The purpose of the study was to develop and examine a list of potential variables that may account for variability in the dispensing rates of four common hearing aid features. A total of 29 potential variables were identified and placed into the following categories: (1) characteristics of the audiologist, (2) characteristics of the hearing aids dispensed by the audiologist, (3) characteristics of the audiologist’s patient population, and (4) evidence-based practice grades of recommendation for each feature. The potentially associative variables then were examined using regression analyses from the responses of 257 audiologists to a dispensing practice survey. There was a direct relation between price and level of hearing aid technology with the frequency of dispensing product features. There was also a direct relation between the belief by the audiologist that a feature might benefit patients and the frequency of dispensing that feature. In general, the results suggested that personal differences among audiologists and the hearing aids audiologists choose to dispense are related more strongly to dispensing rates of product features than to differences in characteristics of the patient population served by audiologists. An additional finding indicated that evidence-based practice recommendations were inversely related to dispensing rates of product features. This finding, however, may not be the result of dispensing trends as much as hearing aid manufacturing trends.
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. ( 1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior . Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
2.
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. ( 2003). 2003 Omnibus survey salary report: Annual salaries. Rockville, MD: Author.
3.
Armitage, P., Berry, G., & Matthews, J.N.S. (2002). Statistical methods in medical research (4th ed.). New York: Wiley-Blackwell.
4.
Bentler, R.A. ( 2005). Effectiveness of directional microphones and noise reduction schemes in hearing aids: A systematic review of the evidence. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 16, 473-484.
5.
Bernabei, R., Gambassi, G., Lapane, K., Landi, F., Gatsonis, C., Dunlop, R., et al. (1998). Management of pain in elderly patients with cancer: SAGE study group-Systematic assessment of geriatric drug use via epidemiology. Journal of the American Medical Association , 279, 1877-1882.
6.
Berry, W.D. ( 1993). Understanding regression assumptions (Quantitative applications in the social sciences, No. 92). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
7.
Blair, E., & Burton, S. ( 1987). Cognitive processes used by survey respondents to answer behavioral frequency questions. Journal of Consumer Research , 14, 280-288.
8.
Blair, S.L., O’Shea, K.E., & Orr, R.K. ( 1998). Surgeon variability in treating nonpalpable breast cancer: Surgical oncology as a value-added specialty. Annals of Surgical Oncology, 5, 28-32.
9.
Bonham, V.L. ( 2001). Race, ethnicity, and pain treatment: Striving to understand the causes and solutions to the disparities in pain treatment. Journal of Law, Medicine, and Ethics, 29, 52-68.
10.
Boston University. (2009). Management of variability program. Retrieved August 27, 2009, from http://www.bu.edu/mvp/ (Updated to http://www.ihoptimize.org as retrieved on December 22, 2009)
11.
Cheng, T.L., DeWitt, T.G., Savageau, J.A., & O’Connor, K.G. (1999). Determinants of counseling in primary care pediatric practice. Archives of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, 153, 629-635.
12.
Chung, K. ( 2004). Challenges and recent developments in hearing aids. Part II. Feedback and occlusion effect reduction strategies, laser shell manufacturing processes, and other signal processing technologies. Trends in Amplification, 8(4), 125-164.
13.
Cohen, J. ( 1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences . (2nd ed.). New York: Academic Press.
14.
Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S.J., & Aiken, L.S. ( 2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
15.
Cord, M.T., Surr, R.K., Walden, B.E., & Dyrlund, O. ( 2004). Relationship between laboratory measures of directional advantage and everyday success with directional microphone hearing aids. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 15, 353-364.
16.
Cox, R.M., & Alexander, G.C. (2002). The International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA): Psychometric properties of the English version. International Journal of Audiology, 41, 30-35.
17.
Cox, R.M., Alexander, G.C., & Beyer, C.M. ( 2003). Norms for the International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 14, 403-413.
18.
Cox, R.M., Stephens, D., & Kramer, S.E. ( 2002). Translations of the International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA). International Journal of Audiology , 41, 3-26.
