An explanatory framework based on the classic resource dependency perspective is used to explain a broad variety of urban government-interest group interactions that are not fully explained by current urban governance theories. A case study of Dutch urban immigrant integration shows that one must combine considerations of information and intermediation capacity to explain why Dutch urban governments interact with immigrant organizations, in addition to common findings about institutional heritage. Their information and intermediation capacity allows local governments to get in touch quickly with immigrant groups during periods that potentially threaten the social order and public safety and creates incentives to maintain grants and keep in touch, whereas contributions of such groups to effective implementation are at least doubted.
Aldrich, H.E., and J. Pfeffer.1976. Environments of organizations. Annual Review of Sociology2:79-105.
2.
Anthonissen, A.F., and P. Verweel.2004. Bonding and bridging social capital in immigrant sportclubs. Paper presented at the pre-Olympic congress, Thessalonki, Greece, August.
3.
Baumgartner, F.R., and B.D. Jones.1993. Agendas and instability in American politics. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
4.
Baumgartner, F.R., and B.L. Leech.1998. Basic interests. The importance of groups in politics and in political science. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.
5.
Bekke, H.A.G.M., and W.J.M. Kickert.1995. Public management and governance. In Public policy and administration sciences in the Netherlands, edited by W. J. M. Kickert and F. A. Vught.Hemel Hempstead, UK: Wheatsheaf.
6.
Benson, J.K.1975. The interorganizational network as a political economy . Administrative Science Quarterly20:229-49.
7.
Beyers, J., and B. Kerremans.2004. Bureaucrats, politicians and societal interests. How is European policy making politicized. Comparative Political Studies37:1119-50.
8.
———. 2007. Critical resource dependencies and the Europeanization of domestic interest groups. Journal of European Public Policy14 (3): 460-81.
9.
Börzel, T.A.1998. Organizing Babylon—On the different conceptions of policy networks. Public Administration76:253-73.
10.
Bouwen, P.2002. Corporate lobbying in the European Union: The logic of access. Journal of European Public Policy9:365-90.
11.
———. 2004. Exchanging access goods for access: A comparative study of business lobbying in the European Union institutions. European Journal of Political Research43:337-69.
12.
Brink, M., E. Tromp, and A. Odé.2003. De participatie en integratieactiviteiten van stedelijke allochtone zelforganisaties in Amsterdam [Participation and integration activities of urban migrant organizations in Amsterdam]. Amsterdam: Regioplan.
13.
Brown, M.1999. Reconceptualizing public and private in urban regime theory: Governance in AIDS politics. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research23 (1): 70-87.
14.
Carpenter, D.P.2001. The forging of bureaucratic autonomy: Reputations, networks, and policy innovation in executive agencies, 1862-1928. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.
15.
Chubb, J.E.1983. Interest groups and the bureaucracy. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford Univ. Press.
DeLeon, R.E.1992. Left coast city: Progressive politics in San Francisco, 1975—1991. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
18.
Denters, S.A.H., O. van Heffen, and H. De Jong.1999. An American perestroika in Dutch cities? Urban policy in the Netherlands at the end of a millennium. Public Administration77 (4): 837-53.
19.
Dowling, J., and J. Pfeffer.1975. Organizational legitimacy, social values and organizational behavior. Pacific Sociological Review18:122-36.
20.
Entzinger, H.2003. The rise and fall of multiculturalism: The case of the Netherlands. In Toward assimilation and citizenship: Immigrant in liberal nation-states, edited by C. Joppke and E. Morawska, 59-86. Hampshire, UK: Palgrave.
21.
Ferman, B.1986. Challenging the growth machine: Neigborhood politics in Chicago and Pittsburgh. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
22.
Fierke, K.2004. World or worlds? The analysis of content and discourse. Qualitative Methods. Newsletter of the American Political Science Association Organized Section on Qualitative Methods2:36-39.
23.
George, A.L., and A. Bennett.2005. Case studies and theory development in the social sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
24.
Gerring, J.2006. Case study research. Principles and practices. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press.
25.
