This research studies the effect of news coverage on third-party interventions in negotiations. In the political context of the post-Oslo era in the Israeli-Palestinian negotiations, it examines the influence of U.S. appeals, reported in the local Israeli press, that called on the Israelis to make concessions. Previous research regarding the reactive devaluation bias (Ross 1995) led to the hypothesis that a positive effect of the third-party communicator will occur: An appeal for Israeli concessions from an American source should elicit more favorable attitudes among Israeli Jews compared to the same appeal from a Palestinian communicator. In addition, I hypothesized that in line with tendencies found in regard to the reactive devaluation bias (l. Maoz et al. in preparation), the magnitude of the positive effect of the third-party communicator will depend on the recipients' political affiliation and will vary for hawks and for doves. These hypotheses are examined, using an experimental design of the communicator's identity (American versus Palestinian) by the recipient's political affiliation (hawks versus doves). The findings support the research hypotheses.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bar-Tal, Daniel , Alona Raviv, and Tali Freund. 1994. “An Anatomy of Political Beliefs: A Study of Their Centrality, Confidence Contents, and Epistemic Authority.”Journal of Applied Social Psychology24(10):849-872.
2.
Bauer, Connie , and Edward Fink. 1983. “Fitting Equations with Power Transformations: Examining Variables with Error.”Communication Yearbook7:146-199.
3.
Bazerman, Max , and Margaret Neale. 1993. Negotiating Rationally. New York: Free Press.
4.
Bercovitch, Jacob , and Jeffrey Rubin, eds. 1992. Mediation in International Relations: Multiple Approaches to Conflict Management. New York: St. Martin's Press.
5.
Donohue, William . 1998. “Managing Equivocality and Relational Paradox in the Oslo Peace Negotiations.”Journal of Language and Social Psychology17(1):72-96.
6.
Fiske, Susan , and Steven Neuberg. 1990. “A Continuum Model of Impression Formation, from Category-Based to Individuating Processes: Influence of Information and Motivation on Attention and Interpretation.”Advances in Experimental Social Psychology23:1-74.
7.
Fiske, Susan , and Shelley Taylor. 1991. Social Cognition. New York: McGraw-Hill.
8.
Franzosi, Roberto . 1989. “From Words to Numbers: A Generalized and Linguistics-Based Coding Procedure for Collecting Event-Data from Newspapers.”Sociological Methodology19:263-298.
9.
Gilliam, Franklin , Shanto Iyengar, Adam Simon, and Oliver Wright. 1996. “Crime in Black and White: The Violent, Scary World of Local News.”Press/Politics1(3):6-23.
10.
Griffin, Dale , and Lee Ross. 1991. “Subjective Construal, Social Inference, and Human Misunderstanding. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology24:319-359.
11.
Haque, Abdul , and E. Lawson. 1980. “The Mirror Image in the Context of the Arab-Israeli Conflict.”International Journal of Intercultural Relations4(1):107-115.
12.
Hirshberg, Matthew . 1993. “The Self-Perpetuating National Self-Image: Cognitive Biases in Perceptions of International Interventions.”Political Psychology14(1):77-97.
13.
Kelman, Herbert . 1992. “Informal Mediation by the Scholar/Practitioner.” In Mediation in International Relations: Multiple Approaches to Conflict Management, ed. Jacob Bercovitch and Jeffrey Rubin. New York: St. Martin's Press.
14.
Maoz, Ifat . 1996. The Effect of Bias Mechanisms on the Evaluation of Concessions Offered by the Opponent in the Israeli-Palestinian Negotiations. Haifa: Jewish-Arab Center, Gustav Heinemann Institute of Middle Eastern Studies, Haifa University.
15.
Maoz, Ifat , Andrew Ward, Lee Ross and Michael Katz. “Reactive Devaluation of a Peace Proposal in Two Cultures.” Manuscript in preparation.
16.
Maoz, Moshe . 1999. “The Oslo Agreements: Toward Arab-Jewish Reconciliation.” In After the Peace: Resistance and Reconciliation, ed. Robert Rothstein. London: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
17.
