Recent scholarship questions the role of the judiciary in promoting social change. The author looks at the question by examining the long effort of the New Jersey Supreme Court to assure social and economic choice for urban residents through inclusionary zoning. The conclusion is that although the judiciary is constrained, the constraints are not necessarily structural. Rather, the court plays a crucial role in agenda setting and prompting other governing institutions to act. As such, the question is not whether the courts can cause social change but what the proper role of the judiciary is in the broad interplay of governing institutions.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ByrdF. W.1987. Mt. Laurel tradeoffs a dilemma for Newark. Newark Star-Ledger, 18 January, 1.
2.
Council on New Jersey Affairs.1991. Housing challenges and opportunities.Princeton: Council on New Jersey Affairs, Princeton University.
3.
DanielsonM.1976. The politics of exclusion.New York: Columbia Univ. Press.
4.
DownsA.1973. Opening up the suburbs.New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press.
5.
ErberE.1983. The road to Mt. Laurel. Planning, 4–12 November.
6.
HughesM. A., and VandorenP. M.. 1990. Social policy through land reform: New Jersey's Mt. Laurel controversy. Political Science Quarterly105: 97–111.
7.
KingP. E.1978. Exclusionary zoning and open housing: A brief judicial history. Geographical Review68: 459–69.
8.
LowiT. J.1979. The end of liberalism.New York: Norton.
9.
LukasJ. A.1986. Common ground.New York: Knopf.
10.
MallachA.1984. Inclusionary housing programs: Policies and practices.New Brunswick, NJ: Center for Urban Policy Research.
11.
MallachA.1985. Blueprint for delay: From Mt. Laurel to molehill. New Jersey Reporter (October): 21–27.
12.
Martha Lamar Associates.1988. Affordable housing in New Jersey: The results of Mount Laurel II and the Fair Housing Act.Lawrenceville, NJ: Author.
13.
MazmanianD. A., and SabatierP. A.. 1989. Implementation and public policy.Boston: University Press of America.
14.
MeheganS.1992. Avalanche on Mt. Laurel: New Jersey's troubled affordable housing system staggers under a recession. New Jersey Reporter (January/February): 44–51.
15.
MooreT. S., and LaramoreA.. 1990. Industrial change and urban joblessness: An assessment of the mismatch hypothesis. Urban Affairs Quarterly25: 640–58.
16.
OrfieldG.1985. Ghettoization and its alternatives. In The new urban reality, edited by PetersonP., 161–93. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
17.
PayneJ. M.1983. Starting over—Mount Laurel II. Real Estate Law Journal12: 85–96.
18.
PetersonP. E.1981. City limits.Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
19.
PetersonP. E.1985. Technology, race, and urban policy. In The new urban reality, edited by PetersonP., 1–29. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
20.
RabkinJ.1989. Judicial compulsions: How public law distorts public policy.New York: Basic Books.
21.
RoseJ. G.1983. The Mt. Laurel II decision: Is it based on wishful thinking?Real Estate Journal12: 115–37.
22.
RosenbergG. N.1991. The hollow hope: Can the courts bring about social change?Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
23.
SeglemL.1990. Governing “one New Jersey” in hard times. New Jersey Reporter (November/December): 14–18.
24.
SeligJ. M.1988. Implementing Mount Laurel: An assessment of regional contribution agreements. Working paper 14. Princeton, NJ: Council on New Jersey Affairs, Princeton University.
25.
TieboutC. M.1956. A pure theory of local expenditures. Journal of Political Economy64: 416–24.
26.
WarrenE.1988. The legacy of judicial policy-making—Gautreaux v. Chicago Housing Authority.Boston: University Press of America.
WhiteM.1978. Self interest in the suburbs: The trend to ward no-growth zoning. Policy Analysis4: 185–203.
29.
WilsonW. J.1985. The urban underclass in an advanced industrial society. In The new urban reality, edited by PetersonP., 129–60. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
30.
ZaxL. A., and KaydenJ. S.. 1983. A landmark in land use. National Law Journal, 14 March, 11–41.