Hanley, F., and C. Dacres.2005. The Bradford case. A case study about in living in a multicultural society. Paper presented at Eurocities' Social Affairs Forum, Bradford, UK, February.
26.
Hargrove, H.C., and J.C. Glidewell.1990. Impossible jobs in public management . Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
27.
Hendriks, F., and P.W. Tops.2003. Local public management reforms in the Netherlands: Fads, fashions and winds of change. Public Administration81 (2): 301-23.
28.
Herrera, Y.M., and B.F. Braumoeller .2004. Symposium: Discourse and content analysis. Qualitative Methods. Newsletter of the American Political Science Association Organized Section on Qualitative Methods2:15-19.
Koopmans, R.2002. Zachte heelmeesters. Een vergelijking van de resultaten van het Nederlandse en Duitse integratiebeleid en wat de WRR daaruit niet concludeert [Soft healers. A comparison of the results of German and Dutch integration policy and what the WRR does not conclude from that]. Migrantenstudies18:87-92.
31.
Le Galès, P., and A. Harding.1998. Cities and states in Europe. West EuropeanPolitics21:120-45.
32.
Lijphart, A.1968. The politics of accommodation. Pluralism and democracy in the NetherlandsBerkeley: University of California Press.
33.
Lipksy, M.1980. Street-level bureaucracy. Dillemmas of the individual in public servicesNew York: Russell Sage Foundation.
34.
Logan, J.R., and H.L. Molotch.1987. Urban fortune: The political economy of place. London: University of California Press.
35.
Lowery, D., and H. Brasher.2004. Organized interests and American government . New York: McGraw-Hill.
36.
Mahoney, J.2000. Path dependency in historical sociology. Theory and Society29:507-48.
37.
Ministry of Interior and Kingdom Relations.2003, Letter of the minister of interior and kingdom relations to national parliament (Parliamentary Papers 2002—2003, 21062, nr. 107) . http://parlando.sdu.nl.
38.
Molina, O., and M. Rhodes.2005. Corporatism: the past, present and future of a concept. Annual Review of Political Science5:305-31.
39.
Mossberger, K., and G. Stoker.2001. The evolution of urban regime theory. The challenge of conceptualization. Urban Affairs Review36 (6): 810-35.
40.
Municipality of Amsterdam.2003. Integratie in Amsterdam: Werk in uitvoering [Integration in Amsterdam: Work in progress]. Amsterdam: Bestuursdienst .
41.
Municipality of Rotterdam.2002. Huisvesting van moskeeën. Eindrapport Rotterdams moskeeënbeleid [Accommodation of mosques. Final evaluation of mosque policy in Rotterdam]. Rotterdam: Gemeente Rotterdam.
42.
———. 2003. Kadernotitie sociale integratie in de moderne Rotterdamse Samenleving [Policy memorandum social integration in a modern Rotterdam society] . Rotterdam: Gemeente Rotterdam .
43.
———. 2004. Eindverslag project emancipatie moslimmannen [Evaluation of a gender equity project for Muslim men]. Rotterdam: dS+V .
44.
———. 2005a. Meedoen of achterblijven. Actieprogramma tegen radicalisering en voor kansen voor Rotterdammers [To participate or to lag behind. Action program against radicalization and in favor of chances for Rotterdam's citizens] . Rotterdam: Gemeente Rotterdam .
45.
———. 2005b. Lus di trafiko. over vinden, binden en begeleiden van Antilliaanse rotterdammers [Traffic light: On finding, binding and coaching Antillean citizens in Rotterdam]. Rotterdam: Gemeente Rotterdam.
46.
O'Toole, L.J., Jr., K.I. Hanf, and P.L. Hupe.1997. Managing implementation processes in networks. In Managing complex networks. Strategies for the public sector, edited by W. J. M. Kickert , E-H. Klijn, and J. F. M. Koppenjan, 137-149. London: Sage.
47.
Ostrom, E.1998. A behavorial approach to the rational choice theory of collective action. Presidential address. American Political Science Association, 1997. American Political Science Review92 (1): 1-22.
48.
Ostrom, E., and J. Walker , eds. 2003. Trust and reciprocity. Interdisciplinary lessons from experimental research. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
49.
