This study presents a framework for assessing the financial condition and fiscal health of municipal governments, develops indices for some dimensions of the framework, and applies the indices to 264 suburban municipalities in the Chicago metropolitan region. The framework is based on a systems view of local government financial condition. It shows that fiscal health is a complex and multidimensional concept with varying time frames. Furthermore, the dimensions are related but often in indirect or nonlinear ways, indicating they must be measured separately rather than combined into a comprehensive indicator of fiscal health. Indices developed here for targeted dimensions of the framework are assessed and compared to alternative indicators of fiscal health developed by others in the field.
Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations. 1971. Measuring the fiscal capacity and effort of state and local areas. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
2.
Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations. 1979. Measuring the fiscal blood pressure of the states: 1964-1975. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
3.
Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations. 1981. Measuring local discretionary authority. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
4.
Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations. 1988. State fiscal capacity and effort. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
5.
Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations. 1989. Local revenue diversification: Local sales taxes. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
6.
Aronson, J. R.1984. Municipal fiscal indicators. In Crisis and constraint in municipal finance: Local fiscal prospects in a period of uncertainty, edited by J. Carr, 3-53. New Brunswick, NJ: Center for Urban Policy Research.
7.
Aronson, J. R., and A. E. King. 1978. Is there a fiscal crisis outside of New York?National Tax Journal31 (2): 135-155.
8.
Bahl, R. W.1984. Financing state and local government in the 1980’s. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.
9.
Bahl, R. W.1996. Local government expenditures and revenues. In Management policies in local government finance, 4th ed., edited by J. R. Aronson and E. Schwartz, 77-95. Washington, DC: International City Managers Association.
10.
Baum, J. C.1996. Organizational ecology. In Handbook of organization studies, edited by S. Clegg, C. Hardy, and W. Nord, 57-76. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11.
Berne, R., and R. Schramm. 1986. The financial analysis of governments. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
12.
Bowman, J., S. MacManus, and J. Mikesell. 1992. Mobilizing resources for public services: Financing urban governments. Journal of Urban Affairs14 (3/4): 311-335.
13.
Brown, K. W.1993. The 10-point test of financial condition: Toward an easy-to-use assessment tool for smaller governments. Government Finance Review9 (1): 21-25.
14.
Bunce, H. L., and S. G. Neal. 1984. Trends in city conditions during the 1970’s: A survey of demographic and socioeconomic changes. Publius14 (2): 7-19.
15.
Burchell, R. W., L. David,G. Sternlieb,J. W. Hughs, and S. C. Casey. 1981.Measuring urban distress: A summary of the major urban hardship indices and resource allocation systems. In Cities under stress, edited by R. Burchell and D. Listokin, 159-229. Piscataway, NJ: Center for Urban Policy Research.
16.
Clark, T. N., and L. C. Ferguson. 1983. City money: Political processes, fiscal strain and retrenchment. New York: Columbia Univ. Press.
17.
Congressional Budget Office. 1978. City need and the responsiveness of federal grants programs. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
18.
Cyert, R. M., and J. G. March.1963. A behavioral theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
19.
Gold, S.1986. State government fund balances, financial assets and measures of budget surplus: federal-state-local fiscal relations. In Technical papers, Vol. 2, 593-662. Washington, DC: National Council of State Legislators.
20.
Groves, S. M., and M. G. Valente. 1994. Evaluating financial condition: A handbook for local government. Washington, DC: International City County Managers Association.
21.
Groves, S. M., M. G. Valente, and M. Shulman. 1981. Financial indicators for government. Public Budgeting and Finance1 (2): 42-60.
22.
Holcombe, R. G., and R. A. Sobel.1997. Growth and variability in state tax revenue: Ananatomy of state fiscal crises. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
23.
Honadle, B. W., and M. Lloyd-Jones. 1998. Analyzing rural local governments’ financial condition: An exploratory application of three tools. Public Budgeting & Finance18 (2): 69-86.
24.
Howell, J. M., and C. F. Stamm. 1979. Urban fiscal stress: A comparative analysis of 66 U.S. cities. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
25.
Kloha, P., C. S. Weissert, and R. Kleine. Forthcoming. Developing and testing a new composite model to predict local fiscal distress. Public Administration Review.
26.