19.
Darlington, R.B. ( 1968). Multiple regression in psychological research and practice . Psychological Bulletin, 69, 161-182.
20.
Darlington, R.B. ( 1990). Regression and linear models. New York: McGraw-Hill.
21.
Eisenberg, J. ( 2001). What does evidence mean? Can the law and medicine be reconciled? Journal of Health Politics, Policy, and Law, 26, 369-381.
22.
Epstein, A.M., Read, J.L., & Winickoff, R. ( 1984). Physician beliefs, attitudes, and prescribing behavior of anti-inflammatory drugs. American Journal of Medicine, 77, 313-318.
23.
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. ( 1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
24.
Fitchtenbaum, R., & Gyimah-Brempong, K. (1997). The effects of race on the use of physician’s services. International Journal of Health Service, 27, 139-156.
25.
Freed, D.J., & Soli, S.D. ( 2006). An objective procedure for evaluation of adaptive antifeedback algorithms in hearing aids. Ear and Hearing, 27, 382-398.
26.
Gallagher, R.M. ( 2003). Physician variability in pain management: Are the JCAHO standards enough? Pain Medicine, 4, 1-3.
27.
Greco, P.J., & Eisenberg, J.M. (1993). Changing physician’s practices. New England Journal of Medicine, 329, 1271-1274.
28.
Green, C.R., Anderson, K.O., Baker, T.A., Campbell, L.C., Decker, S., Fillingim, R.B., et al. (2003). The unequal burden of pain: Confronting racial and ethnic disparities in pain. Pain Medicine, 4, 277-294.
29.
Green, C.R., & Wheeler, J.R. ( 2003). Physician variability in the management of acute postoperative and cancer pain: A quantitative analysis of the Michigan experience. Pain Medicine, 4, 8-20.
30.
Green, C.R., Wheeler, J.R., & LaPorte, F. ( 2003). Clinical decision making in pain management: Contributions of physician and patient characteristics to variations in practice. Journal of Pain, 1, 29-39.
31.
Greenberg, J.E., Zurek, P.M., & Brantley, M. ( 2000). Evaluation of feedback-reduction algorithms for hearing aids. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 108, 2366-2376.
32.
Harris, R.J. ( 1985). A primer of multivariate statistics (2nd ed.). New York: Academic Press .
33.
Hawkins, D., Hamill, T.A., & Kukula, J. ( 2006). Ethical issues in hearing. Audiology Today, 18(4), 22-29.
34.
Hawkins, D., Hamill, T.A., Vliet, D.V., & Freeman, B. ( 2002). Potential conflicts of interest as viewed by the audiologist and the hearing impaired consumer. Audiology Today, 14(5), 27-33.
35.
Hellerstein, J.K. ( 1998). The importance of the physician in the generic versus trade-name prescription decision. RAND Journal of Economics , 29, 108-136.
36.
Hicks, M.L., Kim, W., Abrams, J., Johnson, C.C., Bloung, A.C., & Parham, G.P. ( 1997). Racial differences in surgically staged patients with endometrial cancer. Journal of the National Medical Association , 89, 134-140.
37.
Hillman, A.L., Pauly, M.V., & Kerstein, J.J. (1989). How do financial incentives affect physicians’ clinical decisions and the financial performance of health maintenance organizations? New England Journal of Medicine, 321, 86-92.
38.
Howell, D.C. ( 2001). Statistical methods for psychology (5th ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Duxbury /Thomson Learning.
39.
Johnson, C.E., Danhauer, J.L., & Krishnamurti, S. (2000). A holistic model for matching high-tech hearing aid features to elderly patients. American Journal of Audiology, 9, 112-123.
40.
Johnson, C.E., Danhauer, J.L., Reith, A.C., & Latiolais, L.N. (2007). A survey of audiologists and continuing education. Seminars in Hearing, 28, 3-16.
41.
