This article presents an historical sketch of the insights and applications provided by social science scholars on environmental governance. The authors begin with a review of the conceptual developments during the past 50 years characterized in terms of six conceptual perspectives: pluralism, agency capture, ecological Marxism, ecological modernization, social constructionism, and global environmentalism. This section is followed by an empirical analysis of academic journal coverage of research on environmental governance from 1963 to 2001 listed in the database Sociological Abstracts. The authors conclude that an understanding of the potential for environmental improvement could be advanced by the treatment of works that fall within the conceptual typology described herein, as a cumulative body of interdisciplinary knowledge. Advancements in this area could, furthermore, be facilitated through a broadening of empirical and methodological treatment of environmental governance and a greater attention to macro-structural relations among state and societal forces and environmental phenomena.
Anderson, M. S. (2002). Ecological modernization or subversion? The effect of Europeanization on Eastern Europe. American Behavioral Scientist, 45(9), 1394-1416.
2.
Arai, A. B. (2001). Science and culture in the environmental state. Organization & Environment, 14(4), 409-424.
3.
Ashford, N. A. (2002). Government and environmental innovation in Europe and North America. American Behavioral Scientist, 45(9), 1417-1434.
4.
Barham, B., Bunker, S. G., & O’Hearn, D. (1994). States, firms, and raw materials: The world economy and ecology of aluminum. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
5.
Barney, D. (1974). The last stand. New York: Grossman.
6.
Beamish, T. (2000). Accumulating trouble: Complex organization, a culture of silence, and a secret spill. Social Problems, 47(4), 473-498.
7.
Beamish, T. (2001). Environmental hazard and institutional betrayal: Lay-public perceptions of risk in the San Luis Obispo County oil spill. Organization & Environment, 14(1), 5-33.
8.
Beck, U. (1995). Ecological politics in an age of risk. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
9.
Beck, U. (1999). World risk society. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
10.
Beck, U., Giddens, A., & Lash, S. (1994). Reflexive modernization: Politics, tradition and aesthetics in the modern social order. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
11.
Boyd, R. G., & Hyde, W. F. (1989). Forestry sector intervention: The impacts of public regulation on social welfare. Ames: Iowa State University Press.
12.
Browne, D. R., & Keil, R. (2000). Planning ecology: The discourse of environmental policy making in Los Angeles. Organization & Environment, 13(2), 158-205.
13.
Bunker, S. G. (1985). Underdeveloping the Amazon: Extraction, unequal exchange, and the failure of the modern state. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
14.
Bunker, S. G., & Ciccantell, P. (1995). Restructuring space, time, and competitive advantage in the world-economy: Japan and raw materials transport after World War II. In D. Smith & J. Borocz (Eds.), A new world order? Global transformations in the late twentieth century (pp. 109-130). Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
15.
Buttel, F. H. (1985). Environmental quality and the state: Some political-sociological observations on environmental regulation. Research in Political Sociology, 1, 167-188.
16.
Buttel, F. H. (1998). Some observations on states, world orders, and the politics of sustainability. Organization & Environment, 11(3), 261-286.
17.
Buttel, F. H. (2000a). Classical theory and contemporary environmental sociology: Some reflections on the antecedents and prospects for reflexive modernization theories in the study of environment and society. In G. Spaargaren, A. P. Mol, & F. H. Buttel (Eds.), Environment and global modernity (pp. 17-39). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
18.
Buttel, F. H. (2000b). World society, the nation state, and environmental protection: Comment on Frank, Hironaka, and Schofer. American Sociological Review, 65, 117-121.
19.
Buttel, F. H. (2000c). Ecological modernization as social theory. Geoforum, 31, 57-65.
20.
Buttel, F. H., & Taylor, P. J. (1992). Environmental sociology and global environmental change: A critical assessment. Society and Natural Resources, 5(3), 211-230.
21.
