Abstract
Introduction
ADHD is a neurobehavioral childhood disorder that is characterized by persistent and maladaptive symptoms of hyperactivity/impulsivity and inattention (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th ed. [DSM-5], American Psychiatric Association, 2013). Participants diagnosed with ADHD often display serious impairments in academic, social, and interpersonal functioning (Caci et al., 2014). ADHD is also associated with several comorbid psychiatric conditions such as mood disorders, disruptive behavior, and learning disabilities (Antshel et al., 2011). Despite considerable research efforts, the etiology and pathophysiology of ADHD remain unclear (Buske-Kirschbaum et al., 2013).
There is a growing belief that the immune system may be involved in the pathogenesis of various developmental, emotional, and learning disabilities, including ADHD (Steiner et al., 2012). In particular, the involvement of the autoimmune system in ADHD was hypothesized in a previous study by us in which the presence of the neuronal anti-Yo antibody was demonstrated in patients with this disorder (Passarelli et al., 2013). Toto et al. (2015) also found that antibasal ganglia antibody (ABGA) positivity was significantly higher in patients affected by ADHD than in controls and that serum antistreptolysin O (ASO) was also significantly more frequent in the ADHD group. Similar results were found by Giana et al. (2015) studying dopamine transporter (DAT) antibodies in a group of ADHD children. These findings lend support to the hypothesis that an inflammatory component is involved in the pathogenesis of ADHD. This hypothesis is hardly surprising if we bear in mind that numerous studies have reported changes in cytokine levels that are likely to be due to an inflammatory reaction in children affected by a range of neuropsychiatric diseases. A recent review (Buske-Kirschbaum et al., 2013) of psychoendocrine and neuroimmunological mechanisms of atopic eczema highlighted the possible comorbidity between this disease and ADHD. Cytokines elicited by inflammatory events may directly pass the blood-brain barrier or be carried via cytokine-specific transporters into the brain (Banks & Erickson, 2010). Moreover, peripheral cytokines may indirectly affect central nervous system (CNS) structures by activating vagal afferent fibers (Raison, Capuron, & Miller, 2006). When cytokines enter the brain, they exert a neuronal toxic effect, as has been demonstrated by Rosenkranz et al. (2005). By performing functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) during an allergic episode, these authors detected altered neuronal activity in the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) and in the prefrontal cortex (PFC). In this regard, the PFC is known to subserve executive cognitive functions such as planned behavior, decision making, motivation, and attention (Goto, Yang, & Otani, 2010).
Last, another possible effect upon brain activity has been reported by Anisman, Kokkinidis, and Merali (1996) and Zalcman et al. (1994), whose animal studies demonstrated that administration of interleukin 1 (IL-1), IL-2, IL-6, or interferon gamma (IFNγ) increased norepinephrine levels and reduced dopamine levels. Comparable changes in these neurotransmitters have been observed in ADHD patients (Arnsten, 2009).
In view of the growing body of evidence linking a generalized pro-inflammatory state and many psychiatric conditions, we hypothesize that an imbalance between pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines, triggered by a neuroimmunological disorder, may play a role in the pathogenesis of some cases of ADHD. We focused on the cerebellum because a considerable number of articles have in recent years highlighted the role played by this region of the CNS in ADHD. A recent meta-analysis of 10 studies on the involvement of the cerebellum in ADHD (Stoodley, 2014) demonstrated that a common finding in these studies was significantly lower gray matter volume bilaterally in lobule IX. This is not an unexpected finding if we consider the modulating role played by the cerebellum. The aim of this study was thus to determine whether inflammation is possible in ADHD children and, if so, whether it is related to anticerebellum antibodies. Specifically, we assessed whether pro-inflammatory activity, as tested on the basis of IL-4, IL-6, IL-10, IL-17, tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα), and IFNγ cytokine levels, is present in ADHD children who were positive to antibodies of Purkinje cells from the cerebellum (Passarelli et al., 2013). This study was thus performed to verify whether the presence of anti-Purkinje cell antibodies (anti-Yo) is associated with inflammatory signs such as high pro-inflammatory cytokine serum levels.
