The gender disparity in intimate killings underscores the need for close attention to the phenomenon of intimate partner–perpetrated femicides and theories useful in understanding this pervasive and enduring problem. The most overarching paradigm used is that of the feminist perspective. The purpose of this article is to review the tenets of feminist theory as the most viable and efficacious framework for understanding and explaining intimate partner–perpetrated femicide, to highlight empirical evidence supporting the strength and value of this perspective, to address the contentions of those in opposition to this perspective, and to provide research and policy implications targeted at greater understanding, and, ultimately, lower rates of femicide.
AdinkrahM. (1999). Uxoricide in Fiji: The sociocultural context of husband–wife killings. Violence Against Women, 5, 1294-1320.
2.
AndersonK. L. (1997). Gender, status, and domestic violence: An integration of feminist and family violence approaches. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 59, 655-669.
3.
AvakameE. F. (1998). How different is violence in the home? An examination of some correlates of stranger and intimate homicide. Criminology, 36, 601-632.
4.
AvakameE. F. (1999). Female’s labor force participation and intimate femicide: An empirical assessment of the backlash hypothesis. Violence and Victims, 14, 277-291.
5.
BacchusL.MezeyG.BewleyS. (2006). A qualitative exploration of the nature of domestic violence in pregnancy. Violence Against Women, 12, 588-604.
6.
BaileyW. C. (1999). The socioeconomic status of women and patterns of forcible rape for major U.S. cities. Sociological Focus, 32, 43-63.
7.
BaileyW. C.PetersonR. D. (1995). Gender inequality and violence against women: The case of murder. In HaganJ.PetersonR. (Eds.), Crime and inequality (pp. 174-205). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
8.
BensonM. L.WooldredgeJ.ThistlethwaiteA. B.FoxG. L. (2004). The correlation between race and domestic violence is confounded with community context. Social Problems, 51, 326-342.
9.
BersaniC. A.ChenH. (1988). Sociological perspectives in family violence. In Van HasseltV. B.MorrisonR. L.BellackA. S.HersenM. (Eds.), Handbook of family violence (pp. 57-84). New York, NY: Plenum.
10.
BlockC. R.ChristakosA. (1995). Intimate partner homicide in Chicago over 29 years. Crime and Delinquency, 41, 496-523.
11.
BogradM. (1988). Feminist perspectives on wife abuse: An introduction. In YllöK.BogradM. (Eds.), Feminist perspectives on wife abuse (pp. 11-26). Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
12.
BrowneA. (1987). When battered women kill. New York, NY: Macmillan Free Press.
13.
BrowneA.WilliamsD. G. (1989). Exploring the effect of resource availability and the likelihood of female-perpetrated homicides. Law and Society Review, 23, 75-94.
14.
BrowneA.WilliamsK. R. (1993). Gender, intimacy, and lethal violence: Trends from 1976 through 1987. Gender and Society, 7, 78-98.
15.
BrowneA.WilliamsK. R.DuttonD. G. (1999). Homicide between intimate partners. In SmithM. D.ZahnM. (Eds.), Studying and preventing homicide (pp. 55-78). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
16.
BrowningC. R. (2002). The span of collective efficacy: Extending social disorganization theory to partner violence. Journal of Marriage and Family, 64, 833-850.
17.
CampbellJ. C. (1992). “If I can’t have you, no one can”: Power and control in homicide of female partners. In RadfordJ.RussellD. E. H. (Eds.), Femicide: The politics of woman-killing (pp. 99-113). New York, NY: Twayne.
18.
CampbellJ. C.WebsterD.Koziol-McLainJ.BlockC.CampbellD.CurryM. A.. . . LaughonK. (2003). Risk factors for femicide in abusive relationships: Results from a multisite case control study. American Journal of Public Health, 93, 1089-1097.
19.
CampbellJ. C.GlassN.SharpsP. W.LaughonK.BloomT. (2007). Intimate partner homicide: Review and implications of research and policy. Trauma, Violence & Abuse, 8, 246-269.
20.
