The aim of this study was to study the strengthening effect of ultrasonic vacuum technique on the drying kinetics, moisture distribution, and microstructure of honey using low-field nuclear magnetic resonance and scanning electron microscopy. Results showed that ultrasonic vacuum drying technique could substantially shorten the drying time from 600 to 60 min, compared with vacuum drying. The sonochemical effects of ultrasonic vacuum drying were enhanced with the increased ultrasonic power and were more obvious in the initial stage of drying. This finding is consistent with the effective water diffusion coefficient results. The non-linear fitting analysis of experimental data on seven kinds of thin-layer drying mathematical models showed that logarithmic model is more suitable for describing the law of moisture change in honey during ultrasonic vacuum drying than the other models because of its higher regression coefficient value (≥0.99) and smaller reduced chi-square and root mean square error values (≤0.01). In addition, low-field nuclear magnetic resonance results showed that the increase in ultrasonic power accelerated the migration of bound water to immobilized water in honey samples. Scanning electron microscopy results showed that the porous structure formed by increasing the ultrasonic power is also conducive to the rapid migration and drying of moisture. In conclusion, ultrasonic vacuum drying technique is an effective and safe way for drying viscous materials compared with vacuum drying technique.
Association of Official Analytical Chemists (1995) Official methods of analysis of AOAC International, 16th ed. Washington, DC: Association of Official Analytical Chemists.
2.
Baş larMKiliçhMTokerOSSağdiçOAriciM (2014) Ultrasonic vacuum drying technique as a novel process for shortening the drying period for beef and chicken meats. Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies26: 182–190.
3.
Baş larMKiliçhMYalinkiliçB (2015) Dehydration kinetics of salmon and trout fillets using ultrasonic vacuum drying as a novel technique. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry27: 495–502.
4.
BruceDM (1985) Exposed-layer barley drying, three models fitted to new data up to 150℃. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research32: 337–347.
5.
ChengXFZhangMAdhikariB (2014) Changes in quality attributes of strawberry purees processed by power ultrasound or thermal treatments. Food Science and Technology Research20(5): 1033–1041.
6.
CuiZWSunLJChenWSunDW (2008) Preparation of dry honey by microwave-vacuum drying. Journal of Food Engineering84(4): 582–590.
7.
CuiZWXuSYSunDWChenW (2006) Dehydration of concentrated Ganoderma lucidum extraction by combined microwave-vacuum and conventional vacuum drying. Drying Technology24(5): 595–599.
8.
EarnshawRGAppleyardRMHurst (1995) Understanding physical inactivation processes: Combined preservation opportunities using heat, ultrasound and pressure. International Journal of Food Microbiology28(2): 197.
9.
ErtekinCYaldizO (2004) Drying of eggplant and selection of a suitable thin layer drying model. Journal of Food Engineering63(3): 349–359.
10.
FaladeKOSolademiOJ (2010) Modelling of air drying of fresh and blanched sweet potato slices. International Journal of Food Science & Technology45(2): 278–288.
11.
FanFRoosYH (2019) Physicochemical properties, structural transformation, and relaxation time in strength analysis for honey powder models. Food Research International122(1): 137–148.
12.
Fuente-BlancoSDLSarabiaRFDAcosta-AparicioVMBlanco-BlancoAGallego-JuárezJA (2006) Food drying process by power ultrasound. Ultrasonics44: 523–527.
13.
Gallego-JuárezJARieraEFuente BlancoSRodríguez-CorralGAcosta-AparicioVMBlancoA (2007) Application of high-power ultrasound for dehydration of vegetables: processes and devices. Drying Technology25(11): 1893–1901.
14.
Garcia-PerezJVOrtuñoCPuigACarcelJAPerez-MunueraI (2012) Enhancement of water transport and microstructural changes induced by high-intensity ultrasound application on orange peel drying. Food & Bioprocess Technology5(6): 2256–2265.
15.
García-PérezJVCárcelJABeneditoJMuletA (2007) Power ultrasound mass transfer enhancement in food drying. Food and Bioproducts Processing85(3): 247–254.
16.
HendersonSM (1974) Progress in developing the thin layer drying equation. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers17: 1167–1172.
17.
HendersonSMPabisS (1961) Grain drying theory I: Temperature effect on drying coefficient. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research6: 169–174.
