A major criticism of the Wechsler Memory Scale–III Faces subtest is the number of items, which can be daunting and time-consuming for an impaired client or boring for a normal client. An analysis of several versions, with data from a sample of 50 clinical referrals, revealed that a 32-item subtest was best overall. Using this version, 100% (Faces I) and 94% (Faces II) of the predicted raw scores were less than 4 points away from the actual raw scores, whereas 66% (Faces I) and 70% (Faces II) were less than 2 points away. Limitations of this procedure are discussed.
Axelrod, B. N.
(2001). Administration duration of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale–III and Wechsler Memory Scale–III. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 16, 293-301.
2.
Carlesimo, G. A.
, & Caltagirone, C. (1995). Components in the visual processing of known and unknown faces. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 17,691-705.
3.
Schwinberger, S. R.
, Buse, C., Freeman, R. B., Jr., Schonle, P. W., & Sommer, W. (1992). Memory search for faces and digits in patients with unilateral brain lesions. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 14,839-856.
4.
Wechsler, D.
(1997). The Wechsler Memory Scale–III (manual). San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
