The social and economic decline of first-tier suburbs has emerged as an important issue in metropolitan America, yet little is known about the political and policy responses to this problem. An analysis of Baltimore County demonstrates that the local government was able to implement revitalization projects from 1995 to 2005 since it had jurisdiction over its first-tier suburbs. Characteristics such as a large population in both first-tier and outer suburbs, an affluent tax base, and the lack of municipalities allowed Baltimore County to redistribute funds for these projects. I argue that if policymakers and planners are serious about confronting suburban decline, then either a regional growth boundary or a regional zoning tool is necessary to slow the pressures of urban decentralization. The political realities suggest that the will to maintain local autonomy is stronger than the will to eliminate the real barriers to revitalizing first-tier suburbs.
Baltimore County.2000. Master Plan 2010. Towson, MD.
2.
Bourne, L.S.1996. Reinventing the suburbs: Old myths and new realities. Progress onPlanning46 (3): 163-84.
3.
Boyne, G.A.1992. Is there a relationship between fragmentation and local government costs? A comment on Drew Dolan. Urban Affairs Quarterly28 (2): 317-23.
4.
Burchell, R.W., D. Listokin, and C.C. Galley.2000. Smart Growth: More than a ghost of urban policy past, less than a bold new horizon. Housing Policy Debate11 (4): 821-80.
5.
Christie, L.2005. Older suburbs are new againCNN Money . June 9.
6.
Clinton, H.R.2006. Opening remarks on First Suburbs Symposium. The Brookings Institution. Washington, DC. February 15.
7.
Cohen, J.2002. Maryland's Smart Growth: Using incentives to combat sprawl . In Urban sprawl: Causes, consequences and policy responses , edited by G. Squires, 293-324. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
8.
Cohn, D.2006. Inner suburbs fall through the cracks. The Washington Post, February 15, sec. A.
9.
Colman, W.G.1965. The role of the federal government in the design and administration of intergovernmental programs. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science359 (1): 23-34.
10.
Culver, L.W.1982. The politics of suburban distress. Journal of Urban Affairs4 (1): 1-18.
11.
Dolan, D.1990. Fragmentation: Does it drive up the costs of government ? Urban Affairs Quarterly26 (1): 28-45.
12.
Downs, A.2001. What does “Smart Growth” really mean?Planning, April.
13.
Feiock, R. C., ed. 2004. Metropolitan governance: Conflict, competition and cooperation. Washington, DC: Georgetown Univ. Press.
14.
———. 2007. Rational choice and regional governance. Journal of Urban Affairs29 (1): 47-63.
15.
Frederickson, H.G., G.A. Johnson, and C.H. Wood.2003. The adapted city: Institutional dynamics and structural change. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
16.
Foster, K.A.2001. Regionalism on purpose. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
17.
Gainsborough, J.2001. Smart growth and urban sprawl: Support for a new regional agenda? Urban Affairs Review37 (5): 728-44.
18.
Garreau, J.1991. Edge city: Life on the new frontier. New York: Anchor Books.
19.
Graham, S.2005. Baltimore County waterfront teeming with development. Baltimore Business Journal, March 11, sec. B.
20.
Grogan, P.S., and T. Proscio.2001. Comeback cities: A blueprint for urban neighborhood revival. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
21.
Hanlon, B.F., T.J. Vicino, and J.R. Short.2006. The new metropolitan reality in the US: rethinking the traditional model. Urban Studies43 (12): 2129-43.
22.
Hanlon, B.F., and T.J. Vicino.2007. The fate of inner suburbs: Evidence from metropolitan Baltimore. Urban Geography28 (3): 249-275.
23.
Hudnut, W.H., III.2003. Halfway to everywhere: A portrait of America's first-tier suburbs. Washington, DC: Urban Land Institute.
24.
Jackson, K.1985. Crabgrass frontier: The suburbanization of the United States. New York: Oxford Univ. Press .
Knaap, G.J.2001. Land market monitoring for smart urban growth. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
27.
Lee, S., and N.G. Leigh.2005: The role of inner ring suburbs in metropolitan smart growth strategies. Journal of Planning Literature19:330-46.
28.
Leigh, N.G., and S. Lee.2005. Philadelphia's space in between: Inner-ring suburb evolutionOpolis: An International Journal of Suburban and Metropolitan Studies1 (1): 13-32.
29.
Lucy, W.H., and D.L. Phillips.2000. Confronting suburban decline: Strategic planning for metropolitan renewal. Washington, DC: Island Press.
30.
———. 2006. Tomorrow's cities, tomorrow's suburbs. Chicago: American Planning Association Planner's Press .
31.
Malarkey, J.2006. Housing, business boom in countyThe Baltimore Examiner, April 24.
32.
———. 2007. Demolition of blighted apartments to beginThe Baltimore Examiner, January 22.
33.