Naveh, Chanan . 1998. “The Role of the Media in the Peace Processes: The Case of the Middle East in the 1990s.” Presented at the 48th annual conference of the International Communication Association, Jerusalem, July 20-24.
18.
Rosenberg, Shawn , and Gadi Wolfsfeld. 1977. “International Conflict and the Problem of Attribution.”Journal of Conflict Resolution21(1):75-103.
19.
Ross, Lee . 1995. “Reactive Devaluation in Negotiation and Conflict Resolution.” In Barriers to the Negotiated Resolution of Conflict, ed. Kenneth Arrow, Robert Mnookin, Lee Ross, Amos Tversky, and Robert Wilson. New York: Norton.
20.
Ross, Lee , and Constance Stillinger. 1991. “Psychological Barriers to Conflict Resolution.”Negotiation Journal7(4):389-404.
21.
Rouhana, Nadim . 1998. “Unofficial Intervention: Potential Contributions to Resolving Ethnonational Conflicts.” In Innovations in Diplomatic Practice, ed. J. Melissen. Basingstoke, UK: Macmillan.
22.
Rouhana, Nadim , Anne O'Dwyer, and Sharon Vaso. 1997. “Cognitive Biases and Political Party Affiliation in Protracted Intergroup Conflict.”Journal of Applied Social Psychology27(1):37-57.
23.
Rubin, Jeffrey . 1981. Dynamics of Third Party Intervention: Kissinger in the Middle East. New York: Praeger.
24.
Rubin, Jeffrey , Dean Pruitt, and Sung Kim. 1994. Social Conflict: Escalation, Stalemate, and Settlement. New York: McGraw-Hill.
25.
Shikaki, Khalil . 1997. “Attitudes to the Peace Process among a Sample of Palestinian Students [Respondent to Bernard Sabellah].” In SharedValues towards the Peace Process, ed. Moshe Maoz and Sari Nusseibeh. Jerusalem: Harry Truman Research Institute, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, and Palestine Consultancy Group.
26.
Sigelman, Lee , and Carol Sigelman. 1986. “Shattered Expectations: Public Responses to `Out-of-Character' Presidential Actions.”Political Behavior8(3):262-286.
27.
Silverstein, Brett , and Catherine Flamenbaum. 1989. “Biases in the Perception and Cognition of Actions of Enemies.”Journal of Social Issues45(2):51-72.
28.
Trope, Yaacov . 1989. “Stereotypes and Dispositional Judgment.” In Stereotyping and Prejudice: Changing Conceptions, ed. Daniel Bar-Tal, Carl Graumann, Arie Kruglanski, and Wolfgang Stroebe. New York: Springer-Verlag.
29.
Touval, Saadia . 1982. The Peace Brokers: Mediators in the Arab-Israeli Conflict, 1948-1979. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
30.
Vallone, Robert , Lee Ross, and Mark Lepper. 1985. “The Hostile Media Phenomenon: Biased Perception and Perceptions of Media Bias in Coverage of the Beirut Massacre.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology49(3):577-585.
31.
White, Ralph . 1984. Fearful Warriors: A Psychological Profile of U.S.—Soviet Relations. New York: Free Press.
32.
Wolfsfeld, Gadi . 1997a. “Fair Weather Friends: The Varying Role of the News Media in the Arab-Israeli Peace Process.”Political Communication14(1):29-48.
33.
Wolfsfeld, Gadi . 1997b. “Promoting Peace through the News Media: Some Initial Lessons from the Oslo Peace Process.”Press/Politics2(4):52-70.
34.
Yuchtman-yaar, Ephraim , and Tamar Herman. 1997. The Peace Index Project: Findings and Analyses, June 1996-May 1997 (in Hebrew). Tel Aviv: Tami Steinmetz Center for Peace Research, Tel Aviv University.
35.
Yuchtman-Yaar, Ephraim , Tamar Herman, and Arie Nadler. 1996. The Peace Index Project: Findings and Analyses, June 1994-May 1996 (in Hebrew). Tel Aviv: Tami Steinmetz Center for Peace Research, Tel Aviv University.
