A useful understanding of the relationship between age, actuarial scores, and sexual recidivism can be obtained by comparing the entries in equivalent cells from “agestratified” actuarial tables. This article reports the compilation of the first multisample age-stratified table of sexual recidivism rates, referred to as the “multisample age-stratified table of sexual recidivism rates (MATS-1),” from recent research on Static-99 and another actuarial known as the Automated Sexual Recidivism Scale. The MATS-1 validates the “age invariance effect” that the risk of sexual recidivism declines with advancing age and shows that age-restricted tables underestimate risk for younger offenders and overestimate risk for older offenders. Based on data from more than 9,000 sex offenders, our conclusion is that evaluators should report recidivism estimates from age-stratified tables when they are assessing sexual recidivism risk, particularly when evaluating the aging sex offender.
Abbott, B.R. ( 2009). Applicability of the new Static-99 experience tables in sexually violent predator risk assessments. Sexual Offender Treatment, 4(1), 1-24.
2.
Barbaree, H.E. ( 2010, March). The effects of aging on sex offender recidivism . Training sponsored by the California Department of Mental Health Sex Offender Commitment Program, Seaside, CA .
3.
Barbaree, H.E., & Blanchard, R. ( 2008). Sexual deviance over the lifespan: Reductions in deviant sexual behavior in the aging sex offender. In D. R. Laws & W. O’Donohue (Eds.), Sexual deviance: Theory, assessment and treatment (2nd ed., pp. 37-60). New York: Guilford .
4.
Barbaree, H.E., Blanchard, R., & Langton, C.M. ( 2003). The development of sexual aggression through the life span: The effect of age on sexual arousal and recidivism among sex offenders . In R. A. Prentky, E. S. Janus, & M. C. Seto (Eds.), Sexually coercive behavior: Understanding and management (Vol. 989, pp. 59-71). New York: New York Academy of Sciences.
5.
Barbaree, H.E., Langton, C.M., Blanchard, R., & Cantor, J. ( 2009). Aging versus stable enduring traits as explanatory constructs in sex offender recidivism. Criminal Justice and Behavior , 36, 443-465.
6.
Bayes, T. ( 1764). An essay toward solving a problem in the doctrine of chances. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 53, 370-418.
7.
Donaldson, T., & Wollert, R. ( 2008). A mathematical proof and example that Bayes’s Theorem is fundamental to actuarial estimates of sexual recidivism risk. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 20, 206-217.
Doren, D.M. ( 2004). Stability of the interpretive risk percentages for the RRASOR and Static-99. Sexual Abuse, 16, 25-36.
10.
Doren, D.M. ( 2006). Battling with Bayes: When statistical analyses just won’t do. Sex Offender Law Report, 7, 49-50, 60-61.
11.
Epperson, D.L., Kaul, J.D., Huot, S.J., Hesselton, D., Alexander, W., & Goldman, R. ( 1998). Minnesota Sex Offender Screening Tool-Revised (MnSOST-R) . St. Paul, MN: Minnesota Department of Corrections.
12.
Fazel, S., Sjőstedt, G., Längstrőm, N., & Grann, M. ( 2006). Risk factors for criminal recidivism in older sexual offenders. Sexual Abuse, 18, 181-189.
13.
Hanson, R.K. ( 1997). The development of a brief actuarial risk scale for sexual offense recidivism. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: Public Works and Govt. Services Canada. Available from http://www.psepc-sppcc.gc.ca
14.
Hanson, R.K. ( 2002). Recidivism and age. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 17, 1046-1062.
15.
Hanson, R.K. ( 2006). Does Static-99 predict recidivism among older sexual offenders? Sexual Abuse, 18, 343-355.
16.
Hanson, R.K. ( 2009). Dimensional measurement of sexual deviance. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39 (2), 401-404.
17.
Hanson, R.K., & Bussiere, M.T. (1998). Predicting relapse: A meta-analysis of sexual offender recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 348-362.
18.
Hanson, R.K., & Morton-Bourgon, K. (2005). The characteristics of persistent sexual offenders: A meta-analysis of recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73, 1154-1163.
19.
Hanson, R.K., Morton, K.E., & Harris, A.J.R. (2003). Sexual offender recidivism risk: What we know and what we need to know. In R. Prentky, E. Janus, & M. Seto (Eds.), Understanding and managing sexually coercive behavior (Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, Vol. 989, pp. 154-166). New York: New York Academy of Sciences.
20.
Hanson, R.K., & Thornton, D. ( 2000). Improving risk assessments for sex offenders: A comparison of three actuarial scales. Law and Human Behavior , 24, 119-136.
21.
Harris, G.T., & Rice, M. ( 2007). Characterizing the value of actuarial violence risk assessments . Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34, 1638-1658.
22.
Harris, G.T., Rice, M., & Quinsey, V. ( 1993). Violent recidivism of mentally disordered offenders: The development of a statistical prediction instrument. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 20, 315-335.