Johnson, E.E. ( 2007a). Survey finds higher sales and prices, plus more open fittings and directional mics. Hearing Journal, 60, 52-58.
42.
Johnson, E.E. ( 2007b). Survey explores how dispensers use and choose their preferred hearing aid brands. Hearing Journal, 60, 23-36.
43.
Johnson, E.E. ( 2008a). Despite having more advanced features, hearing aids hold line on retail price. Hearing Journal, 61(4), 42-48.
44.
Johnson, E.E. ( 2008b). Evidence-based hearing aid dispensing: Survey results of exposure and attitudes. Audiology Today, 20(3), 18-20.
45.
Johnson, E.E., Ricketts, T.A., & Hornsby, B.W.Y. (2007). The effects of digital phase cancellation feedback reduction systems on amplified sound quality. Journal of the Academy of Audiology, 18, 404-416.
46.
Kahn, K.L., Rogers, W.H., Rubenstein, L.V., Sherwood, M.J., Reinisch, E.J., Keeler, E.B., et al. (1990). Measuring quality of care with explicit process criteria before and after implementation of the DRG-based prospective payment system, Journal of the American Medical Association , 264, 1969-1973.
47.
Kates, J.M. ( 1999). Constrained adaptation for feedback cancellation in hearing aids. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 106, 1010-1019.
48.
Kiessling, J., Brenner, B., Jespersen, C.T., Groth, J., & Jensen, O.D. ( 2005). Occlusion effect of earmolds with different venting systems . Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 16, 237-249.
49.
Killion, M.C. ( 2004). Myths about hearing in noise and directional microphones . Hearing Review, 11(2), 14-19, 72-73.
50.
Killion, M.C., Niquette, P.A.Gudmundsen, G.I., Revit, L.J., & Banerjee, S. ( 2004). Development of a quick speech-in-noise test for measuring signal-to-noise ratio loss in normal hearing and hearing-impaired listeners . Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 116, 2395-2405.
51.
Kirkwood, D. ( 2006). Survey: Dispensers fitted more hearing aids in 2005 at higher prices. Hearing Journal, 59(4), 40-50.
52.
Kochkin, S. ( 2003). On the issue of value: Hearing aid benefit, price, satisfaction, and brand repurchase rates. Hearing Review, 10(2), 12-25.
53.
Labovitz, S. ( 1970). The assignment of numbers to rank order categories. American Sociological Review, 35, 515-524.
54.
Lessler, J.T., & Forsyth, B.H. ( 1996). A coding system for appraising questionnaires. In N. Schwarz & S. Sudman (Eds.), Answering questions: Methodology for determining cognitive and communicative processes in survey research (pp. 259-292). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
55.
Lexchin, J. ( 2004). The effect of generic competition on the price of brand-name drugs. Health Policy, 68, 47-54.
56.
McCulloch, B.J. ( 1992). Gender and race: An interaction affecting the replicability of well-being across groups. Women Health, 19, 65-89.
57.
McQuay, H.J., & Moore, R.A. ( 1997). Using numerical results from systematic reviews in clinical practice. Annals of Internal Medicine, 126, 712-720.
58.
Menachemi, N., Hikmet, N., Stutzman, M., & Brooks, R.G. ( 2006). Investigating response bias in an information technology survey of physicians. Journal of Medical Systems, 30, 277-282.
59.
Mueller, H.G. ( 2003). Fitting test protocols are "more honored in the breach than the observance". Hearing Journal, 56(10), 19-26.
60.
Mueller, H.G. ( 2005). Fitting hearing aids to adults using prescriptive methods: an evidence-based review of effectiveness. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 16, 448-460.
61.
Mueller, H.G., Weber, J., & Hornsby, B.W.Y. (2006). The effects of digital noise reduction on the acceptance of background noise. Trends in Amplification, 10, 83-93.
62.
Nowlis, S.M., & Simonson, I. ( 1996). The effect of new product features on brand choice. Journal of Marketing Research, 33, 36-46.
63.
O’Brien, R.M. ( 1979). The use of Pearson’s R with ordinal data. American Sociological Review, 44, 851-857.
