Conquering the Brownfields Frontier through the Enhanced Deployment of Environmental Assessment Technologies

Abstract

Communities desperately needing economic revitalization are often not benefiting from the nation’s general prosperity and sustained growth. A culprit in this imbalance is perceived environmental contamination that deters public and private investments in redevelopment. Despite the Clinton administration’s commitment to the economic and environmental revitalization of brownfields (properties whose future use is limited because of real or perceived environmental contamination, and which number over 450,000 in the United States), the rate at which brownfields are returning to productive use is disappointing. Delays stem from uncertainties with regard to the extent and nature of contamination. Accelerated deployment of innovative technology could dramatically increase the quantity of brownfields cleaned up over the next 5 years by providing communities with critical scientific information. This strategy would require the national laboratories working in concert with land grant universities, nonprofits, and the private sector to deploy innovative technologies at the community level.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Center for Strategic and International Studies . (1993). Final report of the CSIS National Benefits From National Laboratories project. Washington, DC: Author.

Daley says U.S. cities lead, federal government follows . (1997, June 22). The Baltimore Sun, p. A1-A1.

Doctors, S. (1969). The role of federal agencies in technology transfer. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Environmental Protection Agency, Office of SolidWaste and Emergency Response . (1996). Road map to understanding innovative technology options for brownfields investigation and cleanup (EPA542-B-97-002). Washington, DC: Author.

Gore proposal aims to tame urban sprawl, $10 billion in bonds would help to finance communities open spaces . (1999, January 11). The Washington Post, p. A2-A2.

Hicks, J. (1999, April). New chemical technologies developed for soil testing. R&D Magazine, p. 15-15.

Hough, G. (1975). Technology diffusion. Baltimore: Lomond Books.

Legislation to improve the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act: Hearing before the Subcommittee on Finance and Hazardous Materials of the Committee on Commerce, House of Representatives , 106th Cong., 1st Sess. (1999).

Leonard-Barton, D. , & Doyle, J. (1996). Commercializing technology: Imaginative understanding of user needs. In R. Rosenbloom & W. Spencer (Eds.), Engines of innovation: U.S. industrial research at the end of an era (pp. 177-208). Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

10.

Marsh, J. , Munro, J. , & McKinnon, C. (1994). Joint federal initiative for the demonstration of on-site innovative technologies: Waste management 1994 conference proceedings. Waste Management, 1, 355-360.

11.

Munro, J. (1978). An analysis of federal efforts to transfer and diffuse energy R&D technologies to the private sector. Unpublished manuscript, University of California, Los Angeles.

12.

National Environmental Technology Applications Corporation . (1990). Incentives and barriers to commercializing environmental technologies (Report for the Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency) (pp. 1-57). Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Applied Research Center.

13.

National Research Council . (1995). Improving the environment: An evaluation of DOE’s environmental management program (Report by the Committee to Evaluate the Science, Engineering, and Health Basis of the Department of Energy’s Environmental Management Program) (p. 122-122). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

14.

Oak Ridge National Laboratory Technology . (1997). Direct sampling ion trap mass spectrometry. Oak Ridge, TN: Oak Ridge National Laboratory.

15.

Office of Science and Technology . (1996). Technology for a sustainable future: A framework for action. Washington, DC: National Science and Technology Council.

16.

Office of Science and Technology Policy . (1994). White House briefing and conference on environmental technologies—National environmental technology strategy: A summary. Washington, DC: Author.

17.

Recycle America’s Land Act: Hearing before the Subcommittee onWater Resources and Environment of the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, House of Representatives , 106th Cong., 1st Sess. (1999) (testimony of Carol Browner).

18.

Sadowski, C. (1999). Taking the lab out in the field. Environmental Protection, 10, 16-21.

19.

Saling, J. (1996, June). A different approach to environmental remediation. Paper presented at the 1996 Eastern Pennsylvania Abandoned Mine Land and Acid Mine Drainage Conference, Wilkes-Barre, PA.

20.

Sullivan, T. , Gitten, M. ,& Moskowitz, P. (1997). Evaluation of selected environmental decision support software. New York: Brookhaven National Laboratory.

21.

Sullivan, T. , Moskowitz, P. , Gitten, M. , & Schaffer, S. (1996). Environmental decision support identification and preliminary review. New York: Brookhaven National Laboratory.

22.

Wise, M. ,& Guerin, M. (1997). Direct samplingMSfor environmental screening. Analytical Chemistry, 69, 26A-32A.

23.

Wise, M. , Thompson, C. , Merriweather, R. ,& Guerin, M. (1997). Review of direct MS analysis of environmental samples. Field Analytical Chemistry and Technology, 1, 251-276.