Fast Fourier transform method in peridynamic micromechanics of composites

We consider a static linear bond–based peridynamic (proposed by Silling, see J. Mech. Phys. Solids 2000; 48:175–209) composite materials (CMs) of a periodic structure. In the framework of the second background of micromechanics (also called computational analytical micromechanics), one proved that local micromechanics (LM) and peridynamic micromechanics (PM) are formally analogous to each other for CM of both random and periodic structures. It allows a straightforward generalization of LM methods (including fast Fourier transform, FFT) to their PM counterparts. So, in the PM counterpart of the implicit periodic Lippmann–Schwinger (L-S) equation in LM, we have three convolution kernels corresponding to the properties of the matrix, inclusions, and interactive interface. Eshelby tensor in LM, depending on the inclusion shape, is replaced by PM counterparts depending on the shapes of inclusions, and the interaction interface (although the Eshelby concept of homogeneous eigenfields does not work in PM). The mentioned tensors are estimated once (as in LM) in a frequency domain (also by the FFT method). The possible incorrectness of FFT applications to PM is analyzed and corrected. The polarization schemes of the solution of the L-S equation in the Fourier space have one primary unknown variable (polarization), whereas the PM counterpart contains three primary ones estimated at each step, which are formally similar to the LM case. A description of the generalized basic scheme and the Krylov approach is presented. Computational complexities O(N log2 N) of the FFT methods are the same in both LM and PM.