We study the crack-tip fields in a three-dimensional (3D) plate with a V-shaped crack employing Rajagopal’s theory of elasticity with the strain-limiting effect. The classical linear elastic fracture mechanics (LEFM) theory bears a well-documented inconsistency, i.e., for a static crack problem under the traction-free boundary condition, the LEFM theory predicts singular crack-tip strains. Such results are inconsistent with the constitutive relation derived using the assumption of uniform bound for the strain values. Instead, Rajagopal’s recent theory of elasticity provides implicit constitutive relations between the linearized strain and Cauchy stress in which one can impose an a-priori upper bound for strains. We formulate the strain-limiting theory comprehensively in this article. The linearized strain is expressed as a nonlinear function of the Cauchy stress. The equation for the equilibrium of the linear momentum under a special type of nonlinear constitutive relation reduces to a second-order quasilinear elliptic boundary value problem (BVP). Using a Picard-type linearization and a continuous Galerkin-type finite element technique, we solve several BVPs with tensile and shear displacement loading. The numerical results for the strains, the stresses, the stress intensity factor (SIF), and strain energy density (SED) are obtained for different Poisson values, strain-limiting parametric values, and the V-shaped angles. The growth of the near-tip strains is far less than that of stresses, and the results for both the SIF and SED are also consistent with the results from LEFM. Our work demonstrates that the framework of Rajagopal’s theory of elasticity can provide a basis for developing physically meaningful and mathematically well-posed BVPs to study evolution of cracks, damage, nucleation, or failure in elastic bodies.
SinclairGB.Stress singularities in classical elasticity–I: removal, interpretation, and analysis. Appl Mech Rev2004; 57(4): 251–298.
5.
WilliamsML.Stress singularities resulting from various boundary conditions in angular corners of plates in extension.New York: American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 1952.
6.
WestergaardHM.Bearing pressures and cracks: bearing pressures through a slightly waved surface or through a nearly flat part of a cylinder, and related problems of cracks. New York: American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 1939.
7.
InglisCE.Stresses in a plate due to the presence of cracks and sharp corners. Trans Inst Naval Archit1913; 55: 219–241.
8.
WilliamsML.The stresses around a fault or crack in dissimilar media. Bull Seismol Soc Am1959; 49(2): 199–204.
9.
GurtinMEMurdochAI.A continuum theory of elastic material surfaces. Arch Ration Mech Anal1975; 57(4): 291–323.
10.
SendovaTWaltonJR.A new approach to the modeling and analysis of fracture through extension of continuum mechanics to the nanoscale. Math Mech Solids2010; 15(3): 368–413.
11.
ZemlyanovaAYWaltonJR.Modeling of a curvilinear planar crack with a curvature-dependent surface tension. SIAM J Appl Math2012; 72(5): 1474–1492.
12.
FergusonLAMuddamallappaMWaltonJR.Numerical simulation of mode-III fracture incorporating interfacial mechanics. Int J Fract2015; 192(1): 47–56.
MallikarjunaiahSMWaltonJR.On the direct numerical simulation of plane-strain fracture in a class of strain-limiting anisotropic elastic bodies. Int J Fract2015; 192(2): 217–232.
15.
BarenblattGI. The mathematical theory of equilibrium cracks in brittle fracture. In: DrydenHLKármánTVKuertiG, et al. (eds) Advances in applied mechanics, vol. 7. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1962, pp. 55–129.
16.
SillingSA.Reformulation of elasticity theory for discontinuities and long-range forces. J Mech Phys Solids2000; 48(1): 175–209.
17.
KnowlesJKSternbergE.Large deformations near a tip of an interface-crack between two neo-Hookean sheets. J Elast1983; 13(3): 257–293.
RajagopalKR.The elasticity of elasticity. Z Angew Math Phys2007; 58(2): 309–317.
20.
RajagopalKR.Non-linear elastic bodies exhibiting limiting small strain. Math Mech Solids2011; 16(1): 122–139.
21.
RajagopalKR.Conspectus of concepts of elasticity. Math Mech Solids2011; 16(5): 536–562.