Method
Participants
We studied 58 consecutive drug-naïve Caucasian ADHD outpatients, who were attending their first psychiatric examination (51 males and seven females; Mage = 113.66 months, SD = 27.62 months), diagnosed between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2014, at the Clinic for Developmental Neurology and Psychiatry at the S. Pertini Hospital in Rome (Italy). The control participants, who comprised 36 healthy, age- and sex-matched Caucasian children (32 males and four females; Mage = 115.10 months, SD = 18.68 months), were randomly recruited, on the basis of a community survey, from two elementary and junior high schools from the same urban area in Rome (Italy). ANOVA for age was F = 1.10 (p = ns). The sex was matched by a Fisher’s exact test: The hypergeometric probability was .25 (ns).
Instruments
Clinical Assessment
Both the ADHD children and their parents separately received a semi-structured psychiatric interview: the Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age Children–Present and Lifetime Version (K-SADS-PL 1.0; Kaufman, Birmaher, Brent, & Rao, 1997), which was administered by an experienced child psychiatrist. Moreover, the ADHD children and controls underwent an additional routine diagnostic assessment, including the ADHD Rating Scale (ADHD-RS; DuPaul, Power, Anastopoulos, & Reid, 1998) adapted for the Italian population (Marzocchi & Cornoldi, 2000), which was filled out by their parents and school teachers. This routine assessment was used to confirm the ADHD diagnosis, according to the DSM-5 criteria, in children with ADHD and to exclude the ADHD diagnosis in the control group. On the basis of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children–Third Edition (WISC-III; Wechsler, 1991), all children with an intelligence quotient (IQ) < 70 were excluded. The two groups of children were matched for sex (p = ns at chi-square statistics) and age (p = ns at ANOVA test). All the children in both groups tested negative to common antibody tests for celiac disease and Hashimoto’s thyroiditis.
The medical history, neurological and physical examinations, and an electroencephalogram were used to exclude comorbid medical and neurological conditions. Any children with a history of atopic eczema or allergy were excluded. No infections or allergic diseases were detected during the blood examination. Written informed consent was obtained from the parents of all the participants enrolled in the study.
Immunohistochemistry and Western Blot
Antibodies to Yo (Purkinje cell cytoplasmic antibody type 1 [PCA-1]) were detected by indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA). The method was performed on a commercially available substrate of primate cerebellum and gut (Euroimmun Italia). The presence of specific antibodies was determined by their reactions to cerebellar neurons (Purkinje, molecular, or granular cells). The patients’ sera were first diluted 1:10 in phosphate buffered saline (PBS)-Tween and then incubated with the substrate provided in the presence of fluorescein-labeled antihuman immunoglobulin G (IgG) conjugate to allow binding of the antibodies to the specific antigens of the substrate. A positive reaction showed granular staining of the Purkinje cell cytoplasm (anti-Yo antibody), whereas a negative reaction did not reveal any staining. Immunofluorescence was visualized by means of a fluorescence microscope (Leica, Leitz DMRB, Germany) at a magnification of at least 20 times.
Patients and control participants’ sera were assessed by means of the EUROLINE neuronal antigen kit (Euroimmun, Italia) for Western blot analysis. The kit consists of membrane chips with individual lines of purified, biochemically characterized antigens coated onto a separate membrane chip. The serum was diluted 1:100 in the sample buffer provided. The intensity of the bands was automatically evaluated using the computer program EUROLINE Scanner. All the analyses were performed in double blind experiments, that is, neither the participants enrolled in the study nor the researchers involved knew whether participants had been assigned to the control group or the experimental group. All the anti-Yo antibody serum determinations were performed blindly.
Cytokine Assay
The serum of the ADHD patients who tested positive to anti-Yo antibodies (N = 45) and the serum of 34 control children who were negative to anti-yo antibodies were subsequently subjected to the cytokine panel assay.
