Assessment of ADHD Documentation From Candidates Requesting Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA) Accommodations for the National Board of Osteopathic Medical Examiners COMLEX Exam
Restricted accessOtherFirst published online September, 2010
Assessment of ADHD Documentation From Candidates Requesting Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA) Accommodations for the National Board of Osteopathic Medical Examiners COMLEX Exam
Purpose: Every year increasing numbers of candidates request special accommodations for high-stakes medical licensing examinations, due to ADHD, on the basis of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). This poses significant challenges for both the applicant and the medical boards and has significant financial, legal, and ethical implications. The purpose of this survey is to review all applications requesting ADA accommodations, on the basis of ADHD, submitted to the National Board of Osteopathic Medical Examiners (NBOME) COMLEX exam. Method: The authors review all 50 requests for special accommodations, on the basis of ADHD, submitted to the NBOME between 2005 and 2007. All requests are reviewed by the investigators independently and then cross-checked to determine interrater reliability. Results: Of all applicants, only 14% (7/50) provide sufficient documentation to support a diagnosis of ADHD. Interrater reliability is high. Conclusions: The majority of applicants who request special testing accommodations on the basis of ADHD do not provide adequate documentation to the medical boards to support the diagnosis.
American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed., text rev.). Washington, DC: Author.
2.
Biederman, J., Mick, E., & Faraone, S.V. ( 2000). Age-dependent decline of symptoms of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: Impact of remission definition and symptom type. American Journal of Psychiatry, 157, 816-818.
3.
Brinckerhoff, L.C., & Banerjee, M. ( 2007). Misconceptions regarding accommodations on high-stakes tests: Recommendations for preparing disability documentation for test takers with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 22, 246-255.
4.
Dulcan, M. ( 1997). Practice parameters for the assessment and treatment of children, adolescents, and adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 36, 85-121.
Gordon, M., Lewandowski, L., Murphy, K., & Dempsey, K. ( 2002). ADA-based accommodations in higher education: A survey of clinicians about documentation requirements and diagnostic standards. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35, 357-363.
7.
Hervey, A.S., Epstein, J.N., & Curry, J.F. ( 2004). Neuropsychology of adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: A meta-analytic review. Neuropsychology, 18, 485-503.
8.
Kessler, R.C., Adler, L., Barkley, R., Biederman, J., Conners, C.K., Demler, O., et al. (2006). The prevalence and correlates of adult ADHD in the United States: Results from the national comorbidity survey replication . American Journal of Psychiatry, 163, 716-723.
9.
Krueger, M.M. ( 2000). The future of ADA protection for students with learning disabilities in post-secondary and graduate environments. University of Kansas Law Review, 48, 607-625.
10.
McGuire, J.M., Madaus, J.W., Litt, A.V., & Ramirez, M.O. ( 1996). An investigation of documentation submitted by university students to verify their learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 29, 297-304.
11.
Millstein, R.B., Wilens, T.E., Biederman, J., & Spencer, T.J. ( 1997). Presenting ADHD symptoms and subtypes in clinically referred adults with ADHD. Journal of Attention Disorders, 2, 156-166.
12.
Ranseen, J.D. ( 1998). Lawyers with ADHD: The special test accommodation controversy . Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 29, 450-459.
13.
U.S. Department of Justice. (2008). Americans with Disabilities Act. Retrieved September 15, 2008 , from http://www.ada.gov/
14.
Wolf, L.E. ( 2001). College students with ADHD and other hidden disabilities: Outcomes and interventions. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 931, 385-395.
