An increasingly larger portion of the environmental movement claims that environmental destruction can only be stopped when our concern about environmental destruction is coupled with an “ecological consciousness,” that is, a wholistic understanding of the relationship between self, society, and nature. The author offers three interconnected theses to explain the increasing affinity for ecological consciousness: (a) Ecological consciousness, as opposed to traditional environmental consciousness, has prerational social causes that challenge modern rationality and, as such, is less reliant on knowledge and experience of environmental degradation for its spread; (b) the prerational dimension of social order links our affective responses and our most basic ontological presuppositions into a cognitive framework in which material and ideal interests are perceived as such; and (c) the experience of powerlessness can, under the right conditions, lead to a change in selfunderstanding such that individuals are left with an affinity for ecological consciousness.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Adam, B. (1998). Timescapes of modernity: The environment and invisible hazards. New York: Routledge.
2.
Adler, P. A. , & Adler, P. (1987). Membership roles in field research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
3.
Albrecht, D. E. , Bultena, G., Hoiberg, E., & Nowak, P. (1982). The new environmental paradigm scale. Journal of Environmental Education, 95, 39-43.
4.
Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. London: Sage Ltd.
5.
Beck, U. (1995a). Ecological enlightenment: Essays on the politics of the risk society. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press.
6.
Beck, U. (1995b). Ecological politics in an age of risk. Cambridge, MA: Polity.
7.
Beck, U. (1995c). Subpolitics: Ecology and the disintegration of the institutional power. Organization & Environment, 10, 52-65.
8.
Beck, U. (1997). The reinvention of politics: Rethinking modernity in the global social order. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
9.
Beck, U. , Giddens, A., & Lash, S. (1994). Modernization: Politics, tradition, and aesthetics in the modern social order. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
10.
Berman, M. (1989). Coming to our senses: Body and spirit in the hidden history of the west. London: Unwin.
11.
Bookchin, M. (1980). Toward an ecological society. Montreal, Canada: Black Rose Books, 1980.
12.
Brown, L. (1993). State of the world. New York: Norton.
13.
Catton, W. , & Dunlap, R. (1978). Environmental sociology: A new paradigm. American Sociologist, 13, 41-49.
14.
Catton, W. , & Dunlap, R. (1980). A new ecological paradigm for post-exuberant sociology. American Behavioral Scientist, 24, 15-47.
15.
Cicourel, A. (1964). Method and measurement in sociology. London: Macmillan.
16.
Daly, H. , & Cobb, J. (1989). For the common good: Redirecting the economy toward community, the environment, and a sustainable future. Boston: Beacon.
17.
Douglas, M. (1983). How institutions think. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.
18.
Drengson, A. (1980). Shifting paradigms: From the technocratic to the person-planetary. Environmental Ethics, 2, 221-240.
19.
Drengson, A. (1989). Person/planet: The creative disintegration of industrial society. New York: Peter Lang.
20.
Dunlap, R. (1980). Paradigmatic change in social science: From human exceptionalism to an ecological paradigm. American Behavioral Science, 24, 5-14.
21.
Dunlap, R. (1987, July/August). Polls, pollution, and politics revisited: Public opinion on the environment in the Reagan era. Environment, 29, 6-11, 32-37.
22.
Dunlap, R. (1992). Trends in public opinion. In R. Dunlap & A. Mertig (Eds.), American environmentalism. New York: Taylor & Francis.
23.
Dunlap, R. , Gallup, G., Jr., & Gallup, A. M. (1993). Health of the planet. Princeton, NJ: Gallup International Institute.
24.
Dunlap, R. , & Mertig, A. (1992). The evolution of the U.S. environmental movement from 1970-1990. In R. Dunlap & A. Mertig (Eds.), American environmentalism. New York: Taylor & Francis.
25.
Dunlap, R. , & Van Liere, K. (1978). The new environmental paradigm. Journal of Environmental Education, 9(4), 10-19.
26.
Eder, K. (1990). The cultural code of modernity and the problem of nature: A critique of the naturalistic notion of progress. In J. Alexander & P. Sztomka (Eds.), Rethinking progress: Movements, forces, and ideas at the end of the 20th century. London: Unwin Hyman.
27.
Eder, K. (1996). The social construction of nature: A sociology of ecological enlightenment. London: Sage Ltd.
28.
Elias, N. (1939). The civilizing process. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
29.
