This paper explores the effect of the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) on poor neighborhoods of Los Angeles during the late 1990s. To date, few analyses have empirically examined the impact of people-based policies on the economies of poor neighborhoods. The paper first documents the magnitude of this individual wage subsidy in Los Angeles as an unrecognized investment in poor neighborhoods on par with place-based policies such as Enterprise Zones. The paper then uses IRS and Economic Census data by ZIP Code to test whether increased EITC income has an effect on the neighborhood retail job base. Findings suggest an independent correlation between EITC investments and retail job gain. The conclusion uses these results to suggest better policy coordination and recommend four productive areas for future research.
Berube, Alan, and Benjamin Forman .2001a. A local ladder for the working poor: The impact of the earned income tax credit in U.S. metropolitan areas . Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Center on Urban and Metropolitan Policy.
2.
———. 2001b. Rewarding work: The impact of the earned income tax credit in Chicago. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Center on Urban and Metropolitan Policy.
3.
California Association of Realtors.1998. ZIP Code housing data 1992-1998. Los Angeles, CA: California Association of Realtors.
4.
Dickert, Stacy, Scott Houser, and Karl Scholz.1995. The earned income tax credit and transfer programs: A study of labor market and program participation. In T ax policy and the economy, vol. 9, edited by James Poterba, 1-50. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5.
Dowall, David E.1996. An evaluation of California's enterprise zone programs . Economic Development Quarterly10 (4): 352-68.
6.
Eissa, Nada, and Jeffrey B. Liebman .1996. Labor supply response to the earned income tax credit. Quarterly Journal of Economics111: 605-37.
7.
Engberg, John, and Daniele Bondonio .2003. Enterprise zones and local employment: Evidence from the states' programs. Pittsburgh, PA: Heinz School of Public Policy and Management, Carnegie Mellon University.
8.
Greenbaum, Robert, and John Engberg.2000. An evaluation of state enterprise zone policies. Policy Studies Review17: 29-46.
9.
Greenstein, Robert.2000. Should EITC benefits be enlarged for families with three or more children?Washington, DC: Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.
10.
Grogger, Jeffrey.2004. Welfare transitions in the 1990s: The economy, welfare policy, and the EITC. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management23 (4): 671-96.
11.
Gyourko, Joseph.1998. Place-based aid versus people-based aid and the role of an urban audit in a new urban strategy. Cityscape: A Journal of Policy Development and Research3 (3): 205-29.
12.
Halper, Evan.2006. State tax break benefits companies, not workers. Los Angeles Times, January 31.
13.
Holzer, Harry.1991. The spatial mismatch hypothesis: What has the evidence shown? UrbanStudies28: 105-22.
14.
Hotz, V. Joseph, and John Carl Scholz .2000. The earned income tax credit . Paper prepared for the National Bureau of Economic Research Conference on Means-Tested Transfers.
15.
Ihlanfeldt, Keith R., and David L. Sjoquist .1998. The spatial mismatch hypothesis: A review of recent studies and their implication for welfare reform. Housing Policy Debate9:849-92.
16.
IRS (U.S. Internal Revenue Service).1991. Data file: ZIP Code data, tax year 1991. Washington, DC : U.S. Internal Revenue Service.
17.
———. 1997. Data file: ZIP Code data, tax year 1997. Washington, DC: U.S. Internal Revenue Service.
18.
———. 1998. Data file: ZIP Code data, tax year 1998. Washington, DC: U.S. Internal Revenue Service.
19.
Jacob France Institute.2004. The importance of the earned income tax credit and its economic effects in Baltimore city. Report prepared for the Baltimore Cash Campaign, June. Available at http://www.ubalt.edu/jfi/jfi/reports/EITC-rept.pdf (accessed February 7, 2006).
20.
Jargowsky, Paul.1997. Poverty and place. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
21.
Jencks, Christopher.1991. Is the American underclass growing? In The Urban Underclass, edited by Christopher Jencks and Paul E. Peterson.Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution Press.
22.
Johnson, Nicholas.2000. A hand up: How state earned income tax credits help working families escape poverty. Washington, DC: Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.
23.
Kain, John F.1968. Housing segregation, Negro unemployment, and metropolitan decentralization. Quarterly Journal of Economics82:175-97.
24.
Lang, Robert. E., and Steven Hornburg .1998. What is social capital and why is it important to public policy? Housing Policy Debate9 (1): 1-16.
25.
Liebman, Jeffrey B.1998. The impact of the earned income tax credit on incentives and income distribution. In Tax Policy and the Economy, vol. 12, edited by James M. Poterba, 93-118. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
26.
McDonald, John.2004. The deconcentration of poverty in Chicago: 1990-2000. Urban Studies14 (11): 2119-37.
27.
Peters, Alan, and Peter Fisher.2002. State Enterprise Zone Programs: Have They Worked? Kalamazoo, MI: W. E. Upjohn Insitute Press.
28.
Quinn, Lois M., and John Pawasarat.2001. Tracking the progress of welfare reform quickly: A model for measuring neighborhood health and change. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Center on Urban and Metropolitan Policy.
29.
Romich, J.L., and Weisner, T.2000. How families view and use the EITC: Advance payment versus lump sum delivery. National Tax Journal53 (4,part2): 1245-65.
30.
Rosenthal, Stuart S., and William C. Strange .2003. Geography, industrial organization and agglomeration. Review of Economics and Statistics85 (2): 377-93.
31.
Smeeding, Timothy M., Katherin Ross Phillips, and Michael O'Connor . (2000). The EITC: Expectation, knowledge, use and economic and social mobility. National Tax Journal53 (December): 1187-1210.
32.
Souleles, Nicholas S.1999. The response of household consumption to income tax refunds . American Economic Review89 (4): 947-58.
33.
Spencer, James H.2004. People, places and policy: A politically-relevant framework for labor market efforts to reduce concentrated poverty and joblessness. Policy Studies Journal32 (4): 545-68.
34.
——. 2005. How to think about place- and people-based approaches to poverty: The significance of the Earned Income Tax Credit as neighborhood investment. Journal of Planning Education and Research24 (3): 292-303.
35.
Spencer, James H., and Paul M. Ong.2004. An analysis of the Los Angeles Revitalization Zone: Are place-based investment strategies effective under moderate economic conditions? Economic Development Quarterly18 (4): 368-83.
36.
Taylor, Brian D., and Paul M. Ong.1995. Spatial mismatch or automobile mismatch? An examination of race, residence, and commuting in US metropolitan areas . Urban Studies32:1453-73.
37.
Texas Perspectives.2004. 2004Update: Increased participation in the earned income tax credit in San Antonio. Report prepared for the City of San Antonio, November 23. Available at http://www.sanantonio.gov/comminit/pdf/112604%20EITC.pdf (accessed February 7, 2006).
38.
U.S. Bureau of the Census.1987. 1987ZIP Code statistics from the economic census. Washington, DC: U.S. Bureau of the Census.
39.
U.S. Bureau of the Census.2001. 1997 economic census by ZIP Code. Retrieved from UCLA Library Government Documents Center.
40.
Wilson, William J.1996. When work disappears: The world of the new urban poor . New York: Vintage Books.