Caldwell, L. K. (1970, May). Authority and responsibility for environmental administration. The Annals of the American Academy of Political Science and Social Science, 389107-115.
22.
Campbell, J. L. (1988). Collapse of an industry: Nuclear power and the contradictions of U.S. policy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
23.
Catton, W. R., Jr., & Dunlap, R. E. (1978). Environmental sociology: A new paradigm. The American Sociologist, 13, 41-49.
24.
Chase-Dunn, C. (1989). Global formation. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
25.
Chew, S. (1995). Environmental transformations: Accumulation, ecological crisis, and social movements. In D. A. Smith & J. Borocz (Eds.), A new world order? Global transformations in the late twentieth century (pp. 201-215). Westport, CT: Praeger.
26.
Ciccantell, P. (2001). NAFTA and the reconstruction of U.S. hegemony: The raw materials foundations of economic competitiveness. Canadian Journal of Sociology, 26(1), 57-87.
27.
Clarke, L. (1993). The disqualification heuristic: When do organizations misperceive risk?Research in Social Problems and Public Policy, 5, 289-312.
28.
Clarke, J. N., & McCool, D. (1985). Staking out the terrain: Power differentials among natural resource management agencies. Albany: State University of New York Press.
29.
Culhane, P. J. (1981). Public lands politics: Interest group influence on the Forest Service and the Bureau of Land Management. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
30.
Davidson, D. J. & MacKendrick, N. (2004). All dressed up with nowhere to go: The discourse of ecological modernization in Alberta. Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology, 41(1), 47-65.
31.
Dietz, T., & Kalof, L. (1992). Environmentalism among nation-states. Social Indicators Research, 26, 353-366.
32.
Dunlap, R. C., & Catton, W. R., Jr. (1994). Struggling with human exemptionalism: The rise, decline, and revitalization of environmental sociology. The American Sociologist, 25, 5-30.
33.
Edelman, M. (1964). The symbolic uses of politics. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
34.
Evans, P. B. (1995). Embedded autonomy: States and industrial transformation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
35.
Evans, P. B. (Ed.). (2002). Livable cities? Urban struggles for livelihood and sustainability. Berkeley: University of California Press.
36.
Fischer, F., & Hajer, M. (Eds.). (1999). Living with nature: Environmental politics as cultural discourse. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
37.
Frank, D. J. (1999). The social bases of environmental treaty ratification, 1900-1990. Sociological Inquiry, 69(4), 523-550.
38.
Frank, D. J., Hironaka, A., & Schofer, E. (2000, February). The nation-state and the natural environment over the twentieth century. American Sociological Review, 65, 96-116.
39.
Freudenburg, W. R. (1996, May). Risky thinking: Irrational fears about risk and society. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 545, 44-54.
40.
Freudenburg, W. R., & Gramling, R. (1994). Bureaucratic slippage and failures of agency vigilance: The case of the environmental studies program. Social Problems, 41(2), 214-239.
41.
Freudenburg, W. R., & Pastor, S. K. (1992). Public responses to technological risks: Toward a sociological perspective. Sociological Quarterly, 33(3), 389-412.
42.
Frickel, S., & Davidson, D. J. (2004). Building environmental states: Legitimacy and rationalization in sustainability governance. International Sociology, 19(1), 89-110.
43.
Frijns, J., Phuong, P. T., & Mol, A. P. J. (2000). Ecological modernization theory and industrializing economies: The case of Viet Nam. In A. P. J. Mol & D. Sonnenfeld (Eds.), Ecological modernisation around the world: Perspectives and critical debates (pp. 257-275). London/Portland, OR: Frank Cass.
44.
Goldman, M. (2001). Constructing an environmental state: Eco-governmentality and other transnational practices of a “green” World Bank. Social Problems, 48(4), 499-523.
45.
Gould, K. A., Schnaiberg, A., & Weinberg, A. S. (1996). Local environmental struggles: Citizen activism in the treadmill of production. New York: Cambridge University Press.
