Special Assessments as a Value Capture Strategy for Public Transit Finance

Abstract

Applying a benefit principle, value capture strategies enable the public sector to harness the value created through infrastructure improvements and to use the funds to pay for such improvements. This article focuses on special assessments by which property owners located within a designated geographic area, or “special assessment district (SAD),” pay for special benefits accruing to their properties that are close to certain infrastructure improvement. The authors review the history of special assessments, the extent of use, and the mechanisms for funding public transportation especially transits. The authors then evaluate the applicability of special assessments in funding public transits on the basis of four criteria: efficiency, equity, sustainability, and feasibility. Finally, the authors discuss suitable conditions for special assessments and provide legal, administrative, and technical recommendations for their use in transportation finance.

Keywords

transportation finance transit-oriented development value capture special assessments

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. (2003). Special Assessment District Act. Retrieved February 8, 2010, from http://www.transportation-finance.org/pdf/funding_financing/legislation_regulations/state_local_legislation/SPECIALASSESSMENT_DISTRICTACT.pdf

Bates

L. J.

Santerre

R. E.

(1993). Property tax collector performance and pay. National Tax Journal, 46(1), 23-31.

Batt

H. W.

(2000). Value capture as a policy tool in transportation economics: An exploration in public finance in the tradition of Henry George. The American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 59(5), 195-228.

Bladikas

A. K.

Pignataro

L. J.

(1990). Efficiency and equity issues in special fees for financing transportation infrastructure. Transportation Research Part A: General, 24(4), 283-292.

California Senate Local Government Committee. (2004). Assessing the benefits of benefit assessments: A citizen’s guide to benefit assessments in California. Sacramento, CA: Author.

Center for Transit-Oriented Development. (2008). Capturing the value of transit. Oakland, CA: Author. Retrieved February 8, 2010, from http://www.reconnectingamerica.org/public/display_asset/ctodvalcapture110508v2

Cervero

(1994). Rail transit and joint development. Journal of the American Planning Association, 60(1), 83-95.

City of Edina, MN. (2010). Special assessment policy. Retrieved February 8, 2010, from http://www.ci.edina.mn.us/Departments/L4_SpecialAssessments.htm

Federal Highway Administration. (2002). New starts roundtables: 2001-2002 proceedings. Retrieved August 11, 2019, from http://www.fta.dot.gov/printer_friendly/planning_environment_2581.html

10.

Foreman

D. A.

Sloan

M. C.

(2006). Final special benefits study for South Lake Union Streetcar Project City of Seattle LID No. 6750. Retrieved February 8, 2010, from http://clerk.ci.seattle.wa.us/~cfpdfs/307911.pdf

11.

Francisco

(2008, October 23). Homeowners, businesses criticize special assessments. Chaska (MN) Herald. Retrieved February 8, 2010, from http://www.chaskaherald.com/news/city-chaska-news/homeowners-businesses-criticize-special-assessments-5355

12.

Government Accountability Office. (2010). Public transportation: Federal role in value capture strategies for transit is limited, but additional guidance could help clarify policies (Report to Congressional Committees, GAO-10-781). Washington, DC: Author.

13.

Gihring

T. A.

(2001). Applying value capture in the Seattle region. Planning Practice and Research, 16(3 & 4), 307-320.

14.

Hagman

D. G.

Misczynski

D. J.

(Eds.). (1978). Windfalls for wipeouts: Land value capture and compensation. Chicago: American Society of Planning Officials.

15.

Hayes

D. J.

(1977). Rapid transit financing: Use of the special assessment. Stanford Law Review, 29(4), 795-818.

16.

Hendricks

S. J.

Dyhouse

(2002). Land developer participation in providing for bus transit facilities and operations. Tampa, FL: Center for Urban Transportation Research. Retrieved February 8, 2010, from http://www.nctr.usf.edu/pdf/Land%20Developer.pdf

17.

Hopfensperger

Smetanka

M. J.

(2008, January 27). Assessments: Not a special feeling. Minneapolis Star Tribune. Retrieved February 8, 2010, from http://www.startribune.com/local/west/14446556.html

18.

Hough

J. A.

Smadi

A. G.

Bitzan

J. D.

(1997). Innovative financing methods for local roads in Midwest and mountain-plains states. Fargo, ND: Upper Great Plains Transportation Institute, North Dakota State University. Retrieved February 8, 2010, from http://www.mountain-plains.org/pubs/pdf/MPC97-74.pdf

19.

Howard

J. A.

Rivkin

Brecher

Heder

(1985). Strategies to implement benefit-sharing for fixed-transit facilities (National Cooperative Transit Research and Development Program No. 12). Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.

20.

Iacono

Levinson

Zhao

Lari

(2009). Value capture for transportation finance: Report to the Minnesota Legislature (Value Capture for Transportation Finance Series, Report No. CTS 09-18S). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Center for Transportation Studies. Retrieved February 8, 2010, from http://www.cts.umn.edu/Publications/ResearchReports/reportdetail.html?id=1800

21.

