Valérie Martel-Lafrenière (Center Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal), Carrie Martin (Canadian Aboriginal AIDS Network), Renee Masching (Canadian Aboriginal AIDS Network), Lyne Massie (Université du Québec à Montréal), Melissa Medjuck (formerly of the Positive Women’s Network), Brigitte Ménard, (McGill University Health Center), Cari L. Miller (formerly of Simon Fraser University), Judy Mitchell (Positive Living North), Gerardo Mondragon (British Columbia Center for Excellence), Deborah Money (Women’s Health Research Institute and Faculty of Medicine at UBC), Ken Monteith (COCQ-SIDA), Marvelous Muchenje (Women’s Health in Women’s Hands CHC), Florida Mukandamutsa (CASM), Mary Ndung’u (African Partnership Against AIDS), Valerie Nicholson (Simon Fraser University), Kelly O’Brien (University of Toronto), Nadia O’Brien (McGill University Health Center and McGill University), Gina Ogilvie (University of British Columbia, Women’s Health Research Institute), Susanna Ogunnaike-Cooke (Public Health Agency of Canada), Joanne Otis (Université du Québec à Montréal), Rebeccah Parry (Simon Fraser University), Sophie Patterson (Simon Fraser University), Angela Paul (Positive Living North), Doris Peltier (Canadian Aboriginal AIDS Network), Neora Pick (Oak Tree Clinic, BC Women’s Hospital and Health Center), Alie Pierre (McGill University Health Center), Jeff Powis (Michael Garron Hospital), Karène Proulx-Boucher (McGill University Health Center), Corinna Quan (Windsor Regional Hospital), Jesleen Rana (Women’s Health in Women’s Hands CHC), Eric Roth (University of Victoria), Danielle Rouleau (Center Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal), Geneviève Rouleau (Center Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal), Sergio Rueda (Center for Addiction and Metal Health), Kate Salters (Simon Fraser University, British Columbia Center for Excellence in HIV/AIDS), Margarite Sanchez (ViVA, Southern Gulf Islands AIDS Society, Simon Fraser University), Roger Sandre (Haven Clinic), Jacquie Sas (CIHR Canadian HIV Trials Network), Édénia Savoie (McGill University Health Center), Paul Sereda (British Columbia Center for Excellence in HIV/AIDS), Stephanie Smith (Women’s College Research Institute), Marcie Summers (formerly of the Positive Women’s Network), Wangari Tharao (Women’s Health in Women’s Hands CHC), Christina Tom (Simon Fraser University), Cécile Tremblay (Center Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal), Jason Trigg (British Columbia Center for Excellence in HIV/AIDS), Sylvie Trottier (Center Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec), Angela Underhill (Women’s College Research Institute), Anne Wagner (Ryerson University), Sharon Walmsley (University Health Network), Clara Wang (British Columbia Center for Excellence), Kath Webster (Simon Fraser University), Wendy Wobeser (Queen’s University), Denise Wozniak (Positive Living Society of British Columbia), Mark Yudin (St. Michael’s Hospital), Wendy Zhang (British Columbia Center for Excellence in HIV/AIDS), Julia Zhu (British Columbia Center for Excellence in HIV/AIDS). All other CHIWOS research team members who wish to remain anonymous.

ORCID iDs

Valerie Nicholson

Angela Kaida

Supplemental Material

Supplemental material for this article is available online.

Author Biographies

Rebecca Gormley, is a community-based research coordinator at the British Columbia Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS, focused on the sexual and reproductive health and rights by, with, and for women living with HIV.

Valerie Nicholson, honoring her given names The One the Eagles watch over, NoDe WenDa <wolf eyes> and Auntie from the Torres Straight Islanders, Valerie is Mi’kmaq, Haida, Roma, and UK Islander descent. Living with HIV for over 16 years, Valerie currently works at the British Columbia Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS as a Peer Researcher and Co-investigator, and at AIDS Vancouver as an Indigenous Peer Navigator. Valerie is the 2018 recipient of CAHR Red Ribbon Research award, and the 2019 AIDS Vancouver Red Ribbon Award for Outstanding Contribution to the HIV/AIDS Movement.

Rebeccah Parry, is currently a peer research assistant working with the British Columbia Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS. She worked as a support worker and Program Coordinator for underserved and marginalized women from 2001 to 2010 and has been involved in supporting the HIV community in various ways since 2012.

