This study seeks to examine the practices of law enforcement agencies in attempting to solve cases of homicide. Five key dimensions, as determined from the extant literature, are examined using data from a recent law enforcement agency study of homicide investigative practices and policies. These include management practices, investigative procedures, analytical methods, demographics of the population served, and the extent of political influences that might affect agency effectiveness in clearing homicides. As expected, the results show some factors that enable effective agency investigations and other factors that hinder such processes. Some results can be interpreted to support contentions of victim devaluation by the police. However, an alternative interpretation, and perhaps more viable notion, is offered suggesting that police devaluation by the community may also contribute to explanations for the variance found in homicide clearance rates.
Addington, L. (2006) Using national incident-based reporting system murder data to evaluate clearance predictors: A research note. Homicide Studies, 10, 140-152.
2.
Alderden, M., & Lavery, T. (2007). Predicting homicide clearances in Chicago: Investigating disparities in predictors across different types of homicide. Homicide Studies, 11, 115-132.
3.
Black, D.J. (1976). The behavior of law. New York : Academic Press.
4.
Black, D.J. (1980). The manners and customs of the police. New York: Academic Press.
5.
Black, D.J. (1989). Sociological justice. New York : Oxford University Press.
6.
Borg, M.J., & Parker. K.F. (2001). Mobilizing law in urban areas: The social structure of homicide clearance rates. Law & Society Review, 35, 435-466.
7.
Cardarelli, A.P., & Cavanagh, D. (1992, November). Uncleared homicides in the United States: An exploratory study of trends and patterns. Paper presented at the meeting of American Society of Criminology, New Orleans, LA.
8.
Cloninger, D.O., & Sartorius, L.C. (1979). Crime rates, clearance rates and enforcement effort: The case of Houston, Texas. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 38, 389-402.
9.
Davies, H. (2007). Understanding variations in murder clearance rates: The influence of the political environment. Homicide Studies , 11, 133-150.
10.
Dillman, D.A. (1978). Mail and telephone surveys: The total design method . New York: John Wiley.
11.
Federal Bureau of Investigation. (1984). Uniform crime reporting handbook. U.S. Department of Justice. U.S. Government Printing Office.
12.
Federal Bureau of Investigation. (2007). Uniform crime reports 2006. U.S. Department of Justice. U.S. Government Printing Office.
13.
Fox, J. (2000, February 22). In L. Parker, Unsolved killings on the rise: Percent of cases closed drops from 86% to 69%. USA Today, 01A.
Greenwood, P.W., Chaiken, J.M., & Petersilia, J. (1977). The criminal investigation process. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
16.
Jaeckle, T. (2007, June). Examining homicide in Dafur. Presentation at the 2007 Homicide Research Working Group Meetings , Minneapolis, Minnesota, June 9.
Litwin, K.J. (2004). A multilevel multivariate analysis of factors affecting homicide clearances. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 41, 327-351.
19.
Litwin, K.J., & Xu, Y. (2007). The dynamic nature of homicide clearances: A multilevel model comparison of three time periods. Homicide Studies, 11, 94-114.
20.
Marche, G.E. (1994). The production of homicide solutions: An empirical analysis. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 53, 385-401.
21.
Mouzos, J., & Muller, D. (2001). Solvability factors of homicide in Australia: An exploratory analysis. Trends and Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice, 216.
22.
Puckett, J.L., & Lundman, R.J. (2003). Factors affecting homicide clearances: Multivariate analysis of a more complete conceptual framework. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 40, 171-193.
23.
Regoeczi, W.C., Kennedy, L.W., & Silverman, R.A. (2000). Uncleared homicide: A Canada/United States comparison. Homicide Studies, 4, 135-161.
24.
Regoeczi, W.C., & Riedel, M. (2003). The application of missing data estimation models to the problem of unknown victim/offender relationships in homicide cases . Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 19, 155-183.
25.
Reiss, A.J., Jr. (1971). The police and the public. Connecticut: Yale University Press.
26.
Riedel, M., & Boulahanis, J. (2007). Homicides exceptionally cleared and cleared by arrest: An exploratory study of police/prosecutor outcomes . Homicide Studies, 11, 151-164.
27.
Riedel, M., & Jarvis, J. (1998). The decline of arrest clearances for criminal homicide: Causes, correlates, and third parties. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 9(3-4), 279-306.
28.
Riedel, M., & Rinehart, T.A. (1996). Murder clearances and missing data. Journal of Crime and Justice, 19, 83-102.
29.
Rinehart, T.A. (1994). An analysis of murder clearances in Chicago: 1981-1991 . Unpublished Master's thesis, Southern Illinois University , Carbondale.
30.
Roberts, A. (2007). Predictors of homicide clearance by arrest: An event history analysis of NIBRS incidents. Homicide Studies , 11, 82-93.
31.
Wellford, C., & Cronin, J. (1999). An analysis of variables affecting the clearance of homicides: A multi-state study. Washington, DC: Justice Research and Statistics Association.
32.
Westveer, A. (2002). Managing death investigations (Vol. 1, 5th ed.). Washington, DC: Federal Bureau of Investigation.
