Impact of a Woman Mayor on Women's Local Political Participation. Does Partisanship Matter?

Abstract

Although women's presence in politics has grown, they remain underrepresented. This study analyses how exposure to successful women politicians influences the future representation of women candidates in local politics. It also explores whether these effects vary according to candidates’ affiliation, distinguishing between those running as members of political parties and those running independently. Using a quasi-experimental design and data from two types of local elections—mayoral and council races in Poland—the study finds that exposure to a woman politician has different implications for women, depending on whether they run on party tickets or independently. These findings add to existing research on women's local political participation and suggest that independent candidacy deserves closer attention in discussions of gender and political representation in local and regional governance.

JEL codes: D72, P16

Keywords

women's political participation local elections regression discontinuity design independent candidacy political representation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aars

Ringkjøb

. 2005. “Party Politicisation Reversed? Non-Partisan Alternatives in Norwegian Local Politics.” Scandinavian Political Studies 28: 161–81. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0080-6757.2005.00126.x.

Badas

Stauffer

K. E.

. 2019. “Voting for Women in Nonpartisan and Partisan Elections.” Electoral Studies 57: 245–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2018.10.004.

Badas

Stauffer

K. E.

. 2023. “Gender and Ambition among Potential law Clerks.” Journal of Law and Courts 11 (1): 116–40.

Bartnicki

Alimowski

Górecki

. 2022. “The Anomalous Electoral Advantage: Evidence from Over 17,000 Mayoral Candidacies in Poland.” European Journal of Political Economy 72: 1–21.

Baskaran

Hessami

. 2018. “Does the Election of a Female Leader Clear the way for More Women in Politics?” American Economic Journal: Economic Policy 10 (3): 95–121. https://doi.org/10.1257/pol.20170045.

Bauer

N. M.

2020a. “Running Local: Gender Stereotyping and Women Candidates in Local Elections.” Urban Affairs Review 56 (1): 96–123.

Bauer

N. M.

2020b. “Shifting Standards: How Voters Evaluate the Qualifications of Female and Male Candidates.” The Journal of Politics 82 (1): 96–123. https://doi.org/10.1086/705817.

Beaman

Chattopadhyay

Duflo

Pande

Topalova

. 2009. “Powerful Women: Does Exposure Reduce Bias?” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 124 (4): 1497–540. https://doi.org/10.1162/qjec.2009.124.4.1497.

Beaman

Duflo

Pande

Topalova

. 2012. “Female Leadership Raises Aspirations and Educational Attainment for Girls: A Policy Experiment in India.” Science 335 (6068): 582–6. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1212382.

10.

Besley

Folke

Persson

Rickne

. 2017. “Gender Quotas and the Crisis of the mediocre man: Theory and Evidence from Sweden.” American Economic Review 107 (8): 2204–42. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20160080.

11.

Bhalotra

S. R.

Clots-Figueras

Iyer

. 2018. “Path-Breakers: How Does Women's Political Participation Respond to Electoral Success?” The Economic Journal 128 (613): 1844–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecoj.12492.

12.

Bjarnegård

2013. Gender, Informal Institutions and Political Recruitment: Explaining Male Dominance in Parliamentary Representation. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137296740

13.

Bjarnegård

Kenny

. 2015. “Revealing the ‘Secret Garden’: The Informal Dimensions of Political Recruitment.” Politics and Gender 11 (4): 748–53. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X15000471.

14.

Boogers

Voerman

. 2010. “Independent Local Political Parties in the Netherlands.” Government Studies 36 (1): 75–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930903435807.

15.

Brancati

2008. “Winning Alone: The Electoral Fate of Independent Candidates Worldwide.” The Journal of Politics 70 (3): 648–62. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022381608080675.

16.

Broockman

D. E.

2014. “Do Female Politicians Empower Women to Vote or Run for Office? A Regression Discontinuity Approach.” Electoral Studies 34 (Supplement C): 190–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2013.10.002.

17.