Melanie Lee, has been a peer research associate for CHIWOS since 2012 and became a part of the National Management Team in 2018. Melanie also voluntarily runs a community-based organic co-op (Harvest Co-op) that serves produce to people living with HIV and their allies. She finds research gratifying as she learns more about humanity, her community, and herself. This work has given her a sense of purpose and belonging.

Kath Webster, is a woman living with HIV who has been engaged in HIV community-based research for over 20 years.

Margarite Sanchez, is an HIV/AIDS activist, advocate, and artist based in BC, Canada. She is the co-founder of two grassroots peer support groups, the Southern Gulf Islands AIDS Society and Viva Women.

Claudette Cardinal, identifies as a Cree Indigenous woman and has significant experience in HIV, mental health, and Indigenous-focused research initiatives. Her experiences include working as an Indigenous Peer Research Associate, a member of the International Community of Women Living with HIV–North America, and collaborating with various organizations, including: the British Columbia Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS, CHIWOS, the Centre for Gender and Sexual Health Equity, THRIVE, CTN CAC, and the Canadian HIV Observational Cohort (CANOC), among others. She is passionate about the relationships between community and researchers, and how to develop meaningful ones in a good way.

Jenny Li, is a data analyst at the British Columbia Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS, working with survey and administrative data.

Lu Wang, is a biostatistician at the British Columbia Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS, providing statistical analysis support for HIV/AIDS-related research.

Rosa Balleny, is an alumni of SFU’s Faculty of Health Sciences and currently works in social services to support and uplift the health and well-being of self-identified women working in Vancouver’s Downtown Eastside street-based sex trade.

Alexandra de Pokomandy, is a family physician specialized in HIV care and epidemiologist. Her clinical practice is at the Chronic Viral Illness Service (CVIS) of the McGill University Health Center (MUHC)—Glen site. Her main research interests are in prevention of comorbidities in people living with HIV, with a particular focus on cancers related to human papillomavirus (HPV) and women’s health.

Mona Loutfy, is an infectious diseases specialist, clinician scientist, and full professor at the University of Toronto and Women’s College Hospital in Toronto. Her main clinical practice is at the Maple Leaf Medical Clinic, where she specializes in care of women, youth, and couples with HIV and reproductive health and HIV. She founded the Women and HIV Research Program at the Women’s College Research Institute in 2006 to carry out research with and for women living with HIV to combat stigma and health inequity and optimize health care delivery and outcomes.

Angela Kaida, is a global health epidemiologist interested in the linkages between HIV and sexual and reproductive health. She is an Associate Professor at the Faculty of Health Sciences at Simon Fraser University, and holds a Canada Research Chair Tier II in Global Perspectives in HIV and Sexual and Reproductive Health.

References

Barker

A. J.

(2015). ‘A Direct Act of Resurgence, a Direct Act of Sovereignty’: Reflections on idle no more, indigenous activism, and Canadian settler colonialism. Globalizations, 12(1), 43–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2014.971531

Barrett

B. J.

St Pierre

(2011). Variations in women’s help seeking in response to intimate partner violence: Findings from a Canadian population-based study. Violence Against Women, 17(1), 47–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801210394273

Bombay

Matheson

Anisman

(2014). The intergenerational effects of Indian Residential Schools: Implications for the concept of historical trauma. Transcultural Psychiatry, 51(3), 320–338. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363461513503380

Burczycha

Conroy

(2018). Family violence in Canada: A statistical profile, 2016. Juristat, 38(1), 1–96.

Cameron

(2009). Criminalization of HIV transmission: Poor public health policy. HIV AIDS Policy & Law Review, 14(2), 1, 63–75.

Carter

Greene

Nicholson

O’Brien

Sanchez

de Pokomandy

Loutfy

Kaida

Canadian

H. I. V. W.

, & Reproductive Health Cohort Study Research, T. (2015). Breaking the glass ceiling: Increasing the meaningful involvement of women living with HIV/AIDS (MIWA) in the design and delivery of HIV/AIDS services. Health Care for Women International, 36(8), 936–964. https://doi.org/10.1080/07399332.2014.954703

Carter

Roth

E. A.

Ding

Milloy

M.-J.

Kestler

Jabbari

Webster

de Pokomandy

Loutfy

Kaida

(2017). Substance use, violence, and antiretroviral adherence: A latent class analysis of women living with HIV in Canada. AIDS and Behavior, 22, 971–985. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-017-1863-x

Cho

Shamrova

Han

J.-B.

Levchenko

(2020). Patterns of intimate partner violence victimization and survivors’ help-seeking. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 35(21–22), 4558–4582. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260517715027

Coker

A. L.

(2007). Does physical intimate partner violence affect sexual health? A systematic review. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 8(2), 149–177. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838007301162

10.