CaputiJ.RussellD. E. H. (1992). Femicide: Sexist terrorism against women. In RadfordJ.RussellD. E. H. (Eds.), Femicide: The politics of woman-killing (pp. 13-26). New York, NY: Twayne.
21.
ChimbosP. D. (1978). Marital violence: A study of interspouse homicide. San Francisco, CA: R & E Research Associates.
22.
DalyM.WilsonM. (1988). Homicide. New York, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
23.
DaviesL.Ford-GilboeM.HammertonJ. (2009). Gender inequality and patterns of abuse post leaving. Journal of Family Violence, 24, 27-39.
24.
DawsonM.GartnerR. (1998). Differences in the characteristics of intimate femicides: The role of relationship state and status. Homicide Studies, 2, 378-399.
25.
DeWeesM. A.ParkerK. F. (2003). Women, region, and types of homicide: Are there regional differences in the structural status of women and homicide offending?Homicide Studies, 7, 368-393.
26.
DobashR. P.DobashR. E. (2004). Women’s violence to men in intimate relationships. British Journal of Criminology, 44, 324-349.
27.
DobashR. P.DobashR. E.WilsonM.DalyM. (1992). The myth of sexual symmetry in marital violence. Social Problems, 39(1), 71-91.
28.
DuganL.NaginD. S.RosenfeldR. (1999). Explaining the decline in intimate partner homicide. Homicide Studies, 3, 187-214.
29.
DuganLNaginD. S.RosenfeldR. (2003). Exposure reduction or retaliation? The effects of domestic violence resources on intimate-partner homicide. Law & Society Review, 37, 169-196.
30.
EllisD. (1987). Post-separation woman abuse: The contribution of lawyers as “barracudas,” “advocates,” and “counselors.”International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 10, 401-410.
31.
EllisD.DeKeseredyW. S. (1997). Rethinking estrangement, interventions, and intimate femicide. Violence Against Women, 3, 590-609.
32.
FeldS. L.StrausM. A. (1990). Escalation and desistance from wife assault in marriage. In StrausM. A.GellesR. J. (Eds.), Physical violence in American families: Risk factors and adaptations to violence in 8,145 families (pp. 489-505). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
33.
FelsonR. B. (2002). Violence & gender reexamined. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
34.
FelsonR. B. (2006, Spring). Is violence against women about women or about violence?Contexts, 21-25.
35.
FelsonR. B.LaneK. J. (2010). Does violence involving women and intimate partners have a special etiology?Criminology, 48, 321-338.
FryeV.WiltS. (2001). Femicide and social disorganization. Violence Against Women, 7, 335-351.
38.
GartnerR.BakerK.PampelF. C. (1990). Gender stratification and the gender gap in homicide victimization. Social Problems, 37, 593-612.
39.
GartnerR.McCarthyB. (1991). The social distribution of femicide in urban Canada, 1921-1988. Law & Society Review, 25, 287-311.
40.
GatesM. (1978). Introduction. In ChapmanJ. R.GatesM. (Eds.), The victimization of women (pp. 9-27). Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.
41.
GauthierD. K.BankstonW. B. (2004). “Who kills whom” revisited: A sociological study of variation in the sex ratio of spouse killings. Homicide Studies, 8(2), 96-122.
42.
GoettingA. (1991). Brief research report: Female victims of homicide: A portrait of their killers and the circumstances of their deaths. Violence and Victims, 6, 159-168.
43.
GruenewaldJ. A.PridemoreW. A. (2009). Stability and change in homicide victim, offender, and event characteristics in Chicago, 1990 and 2000. Homicide Studies, 13, 355-384.
44.
HanmerJ.RadfordJ.StankoE. A. (1989). Policing, men’s violence: An introduction. In HanmerJ.RadfordJ.StankoE. A. (Eds.), Women, policing, and male violence: International perspectives (pp. 1-12). London, UK: Routledge.
45.
HeiseL.Garcia-MorenoC. (2002). Violence by intimate partners. In KrugE. G.DahlbergL. L.MercyJ. A.ZwiA. B.LozanoR. (Eds.), World report on violence and health (pp. 89-121). Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.
46.