18.
HillsBBenamiraSMarighetoNWrightK (2004) T1–T2 correlation analysis of complex foods. Applied Magnetic Resonance26(4): 543–560.
19.
JamradloedlukJNathakaranakuleASoponronnaritAPrachayawarakornS (2007) Influences of drying medium and temperature on drying kinetics and quality attributes of durian chip. Journal of Food Engineering78(1): 198–205.
20.
Jiang M, Bai X, Sun J and Zhu W. (2020). Implication of ultrasonic power and frequency for the ultrasonic vacuum drying of honey. Drying Technology. Epub ahead of print 2020. https://doi.org/10.1080/07373937.2020.1750026.
21.
KouchakzadehAGhobadiP (2012) Modeling of ultrasonic-convective drying of pistachios. Agricultural Engineering International: CIGR Journal14(4): 144–149.
22.
LiuSZhuWBaiXYouTYanJ (2018) Effect of ultrasonic energy density on moisture transfer during ultrasound enhanced vacuum drying of honey. Journal of Food Measurement and Characterization9: 969–980.
23.
LuZMcCarthyMJ (2013) Assessment of pomegranate postharvest quality using nuclear magnetic resonance. Postharvest Biology & Technology77(2): 59–66.
24.
LuoHXiaWXuYJiangQ (2013) Diffusive model with variable effective diffusivity considering shrinkage for hot-air drying of lightly salted grass carp fillets. Drying Technology31(7): 752–758.
25.
MaYZhuWBaiXTLuoLHuangJYuB, et al.(2018) Drying characteristics and kinetics model of liquid whole egg during ultrasound reinforced vacuum drying. Journal of Food Science39(3): 142–149.
26.
MadambaPSDriscollRHBuckleKA (1996) The thin layer drying characteristics of garlic slices. Journal of Food Engineering29: 75–97.
27.
MasonTJ (1998) Power ultrasound in food processing – The way forward. In: PoveyMJWMasonTJ (eds) Ultrasounds in Food Processing, Glasgow: Blackie Academic and Professional, pp. 104–124.
28.
MinaeiSMotevaliAAhmadiEAziziMH (2012) Mathematical models of drying pomegranate arils in vacuum and microwave dryers. Journal of Agricultural Science & Technology14(2): 311–325.
29.
RayaguruKRoutrayW (2012) Mathematical modeling of thin layer drying kinetics of stone apple slices. International Food Research Journal19: 1503–1510.
30.
RenZBianXLinLBaiYWangW (2010) Viscosity and melt fragility in honey-water mixtures. Journal of Food Engineering100(4): 705–710.
31.
SchuhladenKBarańskaASzulcKJankowskaETruszkowskaMOstrowska-LigęzaE, et al.(2020) Reformulation of spray dried apple concentrate and honey for the enhancement of drying process performance and the physicochemical properties of powders. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture100(5).
32.
SongYZangXKamalTBiJCongSZhuB, et al.(2018) Real-time detection of water dynamics in abalone (haliotis discus hannai ino) during drying and rehydration processes assessed by LF-NMR and MRI. Drying Technology36(1): 72–83.
33.
Tekin ZH, Baş lar M, Karasu S and Kilicli M. (2017). Dehydration of green beans using ultrasound-assisted vacuum drying as a novel technique: Drying kinetics and quality parameters. Journal of Food Processing and Preservation. Epub ahead of print 2017. DOI: 10.1111/jfpp.13227.
34.
TogrulHArslanN (2004) Mathematical model for prediction of apparent viscosity of molasses. Journal of Food Engineering62(3): 281–289.
35.
TogrulITPehlivanD (2002) Mathematical modelling of solar drying of apricots in thin layers. Journal of Food Engineering55: 209–216.
36.
Wang CY and Singh RP. (1978). A single layer drying equation for rough rice. American Society of Agricultural Engineers. Paper No. 3001.
37.
ZhaoYBiJYiJNjorogeDMPengJHouC (2019) Comparison of dynamic water distribution and microstructure formation of shiitake mushrooms during hot air and far infrared radiation drying by low-field nuclear magnetic resonance and scanning electron microscopy. Journal of Science Food Agriculture99: 2826–2834.