Colman

Missinne

Bracke

(2014). The role of perceived helpfulness in predicting subjective unmet need and the frequency of health care use. Archives of Psychiatric Nursing, 28(1), 43–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apnu.2013.10.007

11.

Conroy

Cotter

(2017). Self-reported sexual assault in Canada, 2014. Juristat, 37(1), 1–34.

12.

Cooper

Crockett

(2015). Gender-based violence and HIV across the life course: Adopting a sexual rights framework to include older women. Reproductive Health Matters, 23(46), 56–61.

13.

Cuca

Y. P.

Shumway

Machtinger

E. L.

Davis

Khanna

Cocohoba

Dawson-Rose

(2019). The association of trauma with the physical, behavioral, and social health of women living with HIV: Pathways to guide trauma-informed health care interventions. Women’s Health Issues, 29(5), 376–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.whi.2019.06.001

14.

Decker

M. R.

Benning

Weber

K. M.

Sherman

S. G.

Adedimeji

Wilson

T. E.

Cohen

Plankey

M. W.

Cohen

M. H.

Golub

E. T.

(2016). Physical and sexual violence predictors. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 51(5), 731–742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2016.07.005

15.

Derlega

V. J.

Winstead

B. A.

Oldfield

I. I. I. E. C.

Barbee

A. P.

(2002). Close relationships and social support in coping with HIV: A test of sensitive interaction systems theory. AIDS and Behavior, 7(2), 119–129. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023990107075

16.

Dhairyawan

Tariq

Scourse

Coyne

(2013). Intimate partner violence in women living with HIV attending an inner city clinic in the UK: Prevalence and associated factors. HIV Medicine, 14, 303–310. https://doi.org/10.1111/hiv.12009

17.

Draughon

(2012). Sexual assault injuries and increased risk of HIV transmission. Advanced Emergency Nursing Journal, 34(1), 82–87. https://doi.org/10.1097/TME.0b013e3182439e1a

18.

Einboden

Varcoe

(2019). Ethical issues in Healthcare for Women in the Context of Violence. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/med/9780190851361.001.0001

19.

Garcia-Moreno

Watts

(2011). Violence against women: An urgent public health priority. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 89, Article 2. https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.10.085217

20.

Ghafournia

Easteal

(2019). Help-seeking experiences of immigrant domestic violence survivors in Australia: A snapshot of Muslim survivors. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260519863722

21.

Gielen

A. C.

O’Campo

Faden

R. R.

Eke

(1997). Women’s disclosure of HIV status: Experiences of mistreatment and violence in an urban setting. Women & Health, 25(3), 19–31. https://doi.org/10.1300/J013v25n03_02

22.

Green

Platt

(1997). Fear and loathing in health care settings reported by people with HIV. Sociology of Health and Illness, 19(1), 70–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9566.1997.tb00016.x

23.

Greene

Ion

Kwaramba

Mwalwanda

Caswell

Guzha

Carvalhal

(2015). “Trust Me, It’s Different”: Experiences of peer case management of women living with HIV in Ontario, Canada. Canadian Social Work Review/Revue canadienne de service social, 32(1–2), 73–93. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.7202/1034144ar

24.

Greene

Odhiambo

A. J.

Muchenje

Symington

Cotnam

Dunn

Frank

Glum

Gormley

Ion

Nicholson

Shore

Kaida

(2019). How women living with HIV react and respond to learning about Canadian law that criminalises HIV non-disclosure: “how do you prove that you told?” Culture, Health & Sexuality, 21, 1087–1102. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691058.2018.1538489

25.

Greene

O’Brien-Teengs

Whitebird

Ion

(2014). How HIV-positive aboriginal women (PAW) talk about their mothering experiences with child and family services in Ontario. Journal of Public Child Welfare, 8(5), 467–490. https://doi.org/10.1080/15548732.2014.948253

26.

Harnois

C. E.

(2013). Feminist measures in survey research. Sage.

27.

Hatcher

A. M.

Smout

E. M.

Turan

J. M.

Christofides

Stockl

(2015). Intimate partner violence and engagement in HIV care and treatment among women: A systematic review and meta-analysis. AIDS, 29(16), 2183–2194. https://doi.org/10.1097/QAD.0000000000000842

28.

Hudson

Lee

Miramontes

Portillo

(2001). Social interactions, perceived support, and level of distress in HIV-positive women. Journal of the Association of Nurses AIDS Care, 12, 68–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1055-3290(06)60218-5

29.

