This study explores the rhetoric used by Andrew Tate, known as a ‘misogyny influencer’, and its impact on his followers. Tate released a vlog in response to his ban from social media. This vlog was analyzed along with his followers’ comments (n = 300) on the video. Through hegemonic masculinity and social identity frameworks, we offer a thematic analysis of Tate's rhetoric. Results contribute to the growing body of literature on online manospheric communities and why followers may be drawn to Tate's leadership styles. Findings also extend literature regarding themes that may appear in other radicalized spaces.
AllcottH.GentzkowM. (2017). Social media and fake news in the 2016 election. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31(2), 211–236. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.31.2.211
Bowman-GrieveL. (2009). Exploring “stormfront”: A virtual community of the radical right. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 32(11), 989–1007. https://doi.org/10.1080/10576100903259951
8.
BratichJ.Banet-WeiserS. (2019). From pick-up artists to incels: Con(fidence) games, networked misogyny, and the failure of neoliberalism. International Journal of Communication, 13, 25. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/13216
9.
BraunV.ClarkeV. (2012). Thematic analysis. In CooperH.CamicP. M.LongD. L.PanterA. T.RindskopfD.SherK. J. (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in psychology., vol. 2: Research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological (1st ed., pp. 57–71). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/13620-004
DalyS. E.ReedS. M. (2022). “I think most of society hates us”: A qualitative thematic analysis of interviews with incels. Sex Roles, 86(1), 14–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-021-01250-5
DickelV.EvolviG. (2023). “Victims of feminism”: Exploring networked misogyny and #MeToo in the manosphere. Feminist Media Studies, 23(4), 1392–1408. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2022.2029925
FurlK. (2022). Denigrating women, venerating “Chad”: Ingroup and outgroup evaluations among male supremacists on Reddit. Social Psychology Quarterly, 85(3), 279–299. https://doi.org/10.1177/01902725221090907
27.
GingD. (2017). Alphas, betas, and incels: Theorizing the masculinities of the manosphere. Men and Masculinities, 22(4), 638–657. https://doi.org/10.1177/1097184X17706401
28.
GingD. (2023). Tactics of hate: Toxic “creativity” in anti-feminist men's rights politics. In BoyleK.BerridgeS. (Eds.), The Routledge companion to gender, media and violence (pp. 348–357). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003200871
29.
GlaceA. M.DoverT. L.ZatkinJ. G. (2021). Taking the black pill: An empirical analysis of the “incel”. Psychology of Men & Masculinities, 22(2), 288–298. https://doi.org/10.1037/men0000328
30.
GoldmanL.HoggM. A. (2016). Going to extremes for one’s group: The role of prototypicality and group acceptance. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 46(9), 544–553. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12382
31.
Golec de ZavalaA.BierwiaczonekK.CiesielskiP. (2022). An interpretation of meta-analytical evidence for the link between collective narcissism and conspiracy theories. Current Opinion in Psychology, 47(101360), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2022.101360
32.
GrantF.HoggM. A. (2012). Self-uncertainty, social identity, prominence and group identification. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(2), 538–542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.11.006
HaslopC.RingroseJ.CambazogluI.MilneB. (2024). Mainstreaming the manosphere’s misogyny through affective homosocial currencies: Exploring how teen boys navigate the Andrew Tate effect. Social Media & Society, 10(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051241228811
HoggM. A. (2007). Uncertainty-identity theory. In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 39, pp. 69–126). Elsevier Academic Press. https://doi/10.1016/S0065-2601(06)39002-8
37.
HoggM. A. (2020). Uncertain self in a changing world: A foundation for radicalisation, populism, and autocratic leadership. European Review of Social Psychology, 32(2), 235–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2020.1827628
38.
HoggM. A.AdelmanJ. (2013). Uncertainty-identity theory: Extreme groups, radical behavior, and authoritarian leadership. Journal of Social Issues, 69(3), 436–454. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12023
39.
HoggM. A.MahajanN. (2018). Domains of self-uncertainty and their relationship to group identification. Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology, 2(3), 67–75. https://doi.org/10.1002/jts5.20
40.
HoggM. A.MeehanC.FarquharsonJ. (2010). The solace of radicalism: Self-uncertainty and group identification in the face of threat. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(6), 1061–1066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2010.05.005
JonesD. N.PaulhusD. L. (2014). Introducing the short dark triad (SD3): A brief measure of dark personality traits. Assessment, 21(1), 28–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191113514105
46.
KochN. (2022). “On the cult of personality and its consequences”: American nationalism and the Trump cult. In Spatializing authoritarianism (pp. 194–221). Syracuse University Press.
MarchlewskaM.GórskaP.MalinowskaK.JarosławK. (2022). Threatened masculinity: Gender-related collective narcissism predicts prejudice toward gay and lesbian people among heterosexual men in Poland. Journal of Homosexuality, 69(7), 1222–1237. https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2021.1907067
52.
MarveggioM. (2020). The affective practices of incels: A social identity approach to the construction of incel identities [Doctoral dissertation]. The University of Adelaide.
MilesiP. (2022). Identity leadership, procedural justice, and group identification in uncertain organizational contexts. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 52, 886–911. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12897
O’MalleyR. L.HelmB. (2023). The role of perceived injustice and need for esteem on incel membership online. Deviant Behavior, 44(7), 1026–1043. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2022.2133650
58.
PaulhusD. L.CurtisS. R.JonesD. N. (2018). Aggression as a trait: The dark tetrad alternative. Current Opinion in Psychology, 19, 88–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.04.007
59.
ReicherS.HaslamS. A.RathR. (2008). Making a virtue of evil: A five-step social identity model of the development of collective hate. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2(3), 1313–1344. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2008.00113.x
SanfordA. G.SmithS. L.BlumD. (2023). Going viral: How social media increased the spread of COVID-19 misinformation. In RyanJ. M. (Ed.), COVID-19: Individual rights and community responsibilities (pp. 54–76). Routledge.
64.
SayogieF.FarkhanM.JulianH. P.Al HakimH. S. F.WiralaksanaM. G. (2023). Patriarchal ideology, Andrew Tate, and Rumble's podcasts. 3L: Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 29(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.17576/3L-2023-2902-01
65.
SmithA.HigginsM. (2024). Toxic masculinity and banal populism. In ÇobanS.İnceoğluY. G. (Eds.), Media, populism and hate speech (pp. 1–17). Brill.
66.
SoleaA. I.SugiuraL. (2023). Mainstreaming the blackpill: Understanding the incel community on TikTok. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 29, 311–336. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-023-09559-5
Stubbs-RichardsonM.RaderN. E.CosbyA. G. (2018). Tweeting rape culture: Examining portrayals of victim blaming in discussions of sexual assault cases on Twitter. Feminism & Psychology, 28(1), 90–108. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353517715874
70.
Suarez-LledoV.Alvarez-GalvezJ. (2021). Prevalence of health misinformation on social media: Systematic review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 23(1), e17187. https://doi.org/10.2196/17187
WescottS.RobertsS.ZhaoX. (2023). The problem of anti-feminist ‘manfluencer’ Andrew Tate in Australian schools: Women teachers’ experiences of resurgent male supremacy. Gender and Education, 36(2), 167–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2023.2292622
80.
WilliamsonJ. (2024). Sexual assault labels, compassion for others, self-compassion, and victim blaming. Violence Against Women, 30(11), 2981–3004. https://doi.org/10.1177/10778012231168635