All the cytokines were analyzed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) obtained from PharMingen (San Diego, California, United States) with the exception of IL-2, which was based on paired anticytokine antibodies and standards from Genzyme (Cambridge, Massachusetts). The ELISA tests were performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions (see standard procedure by PharMingen ELISA kit). All the tests were based on a common direct assay design. Detection was performed by means of biotinylated anticytokine antibodies, followed by the addition of streptavidin-conjugated horseradish peroxidase. Color reaction was developed by means of ABTS (2.2′ azinobis[3-ethylbenzthiazoline-6-sulfonate]), and analyte concentrations were calculated using SoftMax Pro software. All the cytokine serum determinations were performed blindly.
Statistical Analysis
Differences between the two groups (ADHD group and non-ADHD group) in gender and in anti-Yo antibodies were evaluated by means of Fisher’s exact test. One-way ANOVAs were used on age variable. ANOVAs were also performed to compare the serum cytokine concentrations of the ADHD and non-ADHD groups. The alpha level was set at .05 for all the analyses.
Results
The K-SADS PL 1.0 showed that the ADHD children were affected by the following comorbidities: Twenty-five had oppositional defiant disorder, one had generalized anxiety disorder, and one had enuresis. One of the children in the control group was also found to have enuresis.
Forty-five ADHD children were positive to anti-Yo antibodies (77.58%, four females; age = 112.80 ± 25 months, range = 72-210) and 13 negative (22.42%), whereas only two children of the control group were positive to anti-Yo antibodies (5.56%). The difference was significant at Fisher’s exact test—hypergeometric probability = .02. Forty-five ADHD patients and 34 children (four females; Mage = 115.10 ± 24.10 months, range = 72-204) of the control group were matched for cytokines. No differences were found between the two groups in gender (Fisher’s exact test: hypergeometric probability = .26; p = ns) and age (ANOVA: F = .23, p = ns).
Significant differences emerged between the two groups in IL-6 and IL-10 cytokine concentration levels, with ADHD children displaying higher levels than the non-ADHD group (see Table 1).
Differences Between ADHD and Control Children in Serum Cytokine Levels.
Note. Significant IL-6 and IL-10 differences are shown in bold. IL = interleukin; IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-10 IL-17 = cytokines; TNFα = tumor necrosis factor alpha; IFNγ = interferon gamma; ns = not significant.
Discussion
As we reported, a considerable proportion of ADHD children have a high level of antineural antibodies (ADHD group 77.58% vs. control group 22.42%; p = .02), a confirmation of the results of Passarelli et al. (2013). A high percentage of anti-Yo antibodies in psychiatric patients were detected in this study and in the study by Passarelli et al. Previous findings have reported that the detection of anti-Yo antibodies in the serum is generally associated with paraneoplastic syndromes, particularly in paraneoplastic cerebellar degeneration (PCD). This is a paraneoplastic syndrome associated with a wide range of tumors, including lung cancer, ovarian cancer, breast cancer, and Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Although the MRI may be negative, patients generally have typical cerebellar symptoms, such as dizziness, slurred speech, and ataxic gait, which are obviously not observed in ADHD children.
Moreover, the results of this study suggest that there is a possible association between immune processes and mediators of inflammation, such as cytokines, in ADHD. Indeed, we detected higher levels of IL-6 and IL-10 in an ADHD group positive to anti-Yo antibodies than in a control group. Our results thus suggest that a high antibody level might be correlated with the inflammatory cytokine level, which would thus point to the presence of inflammatory events.
As reported in other studies (Buske-Kirschbaum et al., 2013), the manifestation of chronic allergic inflammation in children, associated with increased inflammatory cytokine levels and exposure to stress in early life, have been found to interfere with the development of brain regions (e.g., the PFC, ACC, corpus callosum) and neurotransmitter systems (e.g., catecholaminergic and dopaminergic system) known to play a crucial role in executive functions, including attention, motivation motor, and cognitive control.