Brown

Mansour

O’Connell

. 2022. “Does Local Female Political Representation Empower Women to Run for Higher Office? Evidence from State and National Legislatures in India.” The World Bank Economic Review 36 (1): 198–218. https://doi.org/10.1093/wber/lhab013.

18.

Buckley

2020. “Going Alone and Taking the Independent Route: New Insights on Female Candidate Emergence.” European Journal of Politics and Gender 3: 349–70. https://doi.org/10.1332/251510820X15891285007145.

19.

Butler

Daniel M

Preece

Jessica Robinson

. 2016. “Recruitment and Perceptions of Gender Bias in Party Leader Support.” Political Research Quarterly 69 (4): 842–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912916668412

20.

Calonico

Cattaneo

M. D.

Farrell

M. H.

Titiunik

. 2017. “rdrobust: Software for Regression Discontinuity Designs.” Stata Journal 17 (2): 372–404. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867X1701700208.

21.

Calonico

Cattaneo

M. D.

Titiunik

. 2014a. “Robust Data-Driven Inference in the Regression-Discontinuity Design.” Stata Journal 14 (4): 909–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867X1401400413.

22.

Calonico

Cattaneo

M. D.

Titiunik

. 2014b. “Robust Nonparametric Confidence Intervals for Regression-Discontinuity Designs.” Econometrica 82 (6): 2295–326. https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA11757.

23.

Casas-Arce

Saiz

. 2015. “Women and Power: Unpopular, Unwilling, or Held Back?” Journal of Political Economy 123 (3): 641–69. https://doi.org/10.1086/680686.

24.

Castorena

2022. “Female Officeholders and Women's Political Engagement: The Role of Parties.” Political Behavior 45: 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-021-09765-z.

25.

Castro

Martins

. 2013. “Running for Office Again: Evidence from Portuguese Municipal Elections.” Public Choice 156 (3-4): 677–702. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-012-9922-3.

26.

Cattaneo

Idrobo

Titiunik

. 2020. A Practical Introduction to Regression Discontinuity Designs: Foundations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108684606

27.

Cella

Manzoni

. 2023. “Gender Bias and Women’s Political Performance.” European Journal of Political Economy 77: 102314.

28.

Cloths-Figueras

2011. “Women in Politics. Evidence from the Indian States.” Journal of Public Economics 95: 664–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2010.11.017.

29.

Cloths-Figueras

2012. “Are Female Leaders Good for Education? Evidence from India.” American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 4: 212–44. https://doi.org/10.1257/app.4.1.212.

30.

Coffé

Hilde

Bolzendahl

Catherine

. 2010. “Same Game, Different Rules? Gender Differences in Political Participation.” Sex Roles 62 (5-6): 318–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-009-9729-y.

31.

Copus

Clark

Reynaert

Steyvers

. 2009. “Minor Party and Independent Politics Beyond the Mainstream: Fluctuating Fortunes but a Permanent Presence.” Parliamentary Affairs 62 (1): 4–18. https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsn035.

32.

Crowder-Meyer

2013. “Gendered Recruitment Without Trying: How Local Party Recruiters Affect Women's Representation.” Politics and Gender 9 (4): 390–413. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X13000391.

33.

Crowder-Meyer

Gadarian

S. K.

Trounstine

. 2015. “Electoral Institutions, Gender Stereotypes, and Women's Local Representation.” Politics, Groups, and Identities 3 (2): 318–34.

34.

Dahlgaard

J. O.

2016. “You Just Made it: Individual Incumbency Advantage Under Proportional Representation.” Electoral Studies 44: 319–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2016.09.004.

35.

De Paola

Scoppa

Lombardo

. 2010. “Can Gender Quotas Break Down Negative Stereotypes? Evidence from Changes in Electoral Rules.” Journal of Public Economics 94 (5-6): 344–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2010.02.004.

36.

