Current Legal Issues in Providing Wound Care in the Home

Abstract

Personal injury claims arising from wound care in the home are a frequent source of frustration for providers. Increasing malpractice premiums, unavailable coverage, and scrutiny of wound care results have exacerbated these pressures. As patients increasingly receive wound care in the home, claims will increase. To develop effective strategies to meet these challenges, it is important to understand why exposure exists, where it exists, and where it does not exist. Personal injury claims arising from nursing wound care sound in either negligence or malpractice. These claims differ fundamentally and create different types of exposure. Appreciating these differences is important in developing strategies to effectively manage the particular risks and to understand the impact an increase in nursing expertise has on the exposure.

Keywords

home care nursing wounds malpractice risk management

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

10 NYCRR 763.5 (2004).

American Tort Reform Association . (2001). Non-economical damage reform. Washington DC: Tort Reform Record.

Baez v. Dombroff, 42 A.D.2d 705 2nd (1988).

Barrett v. Danbury Hospital, 232 Conn. 242 (1995).

Best’s Insurance News . (2001). Mississippi looks for answers to lack of medmal Coverage. Oldwick: A.M. Best Co., Inc.

Bleiler v. Bodnar, 65 NY2d 65, 71 (1985).

Connecticut General Assembly . (2003). An act concerning tort reform; to implement meaningful reform in medical malpractice and similar actions. Proposed S.B. No. 267. Sacramento: Information for Public Affairs.

Conn. Genn. Stat. Sec. (2004). Peer review, definitions, immunity, discovery permissible proceedings. 19a-17b.

Dillard, B. (Ed.). (2002). What’s ahead on the medical liability front in 2002? Medical Liability Monitor, 27(1), 1-8.

10.

Dillard, B. (Ed.). (2004). State legislatures consider tort reforms; doctors aren’t waiting for a national solution. Medical Liability Monitor, 29(2), 1-2.

11.

Golin, C. (2002). Malpractice insurer’s reserves shrink as losses soar despite large premium increases. Medical Liability Monitor, 28(11), 1, 6-7.

12.

Habuda v. Trustees of Rex Hospital, Inc., 164 S.E.2d 17 (N.C. App. 1968).

13.

Hollinworth, H. (2004). Sharing the burden: The complex practice of wound care in the community. British Journal of Community Nursing, 9(1), 5-10.

14.

Insurance Information Institute . (2002). Insurance issues update. Medical malpractice. New York: Insurance Information Institute.

15.

Kileen v. Reinhardt, 419 NYS2d 175 (Dept. 1979)

16.

Lewis, C. G. , Montoux, M. , Slaughter, M. , & Bailey, S. P. (2004). Characteristics of individuals who fell while receiving home health care. Physical Therapy, 84(1), 23-32.

17.

Makar, M. (1996). Nursing in Florida: The path to professional liability. Florida Bar Journal, 70(18), 1-16.

18.

National Association for Home Care . (2000). Basic statistics about home care. Retrieved January 2004 from www.nahc.org/Consumer/hcstats.html

19.

NY Pub. Health Law Sec. 3616-a (2004).

20.

Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning & Evaluation . (2002). Confronting the new health care crisis: Improving health care quality and lowering costs by fixing our medical liability system. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health & Human Services.

21.

O’Malley, A. S. , Clancy, C. , Thompson, J. , Korabathina, R. , & Meyer, G. S. (2004). Clinical practice guidelines as related—but often misunderstood—tools. Joint Commission. Journal of Quality and Safety, 30(3), 163-171.

22.

Ovington, L. G. (2001). Hanging wet-to-dry dressings out to dry. Home Healthcare Nurse, 19(8), 477-483.

23.

Puro v. Henry, 188 Conn. 310, 305 (1982).

24.

Roman, K. (2004). We need a quality-focused approach to risk management. Medical Liability Monitor, 29(2), 8.

25.

Shook, Hardy , & Bacon, LLP . (2001). Liability reform laws. Kansas City: Shook, Hardy & Bacon.

26.

Vandenburgh v. Columbia Memorial Hospital, 91 AD2d 710 (3rd Dept. 1982).