Temporal dominance of sensations and check-all-that-apply analysis of restructured cooked hams elaborated with different salt content and pork quality meats
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online January, 2021
Temporal dominance of sensations and check-all-that-apply analysis of restructured cooked hams elaborated with different salt content and pork quality meats
This study aimed to evaluate the effects of salt (NaCl) content of 1.2%, 1.6%, and 2.0% in the sensory characteristics of restructured cooked hams, formulated with abnormal (PSE; pale, soft, and exudative) and normal (RFN; reddish pink, firm, and non-exudative) meats. The products with 1.2% added salt had higher (P < 0.05) acceptance scores for flavor, regardless of the type of meat used. Hams manufactured with PSE meat and 1.2% salt content had higher (P < 0.05) overall impression scores and were associated with the terms “characteristic ham flavor”, “juicy”, and “soft” in the check-all-that-apply analysis. RFN meat samples with 1.6% and 2.0% salt content were respectively associated to “rubbery” and “firm” texture. The ham flavor was always reported at the beginning of the temporal dominance of sensation test, followed by the term “salty” for the samples with 2.0% salt and “meaty” in the samples with 1.2% salt. The term “umami taste” appears to be associated to that samples made with PSE meat. These results led to the conclusion that PSE meat had a positive effect on the sensory profile of restructured cooked hams, especially in those formulated with 1.2% salt.
AresGDelizaRBarreiroCGiménezAGámbaroA (2010a) Comparison of two sensory profiling techniques based on consumer perception. Food Quality and Preference21(4): 417–426.
2.
AresGGiménezABarreiroCGámbaroA (2010b) Use of an open-ended question to identify drivers of liking of milk desserts. Comparison with preference mapping techniques. Food Quality and Preference21(3): 286–294.
3.
AresGJaegerSR (2013) Check-all-that-apply questions: Influence of attribute order on sensory product characterization. Food Quality and Preference28: 141–153.
4.
BarrettoTLPollonioMARTelis-RomeroJda Silva BarrettoAC (2018) Improving sensory acceptance and physicochemical properties by ultrasound application to restructured cooked ham with salt (NaCl) reduction. Meat Science145: 55–62.
5.
Cazedey HP, Torres Filho RA, Fontes PR, Ramos ALS and Ramos EM (2016) Comparison of different criteria used to categorize the technological quality of pork. Ciência Rural 46(12): 2241–2248.
6.
DesmondE (2006) Reducing salt: A challenge for the meat industry. Meat Science74: 188–196.
7.
DooleyLLeeY-SMeullenetJ-F (2010) The application of check-all-that-apply (CATA) consumer profiling to preference mapping of vanilla ice cream and its comparison to classical external preference mapping. Food Quality and Preference21: 394–401.
8.
HaddadGBSMouraAPRFontesPR, et al.(2018) The effects of sodium chloride and PSE meat on restructured cured-smoked pork loin quality: A response surface methodology study. Meat Science137: 191–200.
9.
HoritaCEsmerinoEVidalV, et al.(2017) Sensory profiling of low sodium frankfurter containing garlic products: Adequacy of Polarized Projective Mapping compared with trained panel. Meat Science131: 90–98.
10.
JorgeECMendesACGAuriemaBE, et al.(2015) Application of a check-all-that-apply question for evaluating and characterizing meat products. Meat Science100: 124–133.
11.
KhetraYKanawjiaSKPuriR (2016) Selection and optimization of salt replacer, flavour enhancer and bitter blocker for manufacturing low sodium Cheddar cheese using response surface methodology. LWT – Food Science and Technology72: 99–106.
12.
Labbe D, Schlich P, Pineau N, Gilbert F and Martin N (2009) Temporal dominance of sensations and sensory profiling: A comparative study. Food Quality and Preference 20(3): 216–221.
13.