Kogan

McCubbins

M. D.

(2008). The problem of being special: Special assessment districts and the financing of infrastructure in California. Los Angeles, CA: Keston Institute for Public Finance and Infrastructure Policy. Retrieved February 8, 2010, from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1277522

22.

Kuranami

Winston

B. P.

Kimura

Rose

Nakagawa

(2000). Study on urban transport development. Washington, DC: The World Bank. Retrieved February 8, 2010, from http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTURBANTRANSPORT/Resources/ut_development_padeco.pdf

23.

Lanferman

Cato

(2010). General and special benefits of special assessments must be separated and quantified. Real Estate, Land Use & Environmental Law Blog. Retrieved August 11, 2010, from http://www.realestatelanduseandenvironmentallaw.com/recent-cases-land-use-and-entitlements-general-and-special-benefits-of-special-assessments-must-be-separated-and-quantified.html

24.

League of Minnesota Cities. (2008). Special assessment guide. St. Paul, MN: Author. Retrieved February 8, 2010, from www.lmc.org/media/document/1/sagtext.pdf

25.

Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transit Authority. (2008). Benefits assessment districts program. Retrieved December 19, 2008, from http://www.metro.net/projects_studies/bad/default.htm

26.

Magalotti

M. J.

Toal

D. S.

(1992). Public private financing in Pennsylvania: The choice of impact fees and assessment districts for local governments. Institute of Technical Engineers Annual Meeting, 62, 406-408.

27.

Mudge

R. R.

Jakubiak

(1987). Financing infrastructure: Innovations at the local level. Washington, DC: National League of Cities.

28.

Mullen

G. E.

(1965). The use of special assessment districts and independent special districts as aids in financing private land development. California Law Review, 53(1), 364-386.

29.

Municipal Research and Services Center of Washington and American Public Works Association. (2003). Local improvement district manual (5th ed.). Seattle, WA: Author.

30.

National Council for Public-Private Partnerships. (2008). New York Avenue Metro Station. Retrieved February 8, 2010, from http://www.ncppp.org/cases/nystation.shtml

31.

Office of Transportation and Portland Streetcar, Inc. (2008). Portland streetcar: Development oriented transit. Retrieved February 8, 2010, from http://www.portlandstreetcar.org/pdf/development_200804_report.pdf

32.

Peachtree Corridor Partnership. (2007). Frequently asked questions about the Peachtree Corridor Project. Retrieved February 8, 2010, from http://www.peachtreecorridor.org/faqs

33.

Portland Streetcar, Inc. (2008). Portland streetcar. Retrieved February 8, 2010, from http://www.portlandstreetcar.org

34.

Rivasplata

(1997). Special assessments. Sacramento, CA: Governor’s Office of Planning and Research.

35.

Robinson

(1999). A new approach to quantifying economic and social benefits for low volume roads in developing countries. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 17(2), 147-155.

36.

Rolon

(2008). Evaluation of value capture mechanisms from linkage capture to special assessment districts. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2079, 127-135.

37.

Rybeck

(2004). Using value capture to finance infrastructure and encourage compact development. Public Works Management & Policy, 8(4), 249-260.

38.

Seattle Streetcar, Inc. (2002). Seattle streetcar fact sheet. Retrieved February 8, 2010, from http://www.seattlestreetcar.org/about/docs/faqAbout.pdf

39.

Smith

J. J.

Gihring

T. A.

(2009). Financing transit systems through value capture: An annotated bibliography. Victoria, British Columbia, Canada: Victoria Transport Policy Institute. Retrieved February 8, 2010, from http://www.vtpi.org/smith.pdf

40.

Stein

Hager

(1992, January 31). Metro Red Line tax approved by High Court. Los Angeles Times.

41.

Stockhoff

Don

(2005). Special assessment district helps Reno to diversify its economy. Public Management, 87(8), 29-31.

42.

Stopher

P. R.

(1993). Financing urban rail projects: The case of Los Angeles. Transportation, 20(3), 229-250.

43.

The Tax Foundation. (1970). Special assessments and service charges in municipal finance (Government Finance Brief No. 20). New York: Author.

44.

Tucker

(2007, August 16). City of Portland wants $15M from property owners for streetcar. Daily Journal of Commerce. Retrieved April 28, 2011, from http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P2-10944198.html.

45.

U.S. Department of Transportation. (1984). Miami’s downtown component of Metrorail: Public private coventure financing using a special assessment district. Washington DC: Author.

46.

Young

(2005a, May 10). New report cites streetcar benefits. The Seattle Times. Retrieved February 8, 2010, from http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2002269261_streetcar10m.html

47.

Young

(2005b, November 12). Landowners hop aboard the Lake Union streetcar line. The Seattle Times. Retrieved February 8, 2010, from http://community.seattletimes.nwsource.com/archive/?date=20051112&slug=slustreetcar12m

48.

Zamora

N. J. H.

(1988). New financing strategy for rapid transit: Model legislation authorizing the use of benefit assessment to fund the Los Angeles Metro Rail. UCLA Law Review, 35(3), 519-525.