The (Mis)utilization of Cues During Deception Detection in 911 Homicide Calls

Abstract

The current study explored cue utilization during 911 homicide calls to better understand deception detection in this high-risk situation. A sample of 93 participants judged the deceptiveness of a random subset of 110 homicide calls placed to 911. A separate group of raters coded 86 different cues expressed by each 911 caller. Results indicated that judges were unable to detect deception accurately. While judges appeared to utilize some cues correctly when assessing callers’ deception, subsequent analyses found that judges likely had difficulty detecting deception because they failed to utilize emotionally related cues correctly.

Keywords

judgment interpersonal interaction 911 social behavior perception

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Akehurst

Köhnken

Vrij

Bull

(1996). Lay persons’ and police officers’ beliefs regarding deceptive behavior. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 10, 461–471.

Bond

C. F.

Jr. DePaulo

B. M.

(2006). Accuracy of deception judgments. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 214–234.

Bond

C. F.

Jr. Kahler

K. N.

Paolicelli

L. M.

(1985). The miscommunication of deception: An adaptive perspective. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 21, 331–345

Brunswik

(1956). Perception and the representative design of psychological experiments. University of California Press.

Burns

M. B.

Moffitt

K. C.

(2014). Automated deception detection of 911 call transcripts. Security Informatics, 3, 1–9.

Cheng

K. H. W.

Broadhurst

(2005). The detection of deception: The effects of first and second language on lie detection ability. Psychiatry, Psychology, and Law, 12, 107–118.

Cromer

J. D.

Brewster

Fogler

Stoloff

(2019). 911 Calls in homicide cases: What does the verbal behavior of the caller reveal? Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 34(2), 156–164.

DePaulo

B. M.

(1992). Nonverbal behavior and self-presentation. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 203–243.

DePaulo

B. M.

Lindsay

J. J.

Malone

B. E.

Muhlenbruck

Charlton

Cooper

(2003). Cues to deception. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 74–118.

10.

DePaulo

B. M.

Pfeifer

R. L.

(1986). On-the-job experience and skill at detecting deception. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 16, 249–267.

11.

Dunkel

C. S.

Summerville

L. A.

Mathes

E. W.

Kesserling

S. N.

(2015). Using the California Q-sort measure of life history strategy to predict sexual behavioral outcomes. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 44, 1705–1711.

12.

Ekman

(1992). Telling lies: Clues to deceit in the marketplace, politics, and marriage. W.W. Norton (Original work published 1985).

13.

Fabianic

(1997). Television dramas and homicide causation. Journal of Criminal Justice, 25, 195–203.

14.

Fleiss

J. L.

Cuzick

(1979). The reliability of dichotomous judgments: Unequal numbers of judges per subject. Applied Psychological Measurement, 3, 537–542.

15.

Frank

M. G.

Ekman

(2004). Appearing truthful generalizes across different deception situations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 486–495.

16.

Funder

D. C.

(1995). On the accuracy of personality judgment: A realistic approach. Psychological Review, 102, 652–670.

17.

Funder

D. C.

(1999). Personality judgment: A realistic approach to person perception. Academic Press.

18.

Funder

D. C.

Furr

R. M.

Colvin

C. R.

(2000). The Riverside Behavioral Q-sort: A tool for the description of social behavior. Journal of Personality, 68, 451–489.

19.

Global Deception Research Team. (2006). A world of lies. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 37, 60–74.

20.

Gosling

S. D.

S. J.

Mannarelli

Morris

M. E.

(2002). A room with a cue: Personality judgments based on offices and bedrooms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 379–398.

21.

Harpster

T. K.

(2006). The nature of 911 homicide calls: Using 911 homicide calls to identify indicators of innocence and guilt [Master’s thesis]. University of Cincinnati.

22.

Harpster

T. K.

Adams

S. H.

(2017). Analyzing 911 homicide calls: Practical aspects and applications. CRC Press.

23.

Harpster

T. K.

Adams

S. H.

Jarvis

J. P.

(2009). Analyzing 911 homicide calls for indicators of guilt or innocence: An exploratory analysis. Homicide Studies, 13, 69–93.

24.

Hartwig

Bond

C. F.

Jr. (2011). Why do lie-catchers fail? A lens model meta-analysis of human lie judgments. Psychological Bulletin, 137, 643–659.

25.

Heinrich

C. U.

Borkenau

(1998). Deception and deception detection: The role of cross-modal inconsistency. Journal of Personality, 66, 687–712.

26.

HtmlQ. (2019). HtmlQ [computer software]. https://github.com/aproxima/htmlq

27.

Hursch

C. J.

Hammond

K. R.

Hursch

J. L.

(1964). Some methodological considerations in multiple-cue probability studies. Psychological Review, 71, 42–60.

28.

Köhnken

(1987). Training police officers to detect deceptive eyewitness statements: Does it work? Social Behaviour, 2, 1–17.

29.

Landis

J. R.

Koch

G. G.

(1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159–174.

30.

Loewenstein

(1996). Out of control: Visceral influences on behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 65, 272–292.

31.

Marcus

Machilek

Schütz

(2006). Personality in cyberspace: Personal websites as media for personality expressions and impressions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(6), 1014–1031.

32.

Markey

P. M.

Feeney

Berry

Hopkins

Creedon

(2022). Deception cues during high-risk situations: 911homicide calls. Psychological Science, 33, 1040–1047.

33.

Miller

G. R.

Stiff

J. B.

(1993). Deceptive communication. SAGE.

34.

Miller

M. L.

Merola

M. A.

Opanashuk

Robins

C. J.

Chancellor

A. S.

Craun

S. W.

(2021). Corrigendum to “911 what’s your emergency?” Deception in 911 homicide and suicide staged as homicide calls. Homicide Studies, 25(3), 256–272.

35.

Ozer

D. J

. (1993). The Q-sort method and the study of personality development. In Funder

D. C.

Parke

R. D.

Tomlinson-Keasey

Widaman

(Eds.), Studying lives through time: Personality and development (pp. 147–168). American Psychological Association.

36.

Porter

ten Brinke

(2010). The truth about lies: What works in detecting high-stakes deception? Legal and Criminological Psychology, 15, 57–75.

37.

Richard

F. D.

Bond

C. F.

Jr. Stokes-Zoota

J. J.

(2003). One hundred years of social psychology quantitatively described. Review of General Psychology, 7, 331–363.

38.

Riggio

R. E.

Friedman

H. S.

(1983). Individual differences and cues to deception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 899–915.

39.

Serfass

D. G.

Sherman

R. A.

(2013). A methodological note on ordered Q-Sort ratings. Journal of Research in Personality, 47, 853–858.

40.

Sherman

R. A.

Figueredo

A. J.

Funder

D. C.

(2013). The behavioral correlates of overall and distinctive life history strategy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105, 873–888.

41.

Sherman

R. A.

Funder

D. C.

(2009). Evaluating correlations in studies of personality and behavior: Beyond the number of significant findings to be expected by chance. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 1053–1063.

42.

Thornton

(1995). Hung jury: The diary of a Menendez Juror. Temple University Press.

43.

Vrij

(1993). Credibility judgments of detectives: The impact of nonverbal behavior, social skills, and physical characteristics on impression formation. The Journal of Social Psychology, 133, 601–610.

44.

Zuckerman

DePaulo

B. M.

Rosenthal

(1981). Verbal and nonverbal communication of deception. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 14, 1–59.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.01 MB

0.02 MB