In this study, the evaluation of the performance of two thin-film UV-C reactors (annular and Taylor–Couette) and a coiled tube system is presented using actinometry and biodosimetry methods. The iodide/iodate actinometry method was found suitable for comparison of the efficiency of UV-C dose delivery of the UV-C continuous flow systems. Inactivation kinetics of Escherichia coli ATCC 8739 in quarter-strength Ringer’s solution (absorption coefficient α254 nm ∼ 0 cm−1) at various flow conditions at Reynolds numbers in the range of 26 to 3000 showed a good correlation between the different reactor types. In high UV-C absorbing liquids, the inactivation efficiency increases due to the improved radial mixing. The inactivation performance of the Taylor–Couette system correlates to the annular reactor when no rotation force is applied. The residence time distributions showed the narrowest distribution with the coiled tube system at comparable flow rates. The results indicate that, despite the laminar flow conditions, the performance of the Taylor–Couette unit becomes equal to the turbulent flow conditions of the coiled tube reactor by rotation of the inner cylinder.
ChoudharyRBandlaSWatsonDGHaddockJAbughazalehABhattacharyaB (2011) Performance of coiled tube ultraviolet reactors to inactivate Escherichia coli W1485 and Bacillus cereus endospores in raw cow milk and commercially processed skimmed cow milk. Journal of Food Engineering107: 14–20.
3.
Dean WR. (1927). Note on the motion of fluid in a curved pipe. Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science 4: 208–223.
4.
DowneyDGilesDKDelwicheMJ (1998) Finite element analysis of particle and liquid flow through an ultraviolet reactor. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture21: 81–105.
5.
ForneyLJGoodridgeCFPiersonJA (2003) Ultraviolet disinfection: Similitude in Taylor-Couette and channel flow. Environmental Science and Technology37: 5015–5020.
6.
ForneyLJPiersonJAGiorgesA (2005) Photon absorption in modified Taylor-Couette flow: Theory and experiment. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research44: 5193–5198.
7.
ForneyLJPiersonJAYeZ (2004) Juice irradiation with Taylor-Couette flow: UV inactivation of Escherichia coli. Journal of Food Protection67: 2410–2415.
8.
FranzCMAPSpechtIChoGSGräfVStahlMR (2009) UV-C-inactivation of microorganisms in naturally cloudy apple juice using novel inactivation equipment based on Dean vortex technology. Food Control20: 1103–1107.
9.
GayanECondonSAlvarezI (2014a) Biological aspects in food preservation by ultraviolet light: A review. Food and Bioprocess Technology7: 1–20.
GayánEMonfortSÁlvarezICondónS (2011) UV-C inactivation of Escherichia coli at different temperatures. Innovative Food Science and Emerging Technologies12: 531–541.
12.
GayanESerranoMJPaganRAlvarezICondonS (2015) Environmental and biological factors influencing the UV-C resistance of Listeria monocytogenes. Food Microbiology46: 246–253.
13.
GeeraerdAHValdramidisVPVan ImpeJF (2005) GInaFiT, a freeware tool to assess non-log-linear microbial survivor curves. International Journal of Food Microbiology102: 95–105.
14.
GiordanoRCGiordanoRLCPrazeresDMFCooneyCL (1998) Analysis of a Taylor-Poiseuille vortex flow reactor I: Flow patterns and mass transfer characteristics. Chemical Engineering Science53: 3635–3652.
15.
GiordanoRLCGiordanoRCCooneyCL (2000a) Performance of a continuous Taylor–Couette–Poiseuille vortex flow enzymic reactor with suspended particles. Process Biochemistry35: 1093–1101.
16.
GiordanoRLCGiordanoRCPrazeresDMFCooneyCL (2000b) Analysis of a Taylor-Poiseuille vortex flow reactor II: Reactor modeling and performance assessment using glucose-fructose isomerization as test reaction. Chemical Engineering Science55: 3611–3626.
17.
Guerrero-BeltránJABarbosa-CánovasGV (2004) Advantages and limitations on processing foods by UV light. Food Science and Technology International10: 137–147.
18.
KataokaKDoiHHongoTFutagawaM (1975) Ideal plug-flow properties of Taylor vortex flow. Journal of Chemical Engineering of Japan8: 472–476.
19.
KeyserMMüllerIACilliersFPNelWGouwsPA (2008) Ultraviolet radiation as a non-thermal treatment for the inactivation of microorganisms in fruit juice. Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies9: 348–354.
20.