Featerstone, M. , Lash, S., & Robertson, R. (Eds.). (1995). Global modernities. London: Sage Ltd.
30.
Fox, W. (1990). Towards a transpersonal ecology: Developing new foundations for environmentalism. Boston: Shambala.
31.
Gaard, G. (Producer). (1994). Thinking Green: Ecofeminists and the Greens [videocassette]. Plainfield, VT: Institute of Social Ecology.
32.
Giddens, A. (1990). The consequences of modernity. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
33.
Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
34.
Giddens, A. (1994). Beyond left and right: The future of radical politics. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
35.
Gleick, J. (1987). Chaos: Making a new science. New York: Penguin.
36.
Gooch, G. (1995). Environmental beliefs and attitudes in Sweden and the Baltic states. Environment and Behavior, 27(4), 513-539.
37.
Goodpaster, K. (1978). On being morally considerable. Journal of Philosophy, 75, 308-324.
38.
Goodwin, N. , Ackerman, F., & Kiron, D. (Eds.). (1997). The consumer society: Vol. 2. Frontier issues in economic thought. Washington DC: Island Press.
39.
Goodwin, N. , Krishman, R., & Harris, J. (Eds.). (1995). A survey of ecological economics: Vol. 1. Frontier issues in economic thought. Washington DC: Island Press.
40.
Grange, J. (1977). On the way towards foundational ecology. Soundings, 60, 135-149.
41.
Guagnano, G. , Stern, P., & Dietz, T. (1995). Influences on attitude-behavior relationships: A natural experiment with curbside recycling. Environment and Behavior, 27(5), 699-718.
42.
Herman, J. L. (1992). Trauma and recovery. New York: Basic Books.
43.
Inglehart, R. (1977). Silent revolution: Changing values and political styles among western publics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
44.
Inglehart, R. (1990). Cultural shift in advanced industrial societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
45.
Inglehart, R. (1997). Modernization and postmodernization: Cultural, economic, and political changes in 43 societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
46.
Inglehart, R. , & Abramson, P. (1995). Value change in global perspective. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
47.
Jantsch, E. (1980). The self-organizing universe: Scientific and human implications of the emerging paradigm of evolution. New York: Pergamon.
48.
Jessop, B. (1987). Economy, state and law in autopoietic theory. Colchester, Essex: Department of Government, University of Essex.
49.
Kelly, P. (1984). Fighting for hope. London: Chatto & Winus.
50.
King, M. (1997). A better world for our children: Explorations in morality and authority. New York: Routledge.
51.
Lash, S. (1999). Another modernity, A different rationality. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
52.
Lash, S. , Bronislaw, S., & Wynne, B. (Eds.). (1996). Risk, environment and modernity. London: Sage Ltd.
53.
Lash, S. , & Friedman, J. (1992). Modernity and identity. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
54.
Lash, S. , & Whimster, S. (Eds.). (1987). Max Weber, Rationality and modernity. London: Allen and Unwin.
55.
Laszlo, E. (1987). Evolution: The grand synthesis. Boston: Shambala.
56.
Luhman, N. (1986). Ecological communication. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
57.
Luhman, N. (1998). Observations on modernity. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
58.
Luke, T. (1997). Ecocritique: Contesting the politics of nature, economy and culture. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minneapolis Press.
59.
Marx, L. (1970). American institutions and ecological ideals. Science, 170, 945-952.
60.
McGuire, M. T. , Raleigh, M. J., & Brammer, G. L. (1984). Adaptation, selection, and benefit-cost balances. Ethology and Social Biology, 5, 269-277.
61.
Meeker, J. (1981). Toward a new natural philosophy. In R. Schultz & J. D. Hughes (Eds.), Ecological consciousness: Essays from the Earthday X Colloquium. Washington DC: University Press of America.
62.
Mellor, M. (1997). Feminism and ecology. Washington Square, NY: New York University Press.
63.
Melucci, A. (1989). The nomads of the present: Social movements and individual needs in contemporary society. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
64.
Merchant, C. (1996). Earthcare: Women and the environment. New York: Routledge.
65.
Merton, R. , & Kendall, P. (1946). The focused interview. American Journal of Sociology, 51, 541-557.
66.
Meyer-Abich, K. (1993). Revolution for nature: From the environment to the connatural world. London: White Horse Press.
67.
Milbrath, L. (1984). Environmentalists: Vanguards for a new society. Albany: State University of New York Press.
68.
