Quasistatic rate-independent damage combined with linearized plasticity with hardening at small strains is investigated. Fractional-step time discretization is devised with the purpose of obtaining a numerically efficient scheme, possibly converging to a physically relevant stress-driven solution, which however is to be verified a posteriori using a suitable integrated variant of the maximum-dissipation principle. Gradient theories both for damage and for plasticity are considered to make the scheme numerically stable with guaranteed convergence within the class of weak solutions. After finite-element approximation, this scheme is computationally implemented and illustrative 2-dimensional simulations are performed.
AlessiRMarigoJJVidoliS.Gradient damage models coupled with plasticity and nucleation of cohesive cracks. Arch Ration Mech An2014; 214: 575–615.
7.
AlessiRMarigoJJVidoliS.Gradient damage models coupled with plasticity: Variational formulation and main properties. Mech Mater2015; 80 B: 351–367.
8.
CrismaleV.Globally stable quasistatic evolution for a coupled elastoplastic-damage model. ESAIM: Control Optim Calc Var, 2014. DOI: 10.1051/cocv/2015037.
9.
LeguillonD.Strength or toughness? A criterion for crack onset at a notch. Eur J Mech A-Solid2002; 21: 61–72.
10.
RoubíčekT.Maximally-dissipative local solutions to rate-independent systems and application to damage and delamination problems. Nonlin Anal Theor2015; 113: 33–50.
11.
ContrafattoLCuomoM. A new thermodynamically consistent continuum model for hardening plasticity coupled with damage. Int J Solids Struct, submitted.
12.
RoubíčekTPanagiotopoulosCGMantičV.Local-solution approach to quasistatic rate-independent mixed-mode delamination. Math Mod Meth Appl S2015; 25: 1337–1364.
13.
KneesDRossiRZaniniC.A vanishing viscosity approach to a rate-independent damage model. Math Models Meth Appl Sci2013; 23: 565–616.
14.
RoubíčekTPanagiotopoulosCGMantičV.Quasistatic adhesive contact of visco-elastic bodies and its numerical treatment for very small viscosity. Z Angew Math Mech2013; 93: 823–840.
15.
RoubíčekTValdmanJ.Perfect plasticity with damage and healing at small strains, its modelling, analysis, and computer implementation (Preprint arXiv no.1505.01018). SIAM J Appl Math, accepted.
16.
BiotMA.Mechanics of Incremental Deformations. New York: Wiley, 1965.
17.
NguyenQS.Some remarks on standard gradient models and gradient plasticity. Math Mech Solids2015; 20: 760–769.
18.
RoubíčekTKružkMZemanJ. Delamination and adhesive contact models and their mathematical analysis and numerical treatment. In: MantičV (ed) Math Methods & Models in Composites. Covent Garden, London: Imperial College Press, 2013, 349–400.
PanagiotopoulosCGMantičVRoubíčekT.Two adhesive-contact models for quasistatic mixed-mode delamination problems. Math Comput Simulat2014; Submitted.
21.
VodičkaRMantičVRoubíčekT.Energetic versus maximally-dissipative local solutions of a quasi-static rate-independent mixed-mode delamination model. Meccanica2014; 49: 2933–2963.
22.
SadjadpourABhattacharyaK.A micromechanics inspired constitutive model for shape-memory alloys. Smart Mater Struct2007; 16: 1751–1765.
23.
BonettiEFrémondMLexcellentC.Global existence and uniqueness for a thermomechanical model for shape memory alloys with partition of the strain. Math Mech Solids2006; 11: 251–275.
24.
FrostMBenešováBSedlákP.A microscopically motivated constitutive model for shape memory alloys: Formulation, analysis and computations. Math Mech Solids. Epub ahead of print 20February2014. DOI: 10.1177/1081286514522474.
25.
KrejčPStefanelliU.Existence and non-existence for the full thermomechanical Souza-Auricchio model of shape memory wires. Math Mech Solids2011; 16: 349–365.
26.
SedlákPFrostMBenešováB. Thermomechanical model for NiTi-based shape memory alloys including R-phase and material anisotropy under multi-axial loadings. Int J Plasticity2012; 39: 132–151.
27.
ToaderRZaniniC.An artificial viscosity approach to quasistatic crack growth. B Unione Mat Ital2009; 2: 1–36.
28.
StefanelliU.A variational characterization of rate-independent evolution. Math Nachr2009; 282: 1492–1512.
29.
RoubíčekT.Rate independent processes in viscous solids at small strains. Math Method Appl Sci2009; 32: 825–862.
30.
HillR.A variational principle of maximum plastic work in classical plasticity. Q J Mech Appl Math1948; 1: 18–28.
31.
ZieglerH.An attempt to generalize Onsager’s principle, and its significance for rheological problems. Z Angew Math Phys1958; 9: 748–763.
32.
MooreEH.Definition of limit in general integral analysis. P Natl Acad Sci USA1915; 1: 628–632.
33.
PollardS.The Stieltjes’ integral and its generalizations. Quart J of Pure and Appl Math1923; 49: 73–138.
34.
RoubíčekT.Nonlinear Partial Differential Equations with Applications, 2nd edition.Basel: Birkhäuser, 2013.
35.
ČermákMKozubekTSysalaS. A TFETI domain decomposition solver for elastoplastic problems. Appl Math Comput2014; 231: 634–653.
36.
AlbertyJCarstensenCZarrabiD.Adaptive numerical analysis in primal elastoplasticity with hardening. Comput Method Appl M1999; 171: 175–204.
37.
GruberPKneesDNesenenkoS. Analytical and numerical aspects of time-dependent models with internal variables. Z Angew Math Mech2010; 90: 861–902.
38.
GruberPValdmanJ.Solution of one-time-step problems in elastoplasticity by a Slant Newton Method. SIAM J Sci Comput2009; 31: 1558–1580.
BrokateMCarstensenCValdmanJ.A quasi-static boundary value problem in multi-surface elastoplasticity. II: Numerical solution. Math Method Appl Sci2005; 28: 881–901.
41.
RahmanTValdmanJ.Fast MATLAB assembly of FEM matrices in 2D and 3D: Nodal elements. Appl Math Comput2013; 219: 7151–7158.
42.
GarcaIGMantičVGracianiE.Debonding at the fibre-matrix interface under remote transverse tension. One debond or two symmetric debonds?Eur J Mech A-Solid2015; 53: 75–88.
43.
PanagiotopoulosCGMantičV.Symmetric and nonsymmetric debonds at fiber-matrix interface under transverse loads. an application of energetic approaches using collocation BEM. Anales de Mecánica de la Fractura2013; 30: 125–130.