Hyman

Forte

Du Mont

Romans

Cohen

M. M.

(2009). Help-seeking behavior for intimate partner violence among racial minority women in Canada. Women’s Health Issues, 19, 101–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.whi.2008.10.002

30.

Illangasekare

S. L.

Burke

J. G.

Chander

Gielen

A. C.

(2014). Depression and social support among women living with the substance abuse, violence, and HIV/AIDS syndemic: A qualitative exploration. Women’s Health Issues, 24(5), 551–557.

31.

Kaida

Carter

Nicholson

Lemay

O’Brien

Greene

Tharao

Proulx-Boucher

Gormley

Benoit

Bernier

Thomas-Pavanel

Lewis

de Pokomandy

Loutfy

, & On behalf of the CHIWOS Research Team. (2019). Hiring, training, and supporting Peer Research Associates: Operationalizing community-based research principles within epidemiological studies by, with, and for women living with HIV. Harm Reduction Journal, 16, Article 47. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12954-019-0309-3

32.

Kaukinen

C. E.

(2002). The help-seeking of women violent crime victims: Findings from the Canadian Violence against Women Survey. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 22(7–8), 5–44.

33.

Kaukinen

C. E.

Meyer

Akers

(2013). Status compatibility and help-seeking behaviors among female intimate partner violence victims. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 28(3), 577–601. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260512455516

34.

Kestler

Murray

Money

Sauve

Pick

(2018). The Oak Tree Clinic: The envisioned model of care for women living with human immunodeficiency virus in Canada [Letter to the Editor]. Women’s Health Issues, 28(2), 197–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.whi.2017.11.007

35.

Khan

(2011). Gender-based Violence and HIV: A program guide for integrating gender-based violence prevention and response in PEPFAR programs. USAID’s AIDS Support and Technical Assistance Resources, AIDSTAR-One, Task Order 1.

36.

Klingspohn

D. M.

(2018). The importance of culture in addressing domestic violence for first nation’s women. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, Article 872. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00872

37.

Kouyoumdjian

F. G.

Calzavara

L. M.

Bondy

S. J.

O’Campo

Serwadda

Nalugoda

Kagaayi

Kigozi

Wawer

Gray

(2013). Intimate partner violence is associated with incident HIV infection in women in Uganda. AIDS, 27, 1331–1338. https://doi.org/10.1097/QAD.0b013e32835fd851

38.

Lavallee

L. F.

Poole

J. M.

(2010). Beyond recovery: Colonization, health and healing for indigenous people in Canada. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 8(2), 271–281. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-009-9239-8

39.

Marshall

C. M.

Rees

H. C.

Nunez

Ezeanolue

E. E.

Ehiri

J. E.

(2014). Intimate partner violence and HIV infection among women: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of the International AIDS Society, 17, Article 18845. https://doi.org/10.7448/IAS.17.1.18845

40.

Liang

Goodman

Tummala-Narra

Weintraub

(2005). A theoretical framework for understanding help-seeking processes among survivors of intimate partner violence. American Journal of Community Psychology, 36(1/2), 71–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-005-6233-6

41.

Logie

C. H.

Kaida

Marcus

de Pokomandy

Ding

Wang

O’Brien

Nicholson

Conway

Loutfy

, & On Behalf of the CHIWOS Research Team. (2020). Prevalence and correlates of forced sex as a mode of HIV acquisition among a cohort of women living with HIV in Canada. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 35, 5028–5063. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.1177/0886260517718832

42.

Logie

C. H.

Marcus

Wang

Kaida

O’Campo

Ahmed

O’Brien

Nicholson

Conway

de Pokomandy

Fernet

Loutfy

, & On behalf of the CHIWOS Research Team. (2019). A longitudinal study of associations between HIV-related stigma, recent violence and depression among women living with HIV in a Canadian cohort study. JIAS, 22, Article e25341. https://doi.org/10.1002/jia2.25341

43.

Loutfy

de Pokomandy

Carter

O’Brien

Lewis

Nicholson

Beaver

Greene

Tharao

Proulx-Boucher

Benoit

Kennedy

Thomas-Pavanel

Ding

Sereda

Jabbari

Shurgold

Colley

Hogg

Kaida

, & CHIWOS Research Team. (2017). Cohort profile: The Canadian HIV Women’s Sexual and Reproductive Health Cohort Study (CHIWOS). PLOS ONE, 12(9), Article e0184708. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0184708

44.