HornungC. A.McCulloughC. B.SugimotoT. (1981). Status relationships in marriage: Risk factors in spouse abuse. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 43, 675-692.
47.
HunnicuttG. (2009). Varieties of patriarchy and violence against women: Resurrecting “patriarchy” as a theoretical tool. Violence Against Women, 15, 553-573.
48.
JenningsW. G.PiqueroA. R. (2008). Trajectories of non-intimate partner and intimate partner homicides, 1980-1999: The importance of rurality. Journal of Criminal Justice, 36, 435-443.
49.
JohnsonM. P. (1995). Patriarchal terrorism and common couple violence: Two forms of violence against women. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57, 283-294.
50.
JurikN. C.WinnR. (1990). Gender and homicide: A comparison of men and women who kill. Violence and Victims, 5, 159-168.
51.
KaukinenC. (2004). Status compatibility, physical violence, and emotional abuse in intimate relationships. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 66, 452-471.
52.
KimmelM. S. (2002). “Gender symmetry” in domestic violence: A substantive and methodological research review. Violence Against Women, 8, 1332-1363.
53.
KratcoskiP. C. (1988). Families who kill. In HagaF. E.SussmanM. B. (Eds.), Deviance and the family (pp. 47-70). New York, NY: Haworth.
54.
LambertL. C.FirestoneJ. M. (2000). Economic context and multiple abuse techniques. Violence Against Women, 6(1), 49-67.
55.
LauritsenJ. L.HeimerK. (2008). The gender gap in violent victimization, 1973-2004. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 24, 125-147.
56.
MarvellT. B.MoodyC. E. (1999). Female and male homicide victimization rates: Comparing trends and regressors. Criminology, 37, 879-902.
57.
MasonA.BlankenshipV. (1987). Power and affiliation, motivation, stress, and abuse in intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 203-210.
58.
McCloskeyL. A. (1996). Socioeconomic and coercive power within the family. Gender & Society, 10, 449-463.
59.
MietheT. D.RegoecziW. C. (2004). Rethinking homicide: Exploring the structure and process underlying deadly situations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
60.
NazrooJ. (1995). Uncovering gender differences in the use of marital violence: The effect of methodology. Sociology, 29, 475-494.
61.
O’LearyK. D. (1988). Physical aggression between spouses: A social learning perspective. In Van HasseltV. B.MorrisonR. L.BellackA. S.HersenM. (Eds.), Handbook of family violence (pp. 31-52). New York, NY: Plenum.
62.
ParkerR. N.TothA. M. (1990). Family, intimacy, and homicide: A macro-social approach. Violence and Victims, 5, 195-210.
63.
PaulsenD. J.BrewerV. E. (2000). The spousal SROK revisited: A comparison of Chicago and Houston intimate partner homicide ratios. Gender Issues, 18, 88-100.
64.
PizarroJ. M.DeJongC.McGarrellE. F. (2010). An examination of the covariates of female homicide victimization and offending. Feminist Criminology, 5(1), 51-72.
65.
PridemoreW. A.FreilichJ. D. (2005). Gender equity, traditional masculine culture, and female homicide victimization. Journal of Criminal Justice, 33, 213-223.
66.
PuzoneC. A.SaltmanL. E.KresnowM. J.ThompsonM. P.MercyJ. A. (2000). National trends in intimate partner homicide: United States, 1976-1995. Violence Against Women, 6, 409-426.
67.
RadfordJ.RussellD. E. H. (Eds.). (1992). Femicide: The politics of woman killing. New York, NY: Twayne.
68.
RadfordJ.StankoE. A. (1996). Contradictions and compromises: The impact of the Children Act on women and children’s safety. In HesterM.KellyL.RadfordJ. (Eds.), Women, violence and male power (pp. 65-80). Buckingham, UK: Open Press University.
69.
RosenfeldR. (1997). Changing relationships between men and women: A note on the decline in intimate partner homicide. Homicide Studies, 1, 72-83.
70.
SaundersD. G. (2002). Are physical assaults by wives and girlfriends a major social problem? A review of the literature. Violence Against Women. Special Issue: Women’s Use of Violence in Intimate Relationships, 8, 1424-1448.