Ladd, H. F., and J. M. Yinger. 1989. America’s ailing cities: Fiscal health and the design of urban policy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press.
27.
Levine, H. C., I. S. Rubin, and G. Wolohojian. 1981. The politics of retrenchment: How local governments manage fiscal stress. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
28.
Levinthal, D. A.1991. Organizational adaptation and environmental selection: Interrelated processes of change. In Organizational learning, edited by M. Cohen and L. Sproul, 195-203. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
29.
MacManus, S. A., and W. J. Pammer Jr. 1990.Cutbacks in the country: Retrenchment in rural villages, townships, and counties. Public Administration Quarterly14 (3): 302-323.
30.
Mattson, G. A.1994. Retrenchment and fiscal policy planning: The political culture of small towns. Public Productivity and Management Review17 (3): 265-279.
31.
Morgan, D. R., and R. E. England.1983.Explainingfiscal stress among large U.S. cities: Toward an integrative model. Policy Studies Review3 (1): 73-78.
32.
Nathan, R., and C. Adams. 1976. Understanding central city hardship. Political Science Quarterly91 (1): 47-62.
33.
Orfield, M.2002. American politics: The new suburban reality. Washington, DC: Brookings Institute.
34.
Pagano, M. A.2002. Municipal capital spending during the “boom.”Public Budgeting & Finance22 (2): 1-20.
35.
Pagano, M. A., and C. W. Hoene. 2003. Cities confront tough choices as fiscal conditions decline: Economic recovery threatened. Research Briefs on America’s Cities2 (May):1-8.
36.
Pagano, M. A., and J. M. Johnston. 2000. Life at the bottom of the fiscal food chain: Examining city and county revenue decisions. Publius30 (1-2): 159-170.
37.
Poterba, J. M.1994.State responses to fiscal crises: The effects of budgetary institutions and politics. Journal of Political Economy102 (4): 799-821.
38.
Rafuse, R. W. Jr, and L. R. Marks. 1991. A comparative analysis of fiscal capacity, tax effort, and public spending among localities in the Chicago metropolitan region. Washington, DC: U.S. Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations.
39.
Ross, J. P., and J. Greenfield. 1980.Measuring the health of cities. In Fiscal stress and public policy, edited by C. Levine and I. Rubin, 89-110. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
40.
Ruchelman, L. I.1996. The finance function in local governments. In Management policies in local government finance, 4th ed., edited by J. R. Aronson and E. Schwartz, 3-34. Washington, DC: International City County Managers Association.
41.
Rusk, D.1995. Cities without suburbs. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press.
42.
Sbragia, A. M.1996. Debt wish: Entrepreneurial cities, U.S. federalism, and economic development. Pittsburgh, PA: Univ. of Pittsburgh Press.
43.
Scott, W. R.1998. Organizations: Rational, natural, and open systems, 4th ed.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
44.
Shannon, J. P.1987. State revenue diversification: The search for balance. In The quest for balance in state-local revenue structures, edited by F. Stocker. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Land Institute.
45.
Sobel, R. S., and R. G. Holcombe. 1996. The impact of state rainy day funds in easing state fiscal crises during the 1990-91 recession. Public Budgeting and Finance16 (3): 28-48.
46.
Stonecash, J., and P. McAfee. 1981. Ambiguities and limits of fiscal strain indicators. Policy Studies Journal10 (4): 379-395.
47.
Suyderhoud, J. P.1994. State-local revenue diversification, balance, and fiscal performance. Public Finance Quarterly22 (2): 168-194.
48.
Thompson, J.1967. Organizations in action. New York: McGraw-Hill.
49.
Tiebout, C. M.1956. A pure theory of local expenditure. Journal of Political Economy64 (5): 416-424.
50.
Touche, Ross & Co.1979. Urban fiscal crisis: Comparative analysis of 66 U.S. cities. New York: Touche, Ross & Co.
51.
U.S. Census Bureau. 1999. Family households/1, by type, age of own children, age of family members, and age, race and Hispanic origin/2 of householder. Table F1. http://www.census.gov/population/socdemo/hh-fam/p20-537/1999/tab%20F1.pdf.
52.
U.S. Department of the Treasury, Office of State and Local Finance. 1978. Report on the fiscal impact of the economic stimulus package on 48 large urban governments. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