Loutfy

Greene

Kennedy

V. L.

Lewis

Thomas-Pavanel

Conway

de Pokomandy

O’Brien

Carter

Tharao

Nicholson

Beaver

Dubuc

Gahagan

Proulx-Boucher

Hogg

R. S.

Kaida

, & On Behalf of the CHIWOS Research Team. (2016). Establishing the Canadian HIV Women’s Sexual and Reproductive Health Cohort Study (CHIWOS): Operationalizing community-based research in a large national quantitative study. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 16(1), 101–110. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-016-0190-7

45.

Martens

(2019, June 27). Birth alerts are “race-based genocide” says Mi’kmaw lawyer. APTN National News. https://www.aptnnews.ca/national-news/birth-alerts-are-raced-based-genocide-says-mikmaw-lawyer/?fbclid=IwAR23gMlj92nagWQ3vJoQNLdms3tY4PxhuK-CA1c6S_6SwAxAzz-dl6223W0

46.

Mill

Edwards

Jackson

Austin

MacLean

Reintjes

(2009). Accessing health services while living with HIV: Intersections of stigma. Canadian Journal of Nursing Research, 41(3), 168–185.

47.

Monterrosa

A. E.

(2019). How race and gender stereotypes influence help-seeking for intimate partner violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260519853403

48.

Moradi

Funderburk

J. R.

(2006). Roles of perceived sexist events and perceived social support in the mental health of women seeking counseling. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 53(4), 464–473. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.53.4.464

49.

Nyblade

Stangl

Weiss

Ashburn

(2009). Combating HIV stigma in health care settings: What works? Journal of the International AIDS Society, 12, 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/1758-2652-12-15

50.

Oak Tree Clinic. (2014, June 2). Oak Tree Clinic: Providing care to women & families with HIV/AIDS. http://www.bcwomens.ca/our-services/specialized-services/hiv-care-for-women-families

51.

O’Neal

Decker

Spohn

Tellis

(2013). Condom use during sexual assault. Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine, 20(6), 605–609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2013.03.023

52.

Orza

Bewley

Chung

Crone

E. T.

Nagadya

Vazquez

Welbourn

(2015). “Violence. Enough already”: Findings from a global participatory survey among women living with HIV. Journal of the International AIDS Society, 18, Article 20285. https://doi.org/10.7448/IAS.18.6.20285

53.

Patterson

Nicholson

Milloy

M.-J.

Ogilvie

Hogg

R. S.

Carter

Ding

Sereda

Greene

de Pokomandy

Loutfy

Kaida

(2019). Awareness and understanding of HIV non‑disclosure case law and the role of healthcare providers in discussions about the criminalization of HIV non‑disclosure among women living with HIV in Canada. AIDS and Behavior, 24, 95–113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-019-02463-2

54.

Perreault

(2015). Criminal victimization in Canada, 2014. Juristat, 35(1), 1–43.

55.

Peterson

J. L.

(2010). The challenges of seeking and receiving support for women living with HIV. Health Communication, 25(5), 470–479. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2010.484878

56.

Phillips-Beck

Eni

Lavoie

J. G.

Avery Kinew

Kyoon Achan

Katz

(2020). Confronting Racism within the Canadian Healthcare System: Systemic exclusion of first nations from quality and consistent care. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(22), Article 8343. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17228343

57.

Popescu

M. L.

Drumm

Dewan

Rusu

(2010). Childhood victimization and its impact on coping behaviors for victims of intimate partner violence. Journal of Family Violence, 25, 575–585. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-010-9317-5

58.

Postmus

J. L.

Severson

Berry

Ahyoo

(2009). Women’s experiences of violence and seeking help. Violence Against Women, 15(7), 852–868. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801209334445

59.

Proulx

(2014). Colonizing surveillance: Canada constructs an indigenous terror threat. Anthropologica, 56(1), 83–100. https://www-jstor-org-443.web.bisu.edu.cn/stable/24469643

60.

Razack

S. H.

(2016). Sexualized violence and colonialism: Reflections on the inquiry into missing and murdered indigenous women. Canadian Journal of Women and the Law, 28(2), i–iv. https://doi.org/10.3138/cjwl.28.2.i

61.

Rollero

Bergagna

Tartaglia

(2019). What is violence? The role of sexism and social dominance orientation in recognizing violence against women. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260519888525

62.

Russo

N. F.

Pirlott

(2006). Gender-based violence concepts, methods, and findings. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1087, 178–205. https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1385.024

63.