22.
RajagopalKR.On the nonlinear elastic response of bodies in the small strain range. Acta Mech2014; 225(6): 1545–1553.
23.
RajagopalKRSrinivasaAR.On the response of non-dissipative solids. Proc R Soc A2007; 463(2078): 357–367.
24.
RajagopalKRSrinivasaAR.On a class of non-dissipative materials that are not hyperelastic. Proc R Soc A2009; 465(2102): 493–500.
25.
RajagopalKR.A note on the linearization of the constitutive relations of non-linear elastic bodies. Mech Res Commun2018; 93: 132–137.
26.
RajagopalKRWaltonJR.Modeling fracture in the context of a strain-limiting theory of elasticity: a single anti-plane shear crack. Int J Fract2011; 169(1): 39–48.
27.
GouKMallikarjunaiahSMRajagopalKR, et al. Modeling fracture in the context of a strain-limiting theory of elasticity: a single plane-strain crack. Int J Eng Sci2015; 88: 73–82.
28.
YoonHCMallikarjunaiahSM.A finite-element discretization of some boundary value problems for nonlinear strain-limiting elastic bodies. Math Mech Solids2022; 27(2): 281–307.
29.
KulvaitVMálekJRajagopalKR.Anti-plane stress state of a plate with a V-notch for a new class of elastic solids. Int J Fract2013; 179(1–2): 59–73.
30.
KulvaitVMálekJRajagopalKR.The state of stress and strain adjacent to notches in a new class of nonlinear elastic bodies. J Elast2019; 135(1): 375–397.
31.
Ortiz-BernardinABustamanteRRajagopalKR.A numerical study of elastic bodies that are described by constitutive equations that exhibit limited strains. Int J Solids Struct2014; 51(3–4): 875–885.
32.
OrtizABustamanteRRajagopalKR.A numerical study of a plate with a hole for a new class of elastic bodies. Acta Mech2012; 223(9): 1971–1981.
33.
ErbayHAşengülY.Traveling waves in one-dimensional non-linear models of strain-limiting viscoelasticity. Int J Non Linear Mech2015; 77: 61–68.
34.
ItouHKovtunenkoVARajagopalKR.On the states of stress and strain adjacent to a crack in a strain-limiting viscoelastic body. Math Mech Solids2018; 23(3): 433–444.
35.
ZhuHMulianaARajagopalKR.On the nonlinear viscoelastic deformations of composites with prestressed inclusions. Compos Struct2016; 149: 279–291.
36.
KannanKRajagopalKRSaccomandiG.Unsteady motions of a new class of elastic solids. Wave Motion2014; 51(5): 833–843.
37.
KambapalliMKannanKRajagopalKR.Circumferential stress waves in a non-linear cylindrical annulus in a new class of elastic materials. Q J Mech Appl Math2014; 67(2): 193–203.
38.
BustamanteR, |SfyrisD.Direct determination of stresses from the stress equations of motion and wave propagation for a new class of elastic bodies. Math Mech Solids2015; 20(1): 80–91.
39.
BulíčekMMálekJRajagopalKR, et al. Existence of solutions for the anti-plane stress for a new class of “strain-limiting” elastic bodies. Calc Var Partial Differ Equ2015; 54(2): 2115–2147.
40.
BulíčekMMálekJRajagopalKR, et al. On elastic solids with limiting small strain: modeling and analysis. EMS Surv Math Sci2014; 1(2): 283–332.
41.
BulíˇcekMMálekJSüliE.Analysis and approximation of a strain-limiting nonlinear elastic model. Math Mech Solids2015; 20(1): 92–118.
42.
CiarletPG.The finite element method for elliptic problems. Philadelphia, PA: SIAM, 2002.
43.
EvansLC.Partial differential equations (Graduate studies in mathematics). Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society, 1998.
44.
RajagopalKR. The mechanics and mathematics of bodies described by implicit constitutive equations. In: International conference continuum mechanics focusing on singularities, Fukuoka, Japan, 13–15 June 2018, pp. 49–65. Berlin: Springer.
45.