Mosher, J.2005. Sale of Dundalk Village Shopping Center hailed as redevelopmentThe Daily Record, March 14, sec A.
34.
———. 2006. Baltimore County to buy troubled Dundalk apartment complex . The Daily Record, March 28, sec. A.
35.
Nelson, A.C., and K.A. Foster.1999. Metropolitan governance structure and income growth. Journal of Urban Affairs21 (3): 309-24.
36.
Niedt, C.2006. Gentrification and the grassroots: Popular support in the revanchist suburb. Journal of Urban Affairs28 (2): 99-120.
———. 2001b. Prospects for regional governance under the new regionalism: Economic imperatives versus political impediments. Journal of Urban Affairs23 (5): 557-71.
39.
Ohlemacher, S.2006. Report: suburbs nearer to cities neglected. The Washington Post, February 15, sec. B.
40.
Orfield, M.1997. Metropolitics: A regional agenda for community and stability . Washington DC: Brookings Institution Press.
41.
———. 2002. American metropolitics: The new suburban reality. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
42.
Ostrom, V., C.M. Tiebout, and R. Warren.1961. The organization of government in metropolitan areas: A theoretical inquiry. American Political Science Review55:831-42.
43.
Ostrom, E., R. Gardner, and J. Walker.1994. Rules, games, and common-pool resources . Ann Arbor, MI: Univ. of Michigan Press.
44.
Ott, T.2006. Cuyahoga's old `burbs need work, report says. Cleveland Plain Dealer, February 15, sec. A.
45.
Outen, D.2005. Baltimore County, Maryland: Using the entire toolkit for habitat protection. In Nature-friendly communities: Habitat protection and land use planning, edited by C. Duerksen and C. Snyder, 152-73. Washington, DC: Island Press.
46.
Palen, J.J.1994. The suburbs. New York: McGraw-Hill.
47.
Phares, D., ed. 2004. Metropolitan governance without government?Aldershot, UK: Ashgate Publishing.
48.
Porter, D.R.1999. Will “Smart Growth” produce “Smart Growth? ” The Abell Report12 (January): 1-8.
49.
Puentes, R., and M. Orfield.2002. Valuing America's first suburbs: A policy agenda for older suburbs in the Midwest. Washington, DC : The Brookings Institution Metropolitan Policy Center.
50.
Puentes, R.,. and D. Warren.2006. One-fifth of America: A comprehensive guide to America's first suburbs. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution Metropolitan Policy Center.
51.
Reutter, M.2004. Making steel: Sparrows Point and the rise and ruin of American industrial might. Urbana and Chicago: Univ. of Illinois Press.
52.
Rochefort, D.A. and R.W. Cobb., eds. 1994. The politics of problem definition: Shaping the policy agenda. Lawrence, KS: University. Press of Kansas.
Savitch, H.V., and R. Vogel.2000. Metropolitan consolidation versus metropolitan governance in Louisville. State and Local Government Review32 (3): 198-212.
55.
Short, J.R.2007. Liquid city: Megalopolis and the contemporary Northeast . Washington, DC: RFF Press.
56.
Smith, N., P. Caris, and E. Wyly.2001. The “Camden syndrome” and the menace of suburban decline: Residential disinvestment and its discontents in Camden County, New Jersey . Urban Affairs Review36 (4): 497-531.
57.
Smith, J.T.2006. Smith seeks council approval to purchase York Park Apartments press release, March 27Office of the County Executive . Towson, MD.
58.
Squires, G. D., ed. 2002. Urban sprawl: Causes, consequences, and policy responses. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute Press.
59.
Teaford, J.C.1979. City and suburb: The political fragmentation of metropolitan America, 1850-1970. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
60.
———. 2008. The American suburb: The basics. New York: Routledge.
61.
Tiebout, C.1956. A pure theory of local expenditures. Journal of Political Economy64 (5): 416-24.
62.
Vale, L.J.1995. The imaging of the city. Communication Research22 (6): 646-63.
63.
Vicino, T.J., S. Sharkey, A. Regan, E. Shockley, L. Gottlieb, B. Hwang, and J. Wilson.2004. Affordable housing in metropolitan Maryland: A policy analysis. Governor's Commission on Housing Policy . Annapolis, MD.
64.
Vicino, T.J., B.F. Hanlon, and J.R. Short.2007. Megalopolis 50 years on: The transformation of a city region. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research31 (2): 344-67.
65.
Weir, M., H. Wolman, and T. Swanstrom.2005. The calculus of coalitions: Cities, suburbs, and the metropolitan agenda. Urban Affairs Review40 (6): 730-60.
66.
Wheeler, T.2005. Baltimore's inner suburbs show signs of aging. The Baltimore Sun, May 12, sec. A.
67.
Wolman, H. L., and E. J. Agius, eds. 1996. National urban policy: Problems and prospects. Detroit: Wayne State Univ. Press.