Milbrath, L. (1989). Envisioning a sustainable society: Learning our way out. Albany: State University of New York Press.
69.
Miles, M. , & Shiva, V. (1993). Ecofeminism. Halifax, Canada: Fernwood.
70.
Moyers, B. (1990). Global dumping ground: The international traffic in hazardous waste. Washington DC: Seven Locks.
71.
Murphy, R. (1994). Rationality and nature: A sociological inquiry into a changing relationship. Boulder, CO: Westview.
72.
Murphy, R. (1997). Sociology and nature: Social action in context. Boulder, CO: Westview.
73.
Naess, A. (1973). The shallow and the deep, long-range ecology movement: A summary. Inquiry, 16, 95-100.
74.
Newman, J. D. , Harbough, C. R., & Harbough, M. (1982). Naloxone—Reversible suppression of isolation call production after morphine injections in squirrel monkeys. Social Neuroscience Abstracts, 8, 940-940.
75.
Nietzsche, F. (1968). The will to power. New York: Vintage.
76.
Olson, M. , Lodwick, D., & Dunlap, R. (1992). Viewing the world ecologically. Boulder, CO: Westview.
77.
O’Riordan, T. (1981). Environmentalism. London: Pion.
78.
Paehlke, R. (1982). Environmentalism and the future of progressive politics. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
79.
Panksepp, J. , & Normalsell, S. M. (1985). Brain opiods and social emotions. In M. Reite & T. Fields (Eds.), The psychobiology of attachment and separation. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
80.
Prigogine, I. (1980). From being to becoming: Time and complexity in the physical sciences. San Francisco: Freeman.
81.
Prigogine, I. , & Stengers, I. (1984). Order out of chaos: Man’s new dialogue with nature. New York: Bantam.
82.
Rabinow, P. (1982). Masked I go forward: Observer and observed in anthropology. In J. Ruby (Ed.), A crack in the mirror: Reflexive perspectives in anthropology. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
83.
Reisman, D. (1964). The lonely crowd: A study of the changing American character. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
84.
Reite, M. , & Field, T. (1985). The psychobiology of attachment and separation. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
85.
Renzetti, C. M. , & Lee, R. M. (1993). Researching sensitive topics. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
86.
Restak, R. (1984). The brain. New York: Bantam.
87.
Rifkin, J. (1984). Algeny: A new world—A new world. New York: Penguin.
88.
Roszak, T. (1973). Where the wasteland ends: Politics and transcendence in postindustrial society. London: Farber and Farber.
89.
Sandel, M. (1982). Liberalism and the limits of justice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
90.
Scott, D. , & Willits, F. (1994). Environmental attitudes and behavior: A Pennsylvania survey. Environment and Behavior, 26(2), 239-260.
91.
Sessions, G. (1995). Deep ecology for the twenty-first century. Boston: Shambala.
92.
Simmons, J. , & Stark, N. (1993). Backyard protest: Emergence, expansion, and persistence of a local hazardous waste controversy. Policy Studies Journal, 21(3), 470-491.
93.
Smith, T. (1992). Strong interaction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
94.
Smith, T. (1994). Catastrophes in interaction: A note on arousal-dependent discontinuities in attachment behavior. Social Psychology Quarterly, 57(3), 274-282.
95.
Smith, T. , & Stevens, G. (1996). Emergence, self-organization, and social interaction: Arousal-dependent structure in social systems. Sociological Theory, 14(2), 131-153.
96.
Spretnak, C. , & Capra, F. (1986). Green politics: The global promise. Santa Fe, NM: Bear.
97.
Szasz, A. (1994). Ecopopulism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
98.
Toulmin, S. (1982). The return to cosmology: Postmodern science and the theology of nature. Berkeley: University of California Press.
99.
Toulmin, S. (1990). Cosmopolis: The hidden agenda of modernity. New York: Free Press.
100.
Van der Kolk, B. (1987). Psychological trauma. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press.
101.
Vincent, J. D. (1990). The biology of emotions. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
102.
Warren, K. (1997). Ecofeminism: Women, culture & nature. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
103.
Wise, R. A. , & Rompre, P. (1989). Brain dopamine and reward. Annual Review of Psychology, 40, 191-225.
104.
Worster, D. (1977). Nature’s economy: The roots of ecology. San Francisco: Sierra Club Books.
105.
Zimmerman, M. (1994). Contesting earth’s future: Radical ecology and postmodernity. Berkeley: University of California Press.