Derks

Van Laar

Ellemers

. 2016. “The Queen bee Phenomenon: Why Women Leaders Distance Themselves from Junior Women.” The Leadership Quarterly 27 (3): 456–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.12.007.

37.

Dolan

2010. “The Impact of Gender Stereotyped Evaluations on Support for Women Candidates.” Political Behavior 32 (1): 69–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-009-9090-4.

38.

Druciarek

Nizyńska

Przybysz

. 2024. “Kobiety w polityce lokalnej. Udział kandydatek w wyborach samorządowych 2024.” Warszawa, Instytut Spraw Publicznych; available at: https://www.isp.org.pl/pl/publikacje/kobiety-w-polityce-lokalnej-udzial-kandydatek-w-wyborach-samorzadowych-2024

39.

Esteve-Volart

Bagues

. 2012. “Are Women Pawns in the Political Game? Evidence from Elections to the Spanish Senate.” Journal of Public Economics 96 (3-4): 387–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2011.12.004.

40.

Ferreira

Gyourko

. 2014. “Does Gender Matter for Political Leadership? The Case of U.S. Mayors.” Journal of Public Economics (112), 24-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2014.01.006

41.

Fox

R. L.

Lawless

J. L.

. 2004. “Entering the Arena? Gender and the Decision to Run for Office.” American Journal of Political Science 48 (2): 264–80. https://doi.org/10.2307/1519882.

42.

Fox

R. L.

Lawless

J. L.

Feeley

. 2001. “Gender and the Decision to Run for Office.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 26 (3): 411–35. https://doi.org/10.2307/440330.

43.

Fréchette

G. R.

Maniquet

Morelli

. 2008. “Incumbents’ Interests and Gender Quotas.” American Journal of Political Science 52 (4): 891–909. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2008.00349.x.

44.

Funk

K. D.

Hinojosa

Piscopo

J. M.

. 2019. “Women to the Rescue: The Gendered Effects of Public Discontent on Legislative Nominations in Latin America.” Party Politics 27: 465–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068819856614.

45.

Gauja

Anika

Cross

William

. 2015. “Research Note: The Influence of Party Candidate Selection Methods on Candidate Diversity.” Representation 51 (3): 287–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/00344893.2015.1108359

46.

Gendźwiłł

2012. “Independent Mayors and Local Lists in Large Polish Cities: Towards a Non-Partisan Model of Local Government?” Local Government Studies 38 (4): 501–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2011.649915.

47.

Gendźwiłł

Żółtak

. 2014. “Why do non-Partisans Challenge Parties in Local Politics? The (Extreme) Case of Poland.” Europe-Asia Studies 66 (7): 1122–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2014.927644.

48.

Gendźwiłł

Żółtak

. 2016. “How Single-Member Districts Are Reinforcing Local Independents and Strengthening Mayors: On the Electoral Reform in Polish Local Government.” Local Government Studies 43 (1): 110–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2016.1254624.

49.

Gilardi

2015. “The Temporary Importance of Role Models for Women's Political Representation.” American Journal of Political Science 59 (4): 957–70. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12155.

50.

Grimmer

Hersh

Feinstein

Carpenter

. 2011. Are Close Elections Random? Unpublished manuscript.

51.

Hassell

H. J. G.

Hollibaugh Jr

Miles

M. R.

. 2025. “Does the Presence or Absence of Elections Remove Gender Differences in Ambition for Public Service?” British Journal of Political Science 55: e6.

52.

Hessami

Lopes da Fonseca

. 2020. “Female Political Representation and Substantive Effects on Policies: A Literature Review.” European Journal of Political Economy 63: 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2020.101896.

53.

Hinojosa

2009. “Whatever the Party Asks of Me: Women's Political Representation in Chile's Unión Demócrata Independiente.” Politics and Gender 5 (3): 377–407. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X09990183.

54.

Hooghe

Quintelier

. 2014. “Political Participation in European Countries: The Effect of Authoritarian Rule, Corruption, Lack of Good Governance and Economic Downturn.” Comparative European Politics 12: 209–32. https://doi.org/10.1057/cep.2013.3.

