Digital Disparities Among Home Care Aides in Washington State

Abstract

Introduction:

This study aims to examine factors contributing to digital disparities among Medicaid Home Care Aides (HCAs) who provide long-term care in Washington State. Despite the profound impact of digital transformation on the HCAs, little research has been conducted.

Objectives:

We conducted a cross-sectional survey to examine digital disparities among the HCAs, focusing on 3 primary domains: access, use, and efficacy.

Methods:

Randomly selected HCAs received surveys via online, phone, and mail. A survey weight was applied to account for oversampling the language groups. Multivariate regressions were conducted.

Results:

Education and English proficiency are critical factors contributing to all 3 domains of digital disparities. Age and gender are associated with use and efficacy. Income predicts access and efficacy.

Conclusion:

In conclusion, (1) socioeconomic factors play a significant role in digital disparities; (2) English proficiency level is a critical determinant of digital disparities; (3) Efficacy matters in addressing digital disparities. We discussed that HCAs’ device access remains lower than the average U.S. household. Digital inequity, rooted in socioeconomic factors and language barriers, could hinder their ability to participate in workforce development opportunities such as online training, certification programs, and communication platforms. Therefore, promoting digital equity through access to affordable devices, digital navigators, multilingual websites, and culturally and linguistically appropriate content can empower HCAs to engage in continuous learning, access essential resources, and deliver more responsive and effective care. These efforts ultimately strengthen the HCA workforce and enhance the quality of care clients receive.

Keywords

home care aides home care workers digital disparities digital access digital use technology efficacy

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Vogels

EA.

Digital Divide Persists Even as Americans With Lower Incomes Make Gains in Tech Adoption. Pew Research Center. June 22, 2021. https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2021/06/22/digital-divide-persists-even-as-americans-with-lower-incomes-make-gains-in-tech-adoption/

Anderson

Rainie

Vogels

EA.

Experts Say the ‘New Normal’ in 2025 Will Be Far More Tech-Driven, Presenting More Big Challenges. Pew Research Center. February 18, 2021. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2021/02/18/experts-say-the-new-normal-in-2025-will-be-far-more-tech-driven-presenting-more-big-challenges/

Choudrie

Pheeraphuttranghkoon

Davari

The digital divide and older adult population adoption, use and diffusion of mobile phones: a quantitative study. Inf Syst Front. 2020;22(3):673-695. doi:10.1007/s10796-018-9875-2

Elena-Bucea

Cruz-Jesus

Oliveira

Coelho

PS.

Assessing the role of age, education, gender and income on the digital divide: Evidence for the European Union. Inf Syst Front. 2021;23(4):1007-1021. doi:10.1007/s10796-020-10012-9

Niehaves

Plattfaut

Internet adoption by the elderly: employing IS technology acceptance theories for understanding the age-related digital divide. Eur J Inform Syst. 2014;23:708-726. doi:10.1057/ejis.2013.19

Park

Freeman

Middleton

Allen

Eckermann

Everson

The multi-layers of digital exclusion in rural Australia. In: 2015 48th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. IEEE; 2015:3631-3640. https://d1wqtxts1xzle7.cloudfront.net/37052474/7367d631-libre.pdf?1426893767=&response-content-disposition=inline%3B+filename%3DThe_multi_layers_of_digital_exclusion_in.pdf&Expires=1702000268&Signature=L4KMYRMrubXxghFMl4xlwj2m-VwGh6MFMxWaETPbVK4v48xm6qai0nOFoadjMYuHRuJbbmpm-Oko0obd6f~dhq~-hL3jl3UvaQueXYoXva1fZ2uwc-wFRvU5ry4Iubev4TtHt5pagMXkmNTuyfFhYns96LNJDJlzweag4uDUo3~VmegMygUrdWbVqWWt7f-j03TRGkHJg-lPQ2JM~X1B3sCQMmnbvL0Y6cCRy~kaF~Z9uHCkS3DeHFGJxl1syRs-wIX2WmrpvnvUsEhwygFp2o3vXHs8G9QDiA1t6qHXqi3zKg4N62Nq4BWET5AqEP5IaPOMbLsQlAvyej65YI-Qdg__&Key-Pair-Id=APKAJLOHF5GGSLRBV4ZA

