Current procedures to estimate sex offender recidivism risk typically involve actuarial instruments, either alone or in combination with adjustments based on other considerations. Two of the most commonly employed actuarial instruments for the assessment of sexual recidivism risk are the Rapid Risk Assessment for Sex Offender Recidivism (RRASOR; R. K. Hanson, 1997) and the Static-99 (R. K. Hanson & D. Thornton, 2000). Although multiple studies of the interrater reliability and predictive validity of these instruments have been completed, with very supportive results, there have to date not been any studies of the degree to which the specific risk percentages attached to each instrument's score replicate and remain stable despite changes in underlying samples' recidivism base rates. This study, using data from multiple sources, investigated this issue. The findings indicated that the 5-year risk percentages for the RRASOR were replicated and were remarkably stable despite changes in the sample's underlying recidivism base rate. The Static-99 5-year risk percentages were mostly replicated and were stable across varying base rates, but to a lesser degree than was found for the RRASOR. Implications of these results are discussed.
Barbaree, H.E., Seto, M.C., Langton, C., & Peacock, E. (2001). Evaluating the predictive accuracy of six risk assessment instruments for adult sex offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 28(4), 490-521.
2.
Bartosh, D.L., Garby, T., Lewis, D., & Gray, S. (2003). Differences in the predictive validity of actuarial risk assessments in relation to sex offender type. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminality, 47(4), 422-438.
3.
*Beech, A., Friendship, C., Erikson, M., & Hanson, R.K. (2002). The relationship between static and dynamic risk factors and reconviction in a sample of U.K. child abusers. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 14(2), 155-168.
4.
*Dempster, R. (1998). Prediction of sexually violent recidivism: A comparison of risk assessment instruments. Master's thesis, Simon Fraser University. Paper presented at the 18th Annual Research and Treatment Conference of the Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers, Lake Buena Vista, Florida, October 1999.
5.
*De Vogel, V., de Ruiter, C., van Beek, D., & Mead, G. (2002). Predictive validity of structured and actuarial risk assessment for sexual violence: A retrospective study in a Dutch sample of treated sex offenders. Manuscript submitted for publication.
6.
Doren, D.M. (2002). Evaluating sex offenders: A manual for civil commitments and beyond. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
7.
Epperson, D.L., Kaul, J.D., Huot, S.J., Hesselton, D., Alexander, W., & Goldman, R. (1999). Minnesota sex offender screening tool-Revised (MnSOST-R): development, performance, and recommended risk level cut scores . Available Retrieved from http://129.186.143.73/faculty/epperson/mnsost-download.htm.
8.
Hanson, R.K. (1997). The development of a brief actuarial risk scale for sexual offense recidivism. Ottawa, Ontario: Department of the Solicitor General of Canada. Retrieved from http://www.sgc.gc.ca/publications/corrections/199704-e.pdf.
9.
Hanson, R.K. (2001). Note on the reliability of STATIC-99 as used by the California Department of Mental Health evaluators (Unpublished report) . Sacramento, CA: California Department of Mental Health.
Hanson, R.K., & Thornton, D. (2000). Improving risk assessments for sex offenders: A comparison of three actuarial scales. Law and Human Behavior , 24(1),119-136.
12.
*Harris, G.T., Rice, M.E., Quinsey, V.L., Lalumière, M., Boer, D., & Lang. C. (in press). A multi-site comparison of actuarial risk instruments for sex offenders. Psychological Assessment.
13.
Hudson, S.M., Wales, D.S., Bakker, L., & Ward, T. (2002). Dynamic risk factors: The Kia Marama evaluation . Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 14(2), 103-120.
14.
Langton, C.M. (2003). Contrasting approaches to risk assessment with adult male sexual offenders: An evaluation of recidivism prediction schemes and the utility of supplementary clinical information for enhancing predictive accuracy. Dissertation at the Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto.
15.
Meehl, P.E. (1954). Clinical vs. statistical prediction: A theoretical analysis and a review of the evidence. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
16.
*McGrath, R.J., Hoke, S.E., Cumming, G., & Livingston, J.A. (2001, November). The Vermont Assessment of Sex Offender Risk (VASOR): An initial reliability and validity study. Poster session presented at the 20th Annual Research & Treatment Conference, Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers, San Antonio, Texas; as further described in McGrath, R.J., Cumming, G., Livingston, J.A., & Hoke, S.E. (2003). Outcome of a treatment program for adult sex offenders: From prison to community. Journal of Interpersonal Violence , 18, 3-17.
17.
*Nicholaichuk, T.P. (2001, November). The comparison of two standardised risk assessment instruments (RRASOR, Hanson, 1997; STATIC 99, Hanson & Thornton, 1999) in a sample of Canadian aboriginal sexual offenders. Paper presented at the 20th Annual Research & Treatment Conference, Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers, San Antonio, TX.
18.
Nicholaichuk, T.P., & Yates, P.M. (2002). Treatment efficacy: Outcomes of the Clearwater sex offender program. In B. Schwartz (Ed.), The sex offender (Vol. 4, pp. 7-1-7-18). New York: Civic Research Institute.
19.
*Nunes, K.L., Firestone, P., Bradford, J.M., Greenberg, D.M., & Broom, I. (2002). A comparison of modified versions of the Static-99 and the sex offender risk appraisal guide. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 14(3), 253-269.
20.
Roberts, C.F., Doren, D.M., & Thornton, D. (2002). Dimensions associated with assessments of sex offender recidivism risk. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 29, 569-589.
21.
*Sjöstedt, G., & Långström, N. (2001). Actuarial assessment of sex offender recidivism risk: A cross-validation of the RRASOR and Static-99 in Sweden. Law and Human Behavior, 25(6), 629-645.
22.
*Sjöstedt, G., & Långström, N. (2002). Assessment of risk for criminal recidivism among rapists in Sweden: A comparison of different procedures. Psychology, Crime, and Law,8, 25-40.
23.
*Thornton, D. (2002). [Her Majesty's Prison Service, United Kingdom] Unpublished data.
24.
Wong, K., Flahr, L., Maire, B., Wilde, S., Gu, D., & Wong, S. (2000, June). Inter-rater reliability of the violence risk scale and the violence risk scale: sex offender version. Poster presented at the Annual Convention of the CanadianPsychological Association, Ottawa, Ontario.
