Polygraph interrogations are used by half of all surveyed juvenile sex offender (JSO) treatment programs in the United States. This is a distinctive and controversial practice that is rarely if ever used with other juvenile delinquent populations, and that is rarely used or is banned from JSO treatment programs in other countries. Clinical polygraphy is an ethically sensitive issue because it involves mental health therapists in involuntary coercive interrogations of minors. This article reviews core mental health professional ethics principles for juveniles. JSO polygraphy is used as an illustrative issue for applying human rights principles to a practice in light of its benefits, risks, and available alternatives.
AhlmeyerS.HeilP.McKeeB.EnglishK. (2000). The impact of polygraphy on admissions of victims and offenses in adult sexual offenders. Sexual Abuse: Journal of Research and Treatment, 12, 123-138.
2.
American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. (2009). Code of ethics. Washington, DC: Author.
3.
American Psychological Association. (2002). Ethical principles of psychologists. Washington, DC: Author.
4.
American Psychological Association. (2008). Amendment to the reaffirmation of the American Psychological Association position against torture and other cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment or punishment and its application to individuals defined in the United States Code as “Enemy Combatants.”Washington, DC: Author.
5.
American Psychological Association. (2009). APA Ethics Committee statement: No defense to torture under the APA Ethics Code. Washington, DC: Author.
6.
Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers. (1997). Professional code of ethics. Beverton, OR: Author.
7.
BlasingameG. D. (1998). Suggested clinical uses of polygraphy in community-based sexual offender treatment programs. Sexual Abuse, 10, 37-45.
8.
CaldwellM. (2007). Sexual offense adjudication and sexual recidivism among juvenile offenders. Sexual Abuse, 19, 107-113.
9.
ChaffinM. (2008). Our minds are made up—don’t confuse us with the facts: Commentary on policies concerning children with sexual behavior problems and juvenile sex offenders. Child Maltreatment, 13, 110-121.
10.
ChaffinM.BerlinerL.BlockR.JohnsonT. C.FriedrichW. N.LewisD. G.. (2008). Report of the ATSA Task Force on children with sexual behavior problems. Child Maltreatment, 13, 199-218.
11.
Colorado Department of Public Safety, Division of Criminal Justice, Office of Domestic Violence & Sex Offender Management (2008). Standards and Guidelines for the Evaluation, Assessment, Treatment and Supervision of Juveniles Who Have Committed Sexual Offenses. Denver, CO: Colorado Department of Public Safety.
12.
CrossT. P.SaxeL. (2001). Polygraph testing and sexual abuse: The lure of the magic lasso. Child Maltreatment, 6, 195-206.
13.
FoucaultM. (1975). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. New York: Vintage.
14.
GlaserB. (2003). Therapeutic jurisprudence: An ethical paradigm for therapists in sex offender treatment programs. Western Criminology Review, 42, 143-154.
15.
HenggelerS. W.LetourneauE. J.ChapmanJ. E.BourduinC. M.ScheweP. A.McCartM. R. (2009). Mediators of change for multisystemic therapy with juvenile sex offenders. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 77, 451-462.
16.
HunterJ. A.LexierL. J. (1998). Ethical and legal issues in the assessment and treatment of juvenile sex offenders. Child Maltreatment, 3, 339-348.
17.
JenkinsA. (2006). The politics of intervention: Fairness and ethics. In LongoR. E.PrescottD. (Eds.), Current perspectives: Working with sexually aggressive youth and youth with sexual behavior problems (pp. 143-166). Holyoke, MA: NERI Press.
18.
JesaniA. (2006). Medical professionals and interrogation: Lies about finding the “truth.”Indian Journal of Medical Ethics, 3, 116-117.
19.
LetourneauE. J.MinerM. H. (2005). Juvenile sex offenders: A case against the legal and clinical status quo. Sexual Abuse, 17, 293-312.
20.
LetourneauE. J.HenggelerS. W.BourduinC. M.ScheweP. A.McCartM. R.ChapmanJ. E.. (2009). Multisystemic therapy for juvenile sexual offenders: 1-year results from a randomized effectiveness trial. Journal of Family Psychology, 23, 89-102.
21.
LevensonJ.D’AmoraD. (2005). An ethical paradigm for sex offender treatment: Response to Glaser. Western Criminology Review, 6, 145-153.
22.
LilienfeldS. O. (2007). Psychological treatments that cause harm. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2, 53-70.
23.
MackJ. (1909). The juvenile court. Harvard Law Review, 23, 104-122.
24.
McGrathR. J.CummingG. F.BurchardB. L.ZeoliS.EllerbyL. (2009). Current practices and Emerging Trends in Sexual Abuser Management: The Safer Society 2009 North American Survey. Brandon, VT: Safer Society Press.
25.
National Association of Social Workers. (1996). Code of ethics. Washington, DC: NASW.
26.
National Research Council. (2003). The polygraph and lie detection. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, Committee to Review the Scientific Evidence on the Polygraph, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education.
27.
OndersmaS. J.ChaffinM.BerlinerL.CordonI.GoodmanG.BarnettD. (2001). Sex with children is abuse: Comments on the Rind et al. meta-analysis controversy. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 707-714.
28.
RatnerR. A. (2002). Ethics in child and adolescent forensic psychiatry. Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 11, 887-904.
29.
ScottE. S.SteinbergL. (2008). Adolescent development and the regulation of youth crime. Future of Children, 18, 15-33.
30.
StangerC.BudneyA. J.KamonJ. L.ThostensenJ. (2009). A randomized trial of contingency management for adolescent marijuana abuse and dependence. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 105, 240-247.
31.
WardT.SyversenK. (2009). Human dignity and vulnerable agency: An ethical framework for forensic practice. Aggression and Human Behavior, 14, 94-105.
32.
WardT.GannonT. A.BirgdenA. (2007). Human rights and the treatment of sex offenders. Sex Abuse, 19, 195-216.
ZerbyS. A.ThomasC. R. (2006). Legal issues, rights and ethics for mental health in juvenile justice. Child and Adolescent Clinics of North America, 15, 373-390.
35.
ZimringF. E. (2004). An American travesty: Legal responses to adolescent sexual offending. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
