Principal—agent models in public administration concentrate upon policy drift—when agencies allow policy to drift away from the bliss point of executive politicians. We distinguish two types of policy drift: policy shifting and agent shirking. The first occurs when agents' political bliss points are located differently from those of their principals. The second occurs when agents do not competently carry out their principals' wishes. One response to policy shift is to appoint agents who share the bliss point of the principal, allowing the reduction of costly monitoring. Through 10 cases in three Israeli cities where political appointments were made to push through structural changes to contract out services, we show that political appointees are less effective than career bureaucrats, so that solving shifting often increases shirking, especially when monitoring is reduced. The agency problems thus created were only solved by increasing monitoring and returning to career civil servants.
Aberbach, Joel D., and Bert A. Rockman .1994. Civil servants and policymakers: Neutral or responsive competence?International Journal of Policy and Administration7 (4): 469-91.
2.
---. 1997. Back to the future? Senior federal executives in the United States. Governance: An International Journal of Policy and Administration10 (4): 323-49.
3.
---. 2000. In the web of politics: Three decades of the U.S. federal executive. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
4.
Banks, J., and B. Weingast.1992. The political control of bureaucracies under asymmetric information. American Journal of Political Science36 (2): 509-24.
5.
Bawn, Kathleen.1997. Choosing strategies to control the bureaucracy: Statutory constraints, oversight, and the committee system. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization13 (1): 101-26.
6.
Bel, G., and A. Costas.2006. Do public sector reforms get rusty? Local privatization in pain. Journal of Economic Policy Reform9 (1): 1-24.
7.
Bel, G., and A. Miralles.2003. Factors influencing the privatization of urban solid waste collection in Spain. Urban Studies40 (7): 1323-34.
8.
Ben-Elia, N.1996. Strategic changes and organizational reorientations in local government: A cross-national perspective. New York : Macmillan.
9.
---. 2004. The fourth generation: New local government for Israel . Floersheimer Studies, Institute of Urban and Regional Studies, Hebrew University. [Hebrew.]
10.
Bendor, J., S. Taylor, and R. van Gaalen.1987. Politicians, bureaucrats and asymmetric information. American Journal of Political Science31:796-828.
11.
Blais, A., and S. Dion.1991. The budget-maximizing bureaucrat. Pittsburgh: Univ. of Pittsburgh Press.
12.
Boyne, G.A.1998. The determinants of variations in local service contracting: Garbage in, garbage out?Urban Affairs Review34 (1): 150-63.
13.
Bok, Derek2003. Government personnel policy in comparative perspective . In For the people: Can we fix public service? edited by John D. Donahue and Joseph S. Nye Jr.Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
14.
Brehm, John, and Scott Gates.1990. Supervision and compliance. Paper presented to the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, San Francisco, CA.
15.
---. 1997. Working, shirking and sabotage: Bureaucratic response to a democratic public. Ann Arbor: Univ. of Michigan Press.
16.
Brichta, A.1998. Don't shed a tear: The decline of political parties in local governments. In The demise of parties in Israel, edited by D. Korn and Hakibbutz Hameuchad. [Hebrew.]
17.
Brichta, A., and A. Pedahzur.2001. Elections to the local authorities in Israel-1998: Continuity or change?Ramot, Tel Aviv University . [Hebrew.]
18.
Brown, Trevor L., and Matthew Potoski .2004. Managing the public service market. Public Administration Review64 (6): 656-68.
19.
Brudney, Jeffrey L., Sergio Fenrnandez, Jay Eunghas Ryu, and Deil S. Wright .2005. Exploring and explaining contracting out: Patterns among the American states. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory15 (3): 393-419.
20.
Calvert, Randall L., Mathew D. McCubbins, and Barry R. Weingast .1989. A theory of political control and agency discretion. American Journal of Political Science33:588-611.
21.
Chandler, T., and P. Feuille.1991. Municipal unions and privatization. Public Administration Review51 (1): 15-22.
22.
---. 1994. Cities, unions and the privatization of sanitation services . Journal of Labor Research15 (1): 53-71.
23.
Cohen, David M.1998. Amateur government. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory8:450-97.
24.