Schafer

K. R.

Brant

Gupta

Thorpe

Winstead-Derlega

Pinkerton

Laughon

Ingersoll

Dillingham

(2012). Intimate partner violence: A predictor of worse HIV outcomes and engagement in care. AIDS Patient Care & STDS, 26(6), 356–365. https://doi.org/10.1089/apc.2011.0409

64.

Sinha

(2013). Section 1: Prevalence and severity of violence against women. Juristat, 33(1), 1–120.

65.

Smith

Rossetto

Peterson

B. L.

(2008). A meta-analysis of disclosure of one’s HIV-positive status, stigma, and social support. AIDS Care, 20(10), 1266–1275. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540120801926977

66.

Spencer

D. C.

(2017). Extraction and pulverization: A narrative analysis of Canada scoop survivors. Settler Colonial Studies, 7(1), 57–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/2201473X.2016.1152651

67.

Temmerman

Ogbe

Manguro

Khandwalla

Thiongo

Mandaliya

K. N.

Dierick

MacGill

Gichangi

(2019). The gender-based violence and recovery centre at Coast Provincial General Hospital, Mombasa, Kenya: An integrated care model for survivors of sexual violence. PLOS Medicine, 16(8), Article e1002886. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002886

68.

UNAIDS. (1999). From principle to practice: Greater involvement of people living with or affected by HIV/AIDS (GIPA).

69.

UNAIDS. (2007). The greater involvement of people living with HIV (GIPA).

70.

Wagner

A. C.

McShane

K. E.

Hart

T. A.

Margolese

(2016). A focus group qualitative study of HIV stigma in the Canadian healthcare system. Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 25(1), 61–71. https://doi.org/10.3138/cjhs.251-A6

71.

Wagnild

Young

(1993). Development and psychometric validation of the resilience scale. Journal of Nursing Measurement, 1, 165–178.

72.

Webster

Carter

Proulx-Boucher

Dubuc

Nicholson

Beaver

Gasingirwa

Mendard

O’Brien

Mitchell

Bajard

Ding

de Pokomandy

Loutfy

Kaida

(2018). Strategies for recruiting women living with human immunodeficiency virus in community-based research: Lessons from Canada. Progress in Community Health Partnerships: Research, Education, and Action, 12(1), 21–34.

73.

WHO. (2017). Violence against women. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/violence-against-women

74.

Wielding

Scott

(2016). What women want: Social characteristics, gender-based violence and social support preferences in a cohort of women living with HIV. International Journal of STD & AIDS, 28(5), 486–490. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956462416654046

75.

Williams

D. R.

Yan

Jackson

J. S.

Anderson

N. B.

(1997). Racial differences in physical and mental health: Socio-economic status, stress and discrimination. Journal of Health Psychology, 2(3), 335–351. https://doi.org/10.1177/135910539700200305

76.

Women and HIV Research Program at Women’s College Hospital. (2020a, February). Caring for women living with HIV: Women-centred HIV care. https://cep.health/media/uploaded/CEP_HIVTool_Clinician_Nov24.pdf

77.

Women and HIV Research Program at Women’s College Hospital. (2020b, February). Women-centred HIV care: Information for women. https://cep.health/media/uploaded/CEP_WomenHIV_Info.pdf

78.

Women’s Coalition. (2014). Getting to the roots: Exploring systemic violence against women in the downtown eastside of Vancouver. http://www.bwss.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/DTES-Womens-Coalition-Getting-to-the-Roots-Nov-2014.pdf

79.

Wortley

Owusu-Bempah

(2012). Race, ethnicity, crime and criminal justice in Canada. In Kalunta-Crumpton

(Ed.), Race, ethnicity, crime and criminal justice in the Americas (pp. 11–40). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230355866_2

80.

Wright

Naar-King

Lam

Templin

Frey

(2007). Stigma scale revised: Reliability and validity of a brief measure of stigma for HIV+ youth. Journal of Adolescent Health, 40(1), 96–98.

81.

Wuest

Merritt-Gray

Berman

Ford-Gilboe

(2002). Illuminating social determinants of women’s health using grounded theory. Health Care for Women International, 23, 794–808.

82.

Zunner

Dworkin

S. L.

Neylan

T. C.

Bukusi

E. A.

Oyaro

Cohen

C. R.

Abwok

Meffert

S. M.

(2015). HIV, violence, and women: Unmet mental health care needs. Journal of Affective Disorders, 174, 616–626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2014.12.017

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.04 MB