An Analysis of the Effectiveness of a Psychotherapy Program for Individuals Convicted of Sexual Crimes in South Korean Prisons: A Two-Wave Latent Change Score Approach
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online September, 2025
An Analysis of the Effectiveness of a Psychotherapy Program for Individuals Convicted of Sexual Crimes in South Korean Prisons: A Two-Wave Latent Change Score Approach
Prisons in South Korea have implemented psychotherapy programs for people convicted of sexual offenses to reduce sexual crime recidivism post-release. This study evaluated the effectiveness of the treatment by analyzing data from 13,200 men convicted of sexual offenses released from 2015 to 2019. We estimated the latent change score (LCS) for rape myths acceptance (RMA) and child sexual assault supportive attitudes (CSA) utilizing the 2W-LCS model. We examined the relationship between the LCS and sexual crime recidivism. Additionally, we employed multigroup analysis to compare the results based on program completion status. The results showed that regardless of completion, the LCSs for both RMA and CSA were significant and negative, indicating a decrease in both levels of cognitive distortion after treatment. In addition, the absolute values of the LCSs for both RMA and CSA were larger in the fully-treated group than in the partially-treated group. The CSA LCSs exhibited a significant relationship with sexual crime recidivism only in the fully-treated group. Overall, the study supports the treatment’s effectiveness and underscores the importance of treatment completion.
AbelG. G.BeckerJ. V.Cunningham-RathnerJ. (1984). Complications, consent, and cognitions in sex between children and adults. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 7(1), 89–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/0160-2527(84)90008-6
2.
AbelG. G.GoreD. K.HollandC. L.CampsN.BeckerJ. V.RathnerJ. (1989). The measurment of the cognitive distortions of child molesters. Annals of Sex Research, 2, 135–152. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00851319
3.
Act On Special Cases Concerning The Punishment Of Sexual Crimes, Art. 16. (2011). Republic of Korea.
4.
AndrewsD. A.BontaJ. (2024). The psychology of criminal conduct (7th ed.). New York: Routledge.
5.
AuburnT.LeaS. (2003). Doing cognitive distortions: A discursive psychology analysis of sex offender treatment talk. British Journal of Social Psychology, 42(2), 281–298. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466603322127256
6.
BagozziR. P.YiY. (1989). On the use of structural equation models in experimental designs. Journal of Marketing Research, 26(3), 271–284. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378902600302
7.
BeggsS. (2010). Within-treatment outcome among sexual offenders: A review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 15(5), 369–379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2010.06.005
8.
BentlerP. M. (1992). On the fit of models to covariances and methodology to the Bulletin. Psychological Bulletin, 112(3), 400–404. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.3.400
9.
BentlerP. M.BonettD. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88(3), 588–606. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588
10.
BrunnerF.NeumannI.YoonD.RettenbergerM.StückE.BrikenP. (2019). Determinants of dropout from correctional offender treatment. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 10, 142–704. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00142
11.
BumbyK. M. (1996). Assessing the cognitive distortions of child molesters and rapists: Development and validation of the MOLEST and RAPE scales. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 8(1), 37–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02258015
CarlL. C.LöselF. (2021). When sexual offender treatment in prison-based social-therapeutic treatment is not completed: Relationship to risk factors and recidivism after release. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 31(6), 421–435. https://doi.org/10.1002/cbm.2220
14.
CheungG. W.RensvoldR. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 233–255. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5
15.
ChoE. K. (2010). 성폭력사범 재범 위험성 평가 척도 개발 [Evaluation scale for the risk of recidivism of sexual violence offenders]. Ministry of Justice of South Korea.
16.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
17.
ColeD. A.MaxwellS. E. (1985). Multitrait-multimethod comparisons across populations: A confirmatory factor analytic approach. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 20(4), 389–417. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr2004_3
18.
ColeD. A.MaxwellS. E.ArveyR.SalasE. (1993). Multivariate group comparisons of variable systems: MANOVA and structural equation modeling. Psychological Bulletin, 114(1), 174–184. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.114.1.174
19.
DuweG.GoldmanR. A. (2009). The impact of prison-based treatment on sex offender recidivism: Evidence from Minnesota. Sexual Abuse, 21(3), 279–307. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063209338490
20.
EdwardsM. C.WirthR. J.HoutsC. R.XiN. (2012). Categorical data in the structural equation modeling framework. In HoyleR. H. (Ed.), Handbook of structural equation modeling (pp. 195–208). New York: The Guilford Press.
21.
HallG. C. N. (1995). Sexual offender recidivism revisited: A meta-analysis of recent treatment studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63(5), 802–809. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.63.5.802
22.
HancockG. R. (1997). Structural equation modeling methods of hypothesis testing of latent variable means. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 30(2), 91–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481756.1997.12068926
23.
HansonR. K.GordonA.HarrisA. J. R., et al. (2002). First Report of the Collaborative Outcome Data Project on the Effectiveness of Psychological Treatment for Sex Offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 14, 169–194. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014624315814
24.
HarkinsL.BeechA. (2007). Measurement of the effectiveness of sex offender treatment. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 12(1), 36–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2006.03.002
25.
HenkC. M.Castro–SchiloL. (2016). Preliminary detection of relations among dynamic processes with two-occasion data. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 23(2), 180–193. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2015.1030022
26.
HuL. T.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
KimB.BenekosP. J.MerloA. V. (2016). Sex offender recidivism revisited: Review of recent meta-analyses on the effects of sex offender treatment. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 17(1), 105–117. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838014566719
31.