ItouHKovtunenkoVARajagopalKR.Contacting crack faces within the context of bodies exhibiting limiting strains. JSIAM Lett2017; 9: 61–64.
46.
MaiTWaltonJR.On strong ellipticity for implicit and strain-limiting theories of elasticity. Math Mech Solids2015; 20(2): 121–139.
47.
MaiTWaltonJR.On monotonicity for strain-limiting theories of elasticity. J Elast2015; 120(1): 39–65.
48.
MallikarjunaiahSM.On two theories for brittle fracture: modeling and direct numerical simulations. PhD Thesis, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 2015.
49.
YoonHCLeeSMallikarjunaiahSM.Quasi-static anti-plane shear crack propagation in nonlinear strain-limiting elastic solids using phase-field approach. Int J Fract2021; 227(2): 153–172.
50.
LeeSYoonHCMallikarjunaiahSM.Finite element simulation of quasi-static tensile fracture in nonlinear strain-limiting solids with the phase-field approach. J Comput Appl Math2022; 399: 113715.
51.
YoonHCVasudevaKKMallikarjunaiahSM.Finite element model for a coupled thermo-mechanical system in nonlinear strain-limiting thermoelastic body. Commun Nonlinear Sci Numer Simul2022; 108: 106262.
52.
BridgesC, |RajagopalKR.Implicit constitutive models with a thermodynamic basis: a study of stress concentration. Z Angew Math Phys2015; 66(1): 191–208.
53.
RajagopalKRSaccomandiG.A novel approach to the description of constitutive relations. Front Mater2016; 3: 36.
CostanzoFWaltonJR.A study of dynamic crack growth in elastic materials using a cohesive zone model. Int J Eng Sci1997; 35(12–13): 1085–1114.
56.
TianYYuZOngCYA, et al. Nonlinear elastic behavior induced by nano-scale α phase in β matrix of β-type Ti–25Nb–3Zr–2Sn–3Mo titanium alloy. Mater Lett2015; 145: 283–286.
57.
DevendiranVKSandeepRKKannanK, et al. A thermodynamically consistent constitutive equation for describing the response exhibited by several alloys and the study of a meaningful physical problem. Int J Solids Struct2017; 108: 1–10.
58.
HaoYLLiSJSunSY, et al. Super-elastic titanium alloy with unstable plastic deformation. Appl Phys Lett2005; 87(9): 091906.
59.
BustamanteRMonteroSOrtiz-BernardinA.A novel nonlinear constitutive model for rock: numerical assessment and benchmarking. Appl Eng Sci2020; 3: 100012.
60.
BustamanteR, |RajagopalKR.A new type of constitutive equation for nonlinear elastic bodies. fitting with experimental data for rubber-like materials. Proc R Soc A2021; 477(2252): 20210330.
61.
BeckLBulíˇcekMMálekJ, et al. On the existence of integrable solutions to nonlinear elliptic systems and variational problems with linear growth. Arch Ration Mech Anal2017; 225(2): 717–769.
62.
ItouHKovtunenkoVARajagopalKR.Nonlinear elasticity with limiting small strain for cracks subject to non-penetration. Math Mech Solids2017; 22(6): 1334–1346.
63.
FuSChungEMaiT.Generalized multiscale finite element method for a strain-limiting nonlinear elasticity model. J Comput Appl Math2019; 359: 153–165.
64.
RajagopalKR.An implicit constitutive relation for describing the small strain response of porous elastic solids whose material moduli are dependent on the density. Math Mech Solids2021; 26(8): 1138–1146.
65.
MurruPTRajagopalKR.Stress concentration due to the presence of a hole within the context of elastic bodies. Mater Des Process Commun2021; 3(5): e219.
66.
PrŭšaVRajagopalKRWinemanA.Pure bending of an elastic prismatic beam made of a material with density-dependent material parameters. Math Mech Solids2022; 27: 1546–1558.
67.
YoonHCMallikarjunaiahSMBhattaD. Preferential stiffness and the crack-tip fields of an elastic porous solid based on the density-dependent material moduli. arxiv [preprint]. arxiv:2212.08181.