Lorido L, Hort J, Estevez M and Ventanas S (2016) Reporting the sensory properties of dry-cured ham using a new language: Time intensity (TI) and temporal dominance of sensations (TDS). Meat Science 121: 166–174.
14.
McGoughMMSatoTRankinJJSindelarSA (2012) Reducing sodium levels in frankfurters using a natural flavor enhancer. Meat Science91(2): 185–194.
15.
NunesCABastosSCPimentaACMPinheiroCJPimentaMESG (2012) Relating consumer acceptance to descriptive attributes by three-way external preference mapping obtained by parallel factor analysis (PARAFAC). Journal of Sensory Studies27(4): 209–216.
16.
NunesCAPinheiroACMBastosSC (2011) Evaluating consumer acceptance tests by three-way internal preference mapping obtained by parallel factor analysis (PARAFAC). Journal of Sensory Studies26: 167–174.
17.
Paula MMO, Haddad GBS, Rodrigues LM, Benevenuto Jr. AA, Ramos AL and Ramos EM (2019) Effects of PSE meat and salt concentration on the technological and sensory characteristics of restructured cooked hams. Meat Science 152: 96–103.
18.
PineauNde BouilléAGLepageM, et al.(2012) Temporal Dominance of Sensations: What is a good attribute list?. Food Quality and Preference26: 159–165.
19.
PineauNSchlichPCordelleS, et al.(2009) Temporal dominance of sensations: Construction of the TDS curves and comparison with time–intensity. Food Quality and Preference20: 450–455.
20.
Poinot P, Arvisenet G, Texier F, et al. (2011) Use of sense masking to study sensory modalities singly: Interest for the understanding of apple in-mouth perception. Food Quality and Preference 22(6): 573–580.
21.
RamosEMGomideLAM (2017) Avaliação da Qualidade de Carnes: Fundamentos e Metodologias, Viçosa: Editora UFV.
22.
Rassmussen AJ and Andersson M (1996) New method for determination of drip loss in pork muscles. In: 42nd International Congress of Meat Science and Technology (ICoMST), Lillehammer, Norway, pp.286–287. Norway: Matforsk.
23.
SantosBABastianello CampagnolPCda CruzAG, et al.(2015) Check all that apply and free listing to describe the sensory characteristics of low sodium dry fermented sausages: Comparison with trained panel. Food Research International76: 725–734.
24.
Silva TLT, Souza VR, Pinheiro ACM, Nunes CA and Freire TVM (2014) Equivalence salting and temporal dominance of sensations analysis for different sodium chloride substitutes in cream cheese. International Journal of Dairy Technology 67(1): 31–38.
25.
Souza VR, Freire TV, Saraiva CG, Carneiro JdDS, Pinheiro AC and Nunes CA (2013) Salt equivalence and temporal dominance of sensations of different sodium chloride substitutes in butter. J Dairy Res 80(3): 319–325.
26.
Torres Filho RA, Silva VM, Rodrigues LM, Fontes PR, Ramos ALS and Ramos EM (2018) Classification of pork quality by hierarchical cluster analysis. British Food Journal 120(7): 1446–1456.
27.
ValentinDCholletSLelièvreMAbdiH (2012) Quick and dirty but still pretty good: A review of new descriptive methods in food science. International Journal of Food Science & Technology47(8): 1563–1578.
28.
VarelaPAresG (2012) Sensory profiling, the blurred line between sensory and consumer science. A review of novel methods for product characterization. Food Research International48: 893–908.
29.
VidalVASPaglariniCSFreitasMQ, et al.(2020) Q Methodology: An interesting strategy for concept profile and sensory description of low sodium salted meat. Meat Science161: 108000.
30.
WakelingINMacFieHJH (1995) Designing consumer trials balanced for first and higher orders of carry-over effect when only a subset of k samples from t may be tested. Food Quality and Preference6: 299–308.
31.
YamaguchiSNinomiyaK (1998) What is Umami?. Food Reviews International14: 123–138.