LeeS. J. (1999). 강간통념척도의 개발과 타당도 검증 [Development of a rape myths scale]. Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, 13(2), 131–148. https://accesson.kr/ksppa/v.13/2/131/25555.
32.
LöselF.LinkE.SchmuckerM.BenderD.BreuerM.CarlL.EndresJ.LauchsL.LauchsL. (2020). On the effectiveness of sexual offender treatment in prisons: A comparison of two different evaluation designs in routine practice. Sexual Abuse, 32(4), 452–475. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063219871576
33.
LöselF.SchmuckerM. (2005). The effectiveness of treatment for sexual offenders: A comprehensive meta-analysis. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 1, 117–146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-004-6466-7
34.
MarshallL. E.MarshallW. L.FernandezY. M.MalcolmP. B.MouldenH. M. (2008). The Rockwood Preparatory Program for sexual offenders: Description and preliminary appraisal. Sexual Abuse, 20(1), 25–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063208314818
NeidighL.KropH. (1992) (In this issue). Cognitive Distortions Among Child Sexual Offenders. Journal of Sex Education and Therapy, 18(3), 208–215. https://doi.org/10.1080/01614576.1992.11074054
39.
Ó CiardhaC.WardT. (2013). Theories of cognitive distortions in sexual offending: What the current research tells us. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 14(1), 5–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838012467856
40.
OlverM. E.MarshallL. E.MarshallW. L.NicholaichukT. P. (2020). A long-term outcome assessment of the effects on subsequent reoffense rates of a prison-based CBT/RNR sex offender treatment program with strength-based elements. Sexual Abuse, 32(2), 127–153. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063218807486
41.
OlverM. E.NicholaichukT. P.GuD.WongS. C. (2013). Sex offender treatment outcome, actuarial risk, and the aging sex offender in Canadian corrections: A long-term follow-up. Sexual Abuse, 25(4), 396–422. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063212464399
42.
OlverM. E.NicholaichukT. P.WongS. C. (2014). The predictive and convergent validity of a psychometric battery used to assess sexual offenders in a treatment programme: An 18-year follow-up. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 20(2), 216–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552600.2013.816791
43.
OlverM. E.StockdaleK. C.WormithJ. S. (2011). A meta-analysis of predictors of offender treatment attrition and its relationship to recidivism. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 79(1), 6–21. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022200
R Core Team. (2024). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
46.
RogersR.DickeyR. (1991). Denial and minimization among sex offenders: A review of competing models of deception. Annals of Sex Research, 4(1), 49–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00850139
47.
RosseelY. (2012). Lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02
48.
SatorraA.BentlerP. M. (2001). A scaled difference chi-square test statistic for moment structure analysis. Psychometrika, 66(4), 507–514. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02296192
49.
SchafferM.JeglicE. L.MosterA.WnukD. (2010). Cognitive-behavioral therapy in the treatment and management of sex offenders. Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy, 24(2), 92–103. https://doi.org/10.1891/0889-8391.24.2.92
50.
SchmuckerM.LöselF. (2015). The effects of sexual offender treatment on recidivism: An international meta-analysis of sound quality evaluations. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 11(4), 597–630. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-015-9241-z
51.
SchmuckerM.LöselF. (2017). Sexual offender treatment for reducing recidivism among convicted sex offenders: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 13(1), 1–75. https://doi.org/10.4073/csr.2017.8
52.
SörbomD.JöreskogK. G. (1981). The use of structural equation models in evaluation research. University, Department of Statistics. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151714
VandenbergR. J.LanceC. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(1), 4–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/109442810031002
WardT.StewartC. A. (2003). The treatment of sex offenders: Risk management and good lives. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 34(4), 353–360. https://doi/10.1037/0735-7028.34.4.353
57.
WebsterS. D.AkhtarS.BowersL. E.MannR. E.RallingsM.MarshallW. L. (2004). The impact of the prison service sex offender treatment programme on minority ethnic offenders: A preliminary study. Psychology, Crime and Law, 10(2), 113–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316031000093432
58.
WidamanK. F.FerrerE.CongerR. D. (2010). Factorial invariance within longitudinal structural equation models: Measuring the same construct across time. Child Development Perspectives, 4(1), 10–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-8606.2009.00110.x
59.
WidamanK. F.ReiseS. P. (1997). Exploring the measurement invariance of psychological instruments: Applications in the substance use domain. In BryantK. J.WindleM.WestS. G. (Eds.), The science of prevention: Methodological advances from alcohol and substance abuse research (pp. 281–324). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10222-009
60.
YatesP. M. (2004). Treatment of adult sexual offenders: A therapeutic cognitive-behavioural model of intervention. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 12(3-4), 195–232. https://doi.org/10.1300/J070v12n03_08
61.
YoonJ.KnightR. A. (2014). 성범죄자를 위한 치료프로그램 개발 및 제도화방안(Ⅱ) : 교정시설내 성범죄자 치료프로그램의 효과성 평가 [Treating sexual offenders (II): Treating sexual offenders] (Report No. 13-B-11). Seoul: Korean Institute of Criminology. https://doi.org/10.23000/TRKO201400010863
62.
YoonJ. S.KimM. Y.LeeT. H. (2020). 교정시설내 성범죄자 심리치료 프로그램 효과성 평가 연구 [The effectiveness of prison-based sex offender treatment program in Korea] (Report No. 20-AB-02). Seoul: Korean Institute of Criminology.