KoutchmaTParisiB (2004) Biodosimetry of Escherichia coli UV inactivation in model juices with regard to dose distribution in annular UV reactors. Journal of Food Science69: 14–22.
21.
KoutchmaTParisiBPatazcaE (2007) Validation of UV coiled tube reactor for fresh juices. Journal of Environmental Engineering and Science6: 319–328.
22.
KoutchmaTNForneyLJMoraruCI (2009) Ultraviolet light in food technology – Principles and applications, Dublin: CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group.
23.
KreftPScheibleOKVenosaA (1986) Hydraulic studies and cleaning evaluations of ultraviolet disinfection units. Journal Water Pollution Control Federation58: 1129–1137.
24.
KuhnHJBraslavskySESchmidtR (2004) Chemical actinometry. Pure and Applied Chemistry76: 2105–2146.
25.
LueptowRMDocterAMinK (1992) Stability of axial flow in an annulus with a rotating inner cylinder. Physics of Fluids A4: 2446–2455.
26.
MafartPCouvertOGaillardSLeguerinelI (2002) On calculating sterility in thermal preservation methods: Application of the Weibull frequency distribution model. International Journal of Food Microbiology72: 107–113.
27.
Mendes de SouzaPMüllerAFernándezAStahlMR (2014) Microbiological efficacy in liquid egg products of a UV-C treatment in a coiled reactor. Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies21: 90–98.
28.
MüllerAGünthnerKAStahlMRGreinerRFranzCMAPPostenC (2015) Effect of physical properties of the liquid on the efficiency of a UV-C treatment in a coiled tube reactor. Innovative Food Science and Emerging Technologies29: 240–246.
29.
MüllerAStahlMRGräfVFranzCMAPHuchM (2011) UV-C treatment of juices to inactivate microorganisms using Dean vortex technology. Journal of Food Engineering107: 268–275.
30.
MüllerAStahlMRGreinerRPostenC (2014) Performance and dose validation of a coiled tube UV-C reactor for inactivation of microorganisms in absorbing liquids. Journal of Food Engineering138: 45–52.
31.
Orlowska M, Koutchma T, Kostrzynska M, Bezanson G, Defelice C and Tang J. (2012) Application of the prototype Taylor-Couette UV reactor for the processing of opaque juices. In: CIFST 50th national conference, Niagara Falls, ON, Canada, 27–29 May 2012.
32.
OrlowskaMKoutchmaTKostrzynskaMTangJDefeliceC (2014) Evaluation of mixing flow conditions to inactivate Escherichia coli in opaque liquids using pilot-scale Taylor–Couette UV unit. Journal of Food Engineering120: 100–109.
33.
RahnRO (1993) Use of potassium iodide as a chemical actinometer. Photochemistry and Photobiology58: 874–880.
34.
RahnRO (1997a) Erratum: Potassium iodide as a chemical actinometer for 254 nm radiation: Use of iodate as an electron scavenger. Photochemistry and Photobiology66: 885.
35.
RahnRO (1997b) Potassium iodide as a chemical actinometer for 254 nm radiation: Use of iodate as an electron scavenger. Photochemistry and Photobiology66: 450–455.
36.
RahnROEcholsS (2010) Iodide/iodate chemical actinometry using spherical vessels for radiation exposure as well as for monitoring absorbance changes: Research note. Photochemistry and Photobiology86: 990–993.
37.
RahnROStefanMIBoltonJRGorenEShawPSLykkeKR (2003) Quantum yield of the iodide-iodate chemical actinometer: Dependence on wavelength and concentration. Photochemistry and Photobiology78: 146–152.
38.
SchmidtSKaulingJ (2007) Process and laboratory scale UV inactivation of viruses and bacteria using an innovative coiled tube reactor. Chemical Engineering and Technology30: 945–950.
SommerRCabajASanduTLhotskyM (1999) Measurement of UV radiation using suspensions of microorganisms. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology53: 1–6.
41.
United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). Design manual – Municipal wastewater disinfection, EPA/625/1-86/021. 1986Cincinnati: Center for Environmental Research Information.
42.
United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). Ultraviolet light disinfection technology in drinking water application – An overview, EPA 811-R-96-002. 1996Washington DC: Office of Ground Water and Drinking Water.
43.
United States Food and Drug Administration (USFDA). (2000). Kinetics of microbial inactivation for alternative food processing technologies, 1-888-INFO-FDA (1-888-463-6332) Silver Spring, MD: U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Available at: http://www.fda.gov/Food/FoodScienceResearch/SafePracticesforFoodProcesses/ucm100158.htm (accessed 2 November 2016).