Pfeffer, J., and G.R. Salancik. [1978] 2003. The external control of organizations. A resource dependence perspective. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford Business Books.
50.
Phelps, N.A., N. Parsons, D. Ballas, and A. Dowling.2006. Business at the margins? Business interests in edge urban politics. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research30 (2): 362-83.
Pierson, P.2004. Politics in time. History, institutions, and social analysis . Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.
53.
Poppelaars, C., and P. Scholten.2007. Two worlds apart. The divergence of national and local immigrant integration policies in the Netherlands. Leiden University and Twente University .
54.
Posner, R.A.1974. Theories of economic regulation. The Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science5:335-58.
55.
Radcliffe, J., and M. Dent.2005. Introduction: From new public management to the new governance? Policy and Politics33 (4): 617-22.
56.
Rhodes, R.A.W.1990. Policy networks. A British perspective. Journal of Theoretical Politics2:293-317.
57.
———. 1997. Understanding governance: policy networks, governance and accountability. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
58.
———. 2000. Governance and public administration. In Debating governance. Authority, steering and democracy, edited by J. Pierre, 54-90. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
59.
Salisbury, R.H.1994. Interest structures and policy domains: A focus for research . In Representing interests and interest representation , edited by W. Crotty, M. A. Schwartz, and J. C. Green. Washington, DC: University Press of America.
60.
Salisbury, R.H., J.P. Heinz, R.L. Nelson, and E.O. Laumann.1992. Triangles, networks and hollow cores. The complex geometry of Washington interest representation. In The politics of interests. Interest groups transformed, edited by M.P.Petracca, 130-49. Boulder, CO: Westview.
61.
Selznick, P.1953. TVA and the grassroots. A study in the sociology of formal organizationsBerkeley: University of California Press.
62.
Schrover, M., and F. Vermeulen.2005. Immigrant organizations. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies31(5): 823-32.
63.
Scott, R.W.1995. Institutions and organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
64.
Smith, G., W. Maloney, and G. Stoker.2004. Building social capital in city politics: Scope and limitations at the inter-organizational level. Political Studies52 (3): 508-30.
65.
Stoker, G.2006. Public value management. A new narrative for networked governance? American Review of Public Administration36 (1): 41-57.
66.
Stone, C.N.1989. Regime politics. Governing Atlanta 1946—1988 . Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
67.
———. 2005. Looking back to look forward. Reflections on urban regime analysis. Urban Affairs Review40 (3): 309-41.
68.
Thompson, J.P.2005. Seeking effective power: Why mayors need community organizations . Perspectives on Politics3:301-08.
69.
Tijdelijke Commissie Onderzoek Integratiebeleid (TCOI).2004a. Bruggen bouwen. Deel 1: eindrapport [Building bridges. Part I: Final report]. Den Haag: Sdu uitgevers.
70.
———. 2004b. Bruggen bouwen. Deel 2: Gesprekken en hoorzittingen [Building bridges. Part 2: Discussions and public hearings]. Den Haag: Sdu uitgevers.
71.
Tillie, J.2004. Social capital of organizations and their members: Explaining the political integration of immigrants in Amsterdam. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies30 (3): 529-41.
72.
Van Evera, S.1997. Guide to methods for students of political science . Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press .
73.
Vereniging van Nederlandse Gemeenten (VNG).2003. De lokale agenda integratiebeleid [Dutch Association of Municipalities: Integration policy on the local agenda]. Den Haag: VNG.
74.
Visser, J., and A. Hemerijck.1997. A Dutch miracle. Job growth, welfare reform and corporatism in the Netherlands. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
75.
Wilson, J.Q. [1989] 2000. Bureaucracy: What government agencies do and why they do it. New York: Basic books.
76.
Zorg + Welzijn.2003. Burgemeester Job Cohen over religie and integratie: “Allochtonen dreigen de samenleving de rug toe te keren” [Mayor Job Cohen on religion and integration: “Migrants are about to turn their back to society”]. January 29, 16-18, www.zorgwelzijn.nl/archief/.
