The Effects of Cueing Temporal and Spatial Attention on Word Recognition in a Complex Listening Task in Hearing-Impaired Listeners

Abstract

In a complex listening situation such as a multiperson conversation, the demands on an individual's attention are considerable: There will often be many sounds occurring simultaneously, with continual changes in source and direction. A laboratory analog of this was designed to measure the benefit that helping attention (by visual cueing) would have on word identification. These words were presented unpredictably but were sometimes cued with a temporal cue or a temporal-and-spatial cue. Two groups of hearing-impaired, older-adult listeners participated, 57 unaided and 19 aided. There was a small effect of cueing: The cues gave a 2% benefit in word identification. A variety of subsidiary measures were collected, including the Test of Everyday Attention and the Speech, Spatial, & Qualities of Hearing Questionnaire, but their links with the benefits of cueing were few. The results demonstrate the difficulty of cueing attention to improve word recognition in a complex listening situation.

Keywords

hearing impairment attention spatial hearing speech reception hearing aids

References

Akeroyd, M.A. , Blaschke, J. , & Gatehouse, S. (2007). The detection of differences in the cues to distance by elderly hearing-impaired listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 121, 1077-1089.

Bench, J. , & Bamford, J. (1979). Speech-hearing tests and the spoken language of hearing impaired children. London: Academic Press.

Best, V. , Gallun, F.J. , Ihlefield, A. , & Shinn-Cunningham, B.G. (2006). The influence of spatial separation on divided listening. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 120, 1506-1516.

Best, V. , Ozmerol, E. , Gallun, F.J. , Sen, K. , & Shinn-Cunningham, B.G. (2005). Spatial unmasking of bird-song in human listeners: Energetic and informational factors. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 118, 3766-3773.

Best, V. , Ozmerol, E.J. , & Shinn-Cunningham, B.G. (2007). Visually-guided attention enhances target identification in a complex auditory scene. Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, 8, 294-304.

Bolia, R.S. , Nelson, W.T. , Erickson, M.A. , & Simpson, B.D. (2000). A speech corpus for multitalker communications research. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 107, 1065-1066.

Broadbent, D.E. (1954). The role of auditory localization in attention and memory span. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47, 191-196.

Broadbent, D.E. (1958). Perception and communication. London: Pergamon.

Brungart, D.S. (2001). Informational and energetic masking effects in the perception of two simultaneous talkers. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 109, 1101-1109.

10.

Brungart, D.S. , & Simpson, B.D. (2007). Cocktail party listening in a dynamic multitalker environment. Perception and Psychophysics, 69(1), 79-91.

11.

Davis, A. (1995). Hearing in adults. London: Whurr.

12.

Dreschler, W.A. , Verschurre, H. , Ludvigsen, C. , & Westermann, S. (2001). ICRA noises: Artificial noise signals with speech-like spatial and temporal properties for hearing-instrument assessment. Audiology, 40, 148-157.

13.

Foster, J.R. , & Haggard, M.P. (1987). The four alternative auditory feature test (FAAF)-linguistic and psychometric properties of the material with normative data in noise. British Journal of Audiology, 21(3), 165-174.

14.

Gatehouse, S. , & Akeroyd, M.A. (2006). Two-eared listening in dynamic situations. International Journal of Audiology, 45(Suppl. 1), S120-S124.

15.

Gatehouse, S. , & Noble, W. (2004). The speech, spatial, and qualities of hearing scale (SSQ). International Journal of Audiology, 43, 85-99.

16.

Kidd, G., Jr. , Arbogast, T.L. , Maxon, C.R. , & Gallun, F.J. (2005). The advantage of knowing where to listen. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 118, 3804-3815.

17.

Lorenzi, C. , Gatehouse, S. , & Lever, C. (1999). Localization in noise in normal-hearing listeners . Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 105, 1810-1820.

18.

MacLeod, A. , & Summerfield, Q. (1990). A procedure for measuring auditory and audio-visual speech reception thresholds for sentences in noise: Rationale, evaluation, and recommendations for use. British Journal of Audiology, 24(1), 29-43.

19.

Noble, W. , & Gatehouse, S. (2004). Interaural asymmetry of hearing loss, Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ) disabilities and handicap. International Journal of Audiology, 43, 100-114.

20.

Noble, W. , & Gatehouse, S. (2006). Effects of bilateral versus unilateral hearing aid fitting on abilities measured by the Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ). International Journal of Audiology, 45, 172-181.

21.

Robertson, I.H. , Ward, T. , Ridgeway, V. , & Nimmo-Smith, I. (1996). The structure of normal human attention: The test of everyday attention. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 2, 525-534.

22.

Trenerry, M.R. , Crosson, B. , DeBoe, J. , & Leber, W.R. (1989). Stroop Neuropsychological Screening Test. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.