Cronin, Thomas E.1980. The state of the presidency. 2nd ed. Boston: Little, Brown.
25.
Derlien, Hans-Ulrich.1996. The politicization of bureaucracies in historical perspective . In Agenda for excellence 2: Administering the state, edited by B. Guy Peters and Bert A. Rockman, 149-62. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
26.
Dery, D.1993. Political appointments in Israel: Between statehood and partisanship. Hakibbutz Hameuchad: The Israel Democracy Institute. [Hebrew.]
27.
---. 1999. Local governments: De-facto decentralization. In Public Policy in Israel, edited by D. Nachimias and G. Menahem.Hakibbutz Hameuchad: The Israel Democracy Institute .
28.
Donahue, John D.1989. The privatization decision: Public ends, private means . New York: Basic Books.
Dunleavy, Patrick.1991. Bureaucracy, democracy and public choice. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
31.
Edwards, George C., III, Robert L. Linberry, and Martin P. Wattenberg.2006. Government in America. New York: Pearson Education.
32.
Elazar, D., and C. Kalchheim.1988. Local government in Israel. Jerusalem and Lanham, MD: Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs and Univ. of America Press.
Ferlie, E., L. Ashburner, L. Fitzgerald, and A. Pettigrew.1996. The new public management in action . Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press .
35.
Ferris, J., and E. Graddy.1988. Production choices for local government services. Journal of Urban Affairs10 (3): 273-89.
36.
Flynn, N., and F. Strehl.1996. Public sector management in Europe. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
37.
Galnoor, I.2007. Public administration in Israel: Development, structure, functions and reforms. Akademon Publications, The Hebrew Univ. [Hebrew.]
38.
Galnoor, I., D. Rosenbloom, and A. Yaroni.1999. Reform of the public administration in Israel. In Public policy in Israel, edited by D. Nachmias and G. Menahem.Hakibbutz Hameuchad: The Israel Democracy Institute. [Hebrew.]
39.
Hammond, Thomas H., and Jeffrey S. Hill .1993. Deference or preference? Explaining senate confirmation of presidential nominees to administrative agencies. Journal of Theoretical Politics5 (1): 23-59.
40.
Hammond, Thomas H., and Jack H. Knott .1996. Who controls the bureaucracy? Presidential power, congressional dominance, legal constraints, and bureaucratic autonomy in a model of multidimensional policy-making. Journal of Law Economics and Organization12 (1): 119-66.
41.
Harris, Milton, and Artur Raviv.1979. Optimal incentive contracts with imperfect information. Journal of Economic Theory20:231-59.
42.
Hayes, Kathy, and Semoon Chang.1990. The relative efficiency of city manager and mayor-council form of government. Southern Economic Journal57 (1): 167-77.
43.
Heclo, Hugh.1975. OMB and the presidency-The problem of "neutral competence ." The Public Interest38:80-98.
44.
---. 1977. A government of strangers: Politics in Washington. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
45.
Hirsch, W.Z.1995a. Contracting out by urban governments: A review. Urban Affairs Review30 (3): 458-72.
46.
---. 1995b. Factors important in local governments' privatization decisions. Urban Affairs Review31 (2): 226-43.
47.
Holmstrom, Bengt.1979. Moral hazard and observability. Bell Journal of Economics10:74-91. ---. 1982. Moral hazard in teams. Bell Journal of Economics13:324-40.
48.
Horn, Murray.1995. The political economy of public administration. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press.
49.
Huber, John D., and N. McCarty.2004. Bureaucratic capacity, delegation, and political reform. American Political Science Review98 (3): 481-94.
50.
Huber, John D., and Charles R. Shipan .2002. Deliberate discretion? The institutional foundations of bureaucratic autonomy. Cambridge , UK: Cambridge Univ. Press.
51.
Ingraham, P.W.1987. Building bridges or burning them? The president, the appointees and the bureaucracy. Public Administration Review47:35-45.
52.
Joassart-Marcelli, P., and J. Musso.2005. Municipal service provision choices within a metropolitan area. Urban Affairs Review40 (4): 492-519.
53.
Kaufman, Herbert.1965. The growth of the federal personnel system. In The federal government service, edited by Wallace S. Sayre, 7-69. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
54.