64.
Pettersson, E. ( 1987). Speech discrimination tests with hearing aids in telecoil listening mode. A comparative study in school children. Scandinavian Audiology, 16, 13-19.
Ricketts, T.A., & Henry, P. ( 2002). Evaluation of an adaptive directional-microphone hearing aid. International Journal of Audiology, 41, 100-112.
67.
Ricketts, T.A., Henry, P., & Gnewikow, D. ( 2003) Full time directional versus user selectable microphone modes in hearing aids. Ear and Hearing, 24, 424-439.
68.
Ricketts, T.A., & Hornsby, B.W.Y. (2003). Distance and reverberation effects on directional benefit. Ear and Hearing, 24, 472-484.
69.
Ricketts, T.A., & Hornsby, B.W.Y. (2006). Directional hearing aid benefit in listeners with severe hearing loss. International Journal of Audiology, 45, 190-197.
70.
Ricketts, T.A., Hornsby, B.W.Y., & Johnson, E.E. ( 2005). Adaptive directional benefit in the near field: Competing sound angle and level effects. Seminars in Hearing26, 59-69.
71.
Ricketts, T.A., & Mueller, H.G. ( 2000). Prediction of directional hearing aid benefit for individual listeners. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 11, 561-569.
72.
Sable, M.R., Schwartz, L.R., Kelly, P.J., Lisbon, E., & Hall, M.A. ( 2006). Using the theory of reasoned action to explain physician intention to prescribe emergency contraception. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 38, 20-27.
73.
Schuster, R.J., Terwoord, N.A., & Tasosa, J. ( 2006). Changing physician practice behavior to measure and improve clinical outcomes. American Journal of Medical Quality, 21, 394-400.
74.
Schwarz, N. ( 1999). Self-report: How questions shape the answers? American Psychologist, 24, 93-105.
75.
Smith, D.M., Martin, D.K., Langefeld, C.D., Miller, M.E., & Freedman, J.A. (1995). Primary care physician productivity. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 10, 495-503.
76.
Stoker, R.G., French, St. G.M., & Lyons, J.M. ( 1986). Inductive coupling of hearing aids and telephone receivers . Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 23, 71-78.
77.
Sullivan, E. ( 2006). 2006 compensation and benefits report. American Academy of Audiology. Retrieved September 25, 2007 , from http://www.audiology.org/membership/benefits/compsurvey/default.htm?PF=1
78.
Tabachnick, B.G., & Fidell, L.S. ( 1996). Using multivariate statistics (3rd ed.). New York: Harper Collins .
Tamayo-Sarver, J.H., Dawson, N.V., Cydulka, R.K., Wigton, R.S., & Baker, D.W. ( 2004). Variability in emergency physician decision making about prescribing opioid analgesics. Annals of Emergency Medicine , 43, 483-493.
81.
Tamblyn, R., Abrahamowicz, M., Brailovsky, C., Grand’Maison, P., Lescop, J., Norcini, J., et al. (1998). Association between licensing examination scores and resource use and quality of care in primary care practice. Journal of the American Medical Association, 280, 989-996.
82.
Tharpe, A.M., Fino-Szumski, M.S., & Bess, F. ( 2001). Survey of fitting hearing aid fitting practices for children with multiple hearing impairments. American Journal of Audiology , 10, 32-40.
83.
Tonelli, M.R. ( 2001). The limits of evidence-based medicine. Respiratory Care, 46, 1435-1440.
84.
Valente, M., Abrams, H., Benson, D., Chisolm, T., Citron, D., Hampton, D., et al. (2006). Guidelines for the audiologic management of adult hearing impairment, Audiology Today, 18(5), 32-37.
85.
Walden, B.E., Surr, R.K., Cord, M.T., & Dyrland, O. ( 2004). Predicting hearing aid microphone preference in everyday listening. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 15, 365-396.
86.
Weisberg, H.F. ( 2005). The total survey error approach. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
