Applying a benefit principle, value capture strategies enable the public sector to harness the value created through infrastructure improvements and to use the funds to pay for such improvements. This article focuses on special assessments by which property owners located within a designated geographic area, or “special assessment district (SAD),” pay for special benefits accruing to their properties that are close to certain infrastructure improvement. The authors review the history of special assessments, the extent of use, and the mechanisms for funding public transportation especially transits. The authors then evaluate the applicability of special assessments in funding public transits on the basis of four criteria: efficiency, equity, sustainability, and feasibility. Finally, the authors discuss suitable conditions for special assessments and provide legal, administrative, and technical recommendations for their use in transportation finance.
BatesL. J.SanterreR. E. (1993). Property tax collector performance and pay. National Tax Journal, 46(1), 23-31.
3.
BattH. W. (2000). Value capture as a policy tool in transportation economics: An exploration in public finance in the tradition of Henry George. The American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 59(5), 195-228.
4.
BladikasA. K.PignataroL. J. (1990). Efficiency and equity issues in special fees for financing transportation infrastructure. Transportation Research Part A: General, 24(4), 283-292.
5.
California Senate Local Government Committee. (2004). Assessing the benefits of benefit assessments: A citizen’s guide to benefit assessments in California. Sacramento, CA: Author.
ForemanD. A.SloanM. C. (2006). Final special benefits study for South Lake Union Streetcar Project City of Seattle LID No. 6750. Retrieved February 8, 2010, from http://clerk.ci.seattle.wa.us/~cfpdfs/307911.pdf
Government Accountability Office. (2010). Public transportation: Federal role in value capture strategies for transit is limited, but additional guidance could help clarify policies (Report to Congressional Committees, GAO-10-781). Washington, DC: Author.
13.
GihringT. A. (2001). Applying value capture in the Seattle region. Planning Practice and Research, 16(3 & 4), 307-320.
14.
HagmanD. G.MisczynskiD. J. (Eds.). (1978). Windfalls for wipeouts: Land value capture and compensation. Chicago: American Society of Planning Officials.
15.
HayesD. J. (1977). Rapid transit financing: Use of the special assessment. Stanford Law Review, 29(4), 795-818.
16.
HendricksS. J.DyhouseC. (2002). Land developer participation in providing for bus transit facilities and operations. Tampa, FL: Center for Urban Transportation Research. Retrieved February 8, 2010, from http://www.nctr.usf.edu/pdf/Land%20Developer.pdf
HoughJ. A.SmadiA. G.BitzanJ. D. (1997). Innovative financing methods for local roads in Midwest and mountain-plains states. Fargo, ND: Upper Great Plains Transportation Institute, North Dakota State University. Retrieved February 8, 2010, from http://www.mountain-plains.org/pubs/pdf/MPC97-74.pdf
19.
HowardJ. A.RivkinG.BrecherS.HederL. (1985). Strategies to implement benefit-sharing for fixed-transit facilities (National Cooperative Transit Research and Development Program No. 12). Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
20.
IaconoM.LevinsonD.ZhaoJ.LariA. (2009). Value capture for transportation finance: Report to the Minnesota Legislature (Value Capture for Transportation Finance Series, Report No. CTS 09-18S). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Center for Transportation Studies. Retrieved February 8, 2010, from http://www.cts.umn.edu/Publications/ResearchReports/reportdetail.html?id=1800
21.
KoganV.McCubbinsM. D. (2008). The problem of being special: Special assessment districts and the financing of infrastructure in California. Los Angeles, CA: Keston Institute for Public Finance and Infrastructure Policy. Retrieved February 8, 2010, from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1277522
MagalottiM. J.ToalD. S. (1992). Public private financing in Pennsylvania: The choice of impact fees and assessment districts for local governments. Institute of Technical Engineers Annual Meeting, 62, 406-408.
27.
MudgeR. R.JakubiakS. (1987). Financing infrastructure: Innovations at the local level. Washington, DC: National League of Cities.
28.
MullenG. E. (1965). The use of special assessment districts and independent special districts as aids in financing private land development. California Law Review, 53(1), 364-386.
29.
Municipal Research and Services Center of Washington and American Public Works Association. (2003). Local improvement district manual (5th ed.). Seattle, WA: Author.
Peachtree Corridor Partnership. (2007). Frequently asked questions about the Peachtree Corridor Project. Retrieved February 8, 2010, from http://www.peachtreecorridor.org/faqs
RivasplataA. (1997). Special assessments. Sacramento, CA: Governor’s Office of Planning and Research.
35.
RobinsonR. (1999). A new approach to quantifying economic and social benefits for low volume roads in developing countries. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 17(2), 147-155.
36.
RolonA. (2008). Evaluation of value capture mechanisms from linkage capture to special assessment districts. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2079, 127-135.
37.
RybeckR. (2004). Using value capture to finance infrastructure and encourage compact development. Public Works Management & Policy, 8(4), 249-260.
SmithJ. J.GihringT. A. (2009). Financing transit systems through value capture: An annotated bibliography. Victoria, British Columbia, Canada: Victoria Transport Policy Institute. Retrieved February 8, 2010, from http://www.vtpi.org/smith.pdf
40.
SteinM.HagerP. (1992, January31). Metro Red Line tax approved by High Court. Los Angeles Times.
41.
StockhoffG.DonA. (2005). Special assessment district helps Reno to diversify its economy. Public Management, 87(8), 29-31.
42.
StopherP. R. (1993). Financing urban rail projects: The case of Los Angeles. Transportation, 20(3), 229-250.
43.
The Tax Foundation. (1970). Special assessments and service charges in municipal finance (Government Finance Brief No. 20). New York: Author.
44.
TuckerL. (2007, August16). City of Portland wants $15M from property owners for streetcar. Daily Journal of Commerce. Retrieved April 28, 2011, from http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P2-10944198.html.
45.
U.S. Department of Transportation. (1984). Miami’s downtown component of Metrorail: Public private coventure financing using a special assessment district. Washington DC: Author.
ZamoraN. J. H. (1988). New financing strategy for rapid transit: Model legislation authorizing the use of benefit assessment to fund the Los Angeles Metro Rail. UCLA Law Review, 35(3), 519-525.