46.
Grossman, P. (2000). Corporate interest and trade liberalization: The North American Free Trade Agreement and environmental protection. Organization & Environment, 13(1), 61-85.
47.
Hajer, M. (1995). The politics of environmental discourse: Ecological modernization and the policy process. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
48.
Hannigan, J. A. (1995). Environmental sociology: A constructionist perspective. London/New York: Routledge.
49.
Hoberg, G. (1992). Pluralism by design: Environmental policy and the American regulatory state. New York: Praeger.
50.
Hopgood, S. (1998). American foreign environmental policy and the power of the state. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
51.
Jasper, J. M. (1990). Energy and the state in the United States, Sweden, and France. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
52.
Kaufman, H. (1960). The forest ranger: A study in administrative behavior. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
53.
Klyza, C. M. (1992). A window of autonomy: State autonomy and the Forest Service in the early 1900s. Polity, 25(2), 173-196.
54.
Krogman, N., & Darlington, J. D. (1996, Fall). Sociology and the environment: An analysis of journal coverage. American Sociologist, 27, 27-38.
55.
Lang, G. (2002). Forests, floods, and the environmental state in China. Organization and Environment, 15(2), 119-130.
56.
Langston, N. (1995). Forest dreams, forest nightmares. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
57.
Long, N. (1949, Autumn). Power and administration. Public Administration Review, 9(4), 257-264.
58.
Lukes, S. (1974). Power: A radical view. London: Macmillan.
59.
Mazmanian, D. A., & Nienaber, J. (1979). Can organizations change? Environmental protection, citizen participation, and the Corps of Engineers. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
60.
McConnell, G. (1970). Private power and American democracy. New York: Random House.
61.
Miller, C. A., & Edwards, P. N. (2001a). Introduction: The globalization of climate science and climate politics. In C. A. Miller & P. N. Edwards (Eds.), Changing the atmosphere: Expert knowledge and environmental governance (pp. 1-30). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
62.
Miller, C. A., & Edwards, P. N. (2001b). Changing the atmosphere: Expert knowledge and environmental governance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
63.
Miller, R. O. (1987). Multiple use in the Bureau of Land Management: The biases of pluralism revisited. In P. O. Foss (Ed.), Federal lands policy (pp. 49-59). New York: Greenwood.
64.
Modavi, N. (1991). Environmentalism, state and economy in the United States. Research in Social Movements, Conflicts, and Change, 13, 261-273.
65.
Mol, A. P. J. (1996). Ecological modernization and institutional reflexivity: Environmental reform in the late modern age. Environmental Politics, 5(2), 302-323.
66.
Molotch, H. (1970). Oil in Santa Barbara and power in America. Sociological Inquiry, 40, 131-144.
67.
Moore, J. W. (2000). Environmental crises and the metabolic rift in world-historical perspective. Organization & Environment, 13(2), 123-157.
68.
Murphy, R. (1994). Rationality and nature: A sociological inquiry into a changing relationship. San Francisco: Westview.
69.
Murphy, R. (2002). The internalization of autonomous nature into society. Sociological Review, 50(3), 313-333.
70.
O’Connor, J. (1988). Capitalism, nature, socialism: A theoretical introduction. Capitalism, Nature, Socialism, 1, 11-38.
71.
O’Connor, J. (1998). Natural causes: Essays in ecological Marxism. New York: Guilford.
72.
Palladino, P. (1996). Entomology, ecology and agriculture: The making of scientific careers in North America 1885-1985. Amsterdam: Harwood Academic.
73.
Peluso, N. (1992). Rich forests, poor people: Resource control and resistance in Java. Berkeley: University of California Press.
74.
Redclift, M. (1986). Redefining the environmental “crisis” in the South. In J. Weston (Ed.), Red and green: The new politics of the environment (pp. 81-101). London: Pluto Press.
