Group-based interventions are widely used as the preferred method for the treatment of sexual offenders. However, little attention has been given to the vital interpersonal processes within groups, which contribute to their therapeutic effect. This paper describes specific principles and techniques of group therapy that will help sex offender treatment practitioners take full advantage of this unique modality and thereby maximize the positive impact of treatment. In contrast to an individual-focused style that characterizes many sex offender treatment groups, group-focused interventions involve all group members and use the social/relational energy that is essential to the group modality.
Adams, D., & McCormick, A. (1982). Men unlearning violence: A group approach based on the collective model. In M. Roy (Ed.), The abusive partner. New York: Van Nostrand.
2.
Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers (ATSA). (2001). Ethical standards and principles for the management of sexual abusers. Beaverton, OR: Author.
3.
Bernard, J., & Bernard, M. (1984). The abusive male seeking treatment: Jekyll and Hyde. Family Relations, 33, 545-547.
4.
Beech A., & Fordham, A.S. (1997). Therapeutic climate of sexual offender treatment programs. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment , 8,219-237.
5.
Garland, R., & Dougher, M. (1991). Motivational intervention in the treatment of sex offenders. In W. Miller & S. Rollnick (Eds.), Motivational interviewing: Preparing people to change addictive behavior, (pp. 303-313). New York: Guilford.
6.
Hanson, R.K., & Bussiere, M.T. (1998). Predicting relapse: A meta-analysis of sexual offender recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 348-362.
7.
Jennings, J.L. (1990). Preventing relapse versus stopping domestic violence: Do we expect too much too soon from battering men? Journal of Family Violence, 5, 43-60.
8.
Jennings, J.L., & Murphy, C.M. (2000). The male-male dimensions of male-female battering: A new look at domestic violence. Psychology of Men and Masculinity , 1, 21-29.
9.
Mackenzie, K.R., & Tschuschke, V. (1993). Relatedness, group work, and outcome in long-term inpatient psychotherapy groups. Journal of Psychotherapy Practice and Research, 1, 147-156.
10.
Marshall, W.L. (2001, May 23). Effectiveness and role of the therapist in the treatment of sex offenders. Presented at the National Sexually Violent Predators Conference, Chicago, IL.
11.
Marshall, W.L. (1996). Assessment, treatment and theorizing about sex offenders: Developments during the past twenty years and future directions . Criminal Justice and Behavior, 23, 162-199.
12.
Marshall, W.L.Anderson, D., & Fernandez, Y. (1999). Cognitive behavioural treatment of sexual offenders . London: Wiley.
13.
Marshall, W.L., & Barbaree, H.E. (1990). Outcome of comprehensive cognitive behavioral treatment programs. In W. Marshall & H. Barbaree (Eds.), Handbook of sexual assault: Issues, theories and treatment of the offender. New York: Plenum .
14.
Marshall, W., Thornton, D., Marshall, L., Fernandez, Y., & Mann, R. (2001). Treatment of sexual offenders who are in categorical denial: A pilot project. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 13, 205-216.
15.
Rutan,J.S.,& Stone, W.N. (1993). Psychodynamic group psychotherapy (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.
16.
Sawyer, S. (2000). Some thoughts about why we believe group therapy is the preferred modality for treating sex offenders. The ATSA Forum, 12, 11-12.
17.
Sawyer, S. (2002). Group therapy with adult sex offenders. In B. Schwartz & H. Cellini (Eds.), The Sex Offender: Vol. 4. Kingston, NJ: Civic Research Institute.
18.
Safer Society Press. (2000). North American Survey of Sexual Abuser Treatment and Models Summary. Brandon, VT: Safer Society Press.
19.
Yalom, I. (1995). The theory and practice of group psychotherapy (4th ed.). New York: Basic Books.
