This study examined whether news framing of policy debates shapes audience members’ emotions. An experiment revolving around the issue of campaign finance reform tested the effects of conflict and substance coverage on anger and disgust among participants. Conflict coverage produced a conditional effect on these emotions, whereas substance coverage did not. Specifically, the extent to which conflict coverage provoked anger and disgust increased with prior support for the losing side of the debate (in this case, the pro-campaign finance reform side). Such effects may carry implications for political journalism and democratic politics.
Bennett, W. L.2006. News: The Politics of Illusion. 7th Edition. New York: Longman.
2.
Cappella, J. A., and K. H. Jamieson. 1997. Spiral of Cynicism: The Press and the Public Good. New York: Oxford University Press.
3.
Conover, P., and S. Feldman. 1986. “Emotional Reactions to the Economy: I’m Mad as Hell and I’m Not Going to Take It Anymore.”American Journal of Political Science30: 30-78.
4.
Entman, R.1993. “Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm.”Journal of Communication43: 51-58.
5.
Fallows, J.1997. Breaking the News: How the Media Undermine American Democracy. New York: Vintage.
6.
Gamson, W. A.1992. Talking Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
7.
Gamson, W. A., and A. Modigliani. 1987. “The Changing Political Culture of Affirmative Action.” In Research in Political Sociology, ed. R. D. Braungart. Vol. 4. Greenwich, CT: JAI.
8.
Gans, H. J.1979. Deciding What’s News. New York: Vintage.
9.
Graber, D. A.1993. Mass Media and American Politics. Washington, D.C.: CQ.
10.
Hibbing, J. R., and E. Theiss-Morse. 2002. Stealth Democracy: Americans’ Beliefs about How Government Should Work. New York: Cambridge University Press.
11.
Iyengar, S.1991. Is Anyone Responsible?Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
12.
Kerbel, M. R., S. Apee, and M. H. Ross. 2000. “PBS Ain’t So Different: Public Broadcasting, Election Frames, and Democratic Empowerment.”Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics5: 3-32.
13.
Klapper, J.1960. The Effects of Mass Communications. New York: Free Press.
14.
Lawrence, R. G.2000. Game-framing the Issues: Tracking the Strategy Frame in Public Policy News. Political Communication17: 93-114.
15.
Lazarsfeld, P., B. Berelson, and H. Gaudet. 1948. The People’s Choice: How the Voter Makes Up His Mind in a Presidential Campaign. New York: Columbia University Press.
16.
Lazarus, R. S.1991. Emotion & Adaptation. New York: Oxford University Press.
17.
Marcus, G. E.2003. “The Psychology of Emotion and Politics.” In Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology, ed. D. O. Sears, L. Huddy, and R. Jervis. New York: Oxford University Press.
18.
Marcus, G. E., W. R. Neuman, and M. MacKuen. 2000. Affective Intelligence and Political Judgment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
19.
Mill, J. S. [1859] 1947. On Liberty. Arlington Heights, IL:AHM.
20.
Nelson, T. E., R. A. Clawson, and Z. M. Oxley. 1997. “Media Framing of a Civil Liberties Conflict and Its Effect on Tolerance.”American Political Science Review91: 567-583.
21.
Patterson, T. E.1994. Out of Order. New York: Vintage.
22.
Price, V., and D. Tewksbury. 1997.“News Values and Public Opinion: A Theoretical Account of Media Priming and Framing.” In Progress in Communication Sciences: Advances in Persuasion, ed. G. A. Barnett and F. J. Boster. Vol. 13. Greenwich, CT:Ablex.
23.
Sears, D. O.1986. “College Sophomores in the Laboratory: Influences of a Narrow Data Base on Psychology’s View of Human Nature.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology51: 515-530.
24.
Valentino, N. A., M. N. Beckman, and T. A. Buhr. 2001. “A Spiral of Cynicism for Some: The Contingent Effects of Campaign News Frames on Participation and Confidence in Government.”Political Communication18: 347-368.
25.
Zaller, J. R.1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. New York: Cambridge University Press.