23.
Harris, G.T., Rice, M., Quinsey, V., Lalumiere, M., Boer, D., & Lang, C. ( 2003). A multisite comparison of actuarial risk instruments for sex offenders. Psychological Assessment, 15, 413-425.
24.
Helmus, L., Thornton, D., & Hanson, R.K. ( 2009, October). Should Static-99 recidivism estimates be adjusted based on age at release? A multi-sample exploration. Paper presented at the 28th Annual Research and Treatment Conference of the Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers, Dallas, TX.
25.
Hirschi, T., & Gottfredson, M. (1983). Age and the explanation of crime. American Journal of Sociology, 89, 52-584.
26.
Lussier, P., & Healey, J. ( 2010). Rediscovering Quetelet, again: The "aging" offender and the prediction of reoffending in a sample of adult sex offenders. Justice Quarterly, 26, 827-856.
27.
Lussier, P., Tzoumakis, S., Cale, J., & Amirault, J. ( 2010). Criminal trajectories of adult sex offenders and the age effect: Examining the dynamic aspect of offending in adulthood. International Criminal Justice Review, 20, 147-168.
28.
Moffitt, T.E. ( 1993). Adolescence-limited and life-course-persistent antisocial behavior: A developmental taxonomy. Psychological Review, 100, 674-701.
29.
Mossman, D. ( 2006). Another look at interpreting risk categories. Sexual Abuse, 18, 41-63.
30.
Olver, M.E., Wong, S., Nicholaichuk, T., & Gordon, A. ( 2007). The validity and reliability of the Violence Risk Scale-Sexual Offender Version: Assessing sex offender risk and evaluating therapeutic change . Psychological Assessment, 19, 318-329.
Prentky, R.A., & Lee, A.F.S. (2007). Effect of age-at-release on long term sexual re-offense rates in civilly committed sexual offenders . Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 19, 43-59.
33.
Quinsey, V.L., Harris, G., Rice, M., & Cormier, C. ( 1998). Violent offenders. Washington, DC : American Psychological Association.
34.
Sampson, R.J., & Laub, J.H. ( 2003). Life-course desisters? Trajectories of crime among delinquent boys followed to age 70. Criminology, 41, 301-339.
35.
Sampson, R.J., & Laub, J.H. ( 2005). A general age-graded theory of crime. In D. Farrington (Ed.), Integrated and developmental and life-source theories of offending (pp. 165-181). Palo Alto, CA: Transaction Publishers.
36.
Simel, D.L., Samsa, G., & Matchar, D. ( 1991). Likelihood ratios with confidence sample size estimation for diagnostic test studies. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology , 44, 763-770.
37.
Skelton, A., & Vess, J. ( 2008). Risk of sexual recidivism as a function of age and actuarial risk. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 14, 199-209.
38.
Thornton, D. ( 2006). Age and sexual recidivism: A variable connection . Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 18, 123-135.
39.
Thornton, D., & Helmus, L. ( 2009, December). Static risk assessment: Understanding and applying the 2009 norms. Training sponsored by the California Department of Mental Health Sex Offender Civil Commitment Program, Seaside, CA.
40.
Vrieze, S.I., & Grove, W. ( 2010). Multidimensional assessment of criminal recidivism: Problems, pitfalls, and proposed solutions. Psychological Assessment , 22, 382-395.
41.
Waggoner, J., Wollert, R., & Cramer, E. ( 2008). A respecification of Hanson’s updated Static-99 experience table that controls for the effects of age on sexual recidivism among young offenders. Law, Probability and Risk, 7, 305-312.
42.
Wollert, R.W. ( 2002). The importance of cross-validation in actuarial test construction: Shrinkage in the risk estimates for the Minnesota Sex Offender Screening Tool-Revised. Journal of Threat Assessment, 2, 87-102.
43.
Wollert, R.W. ( 2003). Additional flaws in the Minnesota Sex Offender Screening Tool- Revised: A response to Doren and Dow. Journal of Threat Assessment, 2(4), 65-78.
44.
Wollert, R.W. ( 2006). Low base rates limit expert certainty when current actuarial tests are used to identify sexually violent predators: An application of Bayes’s Theorem. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law , 12, 56-85.
45.
Wollert, R.W. ( 2007). Poor diagnostic reliability, the Null-Bayes Logic Model, and their implications for sexually violent predator evaluations. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 13, 167-203.
46.
Wollert, R.W. ( 2010, March). The use of probability mathematics in sexually violent predator (SVP) evaluations. Training sponsored by the California Department of Mental Health Sex Offender Commitment Program , Seaside, CA.
47.
Wollert, R., & Waggoner, J. ( 2009). Bayesian computations protect sexually violent predator evaluations from the degrading effects of confirmatory bias and illusions of certainty: A reply to Doren and Levenson (2009). Sexual Offender Treatment, 4(1), 1-26.