Altered maturation of these specific brain circuits may result in persistent neural or neuroendocrine changes, thereby increasing the risk of ADHD in a subset of the children affected by this syndrome. Thus, the previously reported increased level in serum IL-6 suggests that the endocrine system exerts an effect on brain receptors (Makhija & Karunakaran, 2013; Schiepers, Wichers, & Maes, 2005). There is also compelling evidence that inflammatory cytokines activate neuroimmune mechanisms that involve behaviorally and emotionally relevant brain circuits. In this regard, allergen exposure and/or an allergic reaction in animals have been found to stimulate limbic brain regions as well as avoidance behavior, increased anxiety, and reduced social behavior (Basso et al., 2003; Costa-Pinto, Basso, Britto, Malucelli, & Russo, 2005, 2007; Palermo-Neto & Guimaraes, 2000; Tonelli et al., 2009). In humans, altered neuronal activity of the ACC and the PFC during a chronic (allergic) episode has been demonstrated by means of fMRI (Rosenkranz et al., 2005). In conclusion, our results suggest the possible presence of this type of pathogenetic mechanism in part of the ADHD child population.
Another result is worthy of note. It is not only the IL-6 blood level that is higher in the ADHD group than in the control group but also the IL-10 level. In view of the well-known protective role of IL-10 (Iyer & Cheng, 2012), we may explain the lack of significant or serious damage in the MRI images of the cerebellum in ADHD participants (and at the neurological examination in our ADHD sample) by hypothesizing a protective role of IL-10 during inflammation. This is a hypothesis based exclusively on the results of Iyer and Cheng (2012), though we wish to point out that anti-Yo antibodies in paraneoplastic syndromes are frequently associated with cerebellar damage.
A crucial question is, “Why are IL-6 and IL-10 blood levels high, whereas those of other cytokines are not?” One answer may be that not every tissue expresses every cytokine. IL-6 and IL-10 are produced by several types of brain cells and are now known to be very important for the CNS. Their expression is affected in some of the most important brain diseases such as stroke, multiple sclerosis, Alzheimer’s disease, and meningitis and is associated with behavioral changes that occur during bacterial infections. Moreover, animal models strongly suggest that IL-6 and IL-10 may play a role in the neuropathology, and that it is therefore a clear target of strategic therapies (Erta, Quintana, & Hidalgo, 2012; Strle et al., 2001).
Taken together, our results confirm that anti-Yo antibodies, IL-6, IL-10, and ADHD are all correlated with immune processes and inflammation.
The limitations of our study include the fact that the results that emerge from the study do not demonstrate a causal relationship between anti-Yo antibodies, IL-6, and ADHD behavior. We merely report an association between these two phenomena. Moreover, although the role of cytokines as markers of inflammation is well known, in this article (as in numerous other articles on the association between cytokines and behavioral disorders), we were unable to demonstrate a specific link between the presence of auto-antibodies and cytokines. If these results are replicated on a larger sample of participants, other trials may be able to provide evidence of a causal relationship between these biological findings and ADHD. Another potential limitation is the fact that the number of participants included in this study does not guarantee a very high statistical power. Finally, the fact that we did not study the IL-1, IL-13, and IL-16 serum levels may be considered another limitation.
Conclusion
The results of our study shed light on the possible mechanism of action of neural antibodies and cytokines in a subset of ADHD children. This research may be developed further by comparing the anti-Yo antibodies and cytokine levels in ADHD children with those in a sample of psychiatric non-ADHD patients and in a control group. If the results of such a comparison were to confirm the findings of the present study, yet another interesting investigation would be a study on the symptomatology of ADHD children with and without high cytokine blood levels designed to detect any differences between the two groups. All these investigations would also make a significant contribution to diagnostic procedures. Last, a possible clinical and therapeutic use of such investigations might be the introduction of anti-IL-6 biological therapy as add-on treatment during classical pharmacological therapy in ADHD children.
Footnotes
Authors’ Note
“In memoriam” of one of the authors: Dr. Francesca Passarelli passed away prematurely in December 2014. She was actively involved in the organization and execution of this research.
Declaration of Conflicting Interests
The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Funding
The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