Alam

Imran

The digital divide and social inclusion among refugee migrants: a case in regional Australia. Inf Technol People. 2015;28(2):344-365. doi:10.1108/itp-04-2014-0083

Washington State Department of Social and Health Services. Home Care Aide Certification and 75 Hour Training Overview. 2022. https://www.dshs.wa.gov/sites/default/files/ALTSA/hcs/documents/LTC%20Worker%20Training%20Requirements.pdf

U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Occupational Outlook Handbook: Home Health and Personal Care Aides. 2022. https://www.bls.gov/ooh/healthcare/home-health-aides-and-personal-care-aides.htm

10.

Center for Economic and Policy Research. Home Health Care: Latinx and Black Women are Overrepresented, But All Women Face Heightened Risk of Poverty. October 27, 2021. https://cepr.net/home-health-care-latinx-and-black-women-are-overrepresented-but-all-women-face-heightened-risk-of-poverty/

11.

PHI. Direct Care Workers in the United States: Key Facts 2023. 2023. https://www.phinational.org/resource/direct-care-workers-in-the-united-states-key-facts-2023/

12.

Stepick

Tran

BA.

The Rapidly Growing Home Care Sector and Labor Force Participation. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco Community Development Research Brief. 2022;2022-2. doi:%2010.24148/cdrb2022-02

13.

Holly

Home care workforce still facing widespread economic instability. Home Health Care News. https://homehealthcarenews.com/2021/09/home-care-workforce-still-facing-widespread-economic-instability/. September 7, 2021.

14.

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Community Living. Projected future growth of older population. May 5, 2022. https://acl.gov/aging-and-disability-in-america/data-and-research/projected-future-growth-older-population

15.

Donlan

After 3-year dip, home care turnover soars to 77%. Home Health Care News. Published online May 24, 2023. https://homehealthcarenews.com/2023/05/after-dipping-for-three-years-home-care-turnover-rate-soared-to-77-in-2022/

16.

Digital Planet. Digital Injustice: Disparities in Digital Access across the US and How they Disproportionately Hurt the Black and Latinx Communities. 2023. https://sites.tufts.edu/digitalplanet/digital-injustice-covid19/

17.

Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. Understanding the Digital Divide. Vol 49.; 2001. doi:10.1787/236405667766

18.

Pick

Sarkar

Theories of the digital divide: Critical comparison. In: 2016 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS). 2016:3888-3897. doi:10.1109/HICSS.2016.484

19.

Vassilakopoulou

Hustad

Bridging digital divides: a literature review and research agenda for information systems research. Inf Syst Front. 2023;25(3):955-969. doi:10.1007/s10796-020-10096-3

20.

United States. National Telecommunications, Information Administration. Falling Through the Net: Defining the Digital Divide: A Report on the Telecommunications and Information Technology Gap in America. US Department of Commerce, National Telecommunications and Information; 1999.

21.

van Deursen

van Dijk

JA.

The first-level digital divide shifts from inequalities in physical access to inequalities in material access. New Media Soc. 2019;21(2):354-375. doi:10.1177/1461444818797082

22.

Yang

Zhang

Beyond structural inequality: a socio-technical approach to the digital divide in the platform environment. Humanit Soc Sci Commun. 2023;10(1):813. doi:10.1057/s41599-023-02326-1

23.

Litchfield

Shukla

Greenfield

Impact of COVID-19 on the digital divide: a rapid review. BMJ Open. 2021;11(10):e053440. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053440

24.

Chae

Banijamali

Financial insecurity among Medicaid home care aides in Washington State. Home Health Care Manage Pract. 2024;36:180-190. Published online 2023. doi:10.1177/10848223231214630

25.

Commonwealth Fund. Addressing the Shortage of Direct Care Workers: Insights from Seven States.; 2024. https://www.commonwealthfund.org/publications/issue-briefs/2024/mar/addressing-shortage-direct-care-workers-insights-seven-states

26.