55.

Imbens

Lemieux

. 2008. “The Regression Discontinuity Design-Theory and Applications.” Journal of Econometrics 42 (2): 615–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2007.05.001.

56.

Jankowski

Marcinkiewicz

Gwiazda

. 2019. “The Effect of Electing Women on Future Female Candidate Selection Patterns: Findings from a Regression Discontinuity Design.” Politics and Gender 15 (2): 182–210. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X19000096.

57.

Kroeber

2022. “How Parties led by a Woman Redefine Their Positions: Empirical Evidence for Women's Green, Alternative and Libertarian Agenda.” European Journal of Political Research 61 (1): 175–93. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12449.

58.

Lawless

Fox

. 2010. It Still Takes a Candidate: Why Women Don't Run for Office. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511778797

59.

Lippmann

2023. “Persistence of Incumbents and Female Access to Political Positions.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 206: 327–49.

60.

Martínez i Coma

Lago

. 2022. “‘Sacrificial Lambs’ or Candidate Mimicking? Gender-Based Nomination Strategies in Elections.” Party Politics 28 (4): 702–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068821998235.

61.

Maškarinec

2021. “Women and Local Politics: Determinants of Women’s Emergence and Success in Elections to Czech Town Councils, 1998–2018.” Urban Affairs Review 58 (2): 356–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087421992879.

62.

McCrary

2008. “Manipulation of the Running variable in the Regression Discontinuity Design: A Density Test.” Journal of Econometrics 142 (2): 698–714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2007.05.005.

63.

Norris

2006. “The Impact of Electoral Reform on Women's Representation.” Acta Politica 41 (2): 197–213. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ap.5500151

64.

O’Connel

S. D.

2020. “Can Quotas Increase the Supply of Candidates for Higher-Level Positions? Evidence from Local Government in India.” Review of Economics and Statistics 102 (1): 65–78. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest_a_00802.

65.

Piscopo

J. M.

2019. “The Limits of Leaning in: Ambition, Recruitment, and Candidate Training in Comparative Perspective.” Politics, Groups, and Identities 7 (4): 817–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/21565503.2018.1532917.

66.

Profeta

Woodhouse

. 2018. “Do Electoral Rules Matter for Female Representation?.” CESifo Working Paper Series 7101, CESifo. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3228372

67.

Reiser

Holtmann

. 2008. “Farewell to the Party Model?: Independent Local Lists in East and West European Countries.” https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-90923-3

68.

Sanbonmatsu

2006. “Do Parties Know That ‘Women Win’? Party Leader Beliefs About Women's Electoral Chances.” Politics and Gender 2: 431–50. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X06060132.

69.

Schwarz

J. A.

2010. “Election Behavior with High-female Representation: A Regression Discontinuity Analysis.” Working Paper. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1569929

70.

Slegten

Heyndels

. 2021. “Sex-B(i)ased List Promotion: The Effect of Previous Electoral Performance.” Journal of Women, Politics and Policy 42 (4): 314–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/1554477X.2021.1955234.

71.

Smith

Reingold

Owens

. 2012. “The Political Determinants of Women's Descriptive Representation in Cities.” Political Research Quarterly 65 (2): 315–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912910395327.

72.

Sundström

Stockemer

. 2021. “Political Party Characteristics and Women’s Representation: The Case of the European Parliament.” Representation 58 (1): 119–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/00344893.2021.1898458.

73.

Tolley

Lawlor

Fortier-Chouinard

. 2022. “Whiny, Fake, and I Don’t Like Her Hair&. Gendered Assessments of Mayoral Candidates.” Urban Affairs Review 59 (4): 977–1012. https://doi.org/10.1177/10780874221090874.

74.

Wolbrecht

Campbell

D. E.

. 2007. “Leading by Example: Female Members of Parliament as Political Role Models.” American Journal of Political Science 51 (4): 921–39. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00289.x.