This mixed-methods study explores the impact of the Vista curriculum, a trauma-informed antiviolence intervention program for women who have used force in their intimate relationships, delivered by the Department of the Air Force Family Advocacy Program clinicians. Questions sought to understand any changes in personal growth, self-awareness, beliefs, and relationship interaction skills for 62 cisgender women. Findings suggest that women gained personal growth, self-awareness, and increased relationship tools. Women identified the positive impact cofacilitator support and non-judgment had on them and their ability to heal from their experiences and increase their awareness of viable non-forceful alternatives. Policy and practice implications are discussed.
AndersonK. L.UmbersonD. (2001). Gendering violence: Masculinity and power in men’s accounts of domestic violence. Gender & Society, 15(3), 358–380. https://doi.org/10.1177/089124301015003003
3.
ArmstrongE. A.Gleckman-KrutM.JohnsonL. (2018). Silence, power, and inequality: An intersectional approach to sexual violence. Annual Review of Sociology, 44, 99–122. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-073117-041410
4.
BalkinR. S.SheperisC. J. (2011). Evaluating and reporting statistical power in counseling research. Journal of Counseling & Development, 89(3), 268–272. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6678.2011.tb00088.x
5.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
6.
CrenshawK. W. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299. https://doi.org/10.2307/1229039
7.
CreswellJ. W. (2014). A concise introduction to mixed methods research. Sage.
8.
CuijpersP.TurnerE. H.KooleS. L.Van DijkeA.SmitF. (2014). What is the threshold for a clinically relevant effect? The case of major depressive disorders. Depression and Anxiety, 31(5), 374–378. https://doi.org/10.1002/da.22249
9.
DasguptaS. D. (2002). A framework for understanding women’s use of nonlethal violence in intimate heterosexual relationships. Violence Against Women, 8(11), 1364–1389. https://doi.org/10.1177/107780102237408
10.
de Oliveira-FilhoA. D.MoriskyD. E.NevesS. J. F.CostaF. A.de Lyra JuniorD. P. (2014). The 8-item Morisky medication adherence scale: Validation of a Brazilian–Portuguese version in hypertensive adults. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy, 10(3), 554–561. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sapharm.2013.10.006
DobashR. P.DobashR. E.WilsonM.DalyM. (1992). The myth of sexual symmetry in marital violence. Social Problems, 39(1), 71–91. https://doi.org/10.2307/3096914
13.
GardnerD. (2009). Victim-defendants in mandated treatment: An ethical quandary. In McCloskeyK. A.SitakerM. H. (Eds.), Backs against the wall: Battered women’s resistance strategies (pp. 69–86). Routledge.
14.
HermanJ. L. (1992). Trauma and recovery: The aftermath of violence—from domestic abuse to political terror. Basic Books.
15.
Janoff-BulmanR. (2002). Shattered assumptions: Towards a new psychology of trauma. Free Press.
LaranceL. Y.GoodmarkL.MillerS. L.DasguptaS. D. (2019). Understanding and addressing women’s use of force: A retrospective. Violence Against Women, 25(1), 56–80. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801218815776
18.
LaranceL. Y.Hoffman-RuzickaA.ShivasJ. B. (2009). Vista program curriculum: An extended view of serving women who use force. Jersey Center for Non-Violence.
19.
LaranceL. Y. (2024). Broken: Women’s Stories of Intimate and Institutional Harm and Repair. University of California Press.
20.
LaranceL. Y.MillerS. L. (2017). In her own words: Women describe their use of force resulting in court-ordered intervention. Violence Against Women, 23(12), 1536–1559. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801216662340
21.
MillerS. L.GregoryC.IovanniL. (2005). One size fits all? A gender-neutral approach to a gender-specific problem: Contrasting batterer treatment programs for male and female offenders. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 16(3), 336–359. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887403404273944
22.
MillerS. L.ManzerJ. L. (2021). Safeguarding children’s well-being: Voices from abused mothers navigating their relationships and the civil courts. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(9–10), 4545–4569. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260518791599
23.
RietveldT.van HoutR. (2017). The paired t test and beyond: Recommendations for testing the central tendencies of two paired samples in research on speech, language and hearing pathology. Journal of Communication Disorders, 69, 44–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcomdis.2017.07.002
24.
RobertsD. (2002). Shattered bonds: The color of child welfare. Basic Civitas Books.
25.
ShepardM. F.PenceE. L. (1999). An introduction: Developing a coordinated community response. In ShepardM. F.PenceE. L. (Eds.), Coordinating community response to domestic violence: Lessons from Duluth and beyond (pp. 3–23). Sage.
26.
StarkE. (2007). Coercive control: The entrapment of women in personal life. Oxford University Press.
27.
SweetP. (2018). The paradox of legibility: Domestic violence and institutional survivorhood. Social Problems, 66(3), 411–427. https://doi.org/10.1093/socpro/spy012
28.
TylerT. R. (1990). Why people obey the law. Yale University Press.
29.
TylerT. R. (2003). Procedural justice, legitimacy, and the effective rule of law. Crime and Justice, 30, 283–357. https://doi.org/10.1086/652233
YarvisJ. S.KorbutN.MartinJ. A. (2023). Military social work in the US armed forces with a focus on service members and military organizations. In ForgeyM. A.Green-HurdleK. (Eds.), Military social work around the globe (pp. 167–183). Springer.