Atske

Perin

Home broadband adoption, computer ownership vary by race, ethnicity in the U.S. July 16, 2021. https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2021/07/16/home-broadband-adoption-computer-ownership-vary-by-race-ethnicity-in-the-u-s/

27.

van Deursen

. Digital inequality during a pandemic: Quantitative study of differences in COVID-19-related internet uses and outcomes among the general population. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22(8):e20073. doi:10.2196/20073

28.

Gonzales

The contemporary US digital divide: from initial access to technology maintenance. Inf Commun Soc. 2016;19(2):234-248. doi:10.1080/1369118x.2015.1050438

29.

Mitchell

Chebli

Ruggiero

Muramatsu

The digital divide in health-related technology use: the significance of race/ethnicity. Gerontologist. 2019;59(1):6-14. doi:10.1093/geront/gny138

30.

Banerjee

An exploratory study of online equity: differential levels of technological access and technological efficacy among underserved and underrepresented student populations in higher education. Interdisciplinary Journal of e-Skills and Lifelong Learning. 2020;16:093-121. doi:10.28945/4664

31.

Hecker

Briggs

Overlooked and Under-Connected: Exploring Disparities in Digital Skill Levels Among Older Youth of Color in the US. Urban Institute; 2021.

32.

Bakaç

Investigation of the relationship between teacher candidates’ E-learning styles, academic achievements and educational technology self-efficiency perceptions. Cukurova Univ Faculty Educ J. 2022;51(1):148-164. doi:10.14812/cuefd.887697

33.

Araque

Maiden

Bravo

, et al. Computer usage and access in low-income urban communities. Comput Human Behav. 2013;29(4):1393-1401. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.01.032

34.

West

Zhang

Wagner

Gatward

Saw

Axinn

WG.

Methods for improving participation rates in national self-administered web/mail surveys: Evidence from the United States. PLoS One. 2023;18(8):e0289695. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0289695

35.

Courtney

Hartig

Response rates in telephone surveys have resumed their decline. February 27, 2019. https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2019/02/27/response-rates-in-telephone-surveys-have-resumed-their-decline/

36.

Barthel

Mitchell

Asare-Marfo

Kennedy

Worden

Measuring News Consumption in a Digital Era. Pew Research Center; 2020. https://pewrsr.ch/2VUtTFe

37.

Santoso

Lawanto

Becker

Fang

Reeve

EM.

High and low computer self-efficacy groups and their learning behavior from self-regulated learning perspective while engaged in interactive learning modules. J Coll Eng Educ Res. 2014;4(2):3. doi:10.7771/2157-9288.1093

38.

Martin

Computer and internet use in the United States: 2018. American Community Survey Reports. Published online 2021. https://www.census.gov/history/pdf/computer-internetuse2018.pdf

39.

Jackman

Abecassis

State of connectivity 2015: A report on global internet access. Published online 2016. https://about.fb.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/state-of-connectivity-2015-2016-02-21-final-1.pdf

40.

Onyeaka

Romero

Healy

Celano

CM.

Age differences in the use of health information technology among adults in the United States: an analysis of the Health Information National Trends Survey. J Aging Health. 2021;33(1-2):147-154. doi:10.1177/0898264320966266

41.

Mejía

Computer and Internet Use in the United States: 2021.; 2024. https://www2.census.gov/library/publications/2024/demo/acs-56.pdf

42.

Andrade

Doolin

Information and communication technology and the social inclusion of refugees1. MIS Q. 2016;40(2):405-416. doi:10.25300/misq/2016/40.2.06

43.

Menard-Warwick

Peregrina-Williams

Deeb-Sossa

Uliasz

Snow

Toward language justice: systemic dilemmas in the implementation of interpreting services in a California school district. Crit Inq Lang Stud. 2025;22:219-237. Published online 2023. doi:10.1080/15427587.2023.2279325

44.

Shahlaei

Rangraz

Stenmark

Conceptualizing Competence: A Study on Digitalization of Work Practices. European Conference on Information Systems, An Online AIS Conference, June 15-17, 2020. https://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2020_rp/197

45.

Shah

Layman

Using a multipronged approach to implement organizational performance improvements. Health Care Manag. 2005;24(1):48-54.