75.
Redford, E. (1969). Democracy and the administrative state. New York: Oxford University Press.
76.
Reich, C. (1962). Bureaucracy and the forests. Santa Barbara, CA: Center for the Study of Democratic Institutions.
77.
Roberts, J. T. (1996). Predicting participation in environmental treaties: A world-system analysis. Sociological Inquiry, 66(1), 38-57.
78.
Roberts, J. T. (1998). Emerging global environmental standards. Journal of Developing Societies, 14(1), 144-163.
79.
Roberts, J. T., & Grimes, P. E. (2002). World system theory and the environment: Toward a new synthesis. In R. E. Dunlap, F. H. Buttel, P. Dickens, & A. Gijswijt (Eds.), Sociological theory and the environment: Classical foundations, contemporary insights (pp. 167-194). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
80.
Roseneau, J. N. (1997). Along the domestic-foreign frontier: Exploring governance in a turbulent world. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
81.
Sabatier, P. (1979). Major sources on environmental politics: 1974-1977. The maturing of a literature. Policy Studies Journal, 7(3), 592-604.
82.
Sanjour, W. (1992). Why EPA is like it is and what can be done about it. Washington, DC: Environmental Research Foundation.
83.
Scarce, R. (2000). Fishy business: Biology, salmon, and the construction of nature. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
84.
Schnaiberg, A., & Gould, K. (1994). Environment and society: The enduring conflict. New York: St. Martin’s.
85.
Selznick, P. (1980). TVA and the grassroots: A study of politics and organization. Berkeley: University of California Press. (Original work published 1949)
86.
Shepard, J. (1975). The forest killers. New York: Weybright and Talley.
87.
Shiva, V. (1993). The greening of global reach. In W. Sachs (Ed.), Global ecology (pp. 149-169). London: Zed Books.
88.
Sonnenfeld, D. (1998). From brown to green? Late industrialization, social conflict, and adoption of environmental technologies in Thailand’s pulp and paper industry. Organization & Environment, 11, 59-87.
89.
Sonnenfeld, D. A. (2000). Contradictions of ecological modernization: Pulp and paper manufacturing in South-east Asia. Environmental Politics, 9(1), 235-256.
90.
Sonnenfeld, D. A., & Mol, A. P. J. (2002). Globalization and the transformation of environmental governance. American Behavioral Scientist, 45(9), 1318-1339.
91.
Spaargaren, G., & Mol, A. P. J. (1992). Sociology, environment, and modernity: Ecological modernization as a theory of social change. Society and Natural Resources, 5, 323-344.
92.
Spaargaren, G., Mol, A. P. J., & Buttel, F. H. (2000). Introduction: Globalization, modernity, and the environment. In G. Spaargaren, A. P. Mol, & F. H. Buttel (Eds.), Environment and global modernity (pp. 1-15). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
93.
Spector, M., & Kitsuse, J. I. (1977). Constructing social problems. Menlo Park, CA: Cummings.
94.
Weidner, H. (2002). Capacity building for ecological modernization: Lessons from cross-national research. American Behavioral Scientist, 45(9), 1340-1368.
95.
Weinthal, E. (2002). State making and environmental cooperation: Linking domestic and international politics in Central Asia. Boston: MIT Press.
96.
Wilds, L. J. (1990). Understanding who wins: Organizational behavior and environmental politics. New York: Garland.
97.
Yearley, S. (1996). Sociology, environmentalism, globalization: Reinventing the globe. London: Sage.
98.
Yearley, S. (1997). Science and the environment. In M. Redclift & G. Woodgate (Eds.), The international handbook of environmental sociology (pp. 227-236). Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
99.
Young, O. R. (1981). Natural resources and the state: The political economy of resource management. Berkeley: University of California Press.
100.
Young, O. R. (Ed.). (1999). The effectiveness of international environmental regimes: Causal connections and behavioral mechanisms. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