71.
SchwartzM. D. (2005). The past and the future of violence against women. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 20(1), 7-11.
72.
SheffieldC. J. (2007). Sexual terrorism. In O’TooleL. L.SchiffmanJ. R.Kiter EdwardsM. L. (Eds.), Gender violence: Interdisciplinary perspectives (pp. 111-130). New York: New York University Press.
73.
SmithP. H.MoraccoK. E.ButtsJ. D. (1998). Partner homicide in context: A population-based perspective. Homicide Studies, 2, 400-421.
74.
StoutK. D. (1991). Intimate femicide: An ecological analysis. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 6, 29-46.
75.
StoutK. D. (1992). Intimate femicide: An ecological analysis. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 19(3), 29-50.
76.
StoutK. D. (1993). Intimate femicide: A study of men who have killed their mates. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 19, 81-94.
77.
StrausM. A. (2006). Future research on gender symmetry in physical assaults on partners. Violence Against Women, 12, 1086-1097.
78.
SwattM. L.HeN. (2006). Exploring the difference between male and female intimate partner homicides: Revisiting concept of situated transactions. Homicide Studies, 10, 279-292.
79.
TaylorR.NaborsE. L. (2009). Pink or blue . . . black and blue? Examining pregnancy as a predictor of intimate partner violence and femicide. Violence Against Women, 15, 1273-1293.
80.
TitteringtonV. B. (2006). A retrospective investigation of gender inequality and female homicide victimization. Sociological Spectrum, 26, 205-236.
81.
TjadenP.ThoennesN. (2000). Full report of the prevalence, incidence, and consequences of violence against women. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
82.
VieraitisL. M.KovandzicT. V.BrittoS. (2008). Women’s status and risk of homicide victimization: An analysis with data disaggregated by victim–offender relationship. Homicide Studies, 12, 163-176.
83.
VieraitisL. M.WilliamsM. R. (2002). Assessing the impact of gender inequality on female homicide victimization across US cities: A racially disaggregated analysis. Violence Against Women, 8(1), 35-63.
84.
WalkerL. (1979). The battered woman. New York, NY: Harper Perennial.
85.
WallaceA. (1986). Homicide: The social reality. Sydney, Australia: New South Wales Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research.
86.
WarnerT. D. (2010). Violent acts and injurious consequences: An examination of competing hypotheses about intimate partner violence using agency-based data. Journal of Family Violence, 25, 183-193.
87.
WebsdaleN. (1999). Understanding domestic homicide. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.
88.
WellsW.DeLeon-GranadosW. (2004). The intimate partner homicide decline: Disaggregated trends, theoretical explanations, and policy implications. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 15, 229-246.
89.
WestbrookL. (2009). Information myths and intimate partner violence: Sources, contexts, and consequences. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60, 826-836.
90.
WilsonM.DalyM. (1992). Till death us do part. In RadfordJ.RussellD. E. H. (Eds.), Femicide: The politics of woman-killing (pp. 83-98). New York, NY: Twayne.
91.
WilsonM.DalyM. (1993). Spousal homicide risk and estrangement. Violence and Victims, 8, 3-15.
92.
WilsonM.JohnsonH.DalyM. (1995). Lethal and nonlethal violence against wives. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 37, 331-361.
93.
YllöK. (1993). Sexual equality and violence against wives in American states. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 14, 67-86.
94.
YllöK.StrausM. A. (1990). Patriarchy and violence against wives: The impact of structural and normative factors. In StrausM. A.GellesR. J. (Eds.), Physical violence in American families: Risk factors and adaptations to violence in 8,145 families (pp. 383-399). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
95.
YodanisC. L. (2004). Gender inequality, violence against women, and fear: A cross-national test of the feminist theory of violence against women. Violence Against Women, 19, 655-675.
96.
ZalewskiM. (2000). Feminism after postmodernism. London, UK: Routledge.
97.
ZeoliA. M.WebsterD. W. (2010). Effects of domestic violence policies, alcohol taxes and police staffing levels on intimate partner homicide in large US cities. Injury Prevention, 16, 90-95.