Laffont, Jean-Jacques, and David Martimort .2001. The theory of incentive: The principal- agent model. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.
55.
Lamothe, Scott, Meeyoung Lamothe, and Richard C. Feiock .2008. Examining local government service delivery arrangements over time. Urban Affairs Review44 (1): 27-56.
56.
Lane, J.E.2000. New public management. London: Sage.
57.
Lewis, David E.2007. Testing Pendleton's premise: Do political appointees make worse bureaucrats?Journal of Politics69 (4): 1073-88.
58.
Lupia, Arthur, and Mathew McCubbins .1994. Learning from oversight: Fire alarms and police patrols reconstructed. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organisation10:96-125.
59.
Maranto, Robert.1988. Thinking the unthinkable in public administration: A case for spoils in the federal bureaucracy. Administration and Society29 (6): 623-42.
60.
---. 2001. Why the president should ignore calls to reduce the number of political appointees. The Heritage Foundation Backgrounder1413.
61.
---. 2005. Beyond a government of strangers. Lanham, MD: Lexington.
62.
McCubbins, Mathew, and Thomas Schwartz .1984. Congressional oversight overlooked: Police patrols versus fire alarms. American Journal of Political Science28:165-79.
63.
McGinnis, Michael D.1999. Polycentricity and local public economics. Ann Arbor: Michigan Univ. Press.
64.
McGuire, R.A., R.L. Ohsfeldt, and T.N. Van Cott .1987. The determinants of the choice between public and private production of a publicly funded service. Public Choice54 (3): 211-31.
65.
Miller, Gary J., and Andrew B. Whitford .2006. The principal's moral hazard: Constraints on the use of incentives in hierarchy. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory17:213-33.
66.
Ministry of Interior: Local Government Administration.2008. A useful guide for a mayor in local government. The Ministry of the Interior: Local Government Administration. [Hebrew.]
67.
Moe, Terry M.1985a. The politicized presidency. In The new direction in American politics, edited by J. E. Chubb and P. E. Peterson, 267-329. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
68.
---. 1985b. Control and feedback in economic regulation: The case of the NLRB. American Political Science Review79:1094-116.
69.
---. 1989. The politics of bureaucratic structure. In Can the government govern? edited by John Chibb and Paul Peterson.Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
70.
Moon, Jae M., and Peter DeLeon .2001. Municipal reinvention: Managerial values and diffusion among municipalities. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory1193:327-51.
71.
Nathan, Richard.1983. The administrative presidency. New York: Wiley.
72.
Osborne, David and Ted Gaebler1993. Reinventing GovernmentReading, MA: Addison-Wesley
73.
Page, Edward C.1992. Political authority and bureaucratic power: A comparative analysis. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
74.
Peters, B. Guy.1989. The politics of bureaucracy. 3rd ed. New York: Longman.
75.
Peters, B. Guy, and Jon Pierre.2001. Politicians, bureaucrats and administrative reform. London: Routledge.
76.
Pollit, C., J. Birchall, and K. Putnam.1999. Letting managers manage: Decentralization and opting out. In The new management of British local governance, edited by Gerry Stoker. London: Macmillan .
77.
Savas, E.S.1978. The institutional structure of local government services: A conceptual model. Public Administration Review5 (Sept/Oct): 412-19.
78.
---. 2000. Privatization and public-private partnerships. New York: Chatham House.
79.
Sharpe, L.J., and Kenneth Newton.1984. Does politics matter? The determinant of public policy. Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press.
80.
Smith, G., and N.W. Polsby.1981. British government and its discontents . New York: Basic Books.
81.
Stoker, G., ed. 1999. The new management of British local governance. London: Macmillan.
82.
Suleiman, Ezra.2003. Dismantling democratic states. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.
83.
Wilson, James Q.1989. Bureaucracy: What government agencies do and why they do it. New York: Basic Books.
84.
Wood, B. Dan, and W. Richard Waterman .1991. The dynamics of political control of the bureaucracy. American Political Science Review85 (3): 801-21.
85.
Zamir, I.1990. Political appointments. Mishpatim20:19-42. [Hebrew.]
